I just found that program_options (from yahoo files) has a serious defect.
The value of an option cannot start with the character '-', or it will be
interpreted as an option.
Obviously, this makes it difficult to enter a negative number as the option
value.
pgp0.pgp
Description:
You can use the parts independently
There is no install required
You have the complete code, you include the appropriate header!
Yes, for the 'header-only' libraries, filesystem library is not one of
them.
Boost isn't like most 3rd party libraries in the sense of a dll (or
similar) which
Beman Dawes wrote:
Assuming I'm release manager for 1.31.0, I'm going to publish explicit
release criteria for key platform/compiler pairs. Basically, the release
criteria will be 100% accounting for all failures on those
platform/compiler pairs.
I assume that Linux/GCC will be one of those
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:49 PM 8/5/2003, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 09:58 PM 8/4/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
There is a problem
Douglas Gregor wrote:
[...]
You can always write a forwarding 'foo' that checks the argument
types, but
I understand the reason you'd like this feature. My only question is
whether it is worth the additional machinery that it would take,
e.g., would this help a large amount of code? Perhaps
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Philippe A. Bouchard
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 7:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: Re: UI++ [was: GUI sublanguage; Re: Re: Re: Re:
GUI/GDI template library]
Brock Peabody wrote:
Paul Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just uploaded a new project called cppxmlobj which is a
system for persisting C++ objects to and from XML files. It uses
Boost, Patterns, STL etc extensively (even the build system), and I
thought that the list might be interested.
An
[Paul claims that lexical_cast prints (floating-point) numbers with too
few precision digits. Currently, limits::digits10 + 1 is used. Paul
wants to change it to int significant_digits10 = int(ceil(1 +
limits::digits * log10Two)); where limits is the numeric-limits
traits class and log10Two
En réponse à Jason McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[gah, I originally sent this to the wrong address]
I found a slight annoyance with operator (istream, intervalwhatever):
It can't cope with whitespace before its sentinel characters '[' and
',', causing some input operations to fail
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
FWIW, I've used a similar technique in MPL to do recursion unrolling
for the 'advance' algorithm:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/boost/boost/
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to say that I think it's the wrong patch. The right patch
would put the swap specialization into _STL::.
It actually sufixes
I assume you mean suffices.
to put any 'std' extension in a nested namespace (say, stdx); then
injecting
Toon Knapen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using the sunpro toolset I get a strange error when compiling the
boost::filesystem library (and thus all regression testing fails). Below
you can find the error diagnostics. It comes down to an ambiguous
overload of boost::operator==... but the two
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
There are still problems with Optional, related to some compilers
not finding std swap(). I wrote the original code following
compressed_pair.hpp, which is via
I finally had some time to try this out ... the .zip flavor:
and came away confused
=
Installation...step 2.
Place the Boost.Jam binary, called bjam or bjam.exe, somewhere in
your PATH. Verify that correct bjam is being executed by running bjam
--version. You should get
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which compilers are failing and where are the regression report
pages?
Sorry for the delay, I was leaving the office
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:27:08PM -0400, Brian McNamara wrote:
I've been working on a draft of the documentation for the boostified
version of FC++, and it's finally reached a good enough state to be
potentially useful to you-all. Check out
Dave Abrahams writes:
Well, it's interesting but pretty hard to evaluate. As a recent Boost
review of a persistence system shows, there are many dimensions to
this problem domain. It's hard to get a grip on which of those you've
chosen to address without some docs and/or examples. The most I
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
Misha and Aleksey -- I think we really need to distinguish those
failures from real regressions in the chart somehow or we'll never be
able to tell where we stand.
Here -
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 06:03 AM 8/14/2003, Walter Landry wrote:
It would be trivial to add an additional path constructor that takes a
checking function or function object.
But that would kill ease-of-use. It is one thing to require an
additional constructor argument in the fairly limited use
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which compilers are failing and where are the regression report
pages?
Sorry for the delay, I was leaving the office when you posted this
Most
Beman Dawes wrote:
The current approach is clearly too restrictive and isn't
satisfactory. Beyond the problems you mention, there really isn't a
single standard for portability. Even 8.3 names aren't portable to
systems which don't allow periods in names. A whole family of
checkers is
Aleksandr Golovanov wrote:
Hello, I'm pretty new here, but I've extensively used boost library for
about a year.
