On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:48:30 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> wip
>
> make/RunTests.gmk line 357:
>
>> 355: $(subst .java,,$(subst .java,,$
ose instead. If they do not exist, they might be useful
> elsewhere and maybe should be placed in a common make file instead of the
> RunTests.gmk file.
Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
use test
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 16:20:18 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> Let me ask the obvious "dumb" question ... why does this have to be so
>> complicated? Why isn't the name of the test simply passed through to jtreg
>> as typed?
>
>> Let me ask the obvious "dumb" question ... why does this have to be so
>> co
ose instead. If they do not exist, they might be useful
> elsewhere and maybe should be placed in a common make file instead of the
> RunTests.gmk file.
Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
wip
-
Change
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:45:47 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
>> One can select a testcase by ID when running a jtreg test case directly from
>> jtreg (using the testcase.java#testID syntax). However, this has not been
>> possible to do when launching jtreg indirectly from make.
>&g
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:55:09 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> wip
>
> make/RunTests.gmk line 444:
>
>> 442: $(strip $(
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:45:47 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
>> One can select a testcase by ID when running a jtreg test case directly from
>> jtreg (using the testcase.java#testID syntax). However, this has not been
>> possible to do when launching jtreg indirectly from make.
>&g
ose instead. If they do not exist, they might be useful
> elsewhere and maybe should be placed in a common make file instead of the
> RunTests.gmk file.
Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
wip
-
Change
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:26:52 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
>> make/RunTests.gmk line 47:
>>
>>> 45: define IfPrepend
>>> 46: $(if $(strip $1),$(strip $2)$(strip $1),)
>>> 47: endef
>>
>> These two probably fits better in make/common/Utils.gmk.
>
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 06:50:44 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> wip
>
> make/
ose instead. If they do not exist, they might be useful
> elsewhere and maybe should be placed in a common make file instead of the
> RunTests.gmk file.
Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
wip
-
Change
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 01:51:20 GMT, Leo Korinth wrote:
> One can select a testcase by ID when running a jtreg test case directly from
> jtreg (using the testcase.java#testID syntax). However, this has not been
> possible to do when launching jtreg indirectly from make.
>
> This
One can select a testcase by ID when running a jtreg test case directly from
jtreg (using the testcase.java#testID syntax). However, this has not been
possible to do when launching jtreg indirectly from make.
This fix attempts to address this issue. I have not tested this thoroughly yet,
I want
On 29/10/2019 10:50, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2019-10-24 20:03, Leo Korinth wrote:
Fixes after suggestions from Coleen, David, Erik, Igor and Kim:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lkorinth/8232365/00_01/ (incremental)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lkorinth/8232365/01/ (full)
Build changes now
Hi!
I will add "cmsgc" like so: DEPRECATED_JVM_FEATURES="trace cmsgc"
Should I file a reminder bug for later removal of that feature (I guess
not)? If I should, at what version should it be removed?
Thanks for finding this!
/Leo
On 21/10/2019 17:45, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2019-10-21 02:4
Adding the template parameter to TraceEvent makes xlc happy too.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8200246/
Are you fine with this change ?
Observe that this is not a review. I have tested that your fix should
compile on linux, solaris, windows and mac.
Thanks,
Leo
Bes
16 matches
Mail list logo
