Kevin Tarr wrote:
> Kevin T.
> Heisman Heisman, who has the Heisman?
I don't know. Who's even in the running, anyway? I think the last
season I was really paying attention to the Heisman was when Drew Brees
was in the running at some point.
Julia
who knows which high school Brees grad
> > I personally find it annoying that when list members ask them to
> > take it offlist, that they seem incapable of doing so. (It's really
> > annoying to see Jeroen turn verbal acrobatics this morning while
> > trying to justify gross violations of netiquette.)
>
> If it is so annoying, DO NO
Deborah Harrell wrote:
>
>This is a lamentable situation. :(
>
>Since I have recently been deleting several
>threads/posters, I was going to suggest
>
(blah blah blah)
You know that suggesting anything to anyone is
useless, don't you? It requires too much faith in
Humanity to expect that sugges
rs, I was going to suggest that one way
to handle "dinging" was to publicly killfile, ie.
announce "I am temporarily killfiling So-and-So for
profanity/personal attacks/flaming." Maybe if a
person found out that X number of listmembers were
killfiling him/her, they would mod
In a message dated 11/22/2002 10:50:58 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Reminds me of the habit I was considering getting into, pointing out
that people are most likely to accuse others of habits they themselves
are guilty of. Kind of a meta-something, but meta-what? :
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Julia Thompson
...
> Reminds me of the habit I was considering getting into, pointing out
> that people are most likely to accuse others of habits they themselves
> are guilty of. Kind of a meta-somet
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:07:18PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
> Its not that simple. One can killfile someone, and then find responses
> to that person containing the very thing one wishes to avoid. One can
> killfile a thread, but unless one can stop thread creep, that doesn't
> work well also.
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: TO EVERYONE: Dinging Suggestion
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:27:50PM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> > I personal
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:27:50PM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> I personally find it annoying that when list members ask them to
> take it offlist, that they seem incapable of doing so. (It's really
> annoying to see Jeroen turn verbal acrobatics this morning while
> trying to justify gross violat
Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> I suggest whoever brings up policies for suspending people from the list
> because they don't like what they write should be the first recipient of
> the punishment mentioned in their policy. (Not sure what that means I
> would get for this post)
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: TO EVERYONE: Dinging Suggestion
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:51:24 -0500
I suggest whoever brings up policies for suspending people from the list
because they don't like what they write should be the first recipient of
the punishment m
I suggest whoever brings up policies for suspending people from the list
because they don't like what they write should be the first recipient of
the punishment mentioned in their policy. (Not sure what that means I
would get for this post)
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 07:44:49AM -0600, Ronn Blankenshi
AFAIK, we never decided on a procedure to handle "dings". Based on recent
events, I'd like to humbly submit a suggestion to at least prevent endless
back-and-forth arguing.
Let's say that listmember "A" "dings" listmember B.
"B" responds b
- Original Message -
From: "Ronn Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)
> And does your friend consider himself a professional person?
Definately. It was aft
At 09:50 AM 10/31/02, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Louis Couturier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)
> De : Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [ma
At 07:28 PM 10/31/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
>> And Neneh Cherry's song too!
>
>I'm not familiar with that one,
I heard it once in 1989 at an event in downtown Buffalo during the summer,
where a pair of amazing jugglers used it as part of their routine. I
remembered that I thought that the
>> Behalf Of Jean-Louis Couturier
>> If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of
>> the people gravitating around the director or VP.
De : Nick Arnett [mailto:narnett@;mccmedia.com]
> Hey! I've been both! (Director and VP of marketing, that is.)
LOL! And you've never e
Julia Thompson wrote:
> clarification of Peter Principle available upon request
Not necessary in my case.
The Principal of my school is called Peter
Regards, Ray.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces@;mc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces@;mccmedia.com]On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> In a message dated 10/31/2002 6:30:55 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Ding. Ding. Ding.
>
> [EMAIL
In a message dated 10/31/2002 6:30:55 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ding. Ding. Ding.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hired on the bell curve?
That joke was not fit for distribution! >>
Sorry, I'm just a standard deviant.
William T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ding. Ding. Ding.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hired on the bell curve?
That joke was not fit for distribution!
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brin-L list pag
"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 09:00 AM 10/31/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> > In older English murder mysteries, it's not
> >necessarily assumed that the gigolo is actually sleeping with his
> >client. (And now can someone help exorcize David Lee Roth's song from
> >my head?)
