Re: Habitable Planets: was Notes on Uplift

2004-01-10 Thread Trent Shipley
On Friday 2004-01-09 05:34, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
 Trent Shipley wrote:
  If there are 2M inhabited planets then there are 14M fallow planets.
  At any given time there must be a total of 16M habitable planets.
 
  Ok, 700ky, or 1My, don't change the final numbers very much
 

  -Total O-2 habitable planets now
  --- leased:fallow
  --- natural:terraformed
  --- proportion of A, B, C and homeworld leases.
  --- Mean number of planets per citizen race
  --- fairness in distributing leases.

 I also think we came to some figures here.

2M *leased* planets, about 10 per citizen race.  No comments on the ratio of 
terraformed to natural or what kinds of leases.


  With regard to planets I visit:
  http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html

 Some of the factors in Drake's equation are still _extremely_ innacurate.

  N = N* fp ne fl fi fc fL
 
  N: communicating life.
  N*: number of stars, site suggests 100 * 10^9 for Milky Way alone
  fp: fraction of stars with planets

 Seems close to 1 :-)

  ne: number of planets where life can exist

 Seems close to 1/10^11 :-)

  fl: fraction where life evolves
  fi: fraction were intelligent life evolves
  fc: fraction that can and do communicate
  fL: fraction of timewhere communicating civilization exists
 
  Galactics will colonize any planet where life evolves.  fi, fc, and fL
  are irrelevant for calculating planets under GIM control.

 In fact, these numbers _do_ apply to Uplift. fl is 1, because the
 Progenitors fed the planets with life. fi is 2/[total number of species
 that ever existed] if you accept Earthclan's supersticions, or
 1/[total] if you are an Awaiter. Otherwise, this question is anathema.

  (Alternatively fi=1, all planets with life get infested with intelligent
  life. fc=1, all inhabited planets participate in Galcatic Civilization.
  0.12  fL .1 since inhabitable planets spend most of their
  existence in fallow.)

 Ok.

  Ngim =  N* fp ne fl
  N* =  100*10^9 per SETI
  fp  =  0.2 (conservative per SETI)
  ne =  1 (conservative per SETI)

 SETIst are optmistic fanatics :-)

  fl  =  0.0001 (pretty conservative, but then the GIM is only interested
  in planets with *complex* life.)

 fl can be any number :-)

  That gives us 2M *naturally* existing planets in the Milky Way controled
  by the GIM and 10M naturally occuring planets under GIM control through
  five galaxies.  If 4/5 of all GIM controlled planets are terrformed then
  we wind up with 50M GIM planets in five galaxies.

 Ok. But it's better to go back and set the Drake factors based on what
 we want to get in the end.

Excellent idea!

N* = 100*10^9 (that is, 1.00E+11)
fp = .75 (most systems have planets)
ne = .25 (few could support life, partly a cheat factor)
fl = 3.00E-05 (3/100,000 have life, entirely a cheat factor.  Implies there 
are a lot of terraforming candidates)
fi = 1 (ALL good planets get colonized)
fc = 1 (If colonized, the setlers participate in O-2 Civ.)
fL = .125 (7 times out of 8 a planet is fallow)

This gives the number of planets that could *naturally* support life in the 
Milky Way

N = 7.03E+04

5 galaxies

Total natural planets under GIM control = 2.81E+06

Total natural GIM leased planets = 5N = 3.52E+05

Natural/Terraformed = 1/6

Total GIM planets (B or C leasable) = 1.69E+07

(We don't count A class leases because they are in need of terraforming.)

Total GIM B or C leases at present time = 2.11E+06

Giving us about 11.1 planets per race, which is close enough to 10.






___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Uplift Parity: was Notes on Uplift

2004-01-10 Thread Trent Shipley
On Friday 2004-01-09 03:46, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
 Trent Shipley wrote:
  There are two sorts of instability.
 
  One level of instability is at the level of the lineage.  The other is
  the stablity of the inter-species political order.  Moderate or serious
  disparities in wealth curves mean that a lot of lineages die out.  Having
  lineages die out is not necessarily a problem for Galactic political
  stability.  In real life lineages are usually short lived--even in
  lineage oriented societies like the middle east or in Samoa.  Political
  instability results when MAJOR lines die out.  When the King dies without
  issues you get wars of succession.

 Ok. But it seems that in the Uplift Universe few lineages die, or there
 would be more aliances based on ancestry than on religious faith.

Why?

In uplift a races primary alliance is (usually) based on lineage.  Its 
secondary alliance tends to be ideological.  Lineage is small but strong, 
religion is big but weak.


  But it is _very_ unstable. I claim that the rate should be quite close
  to 1 client : 1 patron, so that _most_ lines would be mantained for long
  periods of time.
 
  Lets talk in terms of total clients uplifted during a patron's main
  sequence existence.  In that case a replacement rate of one under total
  fairness gives this histogram.

 Ok, I get your point without the histograms :-)

  I propose:

 So, you would have 35% of _all_ species failing to have a client? That's
 too much IMHO.


What about:

[  0- 20) : 0 clients 
--- some don't want clients
--- some shouldn't have clients (a form of uplift failure)
--- some get cheated out of clients (the Uplift universe ain't fair)

[20- 88) : 1 client
[88- 92) : 2 clients
[92- 95) : 3 clients
[95- 98) : 4 clients
[98- 99) : 5 clients
[99-100) : 6+ clients

Having more that 8 or 9 clients is quite rare.  

If I did this right it should work out to about 1.1 client per patron.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: TV Editing

2004-01-10 Thread John D. Giorgis
It seems like the editing reported it exactly how it is.

