Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-02-24 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 2/24/2004 9:04:01 AM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The Toilet Theory features in a non-uplift short story by Brin > in his most recent collection, and could explain why such things > would be on his mind. This, of course, doesn't change whether > he wa

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-02-24 Thread Matt Grimaldi
Trent Shipley wrote: > > On Wednesday 2004-01-28 19:30, Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > William Taylor wrote: > > > You leave out the very important: > > > > > > 41M BxY: Rediscovery of transfer points to galaxies originally numbered > > > Seven and Eleven, now renumbered Two and Four. > > > > > > Ear

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-29 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/29/2004 5:05:36 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >revised timeline follows. [By the way, this has been a lot of work. Do > we > >want DB's imprimateur?] > > > Not until we have full support of the College of Cardinals :-) > > Alberto Monteiro >

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-29 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Trent Shipley wrote: > > The timeline has been very slightly modified to accomodate two > literary coincidences that should bother no one but Alberto. > Yes, such coincidences bother me :-) > 1492: Discovery of the Americas > 1961: Yuri Gagarin in space > 2211: First contact, 500 years after 1961

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-29 Thread Trent Shipley
The timeline has been very slightly modified to accomodate two literary coincidences that should bother no one but Alberto. 1492: Discovery of the Americas 1961: Yuri Gagarin in space 2211: First contact, 500 years after 1961 (Over Alberto M.'s vigorous objection that it should remain 2212.) 24

Uplift Timeline: Tabernacle leaves Earth

2004-01-29 Thread Alberto Monteiro
What about 2267 AD? It would be 225 years "ago", or about 281 Jijo Years "ago", or about Jijo Year 1650, as in GU2, p.150 [there are many references to 300 Jijo Years of Human Occupation in Jijo, but I can always assume that 300 is a close approximation to 280] Alberto Monteiro PS: I don't like

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-29 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/29/2004 7:13:09 AM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Better ask WT. He's the expert in Galaxy counting :-) > Only that Earth is in Two, and Hurumphta, and supposedly the Hoon home world, isn't. [Contradicting GU2, I think. Though there has to be a col

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-29 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Trent Shipley wrote: > >> 1.6 BYA: Contact lost with three galaxies [7, 9, 11] Remaining >> Galaxies renumbered. Eight galaxies remain. The disaster results >> in cultural upheavals and sparks the first wave of memnetic plagues. >> >> But of course this would not allow the Cambrian explosion

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-29 Thread Trent Shipley
On Wednesday 2004-01-28 19:30, Alberto Monteiro wrote: > William Taylor wrote: > > You leave out the very important: > > > > 41M BxY: Rediscovery of transfer points to galaxies originally numbered > > Seven and Eleven, now renumbered Two and Four. > > > > Earth is in Galaxy Two which was Galaxy Sev

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-29 Thread Trent Shipley
The timeline has been very slightly modified to accomodate two literary coincidences that should bother no one but Alberto. 1492: Discovery of the Americas 1961: Yuri Gagarin in space 2211: First contact, 500 years after 1961 2492: Action resumes with the next Uplift Novel, 1000 years after disc

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-28 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Trent Shipley wrote: > > 2.26G BxY (a): Progenitors physically leave the Galaxies (according to > Inheritor legend). > Or transcend, according to Awaiter legend [CA] > > 1.6G BxY: Contact lost with three galaxies. Eight galaxies remain. The > disaster results in cultural upheavals and sparks the

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-28 Thread Alberto Monteiro
William Taylor wrote: > > You leave out the very important: > > 41M BxY: Rediscovery of transfer points to galaxies originally numbered > Seven and Eleven, now renumbered Two and Four. > > Earth is in Galaxy Two which was Galaxy Seven, which was lost from 150M BxY > to 41M BxY, which includes the h

