Ha Android auto corrected signedup for iPhone..
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 18, 2012 8:54 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
> Well done. As you may remember I signed iPhone to mentor this project so I
> could watch and learn how Git workflows can work for ASF projects.
>
>
Well done. As you may remember I signed iPhone to mentor this project so I
could watch and learn how Git workflows can work for ASF projects.
Thanks for teaching me :)
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 18, 2012 8:50 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote:
> Echoing Fil, HUGE thank you Jukka and Ross. You guys have
t; 3 mentors?
> :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan.
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 9 October 2012 16:11, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > We "need" another mentor (although there i
gt;>http://wiioperasdk.com/sdk/3d.js
>> > >>- Math.uuid.js (http://www.broofa.com) - Dual licensed under the MIT
>> > >>and GPL licenses: http://www.broofa.com/Tools/Math.uuid.js
>> > >>- OpenLayers.js (ttp://svn.openlayers.org/trunk/openlaye
MC vote has concluded you submit the charter to the board
and your (barring unexpected issues) done.
Ross
>
> [1] http://hc.apache.org/charter.html
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> The charter is an resolution that the Board votes o
Zbarcea
* Jasha Joachimsthal
* Jesse Ciancetta
* Joost van Dijk
* Maarten Kremers
* Marlon Pierce
* Matt Franklin
* Niels van Dijk
* Okke Harsta
* Raminder Singh
* Ross Gardler
* Sander
comment is that we really don't care where new
committers are employed. It's not relevant from a community point of
view. There's no harm, but ASF projects tend to ignore affiliations
since everyone is expected to act as an individual anyway.
I've signed off
Ross
--
Ross G
at 1:03 PM, Jukka Zitting >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 31, 2012, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> > > On 30 July 2012 22:18, Gord Tanner >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Our main goal for Ripple being in the ASF is to try to build
> co
not be interested rather than because it is sensitive).
Ross
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
[3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/index.html
>
> Gord
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012
presented.
Ross
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
>> On 30 July 2012 15:06, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:18 PM, wrote:
>> >> I sometimes see cordova not as a specific platform
eyond the boundaries of individual projects or codebases.
I'm not sure we're ready for that yet. What other projects would be
interested in this?
Possibly Wookie (W3C Widget engine), others?
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 30 July 2012 14:53, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> On Jul 26, 2012 9:29 PM, "Filip Maj" wrote:
>>> Ross, I would love to become more familiar with the specific reasoning,
>>> when you hav
is space.
> >That said, having all that stuff decoupled is also not a bad thing at
> >all.
> >
> >Ultimately, I'm very happy to see the code joining us at Apache and
> >whatever choice the RIM creators/committers/contributors decide we
> >support!
> &g
gt; >emulator / device). This is already in a way exhibited by Tizen
> >essentially using Ripple as their simulator in the first place.
> >
> >So in conclusion: both are viable paths IMO, and we do not get to a
> >conclusion haha.
> >
> >What about the idea
t; there's overlap on the level of individual committers.
>
> The decision on this doesn't need to be final, as projects can always
> split or merge projects later on, but starting with at least a good
> approximation of the ultimate or ideal community/project structure
>
-
> - Mobile: 646-460-7066 -
> - Twitter: @ldhasson -
>
> "Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of
> government" - Dennis
On 21 July 2012 15:14, Filip Maj wrote:
> I am very excited about this!
>
> The cordova suite of projects have never addressed emulation and my go-to
> has always been Ripple.
>
> If there is anything I can do to help please let me know.
>
> Mentors (Jukka?): other than setting up a repository, do
are needed to add a new platform to Cordova ! ;-)
>
> Cordially,
> Paul
>
> --
> Paul Plaquette
> Senior Software Engineer
> Open Source Technology Center
> Intel Corp.,Montpellier, France
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
gt;>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-cordova-android/pull/21
>>>
>>> This seems pretty small for a CCLA, but that's the correct process,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Paul Plaquette
> Senior Software Engineer
> Open Source Technology Center
> Intel Corp.,Montpellier, France
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
sking to
self host and thus I'm wondering if other projects not yet married to
infrastructure here might end up asking to use it.
Ross
Ross
>
> cool proj tho.
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> I just wanted to flag a new Incubator proposal
vy user of Git and GitHub.
Note, I don't mean to imply that the ASF will be adopting this as
infrastructure here, we are a long way from evaluating that. However,
some early feedback from this project would be helpful to me as a
mentor on the Allura project.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
P
As the first line of the page says " This page tracks the project status,
incubator-wise". Far from retiring it the PPMC is expected to keep it up to
date whilst in the incubator.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On May 16, 2012 9:46 PM, "Filip Maj" wrote:
> http://
Where are your release process docs, if any?