Dean plainly said that listening to other peoples' arguments for eight
hours would be a waste of time for ordinary people - because they can't be
convinced.

JDG

At 12:54 AM 1/10/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
http://blog.deanforamerica.com/archives/003038.html

TV Editing 

All day long we've seen the television news repeating a short edited
segment of a single line taken from a Canadian television show. Here's
the full transcript. The discussion centered around the pros and cons of
caucuses and primaries:

Dean: On a Saturday, is it easy for me to go cast a ballot and spend 15
minutes doing it, or do I have to sit in a caucus for 8 hours?

Guest: This is a good thing, though.

Dean: I don't think so. I don't have the time to do it. It doesn't get
people involved. It drives people out of the process, and leaves the
people who are left in the process -- the professional people who get
paid to be there. 

Guest: Let the people in the neighborhoods convince you, say...

Dean: They can't convince me. I've got my kid's soccer game. I've got my
second job. I've got all these other reasons that I can't do these
things. 

Guest: If that's the case, the 15 minutes you're going to devote to
politics in your year is a pretty perfunctory involvement in politics.

Dean: Not necessarily. I read the papers, maybe I watch television. I
form my opinions, I get to go exercise my opinion. But I can't stand
there and listen to everyone else's opinion for eight hours about how to
fix the world.

Compare this to the way it is reported on television:

NBC Voice Over: Dean even suggested the caucuses were a waste of time for
ordinary people

Dean: “I can't stand there and listen to everyone else's opinion for
eight hours about how to fix the world.” 


The power of editing to create a story. 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review

2004-01-10 Thread Travis Edmunds



From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:29:34 -0600
Cry ribbit! and unleash the frogs of war.

(I own a button with this on it.)

	Julia
lol That's so nerdy it's actually kinda cool...

-Travis kinda Edmunds

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/featurespgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review

2004-01-10 Thread Travis Edmunds



From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:28:48 -0600
Travis Edmunds wrote:

 From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review
 Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:28:44 -0600
 
 Quick question:  Have you seen Blade Runner and read _Do Androids
 Dream of Electric Sheep?_?
 
Julia

 Nope. Any good?
I ask because it goes back to the movie based on the book discussion.

Blade Runner is based on _Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?_.

The movie took all sorts of liberties and did a lot of really cool
stuff, and I'm wondering what you'll think of it all once you've seen
the movie and read the book.
	Julia

yes, that was a suggestion


You see, I'm at somewhat of a disadvantage due to my age. I'm only 21, and 
I'm only now beginning to immerse myself into the things I really enjoy.

-Travis

_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail  
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review

2004-01-10 Thread Travis Edmunds

From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:25:45 -0800


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Edmunds
 Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 08:15 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review

 Yes and no. I agree with what Jeffrey said pretty much 100%,
 but my point is
 completely different, rendering Jeffries argument's
 inconsequential.
*grin* I love being inconsequential.  It takes all the responsibility off 
me ^_^

lol That my friend, is an interesting statement. I hope you don't terribly 
mind if I use it my travels? As for the responsibility of this particular 
topic in the here and now, it falls to you. A question has been left 
unanswered...


If you
 specifically look at what he said, and compare it to my
 question posed the
 other day, you will understand my point of view.
Y'know, Travis, several of us did just that, and still didn't understand.  
That's why we asked you to elaborate a little. :(

-j-
I refuse to elaborate until such time as you, Jeffrey overextend yourself 
and answer my question. I have this strange feeling though, that you have 
already overextended yourself in supporting your own argument. You are not 
completely to blame however, as your points are good points. Also they are 
truthful, in-depth views of art and artistic interpretation. But they simply 
don't apply to what I say.

-Travis nothing personal Edmunds

Give me a man or woman who has read a thousand books, and you give me an 
interesting companion. Give me a man or woman who has read perhaps three, 
and you give me a dangerous enemy indeed.

_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail  
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: An interesting tidbit of information.

2004-01-10 Thread Travis Edmunds



From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: An interesting tidbit of information.
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:28:15 -0800


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Travis Edmunds
 Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 09:13 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: An interesting tidbit of information.


 A local author, Kenneth J. Harvey, who actually lives just
 down the road
 from me (Small-town Newfoundland) has been included in five
 Best of 2003
 lists for his latest novel titled The Town That Forgot How
 To Breathe.
Hey, there's been some buzz here at AMZN US HQ about that book.. I really 
should read it.

It's supposed to be a Stephen King type book, which makes it kinda 
interesting (waiting for something from Robertlol), especially since I've 
heard through various sources that many of the characters are based upon 
people from the local town in which he and I live.


 Harvey's book explores how outport Newfoundland is in danger
 of losing touch
 with it's past,
Wasn't Newfoundland where the CA government cut off all the shipping of 
food supplies to in the 50's, or something?  Some sort of economic embargo?

-j the most famous author I know is Alison Bechdell, who really IS Moe 
miller-
Ah.not that I know of. Besides I don't think it would happen. Especially 
since we joined Canada (aka CONFEDERATION) in 1949.

-Travis  the population is a mild few hundred where I live Edmunds

_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Fwd: What Not to Do During LOTRs

2004-01-10 Thread Steve Sloan II
Subject: [Larryniven-l] OT: What Not to Do During LOTRs
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 09:34:32 -
From: Nesssus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Larry Niven Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ln-l [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Originally posted:
http://stupidevilbastard.com/archives/2003/11/20/what_not_to_do_during_return_of_the_king.php
[Some Return of the King spoilers ahead...]





















1. Stand up halfway through the movie and yell loudly, Wait...
where the hell is Harry Potter?
2. Block the entrance to the theater while screaming: YOU
SHALL NOT PASS! - After the movie, say Lucas could have
done it better.
3. Play a drinking game where you have to take a sip every time
someone says: The Ring.
4. Point and laugh whenever someone dies.

