On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:27:37 +0100 Vaughan Butler via blfs-support
wrote:
> On 04/09/2020 11:35, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-support wrote:
>> On 2020-09-04 11:03 +0100, Vaughan Butler via blfs-support wrote:
>>> Any ideas why the default network printer doesn't show up in Firefox or
>>> Thunderbird? This
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:42:24 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> In fact there is a tlpdb-full tarball in historic/ - dropping that
> into /opt/texlive//tlpkg allows texdoc to run (on the first run,
> it creates the cache). Tested on 2019 with the corresponding
> version, I'll create
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:13:53 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:54:38PM +0200, Stephen Berman via blfs-support
> wrote:
>> I built the full texlive-20200406 using jhalfs and it installed without
>> error and using LaTeX works so far, but
I built the full texlive-20200406 using jhalfs and it installed without
error and using LaTeX works so far, but when I try to use texdoc, it
fails with the error in the Subject line. My last full build of texlive
was the 2018 source, and it contained
/opt/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/scripts/texdoc/Dat
On Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:49:24 +0200 Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:22 +0200, Stephen Berman via blfs-support
> wrote:
>> On the weekend I built LFS SVN-20200319 with jhalfs (it was the first
>> time I tried jhalfs, and it succeeded), and yes
On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 22:24:09 +0200 Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 10:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support wrote:
>> On 4/2/20 4:22 AM, Stephen Berman via blfs-support wrote:
>> > On the weekend I built LFS SVN-20200319 with jhalfs (it was the
On the weekend I built LFS SVN-20200319 with jhalfs (it was the first
time I tried jhalfs, and it succeeded), and yesterday I wanted to start
on BLFS, but when I ran the BLFS/update-lfs.sh script (after fixing a
syntax error, which I reported to the blfs-dev list), I saw that LFS had
been updated t
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:19:22 -0500 Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support
wrote:
> On 7/26/19 3:33 AM, Stephen Berman via blfs-support wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:20:01 +0200 Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
>> wrote:
[...]
>>> I hate to be the one who says this,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 04:59:43 + (UTC) DJ Lucas via blfs-support
wrote:
> On 7/26/2019 9:47 AM, Stephen Berman via blfs-support wrote:
>> In reviewing what your plugin instructions install, I noticed several
>> libraries were missing that had been installed when I had previous
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 18:40:56 +1000 Wayne Blaszczyk via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 21:14 +0200, Stephen Berman via blfs-support wrote:
[...]
>> I downloaded the relevant source RPMs from the openSUSE Tumbleweed repo,
>> converted them to tar.gz and tried to build
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:20:01 +0200 Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
wrote:
>> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 at 7:14 AM
>> From: "Stephen Berman via blfs-support"
>>
>> To: "Ken Moffat via blfs-support"
>> Cc: "Stephen Berman"
>
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 02:21:28 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:50:03PM +0200, Stephen Berman wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 21:53:59 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I will definitely try to figure out wh
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 21:53:59 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 06:04:13PM +0200, Stephen Berman via blfs-support
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:49:00 +0200 Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:49:00 +0200 Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
wrote:
>> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 8:02 AM
>> From: "Stephen Berman via blfs-support"
>>
>> To: "Ken Moffat via blfs-support"
>> Cc: "Stephen Berman"
&
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:43:40 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:44:23PM +0200, Stephen Berman via blfs-support
> wrote:
>> Although PyQt4 is not a BLFS package nor a direct dependency of one, it
>> is apparently a required dependency to buil
Although PyQt4 is not a BLFS package nor a direct dependency of one, it
is apparently a required dependency to build the GUI of hplip, which,
while also not a BLFS package, is mentioned as optional for cups and
cups-filters, and for SANE as something "you may need" (and indeed I
do), so I think my
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 01:00:19 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 02:52:27PM +, Hans Malissa via blfs-support wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm building LLVM with Clang and Compiler RT on 8.4-systemd following the
>> instructions
>> on http://linuxfromscratch.org/blf
On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 18:27:12 +0200 Stephen Berman via blfs-support
wrote:
> I'm in the process of building the X Window system with all required and
> recommended dependencies, and I've gotten to the point of building
> glib-2.58.3, but it fails as follows:
>
> [
I'm in the process of building the X Window system with all required and
recommended dependencies, and I've gotten to the point of building
glib-2.58.3, but it fails as follows:
[972/1007] Generating glib-gettextize-man with a custom command.
