com via BVARC"
To: "BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB"
Cc: "SETX Telecom"
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 6:04:57 PM
Subject: Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question
I would not use 8X for any feedline..not bad for a double bazooka antenna
though lol
I prefer Heliax myse
I would not use 8X for any feedline..not bad for a double bazooka antenna
though lol
I prefer Heliax myself...the superflex type is great for a lot of
things..and can bend a lot better than regular Heliax...with better loss
than LMR and no shield movement noise ..which really is a pain in
duplex/r
T 4G LTE smartphone
Original message From: Gayle Dotts via BVARC
Date: 8/9/17 4:23 PM (GMT-06:00) To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
Cc: Gayle Dotts Subject: Re: [BVARC]
Coax cable question
So bottom line. yes! For a little bit more in financial expense on the
LM
So bottom line. yes! For a little bit more in financial expense on the
LMR400 cable from RG8x you will noticeably benefit in increased receiving
ability as well as transmiting from the upgrade. thanks.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Gayle Dotts wrote:
> For use in HF at 28.000 Mhz frequen
I use LMR400 Ultraflex for all permanent installs (i.e., not "portable"). My
rationale is, it's a capital expenditure that you only shell out for once, it's
not THAT much more than cheaper options, and I can always repurpose it for just
about any other application (V/U, e.g.) down the road.
I
Spec says .7 db at 30 megs. Not too shabby. Worth it? Heck yes!
RH
Sent from my i-Thingamajig
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote:
>
> For use in HF at 28.000 Mhz frequency, length 75-100 feet, is LMR400 cable
> worth it for better RX/TX attenuation?
>
> ___
Gayle:
The loss of RG213 cable is only about 1 dB (10%)
per 100 ft. at 30 MHz. LMR400 would only be about
1/2 that loss, so I really go with the 213 and wouldn't
worry too much about it.
73s,
Gary Sitton, K5AMH
gasit...@comcast.net
On 8/9/2017 11:55, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote:
For use in
You will have a good bit less loss with the LMR-400 feedline.
Paul Noll
KG5MHD
Love your pets, they want and deserve it !!!
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote:
>
> For use in HF at 28.000 Mhz frequency, length 75-100 feet, is LMR400 cable
> worth it for better RX/TX att
For use in HF at 28.000 Mhz frequency, length 75-100 feet, is LMR400 cable
worth it for better RX/TX attenuation?
___
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com