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-28 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Trent Shipley wrote: > > Yuri Gagarin was the first man in space on 12 April 1961. So the date for > Contact is stuck at 2211 because it makes Contact happen 250 years after we > went into space. 2212 just won't do. > > Math logic looses to literary logic. > Whenever I find round periods like "25

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-28 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Trent Shipley wrote: > >> Why not add the following: >> >> 545 MYA: Diversity is artificially induced in many worlds, including >> Earth [causing the Cambrian explosion]. This is the last reference to >> Earth in the Galactic Library. > > It depends on DB. > Yes. And He wrote on 1999-05-24: Re:

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Trent Shipley
On Tuesday 2004-01-27 22:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 1/27/2004 8:59:02 PM US Mountain Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > 60M BxY: The three core galaxies re-establish contact with Andromeda and > > the > > Milky Way that were "lost" at about 150M BxY. This is a

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/27/2004 8:59:02 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 60M BxY: The three core galaxies re-establish contact with Andromeda and > the > Milky Way that were "lost" at about 150M BxY. This is a time of > medium-scale troubles. A zone of Ash forms in the

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/27/2004 8:59:02 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > . Cultural drift is inevitable. [So WT, > how does this further the plot?] > A blacksmith uses a drift to forge an opening where once there was nothing but solid material. The trick is to not make

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/27/2004 8:28:59 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Also, when CA and GU2 seem to conflict, I am going to favor GU2. (I have > very > mixed feeling about CA.) > A view I think everyone involved with the project came to have. GU2 is specifically for

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/27/2004 8:21:55 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Dear William: > > I dont share your enthusiasm for this plot twist you say DB is planning. I'm enthusiastic in the fact that I don't know what the plot twisr will be, if there will be one, or if in

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Trent Shipley
Yet more revisions. This time related to sundering-knitting. One snarky remark I am already starting to regret. -- Time-Line: History of the Five Galaxies[1] G = Billion, M = Million, K = Thousand; BCE=Before Common (Terragen) Era (=BC), CE = Common (Terragen) Era (=AD); BxY = before Con

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Trent Shipley
On Tuesday 2004-01-27 19:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 1/27/2004 6:13:59 PM US Mountain Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > 150M BxY: Social discord over redevelopment initiates Second Gronin > Collapse. > Permanent loss of contact with two Galaxies. > > [Four and S

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Trent Shipley
On Tuesday 2004-01-27 19:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 1/27/2004 6:13:59 PM US Mountain Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > 150M BxY: Social discord over redevelopment initiates Second Gronin > Collapse. > Permanent loss of contact with two Galaxies. > > [Four and S

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/27/2004 6:13:59 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 150M BxY: Social discord over redevelopment initiates Second Gronin Collapse.  Permanent loss of contact with two Galaxies.  [Four and Seven! Pay attention to the numbers.] Four Galaxies remain in c

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/27/2004 5:28:18 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >545 MYA: Diversity is artificially induced in many worlds, including Earth > >[causing the Cambrian explosion]. This is the last reference to Earth in > >the Galactic Library. > > It depends on DB. I

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Trent Shipley
Made some changes. -- Time-Line: History of the Five Galaxies[1] G = Billion, M = Million, K = Thousand; BCE=Before Common (Terragen) Era (=BC), CE = Common (Terragen) Era (=AD); BxY = before Contact, 0xY = year of Contact (= 2211 CE), AxY = after Contact; All years

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Trent Shipley
> > > 0xY /2211 CE: First Galactic Contact. Human explorers contact > > > Tymbrimi colonists. This was 87 paktaars ago by Galactic measure. > > > > Nope. > > So it needs to be 2212 CE. BTW, what was the date the first Cosmonaut went > into space. Yuri Gagarin was the first man in space on 12 A

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Trent Shipley
On Tuesday 2004-01-27 15:35, Alberto Monteiro wrote: > Some comments: > > 2.8 - 2.2 BYA: Progenitors rule the galaxies in what is > > traditionally thought to be a Golden Age. Mention of 13 Galaxies. > > Records extremely sketchy. > > It seems that what is implied by the text of Contact Aliens is

