On Saturday 16 December 2006 16:41, Jonathan Henkelman wrote:
> First, since this post contains constructive criticism I want to start by
> saying that I think Lilypond is a pretty nice piece of software. A bit
> steep on the learning curve maybe, but excellent all the same.
>
> In terms of making
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Jaap de Vos escreveu:
> > I cannot test versions after 2.7.27. The newer versions indicate no error
> > in the compilation but they don't produce a ps-file and pdf-file. I
> > reinstalled the older version 2.7.27 and than I have no problem
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:12, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg schreef:
> > On Thursday 12 October 2006 01:53, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Thanks for fixing this; can you update issue #111 and add a fixed2925 tag?
Done. Should I mark somehow that I'm the one who
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 00:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg schreef:
> > The attached patch fixes this.
> >
> > The problem is that context::implementation isn't initialised. They don't
> > need to be, because quote and friends use non-transl
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 00:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg schreef:
> > The attached patch fixes this.
> >
> > The problem is that context::implementation isn't initialised. They don't
> > need to be, because quote and friends use non-transl
On Thursday 12 October 2006 01:53, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Marcus Macauley schreef:
> > I just upgraded to 2.9.22 (for Linux), and this bug persists.
> >
> > So here it is again (below) with the proper version number.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=111
>
> Erik,
>
> I beli
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 10:33, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Mats Bengtsson schreef:
> > really
> > well-defined which one and the program should definitely tell that that
> > the user probably has made a mistake and the program had to make a
> > decision on which mark to typeset.
> >
> > In your
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 23:54, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > You should use ly:clone-parser to avoid this problem:
> >
> > #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
> >(ly:parser-parse-string (ly:clone-parse
On Saturday 23 September 2006 17:49, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using LilyPond from CVS, the following snippet causes a syntax error,
> which 2.9.18 did not:
>
> /**
> testFunction =
> #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
> ;; test-data.ly contains music v
On Friday 22 September 2006 13:06, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Trent Johnston wrote:
> > Figures were able to placed above rests but in recent versions these are
> > now ignored. The figured is excepted (ie. lilypond doesn't complain) but
> > there is no figure printed in the output.
>
> I think the
On Saturday 23 September 2006 17:49, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using LilyPond from CVS, the following snippet causes a syntax error,
> which 2.9.18 did not:
I think the problem is my fix for music function arity: The extra tokens
inserted by the lexer may disturb the processing of \include.
On Sunday 24 September 2006 22:28, Graham Percival wrote:
> 2.9.18; the below music function works fine with three variables, but
> adding "four" produces the output below. I'm guessing this is a parser
> issue?
I committed my fix for music arity last Friday, so your code should work with
latest
On Monday 19 June 2006 03:21, Paul Scott wrote:
> This used to work in 2.8:
>
> \version "2.9.9"
>
> KeyG = \key g \major
>
> { \KeyG a'' b'' g'' a'' }
>
>
> Have any keywords been added or something that would break this?
This is now fixed in CVS. Thanks!
--
Erik
_
On Friday 02 June 2006 09:19, Mark Dewey wrote:
> When doing the following:
> <<{d'2.} \\ {c'2}>>
> The dot on d'2 is partially blocked by the note head of c'2.
> This problem does not occur with the following, however:
> <<{d'2.} {c'2}>>
> But, the first method is preferable when doing each part s
Hi,
I haven't had the time to catch up with all the bugs that have been reported
over the past few weeks. This is largely because of Real Life issues (i.e., I
haven't had time). Furthermore, I will start a new job next week, which will
further restrict my lilypond time.
I have concluded that t
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 13.54, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> In light of this suprising you and the idea that relative means
> >> relative to something I might suggest that there be no default and
> >> that not specifying a starting point be an error.
> >
> > Yep.
>
> This i
ng like:
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'average-spacing-wishes = ##f
I think the problem appears because key signatures have different widths.
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bu
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08.59, Trent Johnston wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> I think I worked out the problem I had
>
> #(set-paper-size "a4")
>
> also in the paper block. Once I removed it line-width worked perfectly
> again.