FAILED: docs/reference/glib/glib-gettextize.1
/usr/bin/
On Fri, 10 May 2019 00:32:10 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 05:26:01AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-support wrote:
>>
>> In the meantime, I got an off-list reply with a link for tumbleweed,
>> pointing to
>> http://download.opensuse.org/source/tumbleweed/repo/os
On Fri, 3 May 2019 22:09:12 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support
wrote:
> At the moment I'm trying to get my head around posible use of LTO in
> builds. Today I read some posts (some of them are a bit old) which
> prompted me to look at how fedora and OpenSuse are building firefox
> (apparently, w
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 20:44:50 +0200 Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
wrote:
> On 9/8/18 8:17 PM, Stephen Berman via blfs-support wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 21:50:46 +0200 Stephen Berman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:14:22 -0500 renodr via blfs-support
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 21:50:46 +0200 Stephen Berman
wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:14:22 -0500 renodr via blfs-support
> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-09-07 11:52, Stephen Berman via blfs-support wrote:
>>> The wpa_supplicant page in BLFS 8.3 provides this required patc
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:14:22 -0500 renodr via blfs-support
wrote:
> On 2018-09-07 11:52, Stephen Berman via blfs-support wrote:
>> The wpa_supplicant page in BLFS 8.3 provides this required patch link:
>>
>>
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/8.3/wpa_supp
The wpa_supplicant page in BLFS 8.3 provides this required patch link:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/8.3/wpa_supplicant-2.6-upstream_fixes-2.patch
but that URL does not exist. Doing s/8.3/svn/ does yield an existing
URL; is the patch there also correct for 8.3? (8.2 has a diffe
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:41:33 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> On 04/10/2018 04:21 PM, Stephen Berman wrote:
>
>> The help2man Perl script was installed with lsb-release-1.4; this
>> version is from 2000 and indeed lacks `help-option'. This appears to be
>> a bug in
I tried to build pango-1.40.14 with all required and recommended
dependencies but it failed:
[116/127] Generating pango-view.1 with a custom command.
FAILED: pango-view/pango-view.1
/usr/bin/help2man --no-info --section=1 '--help-option="--help-all"'
'--name="Pango text viewer"' --outpu
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:47:11 +0100 Ken Moffat wrote:
> I've never used autofs (the idea offends me, I *want* to know what
> gets mounted, and where, and I may choose to mount ro or rw at
> different times)
I want to be able to plug in and write to a USB stick or external hard
disk without having
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 07:23:12 +0300 Toomas Rosin wrote:
> Stephen Berman wrote:
>
>> It appears to require rpc.h, which is no longer included in glibc.
>> What do I have to do to build autofs?
>
> Glibc installs rpc.h when you configure it with --enable-obsolete-rpc.
&g
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:25:36 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Stephen Berman wrote:
[...]
>> Ok. (I had checked
>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/autofs.html before
>> posting, but it hasn't been updated yet.)
>
> It gets updated at 0215 US Centr
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:55:11 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Stephen Berman wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:41:08 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen Berman wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:57:32 +0200 "Armin K." wrote:
>> [...]
>>&
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:41:08 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Stephen Berman wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:57:32 +0200 "Armin K." wrote:
[...]