Are you saying that yiu believe current head is ready to be tagged as an
ASF release? I'm happy to start reviewing, although it will likely be a few
days before I have enough time to do it properly.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and
On 10 April 2012 23:39, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2012
>
> Nice, thanks!
>
> In fact with our first months at the Incubator behind us, we no longer
> need to report monthly, just quarterly. Ou
t; [1] http://tv.adobe.com/show/adc-presents-phonegap/
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
>> Brian have we made publicly available any of the webcasts we recorded/gave
>> as Nitobi over the past two years or so?
>>
>> On 3/16/12 3:02 AM, "Ross
a candidate for committership. I did
> >not say such a document should make it hard. Therefore I'm a little
> >confused by your question below. Please restate if I'm missing your
> >point.
>
> Agreed, I started that here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/BecomingA
document what is
expected of a contributor who is a candidate for committership. I did
not say such a document should make it hard. Therefore I'm a little
confused by your question below. Please restate if I'm missing your
point.
Ross
>
> What downsides does this approach pose?
ich is
> why votes like this one should IMHO be held on private@.
>
> [1] http://callback.markmail.org/search/from:kim
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
happen
then I'd like to see what we can do as a trial. Is there any
information about the kinds of webcasts you ran and which worked well?
Ross
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> I was recently at an event in Sri Lanka. At this event I discussed
>&
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the
> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
s from
Phonegap to Cordova (via Callback) - it's a long story.
Ross
>
> cheers
> jonas
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
work in
the past before coming to the ASF? Do you have any models that have
worked well for you in the past?
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Ross, I believe you mentioned you could also "pre-review" my LICENSE/NOTICE
> files. Would be awesome if you could, but I think I'm getting ready for an
> "official" build, so you'll see it all then :-)
>
> Figured
On 16 February 2012 18:57, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> There is no nefarious plan to patch bomb Apache Cordova and any
> indication that might be the case is plain wrong. I think this might
> be a slight cultural disconnect. Apache is new to us and we them.
> Traditionally, in our long 3 year heritage =
didn't know if
> that was adequate to pull in the changes.
CCLAs are usually for named individuals rather than for everyone at
the corporation. Furthermore they are not a replacement of ICLAS.
However, as you not in the case you refer to this is not important as
we have a public contributio
On 16 February 2012 13:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> Judicious clipping has removed the context of this statement, my
>> mail included:
>>
>> " I am only referring to contributions that
On 16 February 2012 12:35, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 06:25, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Ross Gardler
>> wrote:
>> > [ASIDE many people in the ASF argue that the contribution under the
>> > Apache License
On 16 February 2012 11:25, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> [ASIDE many people in the ASF argue that the contribution under the
>> Apache License is sufficient, this is not the forum for this
>> discussion, curren
A couple of times I've noted people in this community indicate that
there is a practice of committing on behalf of other people (most
recently in a private mail that I have requested be discussed onlist),
sometimes from different companies.
Before I go on I am not talking about contributions made
Don't forget that it also has to go to IPMC, but there are sufficient IPMC
votes already, so this is just a notification.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 8, 2012 3:07 PM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tallying this vote so we can move forward.
>
> The sta
unity views. However, as long as we have at
least one volunteer watching the "Bull Elephant" closely (nice analogy
Graham) we will be fine (and historically this has been tested on
more than one occasion). It really doesn't matter who is paying for
our volunteers food, it only matter
On 6 February 2012 21:28, Tim Kim wrote:
> I've been assigned to become the new lead for the BB issue tracker. I look
> forward to working with you all.
Hi and welcome,
Can you please tell me what it means to be a "lead for the BB issue
tracker". I ask this because I'm a mentor to this project a
Thanks Brian. Signed off.
On 31 January 2012 23:03, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Jukka and all, updated here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2011
>
> (still needs mentor signoff!!!)
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
IP review (source headers, license metadata, etc.)
> * Ship an official Apache release
...
> Signed off by mentor: jukka, gianugo
Errr have those mentors signed it off or is this a cut an paste
issue from a previous report
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
he ASF just has a licence to redistribute the code and the
copyright in the collective work (as opposed to individual
contributions).
This doesn't change what you say, it just reinforces it further.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
o have separate
lists.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
As with last month remember to make a distinction between shipping ASF code
and non-ASF code. It would be good to indicate when you hope to make an ASF
release if that is possible.
Also mention that infra is allowing you to use git (and probably show your
appreciation for the work done there, you'
On 5 January 2012 15:17, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
...