Yesterday, I ran into a small problem, lexical_cast accepts copy instead of
(const)? reference to a source. I have a class which I would prefer to be
noncopyable and castable with
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once syntactic markers and/or rules are introduced, whether to
eliminate ambiguities or to improve readability and writablity, the
question is then what are the advantages of a new and unfamiliar set
of markers and/or rules?
You're already making
Thanks, stupid me ! I guess it has been too hot around here these days.
At 13:12 14/08/2003 -0400, you wrote:
From: Jonathan de Halleux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a tree built with the BGL. I want to find the root of the tree.
Has anybody an idea on the algorithm I should be using ? thks
David Abrahams wrote:
Here -
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/resources/cs-win32_metacomm/developer_summary_page.html
Yellow cells indicate failures on the newly added tests/compilers. The
updated report tools are not in the CVS yet, we will check them in after
the
first round of
Fernando Cacciola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand the problem with the original code
(as of revision 1.19), and I don't understand why
1.30.0 fails.
RC_1_30_0 is working for me with gcc-3.2 on Win32.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
Hello, I'm pretty new here, but I've extensively used boost library for
about a year.
Yesterday, I ran into a small problem, lexical_cast accepts copy instead of
(const)? reference to a source. I have a class which I would prefer to be
noncopyable and castable with laxical_cast at the same time.
Alexander Nasonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
There is another pipestream project you can take a look at:
http://pstreams.sourceforge.net/
May be I missed something but this library is about reading from stdin and
writing to stdout of other process. It's not
Greetings,
I've started using boost::filesystem recently, and I'm mostly very
happy. One thing bothers me, though. Why does it implement any
restrictions, by default, on what kind of files it allows? From the
documentation:
The following are not valid name char's: x01-x1F, , , :, , /, \,
Hi,
I am trying to find regression test results for gcc-3.3 on linux and
Intel 7.1 on Linux. Are the meta-intel-7.1 results at
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering for windows or linux?
Does anyone have regression results for gcc/intel on linux?
By the way, these results are really useful,
Samuel Krempp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As said in the Re: Release of 1.30.2 imminent thread,
recent regressions for intel-linux-7.1 on ios_state and format
(eg
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux-links.html#format_test1-intel-7.1)
report weird linking erros (due to
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Cacciola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: although this library is new, google shows (to my
satisfaction) that there are already a couple of users of
Optional out there.
Simple and effective. It is in a production system here.
Many thanks,
-Original Message-
From: Beman Dawes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 August 2003 04:56
To: Boost mailing list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [boost] boost::filesystem file restrictions
At 06:03 AM 8/14/2003, Walter Landry wrote:
I've started using boost::filesystem recently, and
For those who were interested but wanted to see what it is all about
first, I have updated the site so that it has some documentation on how
to actually use the project from within your own code.
http://cppxmlobj.sourceforge.net/use.html
Paul.
-
Paul Hamilton
pHamtec P/L -
David Abrahams wrote:
Martin Wille writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
NOTICE:
If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
Not new: there are still some regressions for Linux:
crc_test regresses for gcc3.1 and
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 20:17:03 -0700, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote
time_duration behaves highly nonintuitively. A time_duration should
be convertible to seconds by calculating td.hours() * 3600 +
td.minutes() * 60 + td.seconds(), right? Wrong!
Hmm, I agree that this is not nice...
...example
From: Jonathan de Halleux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a tree built with the BGL. I want to find the root of the tree.
Has anybody an idea on the algorithm I should be using ? thks
Assuming your graph is bidirectional and has a single root, then you
should just be able to pick any node, pick any
Bohdan wrote:
E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Do you mean link of incompatible library problems ?
If so ... as mentioned this is problem of boost build system
and it will be finally solved. Look at boost::regex, it doesn't have
such problems for compilers supporting #pragma
Paul A. Bristow wrote:
Since I couldn't find how to make the editor work with .ipp
files from the MS documentation, but it ws kindly provided by
a diligent Booster, can you suggest where this info shold be stored?
FYI, a while back I got a power toy called vstweak that allows you to
tweak
...
Well, if things were that simple, we would have used GCC 2.x/3.x on HP-UX as well.
Unfortunately, we have to link against 3rd party C++ libraries (Tuxedo (CORBA),
actually) that have
been compiled with aCC (*gasp* even with the old roguewave STL - they don't even have
the std
namespace).
