RE: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when linking libjvm

2021-01-15 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Martin, Trivial adaptions. Looks good. Best regards Goetz. From: Doerr, Martin Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 5:50 PM To: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev@openjdk.java.net Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Langer, Christoph Subject: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X

RE: Crashes on ppc/s390 after 8231441: AArch64: Initial SVE backend support

2020-09-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
HI, Thanks for the hint! Sounds good, I'll give it a try. ... I removed some emails to reduce traffic. Best regads, Goetz. -Original Message- From: Ningsheng Jian Sent: Montag, 7. September 2020 08:51 To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Andrew Dinn ; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net

Crashes on ppc/s390 after 8231441: AArch64: Initial SVE backend support

2020-09-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Since that change was pushed, the vm crashes in the build: To suppress the following error report, specify this argument # after -XX: or in .hotspotrc: SuppressErrorAt=/type.cpp:1022 # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # Internal Error (/usr/work/...

Re: RFR [XS]: 8248334: hs build errors on ppc64 and s390x platforms

2020-06-26 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I didn't get the RFR mails. Probably the known hotspot-dev Mailing List Problem? But I saw the RFR in the pipermail archive. I had a look at the change. It looks good, and I consider it trivial. Best regards, Goetz.

RE: [11u]: RFR 8235686: Add more custom hooks in Bundles.gmk

2020-03-12 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Christoph, The change looks good. Reviewed. I think Volker wants to bring the FindFiles/CacheFind change to 11, which is in the problematic contexts. But I think we should not wait for that, as this is a oracle parity change. It's trivial to resolve anyways. As Severin I think it's fine

RE: 11u RFR: 8232569: Use test image from different jib profile for testing

2020-03-10 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, +1 I think this is a candidate for the label "openjdk-na" then. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: jdk-updates-dev On > Behalf Of Langer, Christoph > Sent: Montag, 9. März 2020 17:29 > To: Erik Joelsson ; jdk-updates- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Cc: build-dev >

RE: RFR [XS] jdk11 - 8234809: set relro in linker flags when building with gcc

2019-12-19 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Matthias, change looks good. The context is different because "8209817: stack is executable when building with Clang on Linux" is missing in 11. This is a special build fix for google. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: jdk-updates-dev On > Behalf Of Baesken,

RE: RFR [XS]: 8234795: ix build fails on macOS lower than 10.13 after 8214578 was: build fails on macOS 10.12 after 8214578: [macos] Problem with backslashes on macOS/JIS keyboard: Java ignores system

2019-11-26 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
a.net> > Cc: 2d-...@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, Goetz > > Subject: Re: RFR [XS]: 8234795: ix build fails on macOS lower than 10.13 after > 8214578 was: build fails on macOS 10.12 after 8214578: [macos] Problem with > backslashes on macOS/JIS keyboard: Java ignores system settings >

RE: [11u] java/awt/FontMetrics/MaxAdvanceIsMax.java test failure (was: [11u] RFR 8210782: Upgrade HarfBuzz to the latest 2.3.1)

2019-05-15 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
mark the test with @key intermittent if it depends on the system setup that much? Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Balao > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 6:41 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; 'Severin Gehwolf' > ; Langer, Christoph ; > jdk-updates-..

RE: [11u] java/awt/FontMetrics/MaxAdvanceIsMax.java test failure (was: [11u] RFR 8210782: Upgrade HarfBuzz to the latest 2.3.1)

2019-05-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
019 18:27 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; 'Severin Gehwolf' > ; Langer, Christoph ; jdk- > updates-...@openjdk.java.net > Cc: 2d-dev <2d-...@openjdk.java.net>; build-dev@openjdk.java.net; Martin > Balao Alonso > Subject: Re: [11u] java/awt/FontMetrics/MaxAdvanceIsMax.java test

RE: [11u] java/awt/FontMetrics/MaxAdvanceIsMax.java test failure (was: [11u] RFR 8210782: Upgrade HarfBuzz to the latest 2.3.1)

2019-05-08 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
of 11.0.3 and jdk/jdk are scheduled on a SLES 12.3, therefor they don't show the problem. I'll send you a jtr file of the failure off-list. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Severin Gehwolf > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 5:20 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Lange

RE: [11u] RFR 8210782: Upgrade HarfBuzz to the latest 2.3.1

2019-05-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Christoph, I had a look at this change. The integration is good. I thought about the adaptions you had to do. They look good for the compilers you mention, and I would assume they also work with more recent ones. I guess nobody uses more recent compilers on Solaris. On AIX I know further

