Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC 2016 - BRL-CAD

2016-07-11 Thread Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Param Hanji wrote: > The other issue is that the number of partitions per pixel is not >> necessarily the same as the number of segments. IIRC it may be larger. I >> changed the patch to only copy the first partition per pixel. This

Re: [brlcad-devel] Take a look at new site and wiki

2016-07-11 Thread Shubham Chauhan
> > It is actually not a bug, that's how MediaWiki works. For example here is > wikipedia edit page. http://i.imgur.com/2QndAVJ.png Both "Article" and > "Edit" are highlighted. > If that's the case, then we should follow the standard thing precisely. We must keep separate lists (), one containing

Re: [brlcad-devel] Take a look at new site and wiki

2016-07-11 Thread Oleksandr Dubenko
How about something like this? http://i.imgur.com/vSst8AS.png It keeps things separated, clean and not overcrowded with tabs. Also in my opinion Tools and Account menus are right where there should be. One toolbar for all wiki option and tools makes sense and keeps UI clean. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016

Re: [brlcad-devel] Take a look at new site and wiki

2016-07-11 Thread Shubham Chauhan
The amount of overcrowdedness depends on the mouse click density in a particular area. Adding a dropdown for wiki options just increased the #clicks right there. Also the icons are unecessary. I would still suggest you to stick to the standard wiki design. If we can't move the "Edit" and "History"

Re: [brlcad-devel] Take a look at new site and wiki

2016-07-11 Thread Oleksandr Dubenko
> > There's this bug- http://imgur.com/dtcm9a3 Notice the second navbar. > Both the "Page" and "Edit" are highlighted. Minor issue though. It is actually not a bug, that's how MediaWiki works. For example here is wikipedia edit page. http://i.imgur.com/2QndAVJ.png Both "Article" and "Edit" are

Re: [brlcad-devel] GSoC 2016 - BRL-CAD

2016-07-11 Thread Param Hanji
> Hmmm. There seem to be a couple of issues here: > > The boolean weaving code expects seg_in.hit_rayp and seg_out.hit_rayp to > be pointing to something. These values are mostly used for debug printfs in > bool.c with the exception of bool.c:bool_max_raynum. So I changed this to > point to a

Re: [brlcad-devel] Regarding repository permission

2016-07-11 Thread Inderpreet Singh
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Gauravjeet Singh wrote: > Have you read the post, I had some doubts that I mentioned in this post. > I was eagerly waiting for your reply. I read the post and I wasn't sure if you were expecting my reply on them. I just considered

Re: [brlcad-devel] Regarding repository permission

2016-07-11 Thread Inderpreet Singh
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Gauravjeet Singh wrote: > Screenshot part is done. I haven't used phantomJs. > On uploading a model, we get to a form where we save model > description, and upon saving that, we get to model view page, where we > can zoom in and zoom

Re: [brlcad-devel] Regarding repository permission

2016-07-11 Thread Gauravjeet Singh
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Shubham Chauhan wrote: > 3). How's the screenshot thing working out? One way that I came across a > while back was using phantomJS for the task. What is your approach for it? > One thing must be taken care of here is, (in an ideal

Re: [brlcad-devel] Take a look at new site and wiki

2016-07-11 Thread Oleksandr Dubenko
I tried different variants like adding separator, adding space and separating them on different 'levels'. In the end I found that just separating and moving them (like on default mediawiki skin) works pretty well. Thanks for feedback. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:56 PM Shubham Chauhan