Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-16 Thread freewire1
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:45:39 +1000, Russell Chapman wrote: Matt Grimaldi wrote: That being said, there really was no excuse for showing The Flintstones. I dunno - he had some pretty cool technology - way ahead of its time... :-) The Flintstones was very SF. With time machines, invisibility,

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-14 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 08:34 PM 2/12/03 -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote: Jim wrote: Haven't either of you ever noticed that her eyes aren't even? One is higher up on her face than the other. I find it *very* off-putting. Now, Alyssa Milano on the other hand... :-) Alyssa Milano, Shannon Doherty... Will no one

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-14 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 10:08 AM 2/13/03 +, Richard Baker wrote: Jim said: Now, Alyssa Milano on the other hand... :-) Does _Charmed_ have Holly Marie Combs who used to be in _Picket Fences_ too? Yes. -- Ronn! :) Almighty Ruler of the all, Whose Power extends to great and small, Who guides the stars

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread J . v . Baardwijk
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Miller, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: woensdag 12 februari 2003 23:45 Aan: Discussions of the writings of science fiction/futurist authors David Brin and Gregory Benford. Onderwerp: RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Richard Baker
Reggie said: Will no one stand up for Rose McGowan or Holly Marie Combs? :-) I will stand up for the latter! Rich GCU No Added Value ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Richard Baker
Jim said: Now, Alyssa Milano on the other hand... :-) Does _Charmed_ have Holly Marie Combs who used to be in _Picket Fences_ too? Rich, who found himself unable to watch it because the five minutes he saw reminded him of one of those Hallmark tv movies that his mum watches (the ones whose

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Ticia
Damon wrote: Steve Sloan II wrote: I'm afraid that miniseries might be the last gasp, since it was probably commissioned before Sci-Fi's decision to kill Farscape, and get away from actual science fiction. So seriously though, what kind of content is the channel going to have other than SF?

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Ticia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:31:24 +0100 Damon wrote: Steve Sloan II wrote: I'm afraid that miniseries might be the last gasp, since

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Miller, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] You're not allowed to watch? Lemme guess: you're married? :-) [I don't know who wrote this] Not exactly, but one a clear day, I can see married from where we are. Oh dear! Not even married yet, and you

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Reggie Bautista
Ticia wrote: So how come nobody else picked up on Farscape? Wasn't it co-financed by the BBC? How hard is it to find new funding for such an excellent show with great DVD sales and enormous convention merchandising potential ??? One of the reasons that SciFi channel decided to cancel Farscape

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:35 PM 2/12/03 -0800, Deborah Harrell wrote: --- Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't regularly watch the SciFi channel (I don't regularly watch TV period). So what kind of show is Tracker like (so I can gauge how far they've slipped)? Damon. Let me sum it up: Adrian

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 04:52 PM 2/12/03 -0500, Damon wrote: I like Adrian Paul (hey, he's really easy on the eyes, and his Highlander had that brooding dangerous-yet-vulnerable quality so enchanting to many females ;} ), but Gary is absolutely correct. Heh. For some reason he has no effect on me... Me

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:21 PM 2/12/03 +0100, J. van Baardwijk wrote: At 05:08 12-2-2003 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote: I presume you mean Shannen Doherty, late of 90210 and Charmed? snip She Is Easy On The Eyes Though Maru Yeah, well, you didn't really believe that anyone in the male audience of _Charmed_

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-13 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 04:08 PM 2/12/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: Deborah Harrell wrote: --- Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me sum it up: Adrian Paul - bad acting - nearly career ending bad acting Really stupid premise for series - alien, bad English speaking tracker looking for other

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 12:47 AM 2/12/03 -0500, Gary L. Nunn wrote: But the REAL icing on the cake is the new Tremors series. Oh dear God, please tell me it is going to be better than the promos that they have been running. I have little explosions go off in my head when I think about the fact that they cancelled

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Gary L. Nunn
Ronn wrote: I presume you mean Shannen Doherty, late of 90210 and Charmed? She Is Easy On The Eyes Though Maru That's exactly what I meant. That's what I get for sending email at 1:00 am :-) Gary ___