5. Ask everyone around you if they think Gandalf went to Hogwarts.

6. Finish off every one of Elrond's lines with Mr. Anderson.

7. When Aragorn is crowned king, stand up and at the top of your
lungs sing, And I did it MY way...!
8. Talk like Gollum all through the movie. At the end, bite off
someone's finger and fall down the stairs.
9. Dress up as old ladies and reenact The Battle of Helms Deep
Monty Python style.
10. When Denethor lights the fire, shout Barbecue!

11. In TTT when the Ents decide to march to war, stand up and
shout RUN FOREST, RUN!
12. Every time someone kills an Orc, yell: That's what I'm
Tolkien about! See how long it takes before you get kicked
out of the theatre.
13. During a wide shot of a battle, inquire, Where's Waldo?

14. Talk loudly about how you heard that there is a single frame
of a nude Elf hidden somewhere in the movie.
15. Start an Orc sing-a-long.

16. Come to the premiere dressed as Frankenfurter and wander
around looking terribly confused.
17. When they go in the paths of the dead, wait for tense moment
and shout, I see dead people!
18. Imitate what you think a conversation between Gollum, Dobby
and Yoda would be like.
19. Release a jar of daddy-long-legs into the theater during the
Shelob scene.
20. Wonder out loud if Aragorn is going to run for governor of
California.
21. When Shelob comes on, exclaim, Man! Charlotte's really let
herself go!
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brin-L list pages .. http://www.brin-l.org
Science Fiction-themed online store . http://www.sloan3d.com/store
Chmeee's 3D Objects  http://www.sloan3d.com/chmeee
3D and Drawing Galleries .. http://www.sloansteady.com
Software  Science Fiction, Science, and Computer Links
Science fiction scans . http://www.sloan3d.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: TV Editing

2004-01-10 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message - 
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: TV Editing


 It seems like the editing reported it exactly how it is.

 Dean plainly said that listening to other peoples' arguments for
eight
 hours would be a waste of time for ordinary people - because they
can't be
 convinced.

 JDG

No John.
What Dean is saying is that the caucus' last longer than most people
have time for.

Quote:

Dean: I don't think so. I don't have the time to do it. It doesn't
get
people involved. It drives people out of the process, and leaves the
people who are left in the process -- the professional people who get
paid to be there.

End Quote

Therefore the caucus' are preaching to a mostly empty audience.
People are busy doing other things. Most of the people!

The most you are going to get out of the American public is a few
minutes of TV news and that only on *some* days. So basically we are
electing people on the basis of paid political announcements and
fifteen second soundbytes.
There are people who are politically active and others who watch tons
of news, but these people are such a small minority that they have
little actual impact since only the news junkies are swayable to any
appreciable degree.

So for the most part everyone votes along party lines and the only
movement of those lines within the population is due to the
application of soundbytes and the steady drumming of partisans like
Limbaugh and Fox News. (Or maybe even Al Franken to some degree. I'm
not sure how much impact he has if any.)

xponent
Sad State Of Politics Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review

2004-01-10 Thread Robert Seeberger


 You see, I'm at somewhat of a disadvantage due to my age. I'm only
21, and
 I'm only now beginning to immerse myself into the things I really
enjoy.

 -Travis

Ahhh.Well that explains a lot. G

There is nothing wrong with being young except that you are at a bit
of a disadvantage when talking to people who have had much more time
to explore the world.
The young think they know everything and are uninhibited in expressing
that.
Older people are much the same, but experience gives one reason to
have doubts that The Facts are set in stone. To me, they seem to be
set in silly putty and are waiting for a new days paradigm.

Please don't take the above as criticism, its an observation based of
remembrances of my youth. I think a lot of the older people here could
say similar things phrased in a quite different way. G

The present makes the past look different

In any case I appreciate the energy you bring to the discussions and
your unique point of view.

xponent
Old Enough To Be Your Father Ya Little Scalawag Maru
rob
G


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SCOUTED: Poincare Conjecture (Really) Solved?

2004-01-10 Thread David Hobby
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 
 Very good!
 
 In fact, so good I'll let you explain the rest of the statement of the
 Poincare Conjecture . . .
 
 ;-)
...
  I have a vision of producing a definition tree for
 the word homeomorphism, which I'll write as an outline:
 
 homeomorphism
  bicontinuous
  continuous
  open set (undefined term)
  inverse image
...
  And I'm sure I left some stuff out.
 
  ---David
 
 -- Ronn!  :)
 
 Who has his hands full on another list attempting to explain causality
 violation to laypeople . . .

No, I just do outlines.  I'm getting to like the idea,
since it shows just how much work it is to really understand
theorems.  And I'm carefully leaving out all of the logic, as
well.

---David

No, I won't define sphere.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


The Core wins Stupid Movie Physics Award

2004-01-10 Thread Robert Seeberger
http://intuitor.com/moviephysics/



The Core is a marvel. It has everything: common physics
misconceptions, blatant misrepresentations of physical laws, a
complete range of stereotypes, ridiculous feats of engineering, and
pure fabrication of scientific facts. The weighty or sad parts are
so inane, they made us laugh out loud. The dialog, plot, and action
are predictable, if not outright tedious. Yet, the bad physics provide
nonstop surprises. It's the worst physics movie we've ever viewed.
It's so bad, it's almost entertaining.
We meet Geophysicist Dr. Josh Keyes (Aaron Eckhart) as he's
demonstrating how sound travels at different speeds through various
types of rock. The scene plays as though it came from the memory of a
ninth grade physical science student who mostly slept through class.
It has bits and pieces of scientific facts blended with pure
concoction arranged in a dream-like manner

We see an image of an oscilloscope with squiggly lines from a
microphone picking up Keyes voice. Keyes correctly explains that when
sound travels into higher density material its wavelength increases.
He then throws in some pure nonsense about it also losing frequency.
He points a trumpet at a slab of rock and proceeds to play random
off-key notes supposedly to demonstrate some property of the rock.