RE: RFR [11u] : 8221318: [11u] do not disable c99 on Solaris

2019-03-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Looks good to me, thanks for downporting. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: jdk-updates-dev On > Behalf Of Langer, Christoph > Sent: Freitag, 22. März 2019 10:32 > To: Baesken, Matthias ; 'build- > d...@openjdk.java.net' ; jdk-updates- > d...@openjdk.java.net >

RE: RFR : 8218136: minor hotspot adjustments for xlclang++ from xlc16 on AIX

2019-02-05 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
looks good, thanks for the adjustment! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Baesken, Matthias > Sent: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2019 17:56 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; David Holmes > ; 'hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net' d...@openjdk.java.net>; 'magnus.ihse.bur...@o

RE: RFR : 8218136: minor hotspot adjustments for xlclang++ from xlc16 on AIX

2019-02-05 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Matthias, The demangle fix is kind of preliminary, but to get the compiler working it is acceptable to skip this code for now. The old xlc stuff is good to be removed. Could you please remove USE_XLC_PREFETCH_WRITE_BUILTIN altogether and replace its only use by USE_XLC_BUILTINS? Also, I

RE: JDK-8217880 AIX build issue about JDK-8214533

2019-01-29 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Pushed. Best regards, Goetz > -Original Message- > From: Ichiroh Takiguchi > Sent: Dienstag, 29. Januar 2019 11:30 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: build-dev ; ppc-aix-port-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; Baesken, Matthias > > Subj

RE: JDK-8217880 AIX build issue about JDK-8214533

2019-01-29 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, this looks good, the build works with this patch. Do you need a sponsor? Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Ichiroh Takiguchi > Sent: Dienstag, 29. Januar 2019 02:21 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: build-dev ; ppc-aix-port-dev d...@openjdk.java.

RE: RFR: 8214533 IBM-29626C is required for AIX default charset

2019-01-28 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Ichiroh, just open a bug, like "Fix aix build after 8214533" and post a RFR for it. I assume the fix is quite trivial so we can review it quick. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: ppc-aix-port-dev On > Behalf Of Ichiroh Takiguchi > Sent: Montag, 28. Januar 2019

RE: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR(XS): 8213944: Fix AIX build after the removal of Xrandr.h and add a configure check for it

2018-11-20 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Volker, I had a look at your change. It looks good. I appreciate a lot you added a check in configure. Maybe it would be better to pass a WITHOUT_XRANDR or the like to the build, and check for such a define in the code. But I think we should push this change for now to fix the build. A

RE: RFR(XS): 8211837: Creation of the default CDS Archive should depend on ENABLE_CDS

2018-10-08 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Still looks good (now touches much more scenarios, but we should get this straight.) Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: hotspot-runtime-dev boun...@openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Volker Simonis > Sent: Montag, 8. Oktober 2018 12:11 > To: Doerr, Martin > Cc: build-dev

RE: RFR(XS): 8211837: Creation of the default CDS Archive should depend on ENABLE_CDS

2018-10-08 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Volker, Aleksey, Voker, your change looks good. I also think CDS should be turned off on minimal VM, and also the case for zero a few lines below should be removed in a similar manner. But I'll leave to you whether you want to handle that in a separate fix. Best regards, Goetz. >

RE: JEP JDK-8208089: Implement C++14 Language Features

2018-10-05 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ag, 4. Oktober 2018 23:01 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: hotspot-dev developers ; build-dev > ; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: JEP JDK-8208089: Implement C++14 Language Features > > > On Oct 4, 2018, at 2:59 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz > wrote: > > > > Hi, > &

RE: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling

2018-10-04 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks! I'm fine for this to go to 8. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Severin Gehwolf > Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2018 16:40 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Erik Joelsson > ; hotspot-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev d...@openjdk.ja

RE: JEP JDK-8208089: Implement C++14 Language Features

2018-10-04 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I appreciate this is handled in a JEP and well communicated! XLc, the compiler we use for AIX, might be a bottleneck here. But we currently have no compiler-constraints by products on our aix port of jdk12 (for jdk11 we must stay with the current compiler xlc 12 which does not support

RE: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling

2018-10-02 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
nal Message- > From: Severin Gehwolf > Sent: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018 15:00 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Erik Joelsson > ; hotspot-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; build-dev > Subject: Re: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: Use

RE: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling

2018-10-02 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
. Oktober 2018 13:09 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Erik Joelsson > ; hotspot-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; build-dev > Subject: Re: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and > os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with