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Some comments: > 2.8 - 2.2 BYA: Progenitors rule the galaxies in what is > traditionally thought to be a Golden Age. Mention of 13 Galaxies. > Records extremely sketchy. > It seems that what is implied by the text of Contact Aliens is that _early_ in this period Galaxy 1 and Galaxy 2 became link

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-27 Thread Russell Chapman
e of space exploration. It just shows that in some point in the 1980s there was a "cusp" event that separated the Uplift Timeline from ours :-) We can only speculate on _what_ we did wrong. Did the USSR fall too early? We'd stopped before then... For Trent - people in 1902 would have th

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-26 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/26/2004 7:29:31 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > don't think it's absurd - it depends on the rate of space exploration. It > just shows that in some point in the 1980s there was a "cusp" event > that separated

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-26 Thread Alberto Monteiro
of space exploration. It just shows that in some point in the 1980s there was a "cusp" event that separated the Uplift Timeline from ours :-) Remember that in the Uplift story, there was an "Indian Summer" at the end of the XX century, where space exploration boosted with the fou

Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-25 Thread Steve Sloan II
Trent Shipley wrote: > 620 MYA: The ecologically insensitive "Lions" dominate the > Galaxies. Ash spreads through 30% of Galaxy One and 20% of > Galaxy Two. Complex sea life on Earth. I think I remember the Cambrian Explosion being closer to 560 MYA, but it's been a while since I read about it. >

Re: Uplift Timeline

2004-01-25 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Trent Shipley wrote: > > Before do a write-up I needed some dates, so I re-collated the timeline. > > Let me know what you think. > I have just returned from a week-long vacation trip, and I have 2028 e-mails to read O:-) But I promise I will take a look at the data asap. Alberto Monteiro __

Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-20 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/20/2004 9:31:48 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > But I do know that as presented in Contacting Aliens, Earth's entire age of > > dinosaurs occured outside of the current Galactic Civilization. > > What do you mean by "outside"? > The galacti

Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-20 Thread Trent Shipley
On Tuesday 2004-01-20 20:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 1/20/2004 8:04:38 PM US Mountain Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Lost track of which galaxy is which number here. I didn't so much loose track of each Galaxy as give up on tracking them. I just tried to kee

Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-20 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/20/2004 8:04:38 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 280 AxY: [Streaker arrives on Jijo? SS] Transfer point network disrupted; > many > layers of hyperspace impassible or lethal. All contact lost with Galaxy > Four. Strangely altered Streaker appea

Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-20 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/20/2004 8:04:38 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lost track of which galaxy is which number here. Just in case... > > 141 MYA: [Contacting Aliens entry ignored.] > I don't have a copy handy. I don't remember which entry this is. But I do know th

Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-20 Thread Trent Shipley
On Monday 2004-01-19 01:55, The Fool wrote: > > From: Trent Shipley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > 12 MYA: The last recorded "wolfling" race, the Paranaj, is discovered. > > Within > > > 1000 years it is extinct. > > > > 52 KYA: The last recorded "wolfling" race, the Paranaj, is discovered. > > Within

Re: Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-19 Thread The Fool
> From: Trent Shipley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 12 MYA: The last recorded "wolfling" race, the Paranaj, is discovered. Within > 1000 years it is extinct. > 52 KYA: The last recorded "wolfling" race, the Paranaj, is discovered. Within > a thousand years, it is extinct. __

Uplift Timeline (was Tg Territories)

2004-01-18 Thread Trent Shipley
Dear Alberto: The new colony will be an A+/B- world in orbit around Alpha Centuri A. It will be called Easter. Its residents will be called 'Pascuans'. Before do a write-up I needed some dates, so I re-collated the timeline. Let me know what you think. 1) I got my old timeline and fixed it.