>
> And Neneh
At 09:00 AM 10/31/2002 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
> In older English murder mysteries, it's not
>necessarily assumed that the gigolo is actually sleeping with his
>client. (And now can someone help exorcize David Lee Roth's song from
>my head?)
And Neneh Cherry's song too!
JDG
_
In a message dated 10/31/02 12:09:24 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
> If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of
> the people gravitating around the director or VP.
Hey! I've been both! (Director and VP of marketing, that is.)
Ding.
Nick Arnett wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces@;mccmedia.com]On
> > Behalf Of Jean-Louis Couturier
>
> ...
>
> > If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of
> > the people gravitating around the director or VP.
>
> He
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces@;mccmedia.com]On
> Behalf Of Jean-Louis Couturier
...
> If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of
> the people gravitating around the director or VP.
Hey! I've been both! (Director and VP of
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Louis Couturier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: Dinging plans (was RE: test)
> De : Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [mailto:prutje@;softhome.net]
>
> > Male
De : Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [mailto:prutje@;softhome.net]
> Male whore, interesting idea. I always thought those were called play boy.
:o)
If ever you work in close contact with marketing, look at some of
the people gravitating around the director or VP.
Jean-Louis
Ha ha ha! Now, _that's_
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
>
> Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:30:10AM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> > > Erik Reuter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
> > > > dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:31:22PM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:30:10AM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> > > Erik Reuter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
> > > > dong
Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:30:10AM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> > Erik Reuter wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
> > > dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call
> > > them kisses (or ca
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 08:30:10AM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> > Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
> > dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call
> > them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the c
Erik Reuter wrote:
> Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
> dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call
> them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people who use
> them would mean "friendly", "promiscuous", and "real whore".
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
> I'd have separate scores for dings received an dings given. If Erik's
> codes are applied to dings received, we could have a code for dingers
> along the lines of "Tolerant", "Capricious" and "Opinion Police"
Now *that* would be interesting... ;o)
Sonja
__
--- Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
> Erik Reuter [wrote:]
>
> > I would suggest at
> > least 3 codes meaning roughly: "well-though-of",
> "somewhat annoying",
> > "real asshole". Dings could be any real number
> that people decide (but I
> > still think absolute minimum of 1 ding cost to
> ding someo
Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
>
> De : Erik Reuter [mailto:ereuter@;erikreuter.com]
> > Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
> > dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call
> > them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people w
De : Erik Reuter [mailto:ereuter@;erikreuter.com]
> Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
> dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call
> them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people who use
> them would mean "friendly", "p
Maybe we could also have things that decrease your ding number. Not
dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods? Or you could call
them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the codes for people who use
them would mean "friendly", "promiscuous", and "real whore".
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAI
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:56:42PM -0500, Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
> I'd have separate scores for dings received an dings given. If Erik's
> codes are applied to dings received, we could have a code for dingers
> along the lines of "Tolerant", "Capricious" and "Opinion Police"
Great idea! I l
De : Erik Reuter [mailto:ereuter@;erikreuter.com]
> I would suggest at
> least 3 codes meaning roughly: "well-though-of", "somewhat annoying",
> "real asshole". Dings could be any real number that people decide (but I
> still think absolute minimum of 1 ding cost to ding someone else), and
> your
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:42:36PM -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
> Ah, great idea, better than my subject: line idea! Also, instead of
Umm, I should have said, "much better than my formulation of the
subject: line idea", since I did not think of the idea.
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> h
x27;t be too tough. The
codes could be as simple as "1c1", "2c2", etc, something that wouldn't
normally show up in a subject: line.
This would be FAR superior to the dinging that has been described
previously, since each person can decide what they want to read (and
when they
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces@;mccmedia.com]On
> Behalf Of David Hobby
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 7:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dinging plans (was RE: test)
...
> Sorry, I guess that I miss
one, but I hope we can collectively arrive at minimal governance
> with maximum positive effect for all. And I'm sure that no matter what is
> done, some people will disagree about whether we have arrived there or not.
Sorry, I guess that I missed the post where the dinging
syst
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-bounces@;mccmedia.com]On
> Behalf Of Jim Sharkey
[snip]
> Do we know if he intended for the dings to be anonymous? Anyone?
I know! At first, that was the thought, but that was because DB borrowed
the notion from live chat, w
I've been looking through the source for the MLM the list is running on. It
looks to me as though it won't be too difficult to set up everything
*except* the actual effects of dinging on messages. Thus, we could try out
dinging without any actual effects (except, of course, for th
47 matches
Mail list logo