RE: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling

2018-10-02 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I'm fine with this. If I remember correctly, this was proposed before but never pushed in the end. Did you test this on ppc64 be, too? Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: ppc-aix-port-dev On > Behalf Of Severin Gehwolf > Sent: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018 12:34 >

RE: RFR: 8210416: [linux] Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation

2018-09-14 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, We are only talking about reducing O3 to O2 for the compilation step of fdlibm, right? As I know, this is being replaced by Java coding, anyways. Therefore I don't have a strong opinion for any of the choices. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: core-libs-dev On

RE: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR JDK-8209786: gcc 7.3 compiler errors on zLinux

2018-09-06 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Yes, that's fine. I can sponsor it tomorrow. I'm not in the office today. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Leonard > Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 12:29 > To: Magnus Ihse Bursie ; Lindenmaier, Goetz > > Cc: 2d-dev <2d-...@ope

RE: Configure: Does enabling graal automatically disable cmsgc?

2018-08-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
: Freitag, 31. August 2018 12:07 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; hotspot compiler > ; build-dev (build- > d...@openjdk.java.net) > Subject: Re: Configure: Does enabling graal automatically disable cmsgc? > > On 2018-08-31 11:39, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > Hi, > > >

Configure: Does enabling graal automatically disable cmsgc?

2018-08-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I'm just fixing jtreg/runtime/appcds/sharedStrings/IncompatibleOptions.java It is not checking correctly whether ZGC is enabled. I found this code in the test: if (!Compiler.isGraalEnabled()) { // Graal does not support CMS testExec(8, "-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC", "", "", false); } I

Which build platforms are supported for jdk11 and upcoming jdk12?

2018-08-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+Build+Platforms is quite outdated, listing only jdk9. Is there a different site now listing this information? (I'll also update our information on this site.) Because of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210194 we think about

RE: RFR JDK-8209786: gcc 7.3 compiler errors on zLinux

2018-08-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Leonard, Whom should I add as reviewers? (Besides me :)) Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Leonard > Sent: Donnerstag, 30. August 2018 17:02 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Cc: Brian Burkhalter ; build-dev (build- > d...@openjdk.java.net

RE: RFR JDK-8209786: gcc 7.3 compiler errors on zLinux

2018-08-30 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Leonard, the change looks good to me. I'll test it tonight, to make sure it runs with our compilers. Did you run it through jdk-submit? If you supply a patch with all the changeset information (like from hg export) that jchecks fine, I'll sponsor this for you. Best regards, Goetz. >

RE: RFR : 8210205 : build fails on AIX in hotspot cpp tests (for example getstacktr001.cpp)

2018-08-30 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
-...@openjdk.java.net' ; 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Doerr, Martin Subject: RFR : 8210205 : build fails on AIX in hotspot cpp tests (for example getstacktr001.cpp) Hello, please review this small fix to repair our AIX build . Recent changes to jdk/jdk broke

RE: 8207830: [aix] disable jfr in build and tests

2018-07-23 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks Erik! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Erik Joelsson > Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2018 19:33 > To: Vladimir Kozlov ; Lindenmaier, Goetz > ; hotspot-dev developers d...@openjdk.java.net> > Cc: build-dev > Subject: Re: 8207830: [a

RE: 8207830: [aix] disable jfr in build and tests

2018-07-19 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
other part is unchanged. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Kozlov > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 7:22 PM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; hotspot-dev > developers > Cc: build-dev > Subject: Re: 8207830: [aix] disable jfr in build and tests

RE: RFR(xs): 8204935: [aix] TOC overflow in libjvm.so (release build)

2018-06-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Thomas, thanks for fixing and doing the cleanup right away. Looks good. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: ppc-aix-port-dev [mailto:ppc-aix-port-dev- > boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe > Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 08:14 > To: build-dev ;

RE: RFR(xs): 8202325: [aix] disable warnings-as-errors by default

2018-04-26 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Thomas, this looks good and will simplify building on AIX. Thanks, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: ppc-aix-port-dev [mailto:ppc-aix-port-dev- > boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe > Sent: Donnerstag, 26. April 2018 16:04 > To: build-dev

RE: RFR(XS): 8201584: Fix configure on SLES 11 after 8201483

2018-04-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Thanks Magnus and Volker! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Magnus Ihse Bursie [mailto:magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com] > Sent: Montag, 16. April 2018 14:56 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; build-dev (build- > d...@openjdk

RE: RFR(XS): 8201584: Fix configure on SLES 11 after 8201483

2018-04-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ontag, 16. April 2018 14:00 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; build-dev (build- > d...@openjdk.java.net) <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8201584: Fix configure on SLES 11 after 8201483 > > On 2018-04-16 11:16, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote

RFR(XS): 8201584: Fix configure on SLES 11 after 8201483

2018-04-16 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, could I please get reviewes for this tiny fix? Grep does not grok the syntax of the replacement of space to newline. It causes configure failures on SLES 11. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8201584-fixSLES11configure/01/ Best regards, Goetz.

