Ok,
Have invited as many as asked I think.
If anyone is missing an invite just email me here or alex.go...@gmail.com
Been on for awhile so have plenty :¬}
Regards
Alex
On 23/07/2011 06:50, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Hi Jo Anne. Just go to your apps store on your smarter than me phone
(I've got
Hi Jon,
No probs but you need to get a gmail email account which are free
www.gmail.com and can send out the invite. If there are any others have
some invites left.
Also if any of you guys are interested in joining my circle just look
out for me, alex.go...@gmail.com
Regards
On
On 7/22/2011 3:07 AM, Alex Gogan wrote:
Hi Jon,
No probs but you need to get a gmail email account which are free
www.gmail.com and can send out the invite. If there are any others
have some invites left.
Also if any of you guys are interested in joining my circle just look
out for me,
If you still have an invite left, I would like one for matzeb...@gmail.com
Thanks,
-- Matt
From: Alex Gogan a...@gogan.com
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: Google+
Hi Danny
On Jul 22, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Jo Anne wrote:
evenstar5...@gmail.com
Has been invited to Google+
Dave
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
*To:* Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 21, 2011 9:05 AM
*Subject:* Re: Google+
Hi Danny
Done
On 18/07/2011 16:46, Danny O'Dare wrote:
Yes, please invite me!
Thanks,
DANNY
On 13 July 2011 18:21, Alex Gogan a...@gogan.com a...@gogan.com
Hi Jo Anne. Just go to your apps store on your smarter than me phone
(I've got one too) and type in G+
DB just friended me (or whatever you call it on +). I'm glad _he's_
got a short memory.
Doug
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Dave Land dml...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 22, 2011, at 5:45 PM,
Yes, please invite me!
Thanks,
DANNY
On 13 July 2011 18:21, Alex Gogan a...@gogan.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
If anyone wants some google+ invites email me, or if you are on add me my
email for google is alex.go...@gmail.com have couple hundred here
Regards
Alex
Hi Danny
Done
On 18/07/2011 16:46, Danny O'Dare wrote:
Yes, please invite me!
Thanks,
DANNY
On 13 July 2011 18:21, Alex Gogana...@gogan.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
If anyone wants some google+ invites email me, or if you are on add me my
email for google is alex.go...@gmail.com have couple
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Nick Arnett nick.arn...@gmail.com wrote:
So... Google Buzz introduced itself to me this morning, just as I was
reading an article on privacy concerns about it. The biggest one is that it
automatically imports contacts and shows them as friends.
When buzz
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:20 AM, John Williams jwilliams4...@gmail.comwrote:
Why do you think it imported something from your contacts? Did you
click on setup or whatever when the buzz screen popped up?
It said it automatically imported the people I talk to the most. The list
it showed me
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:20 AM, John Williams jwilliams4...@gmail.comwrote:
Why do you think it imported something from your contacts? Did you
click on setup or whatever when the buzz screen popped up?
Here is what it said, exactly:
*Welcome to Buzz*
*Buzz is a new way to share updates,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Nick Arnett nick.arn...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome to Buzz
Buzz is a new way to share updates, photos, videos and more, and start
conversations about the things you find interesting. You're already set up to
follow the people you email and chat with the most.
You guys are lucky, I just got the Palm Pre... love it .. sortof and set up
my gmail account and a few others and it then imported ALL my facebook,
gmail etc contacts and there are thousands of contacts now in the palm
pre...
http://www.gogan.com/blog/
Sent from Ballyboden, Ireland
On Thu, Feb
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nick Arnett nick.arn...@gmail.com wrote:
It said it automatically imported the people I talk to the most. The list
it showed me sure didn't look like that, however.
It was probably the people with gmail accounts that you talk to the most.
--
Mauro Diotallevi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mauro Diotallevi diotall...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nick Arnett nick.arn...@gmail.com
wrote:
It said it automatically imported the people I talk to the most. The
list
it showed me sure didn't look like that, however.
It was
On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:57 AM, Trent Shipley wrote:
Google? Bing? I don't care.
Neither do I, which makes me wonder why you bothered to write anything else.
--
Warren Ockrassa | @waxis
Blog | http://indigestible.nightwares.com/
Books | http://books.nightwares.com/
Web |
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Trent Shipley tship...@deru.com wrote:
Google? Bing? I don't care.
So Bing doesn't stand for But It's Not Google?
Seriously, however... I'm working on a project that involves using several
different search engines, via their APIs, and aggregating results.
On 25/11/2009, at 9:57 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
It would take time to wean myself off Microsoft even if someone
made an desktop operating system that was twice as good.
There is. I did.
