Stjepan Gros writes:
> No need for coordination. When you release new version I'll repackage
> it. It is far less job to do than to create package from scratch. And
> if we find the error after you released 1.2.5 I'll add patch that will
> be shipped with package until you release new version wit
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> Stjepan Gros writes:
>
>> I tried it and it was the same.
>>
>> I also tried to recompile package on CentOS 5.2 and gmixvm there come
>> instantly. Turns out that this is something specific for fedora 11.
>
> Looks like that. It's
Stjepan Gros writes:
> I tried it and it was the same.
>
> I also tried to recompile package on CentOS 5.2 and gmixvm there come
> instantly. Turns out that this is something specific for fedora 11.
Looks like that. It's not happening to me either on a Debian sid with
gtk 2.18. Please, tell me i
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz wrote:
>
> Hi again, Stjepan. I've got another guess of what can be causing the
> initial disk scans, but, since i cannot reproduce them in my system, i
> would need your help, if you have the time.
I'll help, no problem...
> Could you com
Hi again, Stjepan. I've got another guess of what can be causing the
initial disk scans, but, since i cannot reproduce them in my system, i
would need your help, if you have the time.
Could you comment out line number 14 in the file
mixgtk/mixgtk_external.c (the one with a call to update_config_(
Stjepan Gros writes:
>> What are the two ways of starting gmixvm? Do you have the same problem
>> starting (in a terminal) mixvm?
>
> Yes, it is the same no matter if I start it from CLI or from a menu entry.
>
I meant running the "mixvm" program, which is the CLI version of MDK's
MIX virtual ma
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
>
> Hi Stjepan,
>
> Stjepan Gros writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm trying to package mdk for Fedora and I'm almost there. :)
>
> Excellent!
>
>> The problem is that after running gmixvm it consumes much of disk and
>> CPU resources. I managed t
Hi Stjepan,
Stjepan Gros writes:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to package mdk for Fedora and I'm almost there. :)
Excellent!
> The problem is that after running gmixvm it consumes much of disk and
> CPU resources. I managed to find out that it's scanning the whole
> directory tree (either /usr/bin or
Hi!
I'm trying to package mdk for Fedora and I'm almost there. :) The
problem is that after running gmixvm it consumes much of disk and CPU
resources. I managed to find out that it's scanning the whole
directory tree (either /usr/bin or home directory, depending how it is
started). Attached is gdb