[2003-09-03] Beman Dawes wrote:
We've started testing preparatory to moving the web site to SourceForge.
Which reminds me... In a conversation I had with Dave he pointed out to me
the suggested language to use for use of the new license:
See accompanying LICENSE for terms and conditions of
[2003-08-30] Jeff Garland wrote:
Just did a CVS update and I am now unable to build date_time. This is on
Linux. I'm looking at the CVS check-ins, but maybe someone workon on the
build stuff might know right away what's wrong
bjam from libs/date_time/test results in:
[snip]
[2003-08-30] Jeff Garland wrote:
Replies to self...
Just did a CVS update and I am now unable to build date_time. This
is on Linux. I'm looking at the CVS check-ins, but maybe someone
workon on the build stuff might know right away what's wrong
Had to roll back the lastest change in
[2003-08-31] Jeff Garland wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 09:59:26 +0200, Martin Wille wrote
Jeff Garland wrote:
The regression test page seems to be on a diet
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/
You can find some of the other results at
[2003-08-19] Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2003 11:42 pm, Jeremy Siek wrote:
Hi Doug,
Hmm, I just viewed it with a different browser (Apple's Safari instead
of and old version of Netscape on a Sun) and now I see lots of newlines
(there were none before). Is this a case of
[2003-08-11] David Abrahams wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, sure, as long as we are in agreement about having differently
named toolsets for different compiler versions/configurations, e.g.
bcc-5.5.1
bcc-5.6.4
intel-7.1-vc60
intel-7.1-vc60-stlport
[2003-08-03] Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
WxWindows don't have any intermediate compiler but the end user syntax is
not attractive for the signal / slot mechanism (macros).
Yes, and no. You can use the macros if you like that sort of stuff. But the
signal/slot mecahnism is just as easilly
[2003-08-01] E. Gladyshev wrote:
Are you aware that the pImpl idiom is used for many
different things
It defenitly has its place but not in modern C++.
Could you do us the courtesy of indicating who you are quoting when you post
to the list. It's very hard to follow otherwise. Not to mention
[2003-07-25] Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Smith, Devin wrote:
* Why is the new license better?
A: Because it's more thorough
CPL is even more thorough. Heck, what about patents? What about
re-licensing/forks (e.g. infamous LGPL - GPL degradation)?
See... http://tinyurl.com/i1uu
--
[2003-07-10] James Curran wrote:
How directly must the article relate to Boost? I spend about 4
paragraphs discussing Boost shared_ptr in:
Access Raw Data with Performance Counters in Visual C++
DevX.com: http://www.devx.com/cplus/article/7951
I have a similar question; is online only
[2003-06-26] Toon Knapen wrote:
The boost-sandbox is showing some strange behaviour.
When checking out the boost-sandbox/numeric/bindings/traits/type.h using
the :ext: server I get version 1.3 (on the HEAD), with :pserver: it's
only 1.2. The WebCVS also only shows up to version 1.2.
Could
[2003-06-26] Chris Little wrote:
on 6/26/03 1:24 PM, Alexander Terekhov at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howard Hinnant wrote:
Since boost is a spring board for standardization of a library, I'm
wondering if the boost license requires the copyright notice to follow
for other implementations
[2003-06-26] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 03:29 PM 6/26/2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
I would think that since the Library Proposal of the interface is a
separate
document than the Boost implementation+docs of that interface they would
have different licenses. And therefore not present a problem when
[2003-06-25] Beman Dawes wrote:
For more background, including rationale, a FAQ, and acknowledgements, see
http://boost.sourceforge.net/misc/license-background.html
Nice.
* Boosters for whom English isn't their primary language; is the license
understandable?
Spanish is my first, but English
[2003-06-25] Rene Rivera wrote:
must be included, in whole or in part, in all copies of the Software, and
all derivative works of the Software.
Oops, that should be: ...must me included in all... of the Software, in
whole or in part.
It just goes to show how hard it can be to understand
[2003-06-25] David Abrahams wrote:
Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person or
organization
obtaining a copy of the software covered by this license (the Software)
to: use, reproduce, display, distribute, execute, transmit
[2003-06-18] Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
as per http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/20648 are
available from here:
* user summary page -
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/user_summary_page.html
* developer summary page -
[2003-06-19] Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-06-18] Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
So
having what is essentially a binary indicator is misleading.
