Hello Sean,
Looking at possible options, I think I could resort to using
FreeWRL to implement the X3D importer. Is this an acceptable option ?.
Thanks
Konrad
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The G
Hi,
My name is Robert Vines. I am a senior Computer and Information Science major
at faulkner. I was looking at applying for the online geometry viewer interface
project. I was wondering what this project would entail. I am working this
semester with php, html, and css. What kind of things would
Hello Daniel!
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. Essentially, we wouldn't have different
solution prototypes for primitives (as combinations use the rtweight
methodology for an analytic solution), which would make it easier to add
the table functions in the Object class, and the code would also be
Kalpit,
Implementing the missing functions for centroid, volume and surface in
librt for the primitives can be highly non-trivial. How about
implementing the "rtweight methodology" etc. fall-backs for every
element in librt where an analytic solution is missing? After doing
so you only had to ad
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
...
> Something to consider, you could even propose *only* focusing on this
> aspect for GSoC. What I mean is that you could spend time restructuring
> the rt dispatch logic, which is something like
> forAllPixels->shootOneRay->traverse
On Mar 21, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Djimeli Konrad wrote:
> Hello Sean,
>
> I have been trying to read up different license policy but
> I have not yet been able to figure out which could be supported by
> BRL-CAD. I have been looking at libx3d and freewrl which are both GNU
> Lesser Public
GSoC applicants,
For those of you that joined recently, be sure to read our mailing list
archives [1], especially [2].
With the submission deadline one week away, students please remember that the
application deadline is FIRM. Every year, so many students forget this detail
so I encourage yo
On Mar 21, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
> wrote:
>
> If a callout is warranted in the schedule, there should be several instances
> of “test, debug, document” throughout your timeline, but still not one
Hello Sean,
I have been trying to read up different license policy but
I have not yet been able to figure out which could be supported by
BRL-CAD. I have been looking at libx3d and freewrl which are both GNU
Lesser Public License and also Coin3D which is BSD 3-clause license.I
am really
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
> If a callout is warranted in the schedule, there should be several
> instances of “test, debug, document” throughout your timeline, but still
> not one big 2.5 week one at the end. That’d be breadth-first
> waterfall-style cle
Hello Sean!
I figured it would be better to get your comments on the doc itself. So,
here is the Google Doc link :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RgUDxU3x3IC1r9lba49IlKP9-wJ2PCgAbcwlj7wTlTo/edit?usp=sharing
With Regards,
Kalpit Thakkar
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Kalpit Thakkar wrote:
Hello Daniel!
I figured instead of sending you an attachment, I'd send you a link such
that you can comment on it.
Here it is :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RgUDxU3x3IC1r9lba49IlKP9-wJ2PCgAbcwlj7wTlTo/edit?usp=sharing
With Regards,
Kalpit Thakkar
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Kalpit Th
Hi there,
My name is Suyash and I am an undergrad at IIT Roorkee. I would like to
express my interest in the Online Geometry Viewer project. I am mainly
interested in the backend project, but I can work on the frontend too.
For the technologies used, the ideas page lists PHP and Python, and while
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Christopher Sean Morrison
wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Kalpit Thakkar wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry I'm rushing this too much. I am trying to develop my proposal
> for the Object-Oriented C++ Geometry API project and I want to include
> adding features like C
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Daniel Roßberg
wrote:
> Kalpit,
>
> some answers:
>
> 2015-03-16 6:16 GMT+01:00 Kalpit Thakkar :
> > Hello Daniel,
> > I have been looking at Andrei Popescu's patches and I tried to understand
> > the class design in core interface.
> >
> > According to my unders
On Mar 21, 2015, at 2:40 AM, Nihar Mehta wrote:
> I have attached a first unedited version of my proposal. Please suggest
> whatever changes you feel I should make. Or whatever infeasible I have
> included?
>
> 1.Is tessellation,surface trimming and contour refinement a provision in
> curren
On Mar 20, 2015, at 11:29 PM, Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa
wrote:
> I see. Then I need to examine this part better and propose a plan focused on
> this. I only have CS grad student like knowledge of CSG since most of my
> experience in RT is with acceleration structures and ray processing s
17 matches
Mail list logo