RE: RFR [xxs, aix]: JDK-8196488: [aix] TOC overflow for libjvm.so in fastdebug build

2018-02-08 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
HI Thomas, looks good, thanks! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: ppc-aix-port-dev [mailto:ppc-aix-port-dev- > boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe > Sent: Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2018 15:42 > To: ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev

RE: RFR 8190378: Java EE and CORBA modules removal

2018-02-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Lance, Would you mind to add similar change as for test/jdk/tools/launcher/VersionCheck.java also for test/jdk/tools/launcher/HelpFlagsTest.java That test is pretty recent which is why you may have missed it. It will not fail though, there will just be left over stuff in it. Best regards,

RE: AIX build not generating a jre image

2017-10-18 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Steve, I think this is an error. We never decided not to generate a jre image as far as I know. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: ppc-aix-port-dev [mailto:ppc-aix-port-dev- > boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Steve Groeger > Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017

RE: RFR(xs): 8187228: [aix] make data segment page size 64K by default

2017-10-18 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
ebrev is just rebased to the new repo. > > I am unclear whether I am allowed to push this on my own? Does the build > group this? > > Kind Regards, Thomas > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com > <mailto:thomas.stu...@gmail.com&

RE: RFR(M): 8187045: [linux] Not all libraries in the VM are linked with -z,noexecstack

2017-09-26 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, thanks a lot! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 26. September 2017 05:29 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; hotspot-runtime- > d...@openjdk.java.net;

RE: RFR(M): 8187045: [linux] Not all libraries in the VM are linked with -z,noexecstack

2017-09-22 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I updated my webrev to the directory structure: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr17/8187045-execstackLink/webrev.02/ I also ran it through our tests again. Could someone please sponsor this change? Thanks, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz

RE: RFR(xs): 8187228: [aix] make data segment page size 64K by default

2017-09-07 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Thomas, Looks good. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: ppc-aix-port-dev [mailto:ppc-aix-port-dev- > boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe > Sent: Donnerstag, 7. September 2017 12:02 > To: ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev

RE: RFR(M): 8187045: [linux] Not all libraries in the VM are linked with -z,noexecstack

2017-09-05 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, thanks for looking at my change! > Hi Goetz, > > On 1/09/2017 11:05 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I found that not all libraries are linked with -z,noexecstack. > > This lead to errors with our linuxppc64 build. The linker omitt

RE: RFR(M): 8186978: Introduce configure argument enable-cds

2017-09-04 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, thanks for sponsoring the change! Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 23:15 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; 'Magnus Ihse Bursie'

RE: RFR(M): 8187045: [linux] Not all libraries in the VM are linked with -z,noexecstack

2017-09-04 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Magnus Ihse Bursie [mailto:magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com] > Sent: Montag, 4. September 2017 10:42 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; hotspot-runtime- > d...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev <build-dev@openjdk

RE: RFR(M): 8186978: Introduce configure argument enable-cds

2017-08-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
age- > From: Magnus Ihse Bursie [mailto:magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 3:35 PM > To: David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>; Lindenmaier, Goetz > <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net; > build-dev (build-de

RFR(M): 8186978: Introduce configure argument enable-cds

2017-08-31 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, Tests for class data sharing (cds) are enabled if @requires vm.cds is true. The property vm.cds depends on the preprocessor macro ENABLE_CDS. This can not yet be switched by configure. It's only disabled automatically for the minimal build. This change introduces enable-cds with default

RE: RFR: JDK-8066474: Remove the lib/$ARCH directory from Linux and Solaris images

2016-11-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Ah, ok, so this is fine. Best regards, Goetz. > -Original Message- > From: Erik Joelsson [mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com] > Sent: Montag, 21. November 2016 14:27 > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; Vladimir Kozlov > <vladimir.koz...@oracle.co

RE: RFR: JDK-8066474: Remove the lib/$ARCH directory from Linux and Solaris images

2016-11-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
nal Message- > From: Lindenmaier, Goetz > Sent: Montag, 21. November 2016 12:35 > To: 'Vladimir Kozlov' <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>; Erik Joelsson > <erik.joels...@oracle.com>; build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net>; > core-libs-dev <core-libs-...@openjdk.java.