This type of demo can show a representation of the sound waves
produced by musical instruments. However, the instrument has to be
played with a single continuous note. In such a demo, the oscilloscope
displays sound intensity versus time. To calculate the speed of sound
we would need distance versus time data. We're at a loss to explain
what Keyes is really trying to do but are forced to give him the
benefit of the doubt since he's snatched from class by federal agents
before completing his demo.

Keyes is whisked off to a secret location where he joins up with
fellow scientist Serge Leveque (Tcheky Karyo) and is met by General
Thomas Purcell (Richard Jenkins). It seems that 32 Bostonians have
simultaneously dropped dead in a ten-block radius for no apparent
reason, and General Purcell wants to know if it was caused by a covert
weapon. Of course, the military has been put in charge of the
investigation and everything is hush-hush.

Without examining anything, Keyes takes about five seconds to surmise
that the victims all died from malfunctioning pacemakers and the
malfunction was definitely not due to a secret weapon. We're supposed
to be impressed, but our experience with real scientists and engineers
indicates that when they're on-the-record, top-notch scientists and
engineers won't even speculate about the color of their socks without
looking at their ankles. They have top-notch reputations because
they're almost always right. They're almost always right because they
keep their mouths shut until they've fully analyzed the data.

Naturally, General Purcell is totally satisfied with Keyes speculation
and immediately dismisses him. Amazed at General Purcell's lack of
curiosity, Keyes sets out to find answers. After a detailed analysis
he concludes that the Earth's core has stopped spinning and is causing
the Earth's magnetic field to collapse.

Keyes is apparently the only one in the world to discover this fact.
(Where are all the compasses? Are there no Boy Scouts?) When Keyes
tries to share his results with world-renowned scientist Dr. Zimsky
(Stanley Tucci), he's rebuffed as a mere autograph seeker. Keyes
presses an overstuffed folder into Zimsky's hands and emphatically
explains that it has information about the end of humanity.

Zimsky appears to be in the wrong movie. He looks and acts like a
stereotypical 1930s film star. Naturally, as a world renowned
scientist, he is immediately impressed by having a total stranger run
up to him on the street and ask him to endorse a wild-eyed theory. He
not only accepts Keyes folder but ends up carefully studying its
contents.

Alas, Zimsky tells Keyes that his theory can't possibly be correct,
and Keyes ends up sulking in a bar with his friend Serge. Not only is
the future of humanity looking dim but also Keyes' chances for being
the first to publish the prediction.

Keyes' sulking is interrupted by federal agents who again whisk him
off to a secret location this time for a meeting with a whole room
full of top brass. To his surprise, Zimsky is there representing
Keyes' theories as his own. However, Zimsky has fallen out of favor
with General Purcell and the general invites Keyes, rather than
Zimsky, to address the group.

Not one to waste time, Keyes jumps straight to the bottom line:
humanity is doomed and will end in a few months. The cause? Deadly
microwave radiation will cook us since we'll no longer be shielded by
the Earth's magnetic force field or what Keyes refers to as Earth's
electro-magnetic energy field.

Keyes proceeds to demonstrate the effects of losing the magnetic field
by lighting the aerosol from a can of hair spray and flaming a peach
representing Earth. 

Ha Ha! At Last!

2004-01-10 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You see, I'm at somewhat of a disadvantage due to my
 age. I'm only 21, and 
 I'm only now beginning to immerse myself into the
 things I really enjoy.
 
 -Travis

That mean's I'm no longer the youngest Brin-Ler.  It's
about time! :-)


=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freedom is not free
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review

2004-01-10 Thread Reggie Bautista
Vilyehm Teighlore wrote:
  Or in Scotland you wake up with a blue ribbon tied

Debbi replied:
 I Dunno Wher Ya Bin, Milad, But I See Ya Won Firs'
 Prize! Maru;}

Funny this song should come up now...

There are a lot of different versions of that last line.  I don't know
where ya bin my boy, my friend, even changing the word order to Lad (or
boy or friend) I don't know where ya bin

And oddly enough, the song was not written by a Scot, but by an American
folk singer named Mike Cross, born in Tennessee and raised in the
Appalachian mountains who took up guitar playing after giving up a college
golf scholarship to follow his girlfriend to the college of *her* choice.
He picks up the story there:

 We broke up when I was a freshman. I'd given up my golf
 scholarship and even sold my clubs, so I had to find something
 to replace them. I think that's why I took up the guitar. I needed
 a new passion in life.

http://www.mikecross.com/

By strange coincidence (yet another example of list synchronicity), I just
recently purchased a used copy of Dr. Demento 20th Anniversary Collection:
The Greatest Novelty Records Of All Time.  The Bryan Bowers recording of
The Scotsman is the second song on the first CD of the two-CD set.

Reggie Bautista


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SCOUTED: Poincare Conjecture (Really) Solved?

2004-01-10 Thread Reggie Bautista
Ronn! wrote:
 A is homeomorphic to B means that there is a homeomorphism which maps A
 to B.  A homeomorphism is a bicontinuous bijection.