Except for gaming. So I use a MacBook for day-to-day shite, email, letters,
browsing, whatever, and I
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 25/11/2009, at 9:57 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
It would take time to wean myself off Microsoft even if someone
made an desktop operating system that was twice as good.
There is. I did.
Except for gaming. So I use a MacBook for day-to-day shite, email,
On 25/11/2009, at 11:05 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 25/11/2009, at 9:57 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:
It would take time to wean myself off Microsoft even if someone
made an desktop operating system that was twice as good.
There is. I did.
I have Kubuntu, Ubuntu,
http://bingle.nu/
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
From: Matt Grimaldi matzeb...@yahoo.com
FUD usually appears as an acronym for
the usual resistance to change:
Fear
Uncertainty
Doubt
Oh, dear. I'm hosed. I neither twitter nor text nor have a phone that I use
for anything other than talking...
Debbi
I Am NOT A Fuddy-Duddy!!!
From: Matt Grimaldi matzeb...@yahoo.com
FUD usually appears as an acronym for
the usual resistance to change:
Fear
Uncertainty
Doubt
From: Deborah Harrell harrellmed...@yahoo.com
]Oh, dear. I'm hosed. I neither twitter nor text nor have a phone that I use
for anything other
Thanks, Max and Bruce. But I have one more question. What's FUD? Is it
printable?
Amities,
Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
FUD usually appears as an acronym for the usual resistance to change:
Fear
Uncertainty
Doubt
-- Matt
- Original Message
From: Jo Anne evens...@hevanet.com
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Fri, October 16, 2009 12:45:22 PM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
Thanks, Max and Bruce. But I
On 15/10/2009, at 8:11 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au
wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if
there was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my
try it out by joining a discussion about
received the invite, they can use it with any e-mail address
they wish. And yes, they do take a few days to process.
Regards,
Wayne.
- Original Message -
From: Nick Arnett
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave? Is it like what Twits do with
Tweets? I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave? Speak slowly and
directly into the microphone, please.
Amities,
Jo Anne
evens...@hevanet.com
___
Jo Anne wrote:
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave? Is it like what Twits do with
Tweets? I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave? Speak slowly and
directly into the microphone, please.
It depends on who you ask and how much hype they've ingested, digested,
and are prepared to
On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Max Battcher wrote:
Jo Anne wrote:
OK, Guys, what the heck is Google Wave? Is it like what Twits do
with
Tweets? I know what a beta test is, but a Google Wave? Speak
slowly and
directly into the microphone, please.
It depends on who you ask and how much
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
I haven't chimed in on Wave or the more general subject of cloud
computing yet, since I haven't used it yet (which, in some people's
judgment, makes me ineligible to comment, although I consider that a
questionable argument), but my misgivings about it are generally
On Oct 15, 2009, at 4:35 PM, Max Battcher wrote:
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
I haven't chimed in on Wave or the more general subject of cloud
computing yet, since I haven't used it yet (which, in some people's
judgment, makes me ineligible to comment, although I consider that
a questionable
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by
joining a discussion about the future?
Can you invite others to the beta?
, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by joining
Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 6:07 PM:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there
was anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out
by joining a discussion about the future?
Regards,
Wayne Eddy
I'd love to get an invite
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
No Problem, Nick.
I will send you an invite - I think it might take a few days to process
though.
I assume you want to use this address nick.arn...@gmail.com ?
That's the one.
Thanks!
Nick
Message -
From: Nick Arnett
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au
wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering
!
- Original Message -
From: Lance A. Brown la...@bearcircle.net
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Google Wave
Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 6:07 PM:
Hi all, I just got access
Wayne Eddy said the following on 10/14/2009 11:28 PM:
Hi Lance, have you got a gmail address you want to use?
I have sent Nick Dave invites, and I am happy to you one too, but I
want to invite a few others from elsewhere so three invites for the Brin
List will have to do for now.
Looks cool, count me in please. Use brig...@zo.com
Thanks,
Doug
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Wayne Eddy we...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Hi all, I just got access to Google Wave, and I was wondering if there was
anyone on the list who might be interested in helping my try it out by
joining a
_
From: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com [mailto:brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com] On
Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Subject: Re: Google Operating System
Julia wrote:
Reply:
I get no more than 1 in 500 false
-Original Message-
From: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com [mailto:brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com] On
Behalf Of John Williams
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:48 PM
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Subject: Re: Google Operating System
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Julia Thompsonf...@zurg.net wrote:
I get no more than 1 in 500 false positives.
I get no more than 1 in 1000 false negatives.
That is interesting. I am much more worried about false positives
(missing a real email) than I am about false negatives (seeing a few
Julia wrote:
Reply:
I get no more than 1 in 500 false positives.
I get no more than 1 in 1000 false negatives.