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 02:38 pm, Thomas Witt wrote:
gpgkeys: WARNING: this is an *experimental* HKP interface!
gpgkeys: key D1DB3F812DD7B01A not found on keyserver
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
| What is the problem adapting pair of iterators to scalar vectors to
produce
| an iterator
This is just what I would like to see in boost. I have created a
duplicate set of headers for boost (same names, same structure but in
boost_wrappers which do this and include the original header between the
push and pop). We had a discussion about this a while back and I am all
for it, but
At 06:28 AM 8/7/2003, Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried to use the variant library to implement some new
functionality inside the Boost.Spirit library. I must say, I'm
impressed. Very well done!
I've stumbled over a problem though: gcc (Cygwin: gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927
(prerelease))
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Torjo
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI template
library
[...]
I did fix the include file problem.
Robert Ramey wrote:
const int array[] = {1, 2, 3, 4};
boost::container_facadeint cfa(array, sizeof(array)/sizeof(int));
I guess my problem is I still don't understand what is wrong with
const boost::array int, 4 = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
in this case.
If you are referring to having to dictate the
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:38:22 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
No, it means managing the next release.
Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot
of work and a big Thank You! to you for doing this job, but I think it
requires knowledge which I
2) Is there a way to enhance the mutable typedef trick to avoid the
large number of template instantiations?
I have worked on a solution that would require less template instantiations
but would still rely on the __LINE__ trick to avoid violations to the ODR.
The example provided (as an
Consider the following snippet:
void show_warning( message_dialog const, user_message );
void post_command( boost::functionvoid() );
int main()
{
boost::functionvoid( user_message ) f(
bind( post_command
, ( bind( show_warning,
AFAIK, some gui toolkits use not event, but callback system.
IMHO it is more evective. Definitely it should be discussed
carefully.
Aren't we talking about the same thing? ;)
In response to an event, you call an event callback.
That's what my example does - it's obfuscated indeed, but
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:06 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: File missing from Boost 1.30.1 release?
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zak Kipling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just tried
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 12:22 AM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: UI++ [was: GUI sublanguage;Re: Re: Re: Re:
GUI/GDI template library]
--- Philippe A. Bouchard
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:42 PM 8/10/2003, brock wrote:
[...]
Should I get this permission formalized?
Yes, to protect both yourself and Boost.
[...]
Can we say: SCO vs. IBM? ;
Dave
___
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Thanks for all the testing; the release looks pretty darned great!
Just to make sure it's understood - although expected, all the green
failures are still failures. Not that we can do much about them, of course.
From a user
Given that I have a string 's' from somewhere, I'd like to create a
regular expression where some part must match that string. The problem
is, the 's' could contain characters that have a special meaning in
regular expressions. Is there some support function that can provide an
escaped version of
At 06:04 PM 8/5/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Many of the internal references seem to be broken. For example,
path.htm#Representation_example doesn't seem to go anywhere.
Ugh. Fixed.
Thanks,
--Beman
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
I need the ability to do interprocess synchronization through file
locking, c.f. Java.File.createNewFile and Java.File.deleteOnExit:
---
createNewFile
public boolean createNewFile()
throws IOException
Atomically creates a new, empty file named by this abstract
I think problem is with BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(void)
Simply removing that workaround macro from forced_return works for me as a
dirty workaround.
The question is, why BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS on gcc
3.2.x? config/compiler/gcc.hpp comments about some unspecified
If you haven't seen Fresco (successor to InterViews) before, I think it has a lot of
interesting ideas. http://www.fresco.org/
I've heard a couple competing ideas; either wraping native widgets or writing the
widgets from scratch (both is a possibility too, of course). Either way I think it
On Monday 04 August 2003 10:43 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
If anyone's interested, the enclosed patch against the current CC-mode
Did you send this to cc-mode maintainer? Also, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
|| What is the problem adapting pair of iterators to scalar
vectors to
|produce
|| an iterator with complex value type?
|
|The problem is you can hardly adapt a pair. So using
iterator_adaptor
|(the new class template) does not provide any benefit.
|
|
| Why is that?