And that's supposed to help how?  ;-)

Reggie Bautista


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Physics Quiz

2004-01-10 Thread Robert Seeberger

http://intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html





77.5 %
Embarrassing

xponent
But At Least I Passed Without Study G Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Physics Quiz

2004-01-10 Thread Horn, John
 From: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 http://intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html
 
85%.  Not bad considering how long ago my last physics class was...
Did horrible in Basic Kinematics which doesn't surprise me.  Never
did well on that in school!

  - jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Physics Quiz

2004-01-10 Thread Michael Harney

From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
 http://intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html
 
 
 
 
 
 77.5 %
 Embarrassing
 

90% for me.  IMO some of the questions were poorly worded.

Michael Harney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Return of the King Review Re: my mini review

2004-01-10 Thread Kevin Tarr
At 01:13 PM 1/10/2004, you wrote:
Vilyehm Teighlore wrote:
  Or in Scotland you wake up with a blue ribbon tied
Debbi replied:
 I Dunno Wher Ya Bin, Milad, But I See Ya Won Firs'
 Prize! Maru;}
Funny this song should come up now...

There are a lot of different versions of that last line.  I don't know
where ya bin my boy, my friend, even changing the word order to Lad (or
boy or friend) I don't know where ya bin
And oddly enough, the song was not written by a Scot, but by an American
folk singer named Mike Cross, born in Tennessee and raised in the
Appalachian mountains who took up guitar playing after giving up a college
golf scholarship to follow his girlfriend to the college of *her* choice.
He picks up the story there:
 We broke up when I was a freshman. I'd given up my golf
 scholarship and even sold my clubs, so I had to find something
 to replace them. I think that's why I took up the guitar. I needed
 a new passion in life.
http://www.mikecross.com/

By strange coincidence (yet another example of list synchronicity), I just
recently purchased a used copy of Dr. Demento 20th Anniversary Collection:
The Greatest Novelty Records Of All Time.  The Bryan Bowers recording of
The Scotsman is the second song on the first CD of the two-CD set.
Reggie Bautista
The version I have has Lad I donna know where ya bin

From that story I wonder if any his songs are about the power of P.

Kevin T. - VRWC
Insert joke about child of a goddess here
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Physics Quiz

2004-01-10 Thread Kevin Tarr
At 01:21 PM 1/10/2004, you wrote:

http://intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html





77.5 %
Embarrassing
xponent
But At Least I Passed Without Study G Maru
rob


80%. Two of the questions I missed because I did understood the answer 
differently, but I dispute some of the others. Not that the answers were 
wrong, but the way the question read.

At least I got the electricity ones right.

Kevin T. - VRWC
My brother will get 100%, I hope
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Shrub's Conspiracy to Invade Iraq Revealed by Ex-Admin Official

2004-01-10 Thread The Fool
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/printable592330.shtm
l

From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was
a bad person and that he needed to go, he tells Stahl. For me, the
notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do
whatever we decide to do is a really huge leap, says O'Neill. 

O'Neill, fired by the White House for his disagreement on tax cuts, is
the main source for an upcoming book, The Price of Loyalty, authored by
Ron Suskind. Suskind says O'Neill and other White House insiders he
interviewed gave him documents that show that in the first three months
of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for removing
Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of Saddam's
downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping troops, war
crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil. There are memos, Suskind
tells Stahl, One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan for Post-Saddam
Iraq.' A Pentagon document, says Suskind, titled Foreign Suitors For
Iraqi Oilfield Contracts, outlines areas of oil exploration. It talks
about contractors around the world from...30, 40 countries and which ones
have what intentions on oil in Iraq, Suskind says. 

In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one in
a National Security Council meeting questioned why Iraq should be
invaded. It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of
it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,' says O'Neill in
the book. 

--

http://www.holocaust-history.org/works/imt/01/htm/t029.htm

http://www.holocaust-history.org/works/imt/01/htm/t042.htm

From the Nuremberg Indictments, Count 2, Crimes against peace:
All the defendants with divers other persons, during a period of years
preceding 8 May 1945, participated in the planning, preparation,
initiation, and waging of wars of aggression, which were also wars in
violation of international treaties, agreements, and assurances.




I Pledge Impertinence to the Flag-Waving of the Unindicted
Co-Conspirators of America
and to the Republicans for which I can't stand
one Abomination, Underhanded Fraud
Indefensible
with Liberty and Justice Forget it.

 -Life in Hell (Matt Groening)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 02:17 PM 1/6/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2004_01_04_atrios_archive.html#1073407288252422
65

Double Standards on Regional Bigotry 

Imagine if I ran an ad which went something like George Bush should take
his negro lynching, anti-intellectual, pig feet eating, sister-screwing,
wife beating... before the farmer's wife then finishes the sentence:
... KKK-loving, right-wing freak show back to Texas where it belongs.

Mine's slightly more over the top than the actual Club for Growth ad, but
it's no more incorrect.

Slightly?

This country has zero-tolerance for white-on-black race based insults.

That's the real reason for the difference.

Cultural steroetypes of West Virginia are just as permissible as of Vermont
in American culture for better-or-for-worse, and it has nothing to do with
your delusions of right-wing-media-bias.

JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shrub's Conspiracy to Invade Iraq Revealed by Ex-Admin Official

2004-01-10 Thread Kevin Tarr
At 03:16 PM 1/10/2004, you wrote:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/printable592330.shtm
l
From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was
a bad person and that he needed to go, he tells Stahl. For me, the
notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do
whatever we decide to do is a really huge leap, says O'Neill.
O'Neill, fired by the White House for his disagreement on tax cuts, is
the main source for an upcoming book, The Price of Loyalty, authored by
Ron Suskind. Suskind says O'Neill and other White House insiders he
interviewed gave him documents that show that in the first three months
of 2001, the administration was looking at military options for removing
Saddam Hussein from power and planning for the aftermath of Saddam's
downfall, including post-war contingencies like peacekeeping troops, war
crimes tribunals and the future of Iraq's oil. There are memos, Suskind
tells Stahl, One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan for Post-Saddam
Iraq.' A Pentagon document, says Suskind, titled Foreign Suitors For
Iraqi Oilfield Contracts, outlines areas of oil exploration. It talks
about contractors around the world from...30, 40 countries and which ones
have what intentions on oil in Iraq, Suskind says.
And there are plans for invading N Korea, Cuba, Russia, China, Japan, 
Columbia, New Zealand, Spain, Canada..any country you want. It's what 
the military does.

There already were Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oil, like France.

Kevin T. - VRWC
Don't let the facts hit your ass on the way out
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread The Fool
 From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 At 02:17 PM 1/6/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:

ttp://atrios.blogspot.com/2004_01_04_atrios_archive.html#10734072882524
2265
 
 Double Standards on Regional Bigotry 
 
 Imagine if I ran an ad which went something like George Bush should
take
 his negro lynching, anti-intellectual, pig feet eating,
sister-screwing,
 wife beating... before the farmer's wife then finishes the sentence:
 ... KKK-loving, right-wing freak show back to Texas where it
belongs.
 
 Mine's slightly more over the top than the actual Club for Growth ad,
but
 it's no more incorrect.
 
 Slightly?

More than slightly.
 
 This country has zero-tolerance for white-on-black race based insults.

Bullshit.  The Republican party is _built_ on confederate loving, racist,
bigoted, bible thumping fundamentalists in the south.  Republicans
couldn't win without the bigot vote.  Republicans like Rush, and
Buchanan, routinely pander to bigoted southerners.

---

I Pledge Impertinence to the Flag-Waving of the Unindicted
Co-Conspirators of America
and to the Republicans for which I can't stand
one Abomination, Underhanded Fraud
Indefensible
with Liberty and Justice Forget it.

 -Life in Hell (Matt Groening)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Divisional Playoff Pics

2004-01-10 Thread John D. Giorgis
Well, I went 3-1 last week after Seattle just couldn't seal the deal in
overtime.

As great as the Wildcard Weekend usually is, the Divisional Round is
usually a disappointment.   Since the modern playoff system began in 1990,
the home team has won by 9 or more points nearly 70% of that time.

That kind of statistic will certainly affect my picks this weekend:

Carolina at St. Louis - In the hey day of the Rams, John Fox's defensive
unit New York Giants were one of the few groups in the League that seemde
to consistently have an answer for the Rams' attack.   Fox is now
head-coaching the Panthers, and while my first reaction was that the Rams
would blow the under-powered Panthers out of the Dome, I see the Panthers'
defense keeping it close, the underrated Steve Smith giving the Panthers a
chance to score but nevertheless falling short of the Rams who have
just too many weapons.   Pick: RAMS

Tennessee at New England - The NFL loved the highlight films of Oakland and
New England playing in the snow at night two weeks ago, so they scheduled
the Patriots for another night home game this year.   On paper, the Titans
are the best wildcard team and New England has rarely dominated teams
this year  but I just think that they do not match up particularly well
against the Patriots.   I think that with Eddie George injured the Titans
will not be able to run the ball, Steve McNair will be forced into
turnovers, and on the other side of the ball I think that the Patriots will
be able to spread out the Titans defense and pass the ball effectively.
Only the cold should keep this game from getting out of hand.  Pick:
PATRIOTS... big.

Indianapolis at Kansas City - For me, this is the most intriguing game of
the week.  Edgerring James is getting healthier which should allow the
Colts to run the ball effectively on the Chiefs.  Peyton Manning has
already proved that he can pass the ball effectively on the road - just
witness the comeback at Tampa Bay.   On the other hand, the Chiefs have
gone from potentially going undefeated to being totally disrespected by the
NFL.Well, the Chiefs defense despite problems, is still solid and
their offense is still top-shelf.   Moreover, the Chiefs' special teams is
still among the league's best, even with Dante Hall cooling off.   So, I'm
going to go with my gut on this one as the Colts just seem to have an
aura about them right now with Vanderjagt setting the field goal records,
Edgerring James finally recovering from that injury, and Peyton Manning
exorcising the morons who thought he couldn't win a playoff game.  Pick:
COLTS  UPSET SPECIAL

Green Bay at Philadelphia - Speaking of an aura, how about the one around
Green Bay since the death of Brett Favre's father?Unfortunately, they
are running into an Eagles team that is hitting on all cylinders.
Although Philadelphia has some injuries, they are extremely well-coached
with two-time Coach of the Year winner Andy Reid, and they are like the
Patriots in terms of having waves of personnel to plug into positions.
Meanwhile, the Packers may be the weakest team left in the playofffs,
having really struggled against Seattle last week at home, and luckily
winning in overtime.   The Eagles should have no problem in this one.
Pick: EAGLES

JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 03:02 PM 1/10/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
 This country has zero-tolerance for white-on-black race based insults.

Bullshit.  The Republican party is _built_ on confederate loving, racist,
bigoted, bible thumping fundamentalists in the south.  Republicans
couldn't win without the bigot vote.  Republicans like Rush, and
Buchanan, routinely pander to bigoted southerners.

There's no need to swear.

I am just pointing out that the media would not tolerate an over-the-top
Democrtatic ad like the one described, due to our non-tolerance of that
sort of thing, whreas poking fun at Vermonters or West Virginians is
entirely tolerated.

Personally, if you want to talk about pandering, I'll talk abotu a party
that collects 90% of the vote of people of a certain race.   That's only
*possible* via pandering.