It was more than that early on in my use of Gmail, I got one account in
2004, IIRC, and another in 2007. The more recent one, most of the false
positives were from one mailing
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Other than by breaking the M$ pay to play licensing paradigm and
leveling the playing field for open source developers?
Who says M$ won't have users pay to play M$-Linux? It's possible
that the worse nightmare of the free-software sjihad/s community
happens: M$ may
On Jul 8, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Williams wrote:
My prediction is that Chrome OS will never gain significant market
share for high-powered computers, but it may make some inroads in
netbooks (which are in between a notebook and a smart phone in terms
of power). Of course, the google says Chrome
On 09/07/2009, at 1:35 PM, John Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Rceebergerrceeber...@comcast.net
wrote:
I don't see how turning your PC into a dumb terminal could be
considered an advance.
I'm not storing my stuff on Google's servers.
My impression is that the Chrome OS
Charlie Wrote
...and Google already have one. It's called Android, plus there's gOS which
Google had hefty input into. And there are miriad other Linuces and BSDs to
try, up to and including Darwin/OSX. So I'm with Will (you can pick
yourselves up at your leisure). Don't see the point of
John Williams wrote:
My impression is that the Chrome OS will allow you to avoid just
what you say above. It is an actual OS, although probably OS lite
would be a better term. It will be able to run programs on your own
CPU, provided they conform to whatever API google is coding, and it
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Dave Landdml...@gmail.com wrote:
http://bit.ly/1m1rVP
or, if you prefer full-blooded URLs:
http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html
It's brilliant start to finish, but I especially liked:
Trying to make an OS
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html
It's brilliant start to finish, but I especially liked:
Trying to make an OS out of Chrome is like saying you're going
to turn a Pontiac Aztek into a
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Charlie Bellchar...@culturelist.org wrote:
On 09/07/2009, at 1:35 PM, John Williams wrote:
My impression is that the Chrome OS will allow you to avoid just
what you say above. It is an actual OS, although probably OS lite
would be a better term.
...and Google
On 10/07/2009, at 12:53 AM, Mauro Diotallevi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Charlie
Bellchar...@culturelist.org wrote:
On 09/07/2009, at 1:35 PM, John Williams wrote:
My impression is that the Chrome OS will allow you to avoid just
what you say above. It is an actual OS, although
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Bruce Bostwick wrote:
(As far as why .. well, it's possible that Google has taken notice
that Microsoft has been promoting Bing pretty heavily, and this is a
shot across their bow. If Chrome OS succeeds, and evolves into
something that can displace Windows as a
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
(As far as why .. well, it's possible that Google has taken notice
that Microsoft has been promoting Bing pretty heavily, and this is a
shot across their bow. If Chrome OS succeeds, and evolves into
something that can displace Windows as a full-functioning OS,
On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Dave Land wrote:
I am not like our friend Mario with his 57 Varieties approach to
operating systems. I use Mac OS X almost exclusively because
operating system fit and finish matter to me. (This is not a
statement of superiority to Mario, merely noting a
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
(As far as why .. well, it's possible that Google has taken notice
that Microsoft has been promoting Bing pretty heavily, and this is a
shot across their bow. If Chrome OS succeeds, and evolves into
something that can
Bruce Bostwick wrote:
Not to mention that changing Windows virtual monopoly to *Nix
monopoly is _very bad_ for the development of new techs.
How would migrating to a larger user base for *nix be bad for the
development of new techs?
Because Monopoly is Evil.
Other than by breaking the
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Who says M$ won't have users pay to play M$-Linux? It's possible
that the worse nightmare of the free-software sjihad/s community
happens: M$ may embrace, extend and then extinguish Linux.
The way they embraced and extended the Web with
On 8 Jul 2009 at 23:43, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Charlie Wrote
...and Google already have one. It's called Android, plus there's gOS which
Google had hefty input into. And there are miriad other Linuces and BSDs to
try, up to and including Darwin/OSX. So I'm with Will (you can pick
At 10:35 PM Wednesday 7/8/2009, John Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Rceebergerrceeber...@comcast.net wrote:
I don't see how turning your PC into a dumb terminal could be
considered an advance.
I'm not storing my stuff on Google's servers.
My impression is that the Chrome
On 7/9/2009 11:15:40 AM, Bruce Bostwick (lihan161...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
At the risk of being flamed, I might also point out that NASA has long
since forbidden any primary functionality on ISS from running on
Windows platforms because of stability concerns -- if it's onboard and
actually
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
On 7/9/2009 11:15:40 AM, Bruce Bostwick (lihan161...@sbcglobal.net)
wrote:
At the risk of being flamed, I might also point out that NASA has
long
since forbidden any primary functionality on ISS from running on
Windows platforms because of
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Bostwick lihan161...@sbcglobal.net
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: Google Operating System
Sounds like you might know the right people to ask for a tour*. ;)
(*one
Andrew wrote:
The spam filter on Pegaus Mail works fine for me, and it's mine
rather then being in the control of a company which is going to scan
my emails. I've yet to find (and this includes gmail) another filter
which is more than 90% accurate for me.