>
> I haven't read anything in the manaul that setting the paper size would
> st
g e.g. section 10.1. Perhaps this change
should be mentioned in NEWS?
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-lilypond ma
the problem, is presented. "Minimal"
usually means <= 2 bars; I checked (3) above using the following example:
{
#(set-octavation 1) % begin 8va bracket
c1 \break c1
#(set-octavation 0) % end 8va bracket
}
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
On Monday 27 February 2006 15.04, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Monday 20 February 2006 01.13, Trent Johnston wrote:
> > > On Sunday 12 February 2006 12.03, Trent Johnston wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I've found a bug with lyrics using bot
On Monday 13 March 2006 11.04, Trent Johnston wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've got an update on the line-width problem.
>
> I't works fine when I directly input it into a score
>
> \paper { line-width=18.5\cm}
>
> But when used in an separate file using:
>
> \paper { \include "paper.ly" }
>
> Line-width
5. At the start of the second line, the multimeasure rests look
> strange. Why is the 21-bar rest so much shorter than the 20-bar
> rest? I would expect it to be the same length.
This bug is fixed in 2.7.38.
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
ht
On Friday 21 October 2005 19.55, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Friday 21 October 2005 16.37, Edward Neeman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > When PianoStaves are hidden in a system, the
> > Instrument names seem to behave in weird ways. In the
> > following example the Piano
ing of the fingering above the notes looks awful. It will actually
> give you a headache to read too much scale like that. The height should
> not be affected by the presence of a chromatic sign.
Hi,
The bug is fixed in 2.7.38. Thanks!
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lily
, in
process_include
return do_file (name)
File "/home/erik/lily/lilypond/scripts/out/lilypond-book", line 1566, in
do_file
input_fullname = os.read_pipe ('kpsewhich ' + input_filename).read()[:-1]
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'read_pip
\relative c'' { c4 r4 cis2 }
\relative c' { c4 r2 fis4 }
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-lilypond maili
On Sunday 12 March 2006 16.21, Annette R. Giesbrecht wrote:
> I find that even though the example works okay, the log file contains many
> lines with the following "programming error" Inf or NaN encountered
> continuing, cross fingers. (or) programming error: Insane offset
> continuing, cross fing
On Monday 27 February 2006 01.18, Joe Neeman wrote:
> In the attached example, I think that all the accents should be below
> the beam. Is this a bug or intentional behaviour?
It's a bug, and it's a critical one.
Here's a condensed version:
\version "2.7.36"
\layout {ragged-right=##t }
\relativ
On Friday 03 March 2006 12.04, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed some bugs in lily-book in recent CVS:
> > - invoking the script with no parameters doesn't work (ly.help doesn't
> > exist) - --warranty doe
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 09.34, Tiago Morin wrote:
> Congratulations for your wonderfull program.
>
> I supose I found a bug: these two line of scores should give the same
> output. this would avoid a seldom 3voice tempo to have 3 voice score all
> the time.
>
> \version "2.6.3"
>
> \score {
> \tim
Agreed, this looks like a release-critical bug (unless it's intentional?)
A slightly shorter example:
\layout{ragged-right=##t}
\relative {
e8[ dis e dis]
}
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
#x27;4\rest
\override Rest #'direction = #'1 c''4\rest
}
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-l
\new Staff c''4
\new Staff c''4
>>
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-
Hi,
I noticed some bugs in lily-book in recent CVS:
- invoking the script with no parameters doesn't work (ly.help doesn't exist)
- --warranty does not work (no dest= in the add_option call).
--
Erik
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
On Monday 27 February 2006 11.24, liang seng wrote:
> Hi, I would like to report a bug regarding instrument names when using
> Lilypond 2.7.36 for Windows XP. In the pdf file, the instrument names are
> not vertically aligned even though both use the center-align command in
> markup for instrument
On Sunday 26 February 2006 20.41, Andrzej Kopec wrote:
> Lyrics context inherits InstrumentName from its parent context and EXTENT.