>> 3) Can we use the wiki as our "CMS" instead of the other CMS thing?
>
> So far it has been possible to use a Confluence export as a project
> web site, but due to the problems infra has
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 30, 2011 11:32 PM, "Andrew Lunny" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> (tried to send this to the legal list but couldn't find where to
subscribe)
legal-discuss@a.o (but see below with respect to specific licence questions)
>
> I'm working
On 28 December 2011 14:28, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> During project setup I already requested a CMS site for us [3], but I
> haven't yet had the time to figure out what needs to be done on our
> side. Could someone volunteer to take care of setting up an initial
> project web site?
>
I just committe
ay/INFRA/translate+pootle+service+auth+levels
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 15, 2011 3:12 PM, "Patrick Mueller" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:39, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
> > On Dec 15, 20
ns to give
permission to contribute.
Ross
> ----- Original Message -
> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 04:17 AM
> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Callback CCLA questions
>
> ICLAs are require.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Dec 15, 2011 9:50 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Shazron wrote:
> >... 2. How do I verify that a corporation has submitted their CCLA so I
> > can merge in a patch?...
>
> You have to ask your
ICLAs are require. CCLAs are optional (they exist because some comp admires
want them not because the ASF wants them).
It is not possible to get commit access to our repositories without an ICLA
on file. Please tell me how I can help with the situation with RIM
employees. You need to get permissio
; Joe
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> This is fantastic news. Jukka one of our colleagues Hardeep will be
> > >>>> chiming in shortly to help out w/ any infra
Infra had agreed that we can participate in the Git alpha trading.
A few points to be aware of:
- access control in the incubator is not yet on a per project basis. This
means all incubation project committers will have write access. This means
gating of commits is policy rather than technical is
2011
Ross
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> On 30 November 2011 09:10, Andrew Savory wrote:
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> On 28 November 2011 22:57, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I did a prac
Thanks for making sure we didn't miss this.
I already dealt with this so no action needed from this PPMC. See my
earlier mails on the topic (things have moved on since then as you can see
below, but my proposal remains the same except we no longer need to go via
the board).
Ross
Sent from my mob
ted in technical issues, that's up to
the project. The board wants to know about community issues and any
infrastructure requirements that the project has. We should also
address things like IP issues we face etc.
Ross
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew.
> --
> asav...@apache.org
beyond
>> technical issues with the request, I'm wondering about non-technical
>> issues with the request, like CLAs.
>> https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-plugins/pull/252
>> --
>> Patrick Mueller
>> http://muellerware.org
>>
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
y (and thank
you ;-)
Ross
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Thanks for your help so far! And if you're still around, feel free to
>> chime in anytime you like even without the mentor hat.
>>
>> B
On 26 November 2011 22:12, Ross Gardler wrote:
> As a result (and because another mentor has
> stepped up to support my position) I'm willing to make a case to
> infrastructure for you to move to Git ASAP, but I have two conditions before
> I make that request.
>
> The fi
mentors to see they have
> read this message. I will take care later on notifying the incubator.
> CheersChristian
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
d willing to help with any required backend stuff.
Excellent, that adds much more weight to the proposal. Thanks.
Ross
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> On Nov 26, 2011 11:13 PM, "Ross Gardler"
wrote:
> >
> > As some here may know, the ASF has been preparing
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 27, 2011 10:01 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
>
> Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
> On Nov 27, 2011 2:00 AM, "Dave Johnson" wrote:
> >
> > Ross do you have
code is in this weird state between being PhoneGap and Apache
> Callback?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
> On Nov 26, 2011 3:31 PM, "Ross Gardler"
wrote:
>
> > On 26 November 2011 22:34, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> > > Yowza facepalm. That was
On 26 November 2011 22:34, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Yowza facepalm. That was in particularly bad. I updated our web folk
> on the policy and they updated the site appropriately.
>
Thank you for the very quick response.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open De
As some here may know, the ASF has been preparing to roll Git out to all
projects that want it. This work had been non-trivial, the infrastructure
team have been working on the technical issues since committing to it at
ApacheCon in 2010 (and before that they had to figure out what the real
issues
tely unrealistic for these
> programmers. =)
>
> So, I say we go for both. One meeting a month for each. See how that goes.
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> >
> > Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
> > On
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 26, 2011 4:25 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote:
>
> In other threads we've discussed that we want to continue the
> tradition of having a regular phone call to garden the issue tracker,
> but wish to make it more formalized.
>
> I'd lik
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 26, 2011 12:42 PM, "Andrew Savory" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 26 November 2011 10:04, Ross Gardler
wrote:
>
>
> > The important thing is that you have to work very hard to ensure those
who
> >
of or brand for the value of all projects. Callback needs to
respect those rules.