As long as it reports things correctly, it's not.
I'll only say that I agree with Peter's comments on this point.
...Indicators
[2003-06-17] Daniel Wallin wrote:
Is there any interest for luabind in boost? It's similar to boost.python
but generates binding code to Lua instead of Python.
My feeling is that it would make a good package together with BPL.
http://luabind.sourceforge.net
(note that the library is still in
[2003-06-10] Edward Diener wrote:
I was able to log on to the Boost CVS repository, but I have no idea how to
display the file structure in WinCVS. Is there a way to do this or am I
supposed to issue CVS commands and look into a command line window to see
what is there ?
You need to set the
[2003-06-10] Edward Diener wrote:
Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
I was able to log on to the Boost CVS repository, but I have no idea
how to display the file structure in WinCVS. Is there a way to do
this or am I supposed to issue CVS commands and look into a command
line
[2003-06-10] Haobo Yang wrote:
As I beginner of using Boost, I have one stupid question here.
Questions aren't stupid. It's the answers that sometimes are ;-)
I installed Boost_1_30_0 into my Unix machine(Sun Solaris), and then go to
Boost_1_30_0/tools/build/jam_src/bin.solaris, type in sh
[2003-06-04] Adrian Michel wrote:
Hi,
I am a newbie to boost, and I don't know if this issue has been addressed.
I am trying to build the boost libraries on a Win2k machine with MSVC++ 6
installed, so I downloaded bjam, added it to the path, added the boost
libraries path to the include path
[2003-06-02] Malte Starostik wrote:
snip
In order to save some time downloading you can as well:
* get only boost-jam.spec and boost.spec from the URL above
* get the boost sources from boost.org (tar.bz2 version, not tar.gz)
* copy tools/build/jam_src/ somewhere else and rename it to
[2003-03-28] Alisdair Meredith wrote:
For boost 1_29 the Linux regression logs were preserved. For boost 1_30
we have the logs for many more platforms. However, this means that
almost half the logs on the testing page are never going to be updated
and just sit there growing 'older'.
Is it
[2003-03-24] Beman Dawes wrote:
There was some discussion of a better tracking system once before, but I
really think we need to get going on this now. The problems are much more
serious.
What systems work for others in an Internet environment like Boost? Who
could act as host? I see the GCC
[2003-03-15] Reece Dunn wrote:
Is there a library in boost that allows the manipulation of n-ary trees
(including binary trees and arbitary branching trees as subsets of this).
No. But there was some previous discussion about Kasper Peeters tree
implementation...
[2003-02-18] Chris Little wrote:
on 2/18/03 10:58 AM, Beman Dawes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In looking at the Mac OS (Darwin) regression tests to see why there are
so
many failures, a number of tests are failing with only this message:
/usr/local/boost/boost/type_traits/is_float.hpp:22:
[2003-02-17] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
I will try to address 1(without tss) 2 and 4 today.
I committed execution_monitor.cpp with changes that should address above
issues. We may try now recheck how signal handling behave on OpenBSD
They are running now, again. Results will take another 1.5
[2003-02-17] Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-02-17] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
I will try to address 1(without tss) 2 and 4 today.
I committed execution_monitor.cpp with changes that should address above
issues. We may try now recheck how signal handling behave on OpenBSD
They are running now, again
[2003-02-16] David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12:45 PM 2/15/2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
As someone mentioned previously...
The links to libraries and source are broken.
I took a few minutes to put in an .htaccess file on the server that
redirects
[2003-02-16] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Changing line 64 to:
#elif defined(BOOST_HAS_SIGACTION) !defined(__OpenBSD__)
Does make the tests not hang any more.
Instead it causes them to fail with core dumps, or perhaps that's a
success?
errors_handling_test supposed to cause FPE and crash in
As someone mentioned previously...
The links to libraries and source are broken.
I took a few minutes to put in an .htaccess file on the server that
redirects those links to reasonable places.
For the library links they are redirected to the corresponding www.boost.org
point.
For the
[2003-02-15] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 12:45 PM 2/15/2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
As someone mentioned previously...
The links to libraries and source are broken.
I took a few minutes to put in an .htaccess file on the server that
redirects those links to reasonable places
[2003-02-15] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
sigaction is supported by all gcc versions if the platform has it (and
BSD
does).
