Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-10-06 Thread Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz
Stjepan Gros writes: > No need for coordination. When you release new version I'll repackage > it. It is far less job to do than to create package from scratch. And > if we find the error after you released 1.2.5 I'll add patch that will > be shipped with package until you release new version wit

Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-10-06 Thread Stjepan Gros
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz wrote: > Stjepan Gros writes: > >> I tried it and it was the same. >> >> I also tried to recompile package on CentOS 5.2 and gmixvm there come >> instantly. Turns out that this is something specific for fedora 11. > > Looks like that. It's

Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-10-05 Thread Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz
Stjepan Gros writes: > I tried it and it was the same. > > I also tried to recompile package on CentOS 5.2 and gmixvm there come > instantly. Turns out that this is something specific for fedora 11. Looks like that. It's not happening to me either on a Debian sid with gtk 2.18. Please, tell me i

Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-10-05 Thread Stjepan Gros
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz wrote: > > Hi again, Stjepan. I've got another guess of what can be causing the > initial disk scans, but, since i cannot reproduce them in my system, i > would need your help, if you have the time. I'll help, no problem... > Could you com

Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-10-04 Thread Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz
Hi again, Stjepan. I've got another guess of what can be causing the initial disk scans, but, since i cannot reproduce them in my system, i would need your help, if you have the time. Could you comment out line number 14 in the file mixgtk/mixgtk_external.c (the one with a call to update_config_(

Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-10-01 Thread Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz
Stjepan Gros writes: >> What are the two ways of starting gmixvm? Do you have the same problem >> starting (in a terminal) mixvm? > > Yes, it is the same no matter if I start it from CLI or from a menu entry. > I meant running the "mixvm" program, which is the CLI version of MDK's MIX virtual ma

Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-09-29 Thread Stjepan Gros
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote: > > Hi Stjepan, > > Stjepan Gros writes: > >> Hi! >> >> I'm trying to package mdk for Fedora and I'm almost there. :) > > Excellent! > >> The problem is that after running gmixvm it consumes much of disk and >> CPU resources. I managed t

Re: [bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-09-29 Thread Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
Hi Stjepan, Stjepan Gros writes: > Hi! > > I'm trying to package mdk for Fedora and I'm almost there. :) Excellent! > The problem is that after running gmixvm it consumes much of disk and > CPU resources. I managed to find out that it's scanning the whole > directory tree (either /usr/bin or

[bug-mdk] Bug in gmixvm

2009-09-29 Thread Stjepan Gros
Hi! I'm trying to package mdk for Fedora and I'm almost there. :) The problem is that after running gmixvm it consumes much of disk and CPU resources. I managed to find out that it's scanning the whole directory tree (either /usr/bin or home directory, depending how it is started). Attached is gdb