That's the way properties work. You need to explicitly set the instrument
names in lyrics contexts to '() if ChoirStaff has an
instrument_name_engraver. Hint: Chec
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 03.34, liang seng wrote:
> Hi, but this doesn't happen in previous versions (2.7.29), where regardless
> of how many lines an instrument name has per staff using center-align, they
> are always vertically aligned with other instrument names from different
> staves of the
place and putting \unset PianoStaff.instr,
> and further \set PianoStaff.instr = "somethig" again. (I could be annoying
> with bigger scores).
Hi,
This is a known bug, hara-kiri-pianostaff-instr.ly in bug CVS. I marked it as
polular.
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of t
Hi,
input/mutopia/F.Schubert/standchen.ly is broken.
The file contains the following incorrect syntax; I don't understand
what the intended meaning is (I guess convert-ly did something bad):
#(override-auto-beam-setting
'(begin * * * *) @var{a} @var{b}
The error has been th
Hi,
The following code:
\version "2.7.36"
\displayLilyMusic {
c \applyContext #(lambda (c) '()) d
}
gives the following error:
GNU LilyPond 2.7.36
Processing `foo.ly'
Parsing.../home/erik/lily/lilypond/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/display-lily.scm:91:47:
In procedure let in expression (proc
Hi,
the following:
\version "2.7.36"
#(define bar '(() () () ()))
#(foo)
{ c }
%%%5
gives the following error, with incorrect line/column numbers.
GNU LilyPond 2.7.36
Processing `incorrect-linenumber.ly'
Parsing...incorrect-linenumber.ly:1:28: In expression (foo)
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 16.15, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> >>>beam-cross-staff-slope.ly: hairpin decrescendo collides with stems
> >
> > Agreed, critical bug.
>
> Not a bug; the test wasn't designed to test that; I've removed
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 09.06, Graham Percival wrote:
> On 20-Feb-06, at 7:12 PM, Steve D wrote:
> > The graphical example doesn't seem to accurately illustrate the code
> > above it. The stems for notes on the middle line of the staff all point
> > down, despite "\override Stem #'neutral-direc
inued volta brackets
The same known critical bug as the previous one, volta-bracket-break.
This leaves the following list of verified critical bugs:
> > ambitus.ly: no line between the notes of the ambitus
> > beam-cross-staff-slope.ly: hairpin decrescendo collides with stems
> &
test stable version 2.6.5, so I
> think it can be called release critical. If it can't be fixed it should
> be kept in mind to be a bug in WinXP version and be added to the bug
> database.
The bug will be stored in a bug database inside my brain.
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lily
On Monday 20 February 2006 18.39, René Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a little score with the word "Fréijor" in the header field.
> Running it through lilipond just works fine, but running it through
> lilypond-book and postprocessing with latex, dvips and ps2pdf, in the
> resulting pdf the
Hi,
When invoking lilypond --preview on the following:
%
\version "2.7.35"
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
}
{c}
%end
the resulting eps file has a few centimeters of whitespace to the left of the
score. This did not happen in 2.6.
--
Erik
___
b
On Sunday 20 November 2005 17.32, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 November 2005 18.44, Seng Liang wrote:
> > The vertical position of the slur is too low. It is lower than the
> > downward stem of the principal note (b4.). While this can be easily fixed
> > by \overri
On Thursday 12 January 2006 12.25, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 20.05, Eduardo Vieira wrote:
> > Hello developers,
> >
> > I was checking a song I had downloaded and detected that the hooks of the
> > dotted 8th-notes in the 2nd and 4th measure co
On Saturday 10 December 2005 17.57, Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
> The placement of the staccato dots is not correct, version 2.7.19
> windows (staccato.pdf).
Hi,
This bug is fixed in 2.5.35. Thanks!
