Re: [board-discuss] [DECISION] TDF to publish LibreOffice in app stores

2022-06-08 Thread Ayhan YALÇINSOY
Good idea, it works for me.Ayhan YALÇINSOY, Deputy Member of the Board of DirectorsThe Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DEGemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen RechtsLegal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint8 Haz 2022 12:44 tarihinde Florian

Re: [board-discuss] Merged proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-06-08 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi all, Am 8. Juni 2022 22:35:01 MESZ schrieb Thorsten Behrens : >Dear list, > >Andreas Mantke wrote: >> > Interestingly I cannot remember TDF ever tendering for LibreOffice >> > Online work, can you please point me to the details? >> TDF tendered in 2014/2015 the work for the Android editing,

Re: [board-discuss] [DECISION] TDF to publish LibreOffice in app stores

2022-06-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hello, Caolán McNamara píše v St 08. 06. 2022 v 15:45 +0100: > On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 11:44 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: > > happy to update the vote template if the board is fine with that. > > > > All board members are on this list, so we can gather some feedback. > > Yeah, I'm content to

Re: [board-discuss] Merged proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-06-08 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear list, Andreas Mantke wrote: > > Interestingly I cannot remember TDF ever tendering for LibreOffice > > Online work, can you please point me to the details? > TDF tendered in 2014/2015 the work for the Android editing, which was > explained to the board also as important for LOOL. > That

Re: [board-discuss] Merged proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-06-08 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Andreas, On 08/06/2022 19:53, Andreas Mantke wrote: Hi all, Am 06.06.22 um 13:18 schrieb Jan Holesovsky: Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke píše v Ne 05. 06. 2022 v 19:12 +0200: If I remember correctly TDF has paid a big part of work on the basics of LOOL. And maybe some former / current board

Re: [board-discuss] Merged proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-06-08 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi all, Am 06.06.22 um 13:18 schrieb Jan Holesovsky: Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke píše v Ne 05. 06. 2022 v 19:12 +0200: If I remember correctly TDF has paid a big part of work on the basics of LOOL. And maybe some former / current board member recognize which company was paid for that work

Re: [board-discuss] [DECISION] TDF to publish LibreOffice in app stores

2022-06-08 Thread Paolo Vecchi
+1 Paolo On 08/06/2022 16:45, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 11:44 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: happy to update the vote template if the board is fine with that. All board members are on this list, so we can gather some feedback. Yeah, I'm content to see that information

Re: [board-discuss] [DECISION] TDF to publish LibreOffice in app stores

2022-06-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 11:44 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: > happy to update the vote template if the board is fine with that. > > All board members are on this list, so we can gather some feedback. Yeah, I'm content to see that information presented by default. -- Caolán McNamara, Member

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-08 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Michael, I prefer to avoid going into details as people should draw their conclusions by looking at timing and people involved by looking at the ESC meeting minutes and your proposal. On 08/06/2022 10:40, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Paolo, On 08/06/2022 09:18, Paolo Vecchi wrote: That is a

Re: [board-discuss] [DECISION] TDF to publish LibreOffice in app stores

2022-06-08 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Simon Phipps wrote on 04.06.22 at 10:59: > > Can you tell us who "attended" the "meeting" please as only 5 votes were > > recorded so 2 must have been absent. > > that's something for the board to decide, how they want to handle this - > happy to update the

Re: [board-discuss] [DECISION] TDF to publish LibreOffice in app stores

2022-06-08 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello Simon, Simon Phipps wrote on 04.06.22 at 10:59: Can you tell us who "attended" the "meeting" please as only 5 votes were recorded so 2 must have been absent. that's something for the board to decide, how they want to handle this - happy to update the vote template if the board is fine

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Paolo, On 08/06/2022 09:18, Paolo Vecchi wrote: That is a copy/paste from a text the general manager of a commercial contributor sent the 23/05 It is not the greatest vote of confidence in your position that you critique the source of a counter-proposal rather than the proposal itself:

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-08 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, On 08/06/2022 00:57, Cor Nouws wrote: Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote on 08/06/2022 00:31: On 07/06/2022 21:40, Simon Phipps wrote: Kendy made a merged version and shared it with us all... No, once again he took my document and copy/pasted bits of Michael Meeks proposal on it to