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread ValdivielsoB
I don't mind the 13th Warrior..that is KIND of sci-fi'sh...but Braveheart? Mike V. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't regularly watch the SciFi channel (I don't regularly watch TV period). So what kind of show is Tracker like (so I can gauge how far they've slipped)? Damon. Let me sum it up: Adrian Paul - bad acting - nearly career ending bad

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Damon
I like Adrian Paul (hey, he's really easy on the eyes, and his Highlander had that brooding dangerous-yet-vulnerable quality so enchanting to many females ;} ), but Gary is absolutely correct. Heh. For some reason he has no effect on me... Damon.

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Julia Thompson
Deborah Harrell wrote: --- Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me sum it up: Adrian Paul - bad acting - nearly career ending bad acting Really stupid premise for series - alien, bad English speaking tracker looking for other aliens Bad script Really stupid plots Bad

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 05:08 12-2-2003 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote: I presume you mean Shannen Doherty, late of 90210 and Charmed? snip She Is Easy On The Eyes Though Maru Yeah, well, you didn't really believe that anyone in the male audience of _Charmed_ were watching the series because of the *story

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 02:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel At 05:08 12-2-2003 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote: I presume you mean Shannen

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 14:23 12-2-2003 -0800, Jeffrey Miller wrote: Yeah, well, you didn't really believe that anyone in the male audience of _Charmed_ were watching the series because of the *story lines*, did you? :-) I'm not allowed to watch, no matter how much I claim I'm doing research into the

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 16:08 12-2-2003 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote: (Now, if there were just a button for the commercials you can stand to hear, but not to watch -- then I'd be set!) Closing your eyes during those commercials should be helpful... :-) Jeroen Simple Solutions van Baardwijk

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 02:39 PM To: Discussions of the writings of science fiction/futurist authors David Brin and Gregory Benford. Subject: RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel At 14

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
-Original Message- From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 02:42 PM To: Discussions of the writings of science fiction/futurist authors David Brin and Gregory Benford. Subject: Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel At 16

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Jim Sharkey
J. van Baardwijk wrote: At 05:08 12-2-2003 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote: I presume you mean Shannen Doherty, late of 90210 and Charmed? She Is Easy On The Eyes Though Maru Jeroen My eyes were pleased van Baardwijk Haven't either of you ever noticed that her eyes aren't even? One is higher up

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Reggie Bautista
Jim wrote: Haven't either of you ever noticed that her eyes aren't even? One is higher up on her face than the other. I find it *very* off-putting. Now, Alyssa Milano on the other hand... :-) Alyssa Milano, Shannon Doherty... Will no one stand up for Rose McGowan or Holly Marie Combs? :-)

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-12 Thread Julia Thompson
Jim Sharkey wrote: J. van Baardwijk wrote: At 05:08 12-2-2003 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote: I presume you mean Shannen Doherty, late of 90210 and Charmed? She Is Easy On The Eyes Though Maru Jeroen My eyes were pleased van Baardwijk Haven't either of you ever noticed that her eyes

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-11 Thread Damon
Yeah, SciFi Channel pretty much sucks these days. There's SOME light in the tunnel...March 16th will premiere the new mini series Children of Dune. I know I'll be watching... Damon. Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Qui desiderat

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-11 Thread Reggie Bautista
I wrote: Yeah, SciFi Channel pretty much sucks these days. Damon replied: There's SOME light in the tunnel...March 16th will premiere the new mini series Children of Dune. I know I'll be watching... Yeah, I'm looking forward to that, and we still have some new episodes of Farscape coming.

