RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-17 Thread Bryon Daly
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryon Daly side note: $1 million was stolen from that area just a few weeks after I left the job! They never caught anyone for it, even though access to the area was restricted to at most about a dozen people, and

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread ritu
Bryon Daly wrote: Seems ridiculous to me. The US gladly paid out $30 million to the tipster for the Hussein boys, and freely stated so. Why would this be different? I don't buy that national pride argument that the US needed to capture him rather than get him handed over. In

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread Damon Agretto
I haven't read that link yet but there have been a number of reports that the informant would not be paid the award money. Apparently it's because the individual did not surrender the information willingly, and had to be subjected to a hard interrogation, according to the TV news report last

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryon Daly Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 03:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated? From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] An interesting take

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damon Agretto Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 07:25 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated? I haven't read that link yet but there have been a number

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread Bryon Daly
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Bryon Daly: Seems ridiculous to me. The US gladly paid out $30 million to the tipster for the Hussein boys, and freely stated so. Why would this be different? I don't understand what your point is - this article only briefly mentions the reward

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryon Daly Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 01:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated? Yes, I did read it. At least twice. The article suggests

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:29 PM 12/16/03, Miller, Jeffrey wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryon Daly Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 03:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated? From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-16 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The article states Left with him were two AK-47 assault guns and a pistol. I haven't seen anything about this and even read a bried blurb about one of the Iraqi CPA leaders asking Saddam why he didn't use his pistol (I don't remember the exact

RE: Saddam not captured, but liberated?

2003-12-15 Thread Bryon Daly
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] An interesting take on recent news events surrounding Saddam, and does pose some potentially intruiging questions. Possibly meaningless, but the suggestion about negotiations IRT the reward money going sour.. I dunno.