The whole
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David B. Held
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: UI++ [was: GUI sublanguage; Re: GUI/GDI template
library]
Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:12 AM 8/11/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
While I totally support the failures markup goal, I would like to see
_the_ release criteria to include no regressions from the previous
release item as well, preferrably for all non-beta compilers that are
currently
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
After having followed this thread I wander if we are trying to
reinvent
the wheel. By googling a bit one can find plenty of Gui Toolkits and
here I saw little of them. Not a word on Qt, for example. I never
used it for an important project but they give a
Alexander Nasonov wrote:
[snip]
The library doesn't use OS pipes. Pipe support is implemented by hand with a
help of Boost.Threads. Synchronization occurs only in underflow, overflow,
sync, open and close functions which means fast I/O.
The library also has two capacity models: limited and
I am wondering what happened to the allocator idiom in
boost. Was it left out intentially?
I can control all memory allocation details in STL
(orthogonally to data types) but not in boost.
It seems like a step backward comparing to STL.
How can I use allocators with shared_ptr? Is there any
way
At 04:11 PM 8/10/2003, Martin Wille wrote:
I added gcc-3.3.1 to the Linux tests for CVS HEAD.
Test failures have been down to 1% for gcc versions 3.2.3 and 3.3 a
few weeks ago. I think 3.2.3 and 3.3.1 would be good candidates for
being release criteria.
OK, let's use 3.2.3 and 3.3.1 as the Linux
Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bohdan wrote:
[...]
There are a lot of good reasons why we would not always want to have
total control.
Not always means sometimes not ?
According to this logic your gui language is
layer built on top of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:21 PM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: GUI/GDI template library
--- Bohdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Finally your lib may
John Torjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFAIK, some gui toolkits use not event, but callback system.
IMHO it is more evective. Definitely it should be discussed
carefully.
Aren't we talking about the same thing? ;)
Not exactly.
- Callbacks
Victor A. Wagner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Test case (note that WinXP doesn't complain when programs segfault, hence
the Begin/End business):
See http://www.boost.org/more/error_handling.html for a way to work
around that.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
At 01:07 AM 8/10/2003, David B. Held wrote:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
As a user of the filesystem library, I am having the experience that
obvious things are hard to find, and the docs are much harder to
understand than they ought to be.
Brock Peabody wrote:
That's a cool idea. It's a lot prettier than using the preprocessor.
Thanks, Brock.
Does anyone know whether or not a language solution is being
considered
for this or variable class template arguments?
It would be valueable for expressions only, not declarator lists.
Beman Dawes wrote:
I'd like to be sure that some Booster signs up for this beta and starts
running the Boost regression tests against it. And then follows up with
bug reports to Borland as needed. Any bugs fixed in the compiler before
it ships are bugs Boosters don't have to cope with later.
E. Gladyshev wrote:
[...]
assign responsibilites. Then it is up to each
developer to come up with a reasonable personal
timeline (based on his/her personal schedule) for a
part that she/he is going to be working on.
What do you think?
Ok, but the main decisions should be classified
En réponse à David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Martin Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
In that case, can I release 1.30.2? I don't like having the 1.30.1
debacle hanging over my head.
There are new regressions on Linux (RC_1_30_0 branch):
Peter Dimov wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
There is another variation of the idiom, sometimes called hidden
state, which doesn't have the shortcoming in the first place:
class foo
{
public:
foo();
foo(int);
int f() const;
void
--- Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here are some of my postings on the name and project
issues.
Brock and I liked the Notus (god of the south wind)
name.
BTW Brock said that he is in!
I'll be working on setting up the Notus (code name)
project on sf
Hi all
I've found bug in incremental_components examples and
documentation. Type _Rank_ is expected to be size_type, but
container _rank_ is created from vertex_descriptor. Examples work
because adjacency_list VertexList container type is vector.
// ...
typedef adjacency_list vecS, vecS,
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For an exaggerated example, imagine that we design
and implement layer
one knowing nothing about any GUI APIs besides
Win32. We'll probably
have to make a lot of revisions if we then want to
make that scheme fit
over a *nix GUI API.
I agree.
David Abrahams wrote:
I'm trying to say that I think it's the wrong patch. The right patch
would put the swap specialization into _STL::.
I'm weighing up the 'correct' solution with the 'practical' solution.
Correct would be, as you say, fix all the code everywhere else
specializing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bronek Kozicki
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:06 AM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know much about
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 12:53 PM 8/6/2003, Russell Hind wrote:
Perhaps coordinate with John Maddock? He is really our config header
expert.