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/c
Y-W0$7?1M[F#UR\K#R=
> MX?HC[V"*R+M]\CUDT0:$C[R#KN3$?4!NOHL/@T=>F]]O!!BERWNFWD<[1VE5
> M*MY,`/ZU5C\/_Z;>[EMAIL PROTECTED]"1]S[)W>OXG+3_'D,+).`*5E\`$\UR[EUV
> MK]>M<[EMAIL PROTECTED]"81\U[>3Z7`&;I\O[=;[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>2]9YS4`S)W>0!31
On Friday 13 January 2006 14.32, françois VION wrote:
> Hello,
> I've notices that when you write "No" in any text variable, the output
> becomes "N°". The bug exists just when the n is a majuscule.
> Thank You and good luck ...
Hi,
this bug is fixed
gt; c e, f g a b c d
> %\stemDown <-- wrong stem direction
> e g, a b
> %\stemBoth
> c d e f
> g f e d c b a g
> e' d c b a g f e
> f e d c b g a b
> c4 d8 e f g a b
> c4 r
> \stemUp
> 2
> r}}
> }
>
> \score {
> \context Staff <<
&g
On Monday 17 January 2005 02.53, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 December 2004 03.23, Richard Schoeller wrote:
> > I've been running into some issues with percent repeats and want to see
> > if there are suggestions.
...
> > The final thing is a bug. And I ha
On Sunday 19 February 2006 13.42, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> > The lowest-priority bug in the history of the project ...
>
> but it got fixed today anyway :)
There's the same problem with darkyellow/darkcyan also. I fixed it.
--
Erik
gmentation fault
By randomly manipulating the input, the crash can be made to happen as early
as:
Processing `foo.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music... *** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption:
0x08616db0 ***
Aborted
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http:/
ixed in version 2.7.35. Thanks!
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http:
On Friday 10 February 2006 11.37, Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
> \markup in staff.instrument does not work, produces no output.
Hi,
I can't reproduce (2.7.35). Can you verify that it works, or demonstrate the
opposite by sending a (prererably minimal) example?
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintaine
On Sunday 12 February 2006 12.03, Trent Johnston wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've found a bug with lyrics using both \appoggiatura and \grace. Lyrics
> are placed under the appoggiatura and grace notes rather than the main
> note. I've tried this in Lilypond 2.7.33 in both Windows and Linux.
>
> I've attac
On Saturday 18 February 2006 14.57, Aurélien Bello wrote:
> Dear LilyPond makers,
>
> I've a problem using LilyPond 2.7.34
> on a Mac iBook G4.
> I'd like to use the \mark command
> to indicate tempo changes like "Allegro"
> But if the indication is very long
> (for example "Allegro ma non troppo")
| R1 | c1\stopTextSpan | \break
> c1\startTextSpan | R1 | R1 | R1 | R1\stopTextSpan | \break
> R1\startTextSpan | R1 | R1 | R1 | R1\stopTextSpan | \break
> }
>
> \paper {
> indent = 0.0\mm
> raggedright = ##t
> }
> }
>
> % EOF
>
--
Erik Sandbe
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 10.29, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2004 02.00, Rob V wrote:
> > Mats,
> >
> > I think I may have not explained it correctly. I didn't mean the bar
> > numbers, but the numbers that indicate each verse of the lyri
On Monday 13 February 2006 10.35, Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
> Using two voices in the staff shifts the instrument name down one
> space.
> Deleting the second voice gives correct output.
Hi,
This seems to be fixed in 2.7.35. Can you please verify?
--
Erik
__
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 15.22, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > The problem is that also the \set directive seems to happen at the same
> > place as the
> > first syllable, which is too late. A workaround, of course, is to use
> > \with:
> >
> >
> > The problem is the same in
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 12.37, Eduardo Vieira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When the difference beteween notes of two different voices are bigger than
> an octave, then \partcombine don't combine such notes. Has this behavior
> been already reported?
That's the intended beha
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 10.39, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > convert-ly does not work
>
> What does that mean, bug report please?
I saw that he reported that already, subject "convert-ly error in 2.7.32
Windows"
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 08.54, Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
> 2.7.32 on windows: linewidth and leftmargin do not work.
>
> Is it a bug or did I miss something?