You right. But, then it looks like it does not work properly, cause
siglongjump causing SIGSEGV.
Maybe we do not want to use sigaction facility with gcc 2.95.3?
Could we
[2003-02-14] Neal D. Becker wrote:
On Friday 14 February 2003 10:25 am, Vladimir Prus wrote:
[...]
Oh, I see. But this doesn't get installed by any RPM. Should it?
What
is the minimum needed to install in order to be able to play with 3rd
party boost packages?
I'm afraid that full tree
[2003-02-14] Jeff Garland wrote:
First, let me just say thanks to all the regression testers -- this
is really a critical asset to boost developers. And the new summary
page is very helpful and the addition of the age is very nice!
Your welcome, and thanks.
I have a small request. Please send
[2003-02-14] Aleksey Chernoraenko wrote:
Hi Doug,
Sorry, I forgot about these dependencies. Actually we are using the
makefile
where BOOST_SIGNALS_STATIC_LINK is defined.
There is another related issue. We would like to have automatic library
selection feature. This hides the details about
The tests for OpenBSD just finished a while ago and there are some tests
that fail because they hang, using 99% CPU with indefinite execution:
Hang on GCC 2.95.3:
thread / test_condition...
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-OpenBSD-links.html#test_condition%20gcc
thread /
[2003-02-14] Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
Hangs on both GCC 2.95.3 and 3.2:
test / errors_handling_test...
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-OpenBSD-links.
html#errors_handling_test%20gcc
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-OpenBSD-links.
[2003-02-13] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 11:53 AM 2/13/2003, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Hi, everybody
Today I committed second revision to Boost.Test library.
Wow, is that a good idea one day before we branch for release?
I should have done it week ago, but was really sick. Anyway, It
[2003-02-13] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 12:35 PM 2/13/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Whatever we do with color, most of the text that needs to be readable
should be black on white. That's been shown to be most readable for
most people, on average.
That's a good point. Color-blind people may have
[2003-02-11] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 09:01 AM 2/10/2003, Toon Knapen wrote:
I think the traffic-light colors should suffice. I find adding black
confusing.
I agree. The traffic-light metaphor falls apart when you add black.
Yea, but black is used in the regresion tests themselves. How does it
[2003-02-07] Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Rene Rivera wrote:
In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
http
[2003-02-07] Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Rene Rivera wrote:
Don't know if different people ran it or not. But it is simply that one
has
a different file name, from an old run, and the table is sorted strictly
on
the file name of the results.
If the old run is no longer relevent (as run date
[2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote:
Howdy,
I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag to the
intel configuration file for boost build. I have received some bug
reports that don't show up unless that flag is enabled. Since I
understand little of how boost build works, what follows is
[2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote:
I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag to the
[ ... ]
Some questions...
Are the errors in Boost code, or your code?
err...both (boost code that happens to be my
In a bout of cleaning, and wanting to learn about SourceForge file
distribution... I put all the historical releases of Boost, and the current
also, in the SourceForge files distribution system. Also available now are
bzip2 versions for those interested in smaller downloads. For details see:
[2003-02-04] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 05:52 PM 2/4/2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
In a bout of cleaning, and wanting to learn about SourceForge file
distribution... I put all the historical releases of Boost, and the
current
also, in the SourceForge files distribution system.
Thanks! Looks great! I
[2003-01-27] Ronald Garcia wrote:
Howdy,
I'm trying to use boost build with the intel c++ compiler under linux.
My compiler is installed in /usr/local/intel, but boost build appears to
be looking for it in /opt/intel. Is there a way to specify the compiler
location as an option to boost
[2003-01-23] William E. Kempf wrote:
I think I may be the one who broke a lot of the OpenBSD regression tests
by defining BOOST_HAS_PTHREADS in the OpenBSD platform configuration.
IMO this is correct (OpenBSD supports pthreads right?),
Yes it does... with the -pthread flag.
but it causes a
[2003-01-22] Toon Knapen wrote:
So it could be that the hash command doesn't work in AIX as I expected.
To check I first go to a sh (I'm in ksh by default) to check if my PATH is
propagated. The 'which' shows indeed that this is the case. However the
'hash' command has a zero-return (I did
[2003-01-22] Toon Knapen wrote:
OK, I updated the script to prefer using whence to detect things in the
PATH. This should make it work for you. But to make sure could you see if
whence works in AIX any better...
whence xlc 2/dev/null ; echo $?
whence foo 2/dev/null ; echo $?