I'd estimate the efficiency of my
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensingerbrig...@zo.com wrote:
I'd estimate the efficiency of my gmail filter is 99% or better.
That is a particularly uninformative statistic.
Much more interesting would be two figures: probability of false
positives ( number of real marked as spam /
At 11:48 PM Thursday 7/9/2009, John Williams wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensingerbrig...@zo.com wrote:
I'd estimate the efficiency of my gmail filter is 99% or better.
That is a particularly uninformative statistic.
Much more interesting would be two figures: probability of
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:48 PM, John Williams jwilliams4...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Doug Pensingerbrig...@zo.com wrote:
I'd estimate the efficiency of my gmail filter is 99% or better.
That is a particularly uninformative statistic.
Much more interesting would be
Mauro wrote:
So, any early adopters planning on switching over when it ships? I'm
willing to at least give it a hard drive partition.
Me too. I refuse to use Explorer and would jump on a new OS from Google
especially.
Doug
Chrome maru
___
On 7/8/2009 8:06:20 PM, Doug Pensinger (brig...@zo.com) wrote:
Mauro wrote:
So, any early adopters planning on switching over when it ships? I'm
willing to at least give it a hard drive partition.
Me too. I refuse to use Explorer and would jump on a new OS from Google
especially.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Rceebergerrceeber...@comcast.net wrote:
I don't see how turning your PC into a dumb terminal could be considered an
advance.
I'm not storing my stuff on Google's servers.
My impression is that the Chrome OS will allow you to avoid just
what you say above. It
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Gary Nunn wrote:
PS - nothing really here about flatulent llamas, just thought I would
see if anyone was paying attention.
Darn.
I live near an alpaca farm, and wondered if what you had to say might be
applicable
(As the crow flies, they're closer than the
At 08:41 AM Sunday 7/27/2008, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Gary Nunn wrote:
PS - nothing really here about flatulent llamas, just thought I would
see if anyone was paying attention.
Darn.
I live near an alpaca farm, and wondered if what you had to say might be
applicable
On 1/8/06, Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The worldwide popularity of the FSM puts a whole new spin on If god
did not exist we would need to create him (where is that quote from?)
http://urlx.org/google.com/19ef
xponent
Hee Haw! Maru
rob
Voltaire.
~Maru
The ways of the
Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
http://www.venganza.org/
I am surprised at how often this site changes and how much it has
grown.
I end up back there about every 6 weeks or so and it seems to greatly
grow in content everytime I visit.
The funniest thing is the merchandising and the
On 25 Sep 2003 at 20:09, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:19 PM 9/25/03 +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 24 Sep 2003 at 21:36, Doug Pensinger wrote:
All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page
that reads in part:
big snip
Okay, do the hosts thing.
Then,
Thanks all for the help. Google's back and Spy Bot loaded. I'm not
sure how or where I got whatever it was as I'm very cautious about
attachments and downloading, but others - my wife and son - have been on
my machine, so I'll blame them. 8^) In any case, all's well that ends
well, thanks
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page that reads
in part:
I'm not as expert as some on this list are, but I'm up at 3AM, so I'll add
my 2 cents...
Are you trying to get to Google?
Your computer is running software that doesnt
--- Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advice it gives seems very reasonable to me. It does seem odd that the
fake google you're getting redirected to would be warning you about it,
though.
Also, AdAware, and Spybot Search and Destroy are both good programs. I've
used both and
On 24 Sep 2003 at 21:36, Doug Pensinger wrote:
All right, experts, when I try to go to Google I get a web page that
reads in part:
big snip
Okay, do the hosts thing.
Then, immediately head over and get Spybot Search and Destroy:
http://security.kolla.de/news.php?lang=en
It is basically
On 25 Sep 2003 at 0:42, Jan Coffey wrote:
--- Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advice it gives seems very reasonable to me. It does seem odd
that the
fake google you're getting redirected to would be warning you about
it, though.
Also, AdAware, and Spybot Search and
Bryon Daly wrote:
Also, AdAware, and Spybot Search and Destroy are both good
programs. I've used both and prefer spybot, but both are
reputable.
AOLMe too!/AOL
But seriously, it's a good idea for everybody to run one or
both of those programs every now and then, whether they fix
this problem
83 matches
Mail list logo