Try convert-ly.
From the .32 release announcement:
.32 contains some syntax changes: words inside the \paper and \layout
block are he
On Sunday 05 February 2006 01.45, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/lilypond
> Module name: lily-bugs
> Branch:
> Changes by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>06/02/05 00:45:52
> --- lily-bugs/bugs/c-clef-clef.ly:1.3 Mon Oct 3 08:48:00 2005
> +++ lily-bugs/bugs/c-clef-clef
On Monday 06 February 2006 12.31, liang seng wrote:
> Hi, I'm using Lilypond 2.7.27 for Windows 98. There seems to be a problem
> regarding the Mark_engraver property. Apparently, when Mark_engraver is
> used, it seems to disregard the
> \set Score.rehearsalMarkAlignSymbol property. Here is an exam
quot;2.7.28"
\header {
texidoc = "When interpolation changes the stem direction of a tied note, the
tie direction sometimes doesn't change."
reportedin = "2.7.28"
}
\relative c'' {
b1~ b4 a
}
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
ht
On Saturday 04 February 2006 13.39, Herman Grootaers wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2006 09:33, Erik Sandberg wrote: > On Friday 03
>
> February 2006 07.57, Herman Grootaers wrote:
> > > Ladies/Gentlemen,
> > > Maybe a bug or am I doing something (very) stupid, l
On Friday 03 February 2006 07.57, Herman Grootaers wrote:
> Ladies/Gentlemen,
> Maybe a bug or am I doing something (very) stupid, like not Reading The
> Fine Manual ( :=)) ) ??
You're looking for \fermataMarkup. It's mentioned somewhere in the manual, I
think.
--
Erik San
anged with:
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'average-spacing-wishes = ##f
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-lilypo
On Friday 27 January 2006 15.55, Thies Albrecht wrote:
> > Can you send the problematic output in some graphical format
> > (pdf/png)?
>
> Attached you'll find four PDF files containing the described behaviour.
>
> Example.pdf: Output from example code I've posted.
> Example (Fix1).pdf: ... variati
On Saturday 28 January 2006 11.02, Christian Hitz wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> in the following example the flag collides with the dot of the d.
Hi,
This is a known bug, c-dot-flag.ly in the bug CVS archive. I marked it
popular.
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS arch
inks = \context Staff = "links" \relative c {
\clef bass
f2 f4( f4 |
f4) f8.
\change Staff = "rechts"
g16
\change Staff = "links"
r2 |
}
\new GrandStaff
<< \rechts
\links
>>
% EOF
On Thursday 26 January 2006 11.24, Paul Scott wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> >On Thursday 26 January 2006 10.16, Paul Scott wrote:
> >>Erik Sandberg wrote:
> >>>On Thursday 26 January 2006 01.38, Paul Scott wrote:
> >>>>When running a very rece
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10.16, Paul Scott wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> >On Thursday 26 January 2006 01.38, Paul Scott wrote:
> >>When running a very recent CVS version (2.7.28) flats are remembered
> >>and canceled in the next bar - a sharp on that pitch shows
ber.ly in the bug CVS repository. If it is not the same
problem, can you please sending a working & minimal example?
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14.58, Thies Albrecht wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> Using Lily v2.7.28 on WinXP compiling the example below I get the
> following error:
>
> The stem of the last eigth note in bar #1, staff #3 is a bit to long.
Looks fine here, 2.7.28/Ubuntu. That stem is as short as it can
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 23.53, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> > It is a very serious bug, I can confirm.
> >
> > Bert
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to see scans of serious music, where there is a crescendo
> ending of the first note of a system.
The problem is that _diminuendos_ are b
On Monday 23 January 2006 22.21, Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> I get very ugly, too short ties. How to set the minimum length (as a
> workaround)? However, I think this should be automatical.
Hi,
Can you send a minimal .ly example? (preferably with raggedright)?