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-11 Thread Damon
are trying to get away from doing space shows, presumably because they are more expensive that garbage like Tracker (my apologies to anyone on the list who might like that show). I don't regularly watch the SciFi channel (I don't regularly watch TV period). So what kind of show is Tracker

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-11 Thread Steve Sloan II
Damon wrote: Yeah, SciFi Channel pretty much sucks these days. There's SOME light in the tunnel...March 16th will premiere the new mini series Children of Dune. I know I'll be watching... I'm afraid that miniseries might be the last gasp, since it was probably commissioned before Sci-Fi's

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-11 Thread Damon
I'm afraid that miniseries might be the last gasp, since it was probably commissioned before Sci-Fi's decision to kill Farscape, and get away from actual science fiction. So seriously though, what kind of content is the channel going to have other than SF? Goofy paranormal shows? Non-stop

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-11 Thread Gary L. Nunn
I don't regularly watch the SciFi channel (I don't regularly watch TV period). So what kind of show is Tracker like (so I can gauge how far they've slipped)? Damon. Let me sum it up: Adrian Paul - bad acting - nearly career ending bad acting Really stupid premise for series - alien, bad

RE: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-11 Thread Gary L. Nunn
So seriously though, what kind of content is the channel going to have other than SF? Goofy paranormal shows? Non-stop Trek marathons? Do the owners want to kill the channel as badly as they wanted to kill Futurama? Damon. Sunday they had Flintstones Flintstones: Viva Rock

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-10 Thread Matt Grimaldi
Robert Seeberger wrote: - Original Message - From: Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brin Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:55 PM Subject: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel When the Sci-Fi channel stated that they wanted to get away from

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-10 Thread Julia Thompson
Doug Pensinger wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: Gary L. Nunn wrote: I remember way back in the beginning when the Sci-Fi channel showed uncut and commercial free versions of science fiction shows. But then again, I remember when MTV used to show music videos. :-) Now there's M2 for

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-10 Thread Russell Chapman
Matt Grimaldi wrote: That being said, there really was no excuse for showing The Flintstones. I dunno - he had some pretty cool technology - way ahead of its time... :-) Cheers Russell C. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-10 Thread Jose J. Ortiz-Carlo
From: Russell Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:45:39 +1000 Matt Grimaldi wrote: That being said, there really was no excuse for showing The Flintstones. I dunno - he

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-10 Thread Russell Chapman
Jose J. Ortiz-Carlo wrote: I dunno - he had some pretty cool technology - way ahead of its time... :-) Cheers Russell C. You mean, all that stuff he did with just a snap of his fingers? That can only mean one thing: He's a member of the Q Continuum!! Well, possible, but I was referring to

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-09 Thread Jose J. Ortiz-Carlo
From: Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brin Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:55:55 -0500 When the Sci-Fi channel stated that they wanted to get away from the hard science fiction programming

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-09 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brin Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:55 PM Subject: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel When the Sci-Fi channel stated that they wanted to get away from the hard science fiction

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-09 Thread Julia Thompson
Gary L. Nunn wrote: I remember way back in the beginning when the Sci-Fi channel showed uncut and commercial free versions of science fiction shows. But then again, I remember when MTV used to show music videos. :-) Now there's M2 for that. (At least, I *think* that's the name of the

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-09 Thread Kevin Tarr
At 04:15 PM 2/9/2003 -0600, you wrote: Gary L. Nunn wrote: I remember way back in the beginning when the Sci-Fi channel showed uncut and commercial free versions of science fiction shows. But then again, I remember when MTV used to show music videos. :-) Now there's M2 for that. (At least,

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-09 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 09:22 PM 2/9/03 -0500, Kevin Tarr wrote: Double entendre? (Spelled it right the first time!) I know they are finally changing the name of the First Union Center in Philly. It's so easy to say FU center, especially after paying for parking and tickets. Furman University in Greenville,

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-09 Thread Julia Thompson
Kevin Tarr wrote: At 04:15 PM 2/9/2003 -0600, you wrote: Gary L. Nunn wrote: I remember way back in the beginning when the Sci-Fi channel showed uncut and commercial free versions of science fiction shows. But then again, I remember when MTV used to show music videos. :-) Now

Re: The rapid decline of the Sci-Fi Channel....

2003-02-09 Thread Doug Pensinger
Julia Thompson wrote: Gary L. Nunn wrote: I remember way back in the beginning when the Sci-Fi channel showed uncut and commercial free versions of science fiction shows. But then again, I remember when MTV used to show music videos. :-) Now there's M2 for that. (At least, I *think*