Hi Andreas, @!
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 11:18 AM kainz.a wrote:
> ..
> As I wrote, community edition is fine for me. Fun Project, Fantastic
> People will be something like a backup which describes the LibreOffice
> community and can be from my point of view a bit more motivated to donate
> or
Hi
Em 10/07/2020 09:59, Kev M escreveu:
> Also to add,
>
> Why not call it LibreOffice Vanilla?
Please don't.
FWIW, vanilla out of the nerd or English-centric bubble is a flavor for
ice cream or sweet dessert. Such name diminish the software, and
everything else that is around LibreOffice out
Many people from the hispanic Community is in favor of Community tag,
myself included. This term identifies pretty well a group of people who
are passionate, in this case about a free and open tool.
However, the adoption of such an appellation must be communicated in an
appropriate manner and
Thank Thorston
I think the discussion was well and we have now something we can work with.
LibreOffice Community Edition
If we wait for another 6 months nothing will happen. Only the spirit will
go away and the community need a clear message how future will be.
Design proposals can be done
On 10/07/2020 11:12, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> With all the feedback received, I strongly propose to leave 7.0 without
> tagging and finalize the plan for a later release.
I share Thorsten's view. While I've generally been a big proponent of
getting everything nailed down in one
Hi Flo, *,
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> first and foremost, thanks a lot to everyone for taking on the challenging
> task to work on a marketing plan. I am sure this was not easy, so thanks to
> all of you for your work on this - and thanks to the board for the
> transparent communication in
Also to add,
Why not call it LibreOffice Vanilla?
There's no inferences as Community or Personal have that suggest a lesser
product. It's not called Plain, which sounds boring. Partners can sell
Libreoffice support with the Libreoffice "powered by" or "engine" (personally
engine sounds like it
Hey Michael,
That's fair, I think then what Lionel is saying makes sense. There should be a
automated/listed price version for small enterprises and individual users that
want support or just to support. Maybe a different vendor would handle this
segment of the market with a partnership with
Florian,
I fully support what you wrote.
That's it.
Ciao
Paolo
On 10/07/2020 12:12, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> first and foremost, thanks a lot to everyone for taking on the
> challenging task to work on a marketing plan. I am sure this was not
> easy, so thanks to all of you for
Am 08.07.20 um 16:44 schrieb Kev M:
> I also think someone earlier referenced that this could be
> interpreted as being against the TDF bylaws, so those might need to
> be changed anyway.
This is a big part of the problem because this is exactly an option that cannot
be done - at least not in a
Hello,
first and foremost, thanks a lot to everyone for taking on the
challenging task to work on a marketing plan. I am sure this was not
easy, so thanks to all of you for your work on this - and thanks to the
board for the transparent communication in public!
With all the feedback
Hi Kev,
I havn't had a chance to get back to your rather detailed and
interesting feedback en-mass; but let me respond to just this one
(nearly totally off-topic)
nugget =)
On 10/07/2020 05:15, Kev M wrote:
> Personally, in the IT world, I usually ignore the "contact us for
> pricing"
Nice, hadn't seen this. Thanks for pointing it out Lionel. I purchased a
license to support it. I like how they've framed it as LibreOffice Vanilla vs
LibreOffice powered by CIB.
I agree with your other points too Lionel and you've communicated it in a way I
was looking to in an earlier post.
13 matches
Mail list logo