So John, would you be interested in trying to get this sorted out for
the next release? As I have said, I currenly only use BCB, and so can't
offer much
At 04:43 PM 8/7/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:38:22 +0200, Daniel Frey wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
No, it means managing the next release.
Um, no, I don't feel like I can handle that. Sorry. I'm sure it's a lot
of work and a big Thank You! to you for doing this job, but I
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 12:21 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Boosters,
Since some of the applications and libraries we plan on releasing soon
rely on Boost features and bugfixes that are in the CVS but not in
Boost 1.30.[012] I wonder what the
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
typedef typename apply
typename lambdaPolicy::type
, T
::type p;
things should work independently of whenever 'Policy' is in form of
'my_policy_' or 'my_policy' - given that the
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think now we need to decide which
*nix GUI API to use
and get started on a proof of concept.
I am currently working with win32 only. I can take
care of this one. I think it'll be nice to have
support for X as well.
Maybe we should decide which
At 3:28 PM -0500 8/6/03, Brock Peabody wrote:
Because for a pretty large number of applications you can really
simplify your code a lot by relying on the GUI system to 'do the right
thing':
using boost::gui;
void my_action() {...}
void progress_action(int tick) {...}
gui::show( sample
At 03:35 PM 8/6/2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
I've having trouble with the Borland compiler. It is getting an error in
its own utime.h header:
Error E2303 D:\Program Files\Borland\CBuilder6\Include\utime.h 42: Type
name expected
If anyone can figure out a workaround, please let me know.
Never mind;
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I worry a little about requiring library authors not to regress on
compiler combinations they don't test with.
Well, the regressions are run daily, so testing happens. Another
Some time back I mentioned I was interested in iterator adaptors to convert
between vectors of complex and scalar. I have looked at using the iterator
adaptor framework in boost. It appears that it is easy enough to adapt from
a complex sequence to pick off either the real or imaginary part,
John -
Sorry to be slow on this reply...
John Torjo wrote:
[1]
unary operator-(time_iterator).
Example: -hours(24) instead of hours(-24).
(seems more straightforward)
I see your point, but then don't you have to add all the other
operators for consistency? Not sure that makes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of E. Gladyshev
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:33 PM
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: Re: [boost] GUI/GDI template library
[...]
Don't know where to start...
Greek and Roman mythology?
'Aquilo'
I am currently porting something called XMLUI to use boost/bjam etc.
The general background of XMLUI is based on the work we did at mBED for
a flash-like animation system (although it predated flash).
This project is the culmination of a number of years of design of
widget-less UI systems that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Maddock wrote:
|Just out of curiosity. What the heck is librt?
|
|
| It contains the POSIX realtime feature set (used by boost.threads, and
hence
| tested by boost.config for timeouts and thread priorities and the like).
Ahhh.. Thanks!
Thomas
-
At 07:02 PM 8/10/2003, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
More seriously, did you have a chance to test GCC-3.3.1?
I just tested 3.3.1 on Windows, and the 7 ublas tests which had been
failing on 3.3 are now passing. The variant libraries variant_test4 is also
now passing.
The current plan is to use
SourceForge has a Tasks list feature which is now enabled for Boost. See
the Tasks entry on the top toolbar at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/
If you click Tasks, that should take you to a page listing sub-projects.
There is currently only one sub-project, titled 1.31.0 Release
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't know where to start...
Greek and Roman mythology?
'Aquilo' the north wind, the ruler of the winds.
'Notus' the south wind
'Flora' goddess of flowers and spring.
'Arcadia' a district of the Peloponnesus, the home
of
pastoral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes:
[...]
| This whole thing (-fabi-version) is messy. It is what one gets by
| taking users for beta testers ;-)
|
| That's not the whole story. When testing with GCC 3.3.1 prerelease I noticed
| that setting -fabi-version isn't necessary anymore. So I
Martin Wille wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
Martin Wille writes:
The fix made to the gcc toolset regarding the use of the
GXX variable should be backported to 1_30_2.
Please be more specific, i.e. post a patchset.
If I had a patchset then I would have applied it :)
(I sent a bug report some
I'm not sure how to proceed with this so if there is anything I can do
in the meantime, let me know. Feel free to e-mail me off the list.
OK, I've got this working pretty well with regex - but as it entails changes
to boost.config I'm not sure if I should make the changes now or wait until
1 - 100 of 459 matches
Mail list logo