>>> Try installing libtirpc and pass CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/tirpc" to the
>>> configure script invocation. I
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:57:32 +0200 "Armin K." wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 20:46 +0200, Stephen Berman wrote:
>> I wanted to install autofs, so following the instructions in BLFS
>> 8.1, I
>> installed the required dependency rpcsvc-proto, ran configure and
>
I wanted to install autofs, so following the instructions in BLFS 8.1, I
installed the required dependency rpcsvc-proto, ran configure and make,
and this is the result:
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile.conf
config.status: creating include/config.h
set -e; for i
Following the BLFS 8.1 instructions I installed all required and
recommended dependencies of libblockdev-2.11-1, but not the optional
dependency parted-3.2, but when I ran configure it broke off with this:
*** Libblockdev encountered the following issues during configuration:
No package 'libparted
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:25:06 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Stephen Berman wrote:
>> I built poppler-0.57.0 in (B)LFS 8.1 with the required and recommended
>> dependencies, including openjpeg-1.5.2 rather than openjpeg-2.2.0.
>> Later I built cups-filters and its dependencies, o
I built poppler-0.57.0 in (B)LFS 8.1 with the required and recommended
dependencies, including openjpeg-1.5.2 rather than openjpeg-2.2.0.
Later I built cups-filters and its dependencies, one of which,
mupdf-1.11, lists openjpeg-2.2.0 as a recommended dependency, so I built
that as well. But the cu
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:03:55 +0100 Richard Melville <6tric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 June 2017 at 11:51, Stephen Berman wrote:
>
> I installed ImageMagick-6 on top of ImageMagick-7, using
> ImageMagick-6.9.7-8-libs_only-1.patch (from BLFS 8.0). This installs
> the f
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:05:03 +0100 Richard Melville <6tric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 June 2017 at 17:05, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Richard Melville wrote:
>
> So as not to waste anybody's time, I would just like to report that a web
> search finally answered my question. Indeed, my understand
On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:31:19 +0200 Pierre Labastie
wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 21:49, Stephen Berman wrote:
>> I want to build R (https://cran.r-project.org/) on (B)LFS 8.0 and one of
>> its dependencies is a Fortran compiler. According to the BLFS book,
>> adding Fortran t
On Wed, 10 May 2017 20:57:36 +0100 lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
>> From: Stephen Berman
>> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 21:49:17 +0200
>>
>> I want to build R (https://cran.r-project.org/) on (B)LFS 8.0 and one of
>> its dependencies is a Fortran compile
I want to build R (https://cran.r-project.org/) on (B)LFS 8.0 and one of
its dependencies is a Fortran compiler. According to the BLFS book,
adding Fortran to GCC requires a full recompilation, and this is done by
bootstrapping, which "is needed for robustness and is highly recommended
when upgrad
I built texlive 2016 from source according to the BLFS 8.0 instructions,
and while the build succeeded, there was one stumbling block which I
would have avoided with more explicit instructions. Namely, instead of
just saying that ghostscript-9.20 is a recommended dependency "(for
dvisvgm ...)", it
On Wed, 03 May 2017 13:02:14 +0200 Stephen Berman
wrote:
> On Tue, 2 May 2017 18:02:55 +0100 Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> I'm sure that at one time (when gtk3 was first usable) we noted that
>> both gtk2 AND gtk3 were needed. Not sure why that dropped out -
>> ma
On Tue, 2 May 2017 18:02:55 +0100 Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 10:46:33AM +0200, Stephen Berman wrote:
>> I have built LFS 8.0 and numerous packages from BLFS 8.0, mostly without
>> unsurmountable problems. But I cannot build firefox-51.0.1:
>>
>
I have built LFS 8.0 and numerous packages from BLFS 8.0, mostly without
unsurmountable problems. But I cannot build firefox-51.0.1:
DEBUG: configure:12346: checking for gtk+-3.0 >= 3.4.0 gtk+-unix-print-3.0
glib-2.0 gobject-2.0
DEBUG: configure:12353: checking MOZ_GTK3_CFLAGS
DEBUG: configure:1
46 matches
Mail list logo
