> On Aug 13, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Gauravjeet Singh
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
>> If possible do push your latest code before you go. Even for the
>> future, small frequent commits are preferred.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> If possible do push your latest code before you go. Even for the
> future, small frequent commits are preferred.
Regarding OGV repository
Since it's a forked repository (from
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> Thanks for informing.
Hello,
I am back now.
> If possible do push your latest code before you go. Even for the
> future, small frequent commits are preferred.
I will keep that in mind from now on.
--
Fear is
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> I have to go somewhere this week. And I am unsure if I will get
> internet access where I am going.
> So I won't be able to interact for few days.
Thanks for informing.
If possible do push your latest code
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> Keep your daily logs up to date, and also keep interacting about your
> progress and journey here in ML / IRC.
I have to go somewhere this week. And I am unsure if I will get
internet access where I am going.
So I
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> Screenshot part is done. I haven't used phantomJs.
> On uploading a model, we get to a form where we save model
> description, and upon saving that, we get to model view page, where we
> can zoom in and zoom
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> Have you read the post, I had some doubts that I mentioned in this post.
> I was eagerly waiting for your reply.
I read the post and I wasn't sure if you were expecting my reply on
them. I just considered
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Shubham Chauhan
wrote:
> 3). How's the screenshot thing working out? One way that I came across a
> while back was using phantomJS for the task. What is your approach for it?
> One thing must be taken care of here is, (in an ideal
Hey Gaurav,
1). Regarding the settingSwitch option, let it be there for now. Let inder
reply, he can tell you if we'll need it in the future.
2). Regarding the countModels thing, do go forward with the .count()
function, seems to be a better approach.
3). How's the screenshot thing working out?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
>
> Here it is.
> http://gauravjeetsingh.github.io/2016/06/26/midterm-evaluation.html
Have you read the post, I had some doubts that I mentioned in this post.
I was eagerly waiting for your reply.
--
Fear is
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> Sure thing, I, most probably, should start writing now ;) There's a lot to
> tell :D
> Also regarding milestones, I think I will spark a discussion soon.
Share the link to your post here, when you are done
On Jun 20, 2016 12:27 PM, "Inderpreet Singh" wrote:
>
> Your PR is now merged. So you have two successful merges.
Ah! Thank you :)
I am finished with my schema, and will be sending another PR soon.
If current code of branch seems good enough, I would like you to merge
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> Also, if you want to propose some changes to
> your milestones for the second part you can discuss about that now.
For discussions as usual, I am available in evenings and if I am
unresponsive on IRC and there's
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> Yes, I had seen the comment on github and have sent another pull request now.
Your PR is now merged. So you have two successful merges.
As midterm evaluation has approached I would like you to write down
all
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> @Gaurav
Hey Inder,
> I have merged one of your pull requests, but you need one more
> substantial pull request for commit access. I have commented for the
> same on github, just confirm that you have seen the reply.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
> Commit access is given after at least two successful pull requests / patches
> that are flawless improvements. Do you have any pending? If not, I suggest
> reordering your timeline to work on something minimally
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> It's been few days since you started on FreeBSD, any luck till now?
>
Sadly, no.
> You can also try contacting freeBSD mailing list and forums with
> specifics, if you are still having problems.
Ah! I would sure do
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> I was trying to get FreeBSD on my local machine.
> I spent a whole day on it, but no luck till now.
>
> I have gotten the FreeBSD iso file, and I was trying to make a
> bootable USB using it.
It's been few
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> As you would be deploying almost every week, so I think getting ready
> for that should be a priority.
>
> Best of luck :)
Hey Inder,
I was trying to get FreeBSD on my local machine.
I spent a whole day on it, but
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> Also I think this will swap my first two milestones as per proposal.
> My first milestone was code cleanup and second was deployment.
> Now I should start working on deployment and code cleanup will begin
>
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Inderpreet Singh wrote:
> Hi Gaurav,
Hello Inder,
> I will get working on reviewing your pull requests. However, till
> than can you try deploying the current code on a freebsd machine? I
> see that deployment is a major part of your
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Gauravjeet Singh
wrote:
> In OGV repository, I had sent two pull requests, which are still pending
> #34 : https://github.com/BRL-CAD/OGV-meteor/pull/34
> #31 : https://github.com/BRL-CAD/OGV-meteor/pull/31
Hi Gaurav,
I will get
For code clean-up (whosoever has the rights and will be doing it), I
suggest to merge last year's GSoC branch i.e. "GSOC2015-merged" with the
master branch (after some bug-fixes and testing).
Basically, what I'm suggesting is the following structure for the git repo -
'master' branch - tested
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
> Commit access is given after at least two successful pull requests / patches
> that are flawless improvements. Do you have any pending?
In OGV repository, I had sent two pull requests, which are still pending.
24 matches
Mail list logo