Ross
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Nov 26, 2011 8:31 AM
Subject: Wording
To: "Ross Gardler"
Ross,
you do know better than
Apache projects do not do these kind of meetings, officially.
Of course it is silly to say they never happen. Some ASF people would say
"no you can't do it", I believe that would just result in such meetings not
being announced here, but still taking place. So I say "go ahead, but be
very careful.
y to those pages
>>>
>>> On 11-11-23 9:42 AM, "Michael Brooks" wrote:
>>>
>>>>Thanks Jan!
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 23, 2011, at 12:10 , R
think it can be open
> to everybody who registered. If that is possible, it would help better
> than approving name by name.
>
> Thanks
> Christian
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
on form your planning? The
>>> issues yo mean - is that git@asf?
>>
>> That is a good question, no timeline planned, but having canonical rcs
>> sorted is a first step to cutting a release. What else should we know
>> about?
>>
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
I should post here too since I changed the subject.
It seems my search of MarkMail before sending this email was a
demonstration of my, errr, fallability ;-)
Please ignore my comments and instead see
http://markmail.org/message/vcrw2swiwiwcojsd
Ross
On 22 November 2011 20:48, Ross Gardler
;m not Brian but see here: http://markmail.org/message/vcrw2swiwiwcojsd
My appologies.
I did search markmail, but clearly didn't do it very well.
Ignore my comments.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
et up? If so where can I view the
archives of that discussion?
Ross
On 22 November 2011 18:51, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> The subject says it all. If we're going to change it sooner is better.
> We had rough consensus for Cordova in earlier threads so lets make it
> official.
>
>
On Nov 22, 2011 4:54 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote:
>
> we were only planning on doing one more release for the year; how do
> you feel about looking at shipping mid dec?
Apache releases *must* be made from Apache hardware.
Typically the first incubator release from Podlings takes quite a
while to ge
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 22, 2011 6:53 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Filip Maj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11-11-19 9:22 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
> >
> >>> I'm logged in but both still say "immutable page", d
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 17, 2011 8:58 PM, "Matt Kane" wrote:
>
> On 17/11/11 17:43, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>> No, they cannot be pushed to anywhere other than ASF hardware. That is
the
>> point. It does ma
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 17, 2011 4:19 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote:
>
> > I've asked twice already, but not got a direct response. I'll ask
> > again: What is it about the existing development process that cannot
> > happen in SVN.
>
>
> I feel I've answer
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 17, 2011 4:41 PM, "Matt Kane" wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Nov 2011, at 15:47, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> >
> > Originally I thought we were talking about Git, but Brian said "It
> > should rema
e acceptable you will need to demonstrate a
healthy understanding of The Apache Way and Gits place within it.
Hopefully that will develop over on couchDB (yes I'm on that list).
Ross
Ross
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> On 17 November
dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Plans for migrating to SVN?
>
> Are we mixing up the arguments for GitHub with those for Git? I mostly
> read arguments for Git, with a "GitHub is a convenience". That's certainly
> how I feel.
>
> - eduard/o
>
> On
Git, but Brian said "It
should remain on Github beyond the interim and we should merge code
from there appropriately."
So I'm not sure anymore.
Ross
>
> - eduard/o
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's not th
On 17 November 2011 13:52, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> However, don't you think it's a bit counterproductive to enforce the
>> migration to Subversion now if it's possible that say in 2012 it might
>> already be OK to use Git within the
On 17 November 2011 13:44, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ross, I totally agree with your points here.
>
> However, don't you think it's a bit counterproductive to enforce the
> migration to Subversion now if it's possible that say in 2012 it might
> already be OK to use Git within the ASF?
It's
git thing, Git is just a tool, but it does not need to change a
development process that works for 150+ projects simply because
Callback feels it should change.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
nt.
>>
>> The CouchDB project is currently using Git as their main repository,
>> as an experiment which might result in ASF projects being allowed to
>> use either Git or Subversion in the future. We don't know when that
>> might happen. I personally hope that happens soon, but that's just my
>> opinion.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
I feel that
>> there is some movement between ipmc people to clean up.
>>
>> Honestly I think that Wave has lost lots steam with not bringing their
>> source code into the ASF servers directly.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Christian
>>
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
On 15 November 2011 14:03, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> I'm not seeing any plans for migrating the Callback source to SVN. Can
>> you please tell us where we are at with this critical step to enterin
I'm not seeing any plans for migrating the Callback source to SVN. Can
you please tell us where we are at with this critical step to entering
incubation.
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
95 matches
Mail list logo