JDG

___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SCOUTED: Poincare Conjecture (Really) Solved?

2004-01-10 Thread Julia Thompson
David Hobby wrote:

 No, I won't define sphere.

And I suppose you won't define noncompressible and cow, either.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Right-wing press bias goes mainstream

2004-01-10 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 12:41 PM 1/6/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
 From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 At 08:33 PM 1/5/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
 No _YOU_ Are Wrong.  The article I pointed to Was Listed _Explitly_ AS
 NEWS, not as an editorial by The AP.
 
 I accessed your linke to the SFGate website, and found nothing that
 explicitly listed the story as news.

Because that is a link to the news story and Not the link to the AP News
Feed, which this story came out of?
 
 How do you explain, however, my links to the below stories?Do you
 seriously think that the AP had two reporters filing the *news* stories
on
 the same debate?   Isn't it far more likely, that the reporter below
was
 tasked with the news story and the other reporter was assigned to
 analysis?

Yes, the AP has on many occasions had multiple differenent news stories
reporting the same thing.

Rarely like this.   The often update and expand previous articles, but they
don't send two reporters to a Democratic debate in Iowa to write parallel
stories.   Sorry just doesn't happen.

And indeed, if you can't recognize that piece as being very clearly written
as an opinion/analysis piece, and not as a news piece - then I really
can't help you.I would figure that someone reads as much news as you do
would be more experienced in that sort of thing.

JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread The Fool
 From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 At 03:02 PM 1/10/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
  This country has zero-tolerance for white-on-black race based
insults.
 
 Bullshit.  The Republican party is _built_ on confederate loving,
racist,
 bigoted, bible thumping fundamentalists in the south.  Republicans
 couldn't win without the bigot vote.  Republicans like Rush, and
 Buchanan, routinely pander to bigoted southerners.
 
 There's no need to swear.

That's not swearing.
 
 I am just pointing out that the media would not tolerate an
over-the-top
 Democrtatic ad like the one described, due to our non-tolerance of that
 sort of thing, whreas poking fun at Vermonters or West Virginians is
 entirely tolerated.
 
 Personally, if you want to talk about pandering, I'll talk abotu a
party
 that collects 90% of the vote of people of a certain race.   That's
only
 *possible* via pandering.

They vote that way not because they are being pandered to, but because
the other party panders to the the racists.  The Republican party
requires 80+% of white voters in some states to win elections.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message - 
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry


  From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  At 03:02 PM 1/10/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
   This country has zero-tolerance for white-on-black race based
 insults.
  
  Bullshit.  The Republican party is _built_ on confederate loving,
 racist,
  bigoted, bible thumping fundamentalists in the south.
Republicans
  couldn't win without the bigot vote.  Republicans like Rush, and
  Buchanan, routinely pander to bigoted southerners.
 
  There's no need to swear.

 That's not swearing.

  I am just pointing out that the media would not tolerate an
 over-the-top
  Democrtatic ad like the one described, due to our non-tolerance of
that
  sort of thing, whreas poking fun at Vermonters or West Virginians
is
  entirely tolerated.
 
  Personally, if you want to talk about pandering, I'll talk abotu a
 party
  that collects 90% of the vote of people of a certain race.
That's
 only
  *possible* via pandering.

 They vote that way not because they are being pandered to, but
because
 the other party panders to the the racists.  The Republican party
 requires 80+% of white voters in some states to win elections.


As promised, my ex-wife replies:

The Texas Miracle  or The National Nightmare.?



References: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0102-07.htm
http://www.skirsch.com/politics/rodpaige/rod_paige_page.htm
{TAAS tests, Texas, HISD, Paige, governor bush, Rand report)
http://thousandreasons.org/(under education) What Bush has truly
done for education with relevant links
www.senate.gov (nominations) for dept. of education
News stories:
www.khou.com/news/defenders/investigate
www.houstonchronicle.com
www.nytimes.com
Keywords: Sharpstown, HISD, PAIGE, drop outs, Kimball, Cuadra,
TEA, Stripling.

For those of us in Houston Texas, who watched 60 minutes, it was
more than a news story, but a minor victory in the war for this
generation of children.
We are seated here in Houston Texas, birthplace of the LEAVE NO
CHILD BEHIND PROGRAM.
The Houston Independent School District , under the lead of Rod
Paige, Head of the Dept. of Education are responsible, for this
program built on lies and deceptions, in which children are
deliberately sabotaged for the sake of money.
Even when President Bush was Governor of Texas, he did not heed
counsel concerning state mandated tests, but willingly plunged our
nation's education system into a nightmare
As a parent of a teenager, who entered my alma mater of Sharpstown
High School four years ago, I thought my greatest worries would be
in protecting her from everyday teen temptations.  Instead, our
campus has been the site of a destructive and National battle for
our educational system.
With the help of Dr. Robert Kimball and our local news, the
padding of records( that is reporting of zero drop outs) and the
purposeful hold back of students who would score low on the TAAS
tests was exposed. This has happened district wide and is
happening nationwide. The main and only emphasis, is in performing
well on standardized state tests in order to receive federal
money. It is the system that is corrupt. Instead of financing and
focussing on basic education, recruiting and paying excellent
teachers and promoting students based on their courses and
abilities, administrators and principals receive bonuses for 
skewed  statistics on National Tests.
Justice was not done, HISD laid the blame on two innocent
employees.
This year's graduation class will be 150 out of 1400 that began.
Our campus is a cemetery/ prison. The more people talked, the
greater the censorship. Civil rights of students, teachers and
parents occurred without a wink of the eye. I don't think the
political careers of few people and their cronies who lap at the
financial trough of education are worth the future of this whole
generation.
They would rather put millions into spinmasters and propaganda
than fix the problems. Bush has no intentions of relenting. His
nominees for the Dept of Education clearly show his heart is not
with the children. ( www.senate.gov )  Nominations.
 This is not a Republican or Democratic issue. It is a national
moral dilemma.
The tax payers are overtaxed, teachers are forced out the door,
and our economy will pay the price of under-educated, forced out
the door youth.
I would urge everyone to educate themselves on this issue. Use
critical thinking in the year to come. If we turn our backs on
this generation, we will all pay a high price. Do not believe the
strawmen of  political attacks or racism. It is all children,
white black Hispanic that are being sabotaged. Do not believe the
high priced statisticians who are paid to skew figures.
Accountability starts at the top, with Bush and Paige.
Accountability to school districts who bend the law.
DO your research and write your senators. Find out what is really

Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread William T Goodall
On 10 Jan 2004, at 9:25 pm, John D. Giorgis wrote:

At 03:02 PM 1/10/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
This country has zero-tolerance for white-on-black race based 
insults.
Bullshit.  The Republican party is _built_ on confederate loving, 
racist,
bigoted, bible thumping fundamentalists in the south.  Republicans
couldn't win without the bigot vote.  Republicans like Rush, and
Buchanan, routinely pander to bigoted southerners.
There's no need to swear.
Nice to see you engaging in the list again.  Without different voices 
this list would be as shallow as that 'other' list ;)

Swearing? Where? I don't see any need for people to use coarse language 
on the list, but I didn't see it here.

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
It is our belief, however, that serious professional users will run 
out of things they can do with UNIX. - Ken Olsen, President of DEC, 
1984.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread Kevin Tarr



As promised, my ex-wife replies:

The Texas Miracle  or The National Nightmare.?
snip

rob
I don't know how much was hers, if it all was. I'm not arguing against 
anything written. I just want to point out that this has been going on for 
years under all leadership, as the point seemed to be. I consider the 
problem to come from 1960s (earlier?) when the DoE was created. The Federal 
gov should not receive or pay out one penny, it should all be handled on 
the state level. If the DoE remains, it can monitor individual states, and 
offer suggestions but not mandates.

The problem is money, not too little but too much. Too much for 
administrators to sit around doing nothing else but trying to figure how to 
get more. Too much for teachers and their unions to drool over. Too much to 
build gilded palaces and sports emporiums.

As the writer said, the tax payers are the ones feeling the brunt. I'm not 
saying I think I should pay nothing, but there aren't too many areas with 
so little oversight. Unpaid, nonprofessional busybodies controlling tens of 
millions of dollars. (And before anyone says I should do something, because 
of my job I cannot hold an elected position.)

Kevin T. - VRWC
Enough for now
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Ha Ha! At Last!

2004-01-10 Thread G. D. Akin
Gautam Mukunda wrote:

 --- Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  You see, I'm at somewhat of a disadvantage due to my
  age. I'm only 21, and 
  I'm only now beginning to immerse myself into the
  things I really enjoy.
  
  -Travis
 
 That mean's I'm no longer the youngest Brin-Ler.  It's
 about time! :-)
--

So who's oldest?

George A

P.S.  I'm 53 and would just as soon NOT win the prize.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Ha Ha! At Last!

2004-01-10 Thread Kevin Tarr
At 11:35 PM 1/10/2004, you wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:

 --- Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  You see, I'm at somewhat of a disadvantage due to my
  age. I'm only 21, and
  I'm only now beginning to immerse myself into the
  things I really enjoy.
 
  -Travis

 That mean's I'm no longer the youngest Brin-Ler.  It's
 about time! :-)
--
So who's oldest?

George A

P.S.  I'm 53 and would just as soon NOT win the prize.
Maybe the website could put up an anonymous poll? It could list the 
youngest/oldest ages and the average.

And I'm wondering, isn't Andrew C younger than Gautam? If he's still posting.

Kevin T. - VRWC
Sneaking up on 37
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Book questions

2004-01-10 Thread G. D. Akin
Has anyone read Kim Stanley Robinson's Orange County trilogy?  Are they
worth reading?

George A


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Double Standards on Regional Bigotry

2004-01-10 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 04:08 PM 1/10/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
 Bullshit.  

I wrote:
 There's no need to swear.

The Fool wrote:
That's not swearing.

Uh, does *anyone* here agree with The Fool?

JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Physics Quiz

2004-01-10 Thread G. D. Akin

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 3:21 AM
Subject: Physics Quiz


 
 http://intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html
 
 
 
 
 
 77.5 %
 Embarrassing
 
 xponent
 But At Least I Passed Without Study G Maru
 rob

Same score, but not embarrassed.

George A

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Ha Ha! At Last!

2004-01-10 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/10/2004 9:36:30 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 So who's oldest?
  
  George A
  
  P.S.  I'm 53 and would just as soon NOT win the prize.

50 + one day

And I do not brpth act the oldest.

William Taylor
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Physics Quiz

2004-01-10 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 1/10/2004 10:43:04 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  77.5 %
   Embarrassing
   
   xponent
   But At Least I Passed Without Study G Maru
   rob
  
  Same score, but not embarrassed.
  
  George A

75% and I have no idea why it was so high.

Nothing but rulers and marbles in high school physics class.

William Taylor

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Ha Ha! At Last!

2004-01-10 Thread G. D. Akin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 1/10/2004 9:36:30 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  So who's oldest?
   
   George A
   
   P.S.  I'm 53 and would just as soon NOT win the prize.
 
 50 + one day
 
 And I do not brpth act the oldest.
 
 William Taylor

--

A Belated Happy Birthday.

George A 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l