The expected
[2003-01-21] Toon Knapen wrote:
Rene,
On IBM build.sh does not detect automagically that its supposed to use
vacpp.
So If you add $toolset (as shown) to the call to build.sh in run_tests.sh
it
works fine :
LOCATE_TARGET=bin sh ./build.sh $toolset
I can see how that makes it better :-)
BUt I
[2003-01-21] David Abrahams wrote:
Toon Knapen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:30, Rene Rivera wrote:
BUt I can't figure out why it doesn't detect the toolset? All the
build.sh
does is check to see if xlc is in the path.
I can confirm that xlc is in the path. So
[2003-01-20] Toon Knapen wrote:
On Monday 20 January 2003 03:14, Rene Rivera wrote:
In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over
[2003-01-20] Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-01-20] Toon Knapen wrote:
How come it picked up cs-aix.html and not cs-vacpp6.html. The latter is
the
What it did not pick was the cs-vacpp-links_6.html, and that's because of
the extra _6. If those where cs-vacpp6-links.html and cs-vacpp6.html
it would
[2003-01-21] David A. Greene wrote:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
I have one policy that I forgot to mention: chain_lookup_policy. It's
work
is based on Chain of responcibilities Design pattern. In this case Every
parameter knows how to parse itelf out of input. And this
identification may
not be
[2003-01-19] Gennaro Prota wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 15:19:15 -0600, Rene Rivera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2003-01-19] Gennaro Prota wrote:
I would *love* to see boost becoming a charity-ware collection of
libraries.
Why?
What a question! Because that would mean making good deeds.
You
In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs
..and take a look.
And for
[2003-01-19] Jeff Garland wrote:
In order to make regression test browsing more pleasant for all of us. I
decided to work up a little script to gather up all the test results that
get posted to the boost.sourceforge.net site. So browse on over to:
[2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote:
Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote:
At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
windows. Judging by the naming convention used by the other current
boost
libraries, shouldn't this library be called
[2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote:
Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[2003-01-16] David Abrahams wrote:
Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 15:49, you wrote:
At 04:25 AM 1/15/2003, Steven Kirk wrote:
windows. Judging by the naming convention used
[2003-01-10] Toon Knapen wrote:
First run is uploaded, check it out via the compiler-status page in the
CVS.
Rene, how can I get the aCC compile to work (it's reporting Missing the
whole time as you can see)
I've update the build.sh to detect the HP-UX uname, and to added the -Ae
flag to
[2003-01-10] Steven Kirk wrote:
When building the boost date/time library in the 1.29.0 release, bjam
compiles and runs all of the library's tests and examples as well as the
library itself. Other libraries do not appear to do this, is this the
correct behaviour? It takes significantly longer to
First daily run of regressiosn test on OpenBSD are up. See them at:
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-OpenBSD.html
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 102708583@icq
___
Unsubscribe other
[2003-01-10] Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-01-10] Toon Knapen wrote:
../bootstrap.cc/jam0 -f build.jam --toolset=cc --toolset-root=
build.jam:103: in module scope
*** argument error
* rule toolset ( name command : opt.out + : opt.define + : release-flags *
:
debug-flags * : linklibs * )
* called
[2003-01-10] Toon Knapen wrote:
On Friday 10 January 2003 17:29, Rene Rivera wrote:
I've update the build.sh to detect the HP-UX uname, and to added the
-Ae
flag to build.sh and build.jam. The missing flag is what probably caused
the problems. Could you try it now?
works _if_ you dont't
[2003-01-09] John Maddock wrote:
John would you mind if I improve on the script. I'd like to run it on
my
OpenBSD server to help out. But I would have to add fetching of Boost
from
CVS as a step. -- I could document it more as I do this ;-)
No absolutely go for it!
I guess there really
[2003-01-09] William E. Kempf wrote:
From: Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The one place I would like to have such a thing it would have to be id().
I have one, very overused, place in my code where I have to iterate on a
list of objects, which have thread pointers to find the object given
[2003-01-09] Toon Knapen wrote:
On Thursday 09 January 2003 16:06, David Abrahams wrote:
is giving me trouble due to the LOCATE_TARGET. This apparantly makes
that the sources are searched for in the bin subdir ?! Should'nt it
be removed ?