RE: RFR: JDK-8066474: Remove the lib/$ARCH directory from Linux and Solaris images

2016-11-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, we appreciate this change a lot, and also if /server would go away. I built and tested it on linuxppcle, aixppc and linuxs390. There is still a place that refers to a removed variables and breaks the build: jdk/src/java.base/unix/native/libjli/ergo.c:94 LIBARCHNAME You can probably just

RE: RFR: JEP draft for Linux/s3990x port

2016-10-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Kozlov [mailto:vladimir.koz...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 1:09 AM > To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; Volker Simonis > <volker.simo...@gmail.com> > Cc: s390x-port-...@openjdk.java.net; porters-...@openjdk.java.net; build- > dev <build

RE: RFR: JEP draft for Linux/s3990x port

2016-10-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
13, 2016 8:32 AM > To: Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com> > Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; s390x-port- > d...@openjdk.java.net; porters-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev d...@openjdk.java.net>; HotSpot Open Source Developers d...@openjdk.jav

RE: RFR: JEP draft for Linux/s3990x port

2016-10-04 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Vladimir, This webrev contains all the changes to hotspot needed for the port: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166730-linuxs390-all/hotspot.wr01/ It includes http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8166560-basic_s390/hotspot.wr03/

RE: RFR(S): 8154087: Fix AIX and Linux/ppc64le after the integration of the new hotspot build

2016-04-13 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Volker, I had a look at your changes. Good that 'warning as errors' already lead to a fix :) Note that your changes might break the old build, as you remove the endianess check in flags.m4 etc.. I think this is ok, though, as else dead code will remain in the file. Looks good, reviewed.

RE: Silence warnings with new GCC

2015-11-26 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Andrew, I know about this problem ... I guess a change of mine causes these warnings. While I found a row of good fixes, these with ShouldNotReachHere are annoying. What you propose has been discussed in April: 8065585: Change ShouldNotReachHere() to never return. I didn't follow the

RE: (XXS)RFR: 8076581: Need a NON-PCH build to quickly detect missing dependencies in the source base

2015-07-06 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi David, this change is good, I appreciate it a lot! Best regards, Goetz. -Original Message- From: hotspot-dev [mailto:hotspot-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of David Holmes Sent: Montag, 6. Juli 2015 11:11 To: hotspot-dev developers; build-dev Subject: (XXS)RFR: 8076581:

RE: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model

2014-03-24 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, builds and runs on ppc linux be / aix. Best regards, Goetz. -Original Message- From: Alexander Smundak [mailto:asmun...@google.com] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 9:10 PM To: David Holmes Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz; build-dev; HotSpot Open Source Developers Subject: Re: RFR (M

RE: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model

2014-03-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Sasha, I tried to test your change (02), but it does not work. On linux ppc be;) I get make[4]: Leaving directory `/net/usr.work/d045726/oJ/builds/8036767-comp-ld9502-dbg/linux_ppc64_compiler2/debug' make[4]: Entering directory

RE: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model

2014-03-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
- From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 12:08 PM To: Lindenmaier, Goetz; 'Alexander Smundak' Cc: 'build-dev'; 'HotSpot Open Source Developers' Subject: Re: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model On 21/03/2014 7:06 PM, Lindenmaier

RE: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model

2014-03-21 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
' was compared with 'big'. Make is strange ... After fixing that, tested linuxppc64, aix and linuxx86_64, they all work. Best regards, Goetz. -Original Message- From: Alexander Smundak [mailto:asmun...@google.com] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 10:02 PM To: Lindenmaier, Goetz Cc: David Holmes

RE: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model

2014-03-18 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
of a different build path. Best regards, Goetz. -Original Message- From: Vladimir Kozlov [mailto:vladimir.koz...@oracle.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:36 AM To: Lindenmaier, Goetz; Magnus Ihse Bursie; David Holmes Cc: build-dev; HotSpot Open Source Developers; Alexander Smundak

RE: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model

2014-03-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Magnus, The change keeps target cpu and target cpu arch as is. The C-code uses -DLITTLE_ENDIAN to distinguish implementation differences. As I understand, we discuss the setting of BUILDARCH in the makefiles. Indirectly it is set from uname, which returns ppc64le on these machines. This

RE: RFR (M): 8036767 PPC64: Support for little endian execution model

2014-03-17 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, having said what I wanted to say about the build output directory path, I'm fine with both solutions. In the end it affects only a few line in shared make files. Best regards, Goetz -Original Message- From: hotspot-dev [mailto:hotspot-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of