Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-12-01 Thread Julia Thompson
Bradford DeLong wrote: > > > > I imagine that the fact that Mary was mentioned in > >> this sentence might be interpreted as Jacob being > >> _her_ father and not Joseph. You know, translation > >> errors from Aramaic to Greek, etc. > > Were I an omnipotent omniscient omnibenevolent God, such

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-12-01 Thread Bradford DeLong
> I imagine that the fact that Mary was mentioned in this sentence might be interpreted as Jacob being _her_ father and not Joseph. You know, translation errors from Aramaic to Greek, etc. Were I an omnipotent omniscient omnibenevolent God, such translation errors are things that I would be

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-12-01 Thread Bradford DeLong
Nick Arnett wrote: It's really only a minority that believes wacko ideas such as dinosaur bones being a trick of the devil. But we live in a time when the more wacky an idea is, the more media attention it gets. I had thought that the "dinosaur bones is a trick of the devil" line was utter

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-29 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Bradford DeLong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Were I an omnipotent omniscient omnibenevolent God, > such translation > errors are things that I would be sure were *not* > made. > > But maybe he has a really weird sense of humor. The cats look at me in a pitying way at this point, then resum

RE: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-29 Thread Nick Arnett
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Doug > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 2:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated > > > Nick Arnett wrote: > > >

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-29 Thread Doug
Nick Arnett wrote: It's really only a minority that believes wacko ideas such as dinosaur bones being a trick of the devil. But we live in a time when the more wacky an idea is, the more media attention it gets. I know, I know, I wasn't really being serious at all. Sorry if it sounded like

RE: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-29 Thread Nick Arnett
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Doug > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 11:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated > > > Bradford DeLong wrote: > >

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-29 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:32:35 -0800 Bradford DeLong wrote: But maybe he has a really weird sense of humor. Well we already know that. Look at all the phony clues he left to make us thin

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-29 Thread Doug
Bradford DeLong wrote: But maybe he has a really weird sense of humor. Well we already know that. Look at all the phony clues he left to make us think that we evolved. And how he made us believe that there were all sorts of different gods running the show for thousands of years instead of

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-29 Thread Bradford DeLong
> I imagine that the fact that Mary was mentioned in this sentence might be interpreted as Jacob being _her_ father and not Joseph. You know, translation errors from Aramaic to Greek, etc. Were I an omnipotent omniscient omnibenevolent God, such translation errors are things that I would be

Re: jesus genealogy is evil, why it must be eradicated

2002-11-28 Thread The Fool
> From: Alberto Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The Fool quoted: > > > > 16 Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, > > of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. > > > I imagine that the fact that Mary was mentioned in > this sentence might be interpreted as Jacob being > _he