No, it means that targets will be placed in the
[2003-01-09] David Abrahams wrote:
Toon Knapen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did a bunch of testing on and porting to HP, but I wasn't using
filesystem or the post-processing tools. If it's giving you trouble
you might consider just using bjam to run tests for a while as you
pick off the
[2003-01-09] Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-01-09] David Abrahams wrote:
No, it means that targets will be placed in the bin subdir.
However, Rene has put together some new build scripts for bjam. The
new recommended procedure is:
bash ./build.sh
I know that build.sh starts with #!/bin/sh
[2003-01-09] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 04:48 AM 1/9/2003, Toon Knapen wrote:
I'm working on the port to HPUX (recently I've send a few msg's out on
this) but have trouble compiling the regression-reporting tools.
Already patched a few things in MPL but now the filesystem lib is
causing
[2003-01-09] Toon Knapen wrote:
Anyway, to compile jam_src you can use cc (with the -Ae option though) as
you can see in the Jambase.
PS. What does the -Ae option do?
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 102708583@icq
[2003-01-09] David Abrahams wrote:
Toon Knapen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 09 January 2003 12:12, Rene Rivera wrote:
It's doesn't because I haven't had time to add it since the toolset
appeared in Boost.Build ;-) I'll try and add ASAP. ... Question on
this...
Is it a possibility
[2003-01-08] William E. Kempf wrote:
I'd appreciate comments on the above design. Specifically I have these
questions:
* Are there concerns about using conditional compilation and optional
portions of the
library, as POSIX does? I believe this is the only way Boost.Threads and
the C++
[2002-12-23] Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
It seems that running the regression with multiple gcc toolsets has similar
issues with gcc as it had with intel-linux a couple of days ago. I am
using:
$BOOST_BUILD_ROOT/tools/build/gcc2953-tools.jam
{
local GCC_ROOT_DIRECTORY = /opt/gcc2 ;
local
[2002-12-03] David Abrahams wrote:
This is a formal call for volunteers to fill out a few of the
open-source license evaluations at
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License
These typically take less than 10 minutes apiece to do, and could make
a huge
[2002-12-04] Rene Rivera wrote:
[2002-12-03] David Abrahams wrote:
This is a formal call for volunteers to fill out a few of the
open-source license evaluations at
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License
These typically take less than 10 minutes apiece
[2002-12-02] Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [2002-12-01] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
|
|
| Robin.Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| Bzip2 is widely spreaded with GNU software. It is available to
[2002-12-01] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Because none of those; bz2, rar, or ace, will let you do this...
tar zxvf boost-1.29.0.tar.gz
I could not get your point here. Every archiver has it's own command for
unpacking. So what?
My point was that gz, and now I know bzip2, are built into
[2002-12-01] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Robin.Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Bzip2 is widely spreaded with GNU software. It is available to all *nix
platforms those are available to me, include linux, *bsd, solaris, etc...
IMHO, using tar.bz2
[2002-11-25] Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Nice to know, but AFAIK (C) does have legal standing; but only if used
in
| addition to Copyright. And yes the command as previously posted checked
| for copyright only :-)
But of course if Copyright is present
[2002-11-25] Chris Little wrote:
on 11/25/02 2:13 PM, Paul A. Bristow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should we use
Copyright (c), 2002, A N Author
Except for the commas, as they are grammatical sugar from the copyright law
perspective.
to cover as many countries/lawyers as possible?
But
[2002-11-24] David Abrahams wrote:
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we add -Wno-non-virtual-dtor to g++ tests? The ability of shared_ptr
to
support nonvirtual destructors is an essential feature, and the tests do
exercize it.
Can't you just add
gcc*cxxflags-Wno-non-virtual-dtor
, but AFAIK (C) does have legal standing; but only if used in
addition to Copyright. And yes the command as previously posted checked
for copyright only :-)
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Beman Dawes wrote:
At 12:36 PM 11/19/2002, Rene Rivera wrote:
I think you did a limited search... only in the headers
[2002-11-19] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've checked the sources, and there are about 50 files lacking
copyright statements. If there are no objections, I'll update them
as appropriate (using the statements in other files of the library
in
88 matches
Mail list logo