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer
ff \relative <<
\repeat volta 2 { b'8. b16 fis4 gis\trill }
\alternative { {
\grace a'8 a'4 r8. g,16[ c8. e16]\bar "||"
}{
\grace a,8 a'4 r4 r
} }
>>
\new Staff {
\clef bass
a,4
a, 8 r r4
a, r
}
>>
H
On Monday 23 January 2006 11.40, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> > Thanks for investigating this. What does the SVG spec say, is this a
> > LilyPond or an IE 6.0 bug?
>
> Looking at this page
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/coords.html
>
> and especially
>
> translate:
; note, and the open decrescendo looks awkward too.
I agree, especially with the decrescendo point. I'll let the bug stay in the
cvs repository.
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v
On Sunday 17 April 2005 12.36, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Hi,
This bug is fixed in 2.7.28.
Erik
> This clearly looks like a bug. The difference between the following two
> scores illustrates how the second alternative begins too early when
> the voltas are moved to the chords. The same bug happens i
On Saturday 21 January 2006 20.06, nullplan (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \new Staff <<
> \repeat volta 2 { b8. b16 fis4 gis\trill }
> \alternative {
> \grace a8 a'4 r8. g,16[ c8. e16]\bar "
t;
\new ChordNames \chordmode { a1 }
\new Staff e'1
\new ChordNames \chordmode {a1:m }
\new Staff e'1
>>
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
__
On Friday 20 January 2006 21.41, nullplan (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I tried to use the following code today:
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \new Staff <<
> \repeat volta 2 { foo bar }
> \alternative {
> \grace a8 a'4 r8. g,16[ c8. e16]\bar "||"
> }{
> \grace a8 a'4 r
t;|" %%% the bar should be numbered 3, but it is numbered 2
> %measure 3
> a1
> %measure 4 --- this bar should be numbered 4, but it is numbered 3
> f1
> }
>\layout {
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
>
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 23.58, Felix Hammer wrote:
> Hello Erik
>
> Today i tried GNU LilyPond 2.7.27.
> There no problem with "less space between TimeSignature and first note"
>
> Is it possible to fix these bug in the actual stable version? i realy like
> autopackage ;)
It will be in the stab
pace.ly:
%
%Andrea Valle
\version "2.7.27"
\header {
texidoc = "Tuplet number collides with beam when staff-space is increased."
reportedin = "2.7.27"
}
\layout{
raggedright=##t
}
\new Staff \with { \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #1.5 }
\relative {
\
On Saturday 14 January 2006 20.12, Eduardo Vieira wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently installed the version 2.7.26-1 and noticed that some changes
> were done on the way to handle the "fas" in usison. Unfortunately it wasn't
> fixed properly. Instead of shifting the notes to avoid collision, they
> should b
On Sunday 15 January 2006 12.16, Felix Hammer wrote:
> Hello
>
> I typed Handel Violin-Sonata with Lilypond. I have a little but annoying
> Problem with the space between the TimeSignature and the first note in the
> PianoStaff. There is no problem If i compile the ViolinStaff alone.
>
> Here is a
e one single bar
which demonstrates the problem)
Thanks,
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypo
On Friday 13 January 2006 17.25, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
> > > While in the second case, lilypond seems to be confused by the mixing
> > > of right-to-left (parentheses) and left-to-right (Hebrew) characters,
> > > so that the text line is "scrambled" (see attached "pdf" [1]).
> >
> > I don't know
On Friday 13 January 2006 21.34, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> If you want to concatenate two strings, one method is to
> set the word-space property to zero:
> \markup{\override #'(word-space . 0) \line {1\super st } clarinet }
>
> Of course, it's more convenient to hack together a \concatenate
> markup
On Thursday 12 January 2006 23.27, Gilles wrote:
> [The list moderator rejected a previous post with this message;
> so I had to remove the "pdf" attachment. Hopefully someone will
> be kind enough to try and compile the attached lily file, and tell
> me whether he gets the same result as I.]
>
>
;
}
\layout{raggedright=##t}
\relative
{ c8:16 e: g: c: }
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/bugs/v2.7/
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-li
1 - 100 of 818 matches
Mail list logo
