Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread JD Erskine
On 12/May/10 18:02, Meg Dedolph wrote: Hi everyone, I have a question about dance length - not the length of time you run a particular dance, but the length of an evening of dancing. In Chicago, we recently went from a three-hour Monday night dance to a two-and-a-half hour Monday night dance.

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Barbara Groh
Our Monday night dance in Asheville goes from 8-10:30, but we keep the break very short5 or 6 minutes. The Thurs. dance runs 8-11 with a 15 min. break. When I have to be up early the next day, I really appreciate calling a dance that ends at 10:30 ! ~Barbara - Original Message -

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Clark Baker
On May 12, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Meg Dedolph wrote: > I have a question about dance length - not the length of time you run a > particular dance, but the length of an evening of dancing. In Chicago, we > recently went from a three-hour Monday night dance to a two-and-a-half hour > Monday night

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread mhillegonds
>Jeff wrote: I believe there's no way to >set up a contra dance with more than >>2 couples where no one is ever out >and each couple dances with all >other >couples Sounds like an interesting challenge! 8-) Mark Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Jeff

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Jeff Kaufman
Ron Nelson wrote: > > Gee, I guess you would need 6 couples to get to everyone. Thanks, > Luke, for broadening my perspective. > Six doesn't help. I believe there's no way to set up a contra dance with more than 2 couples where no one is ever out and each couple dances with all other couples.

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread JD Erskine
On 13/May/10 11:03, Ron Nelson wrote: Gee, I guess you would need 6 couples to get to everyone. Thanks, Luke, for broadening my perspective. I'd think you'd need an odd number of pairs. Adding this idea to my small numbers (of dancers) grab bag. Cheers, John J.D. Erskine Victoria, BC No

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Ron Nelson
Gee, I guess you would need 6 couples to get to everyone. Thanks, Luke, for broadening my perspective. Ron > From: luke.do...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:48:16 -0500 > To: call...@sharedweight.net > Subject: Re: [Callers] Dance length > > > Actually, no. Most Becketts progress

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Luke Donev
> Actually, no. Most Becketts progress in a clockwise direction. Everyone has > equal > opportunity to dance with each of the other couples. Double progression dances, becket (either direction) or improper, only let you dance with half the couples when there's an even number of couples. For four

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Ron Nelson
> > Richard Hart wrote: With just 4 couples left, I've > > sometimes called a quad becket with some success. > > > > These would be double progression, no? So couple A dances with couple > C, then couple D, but never couple B? > > Jeff Actually, no. Most Becketts progress in a

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Ron Nelson
I like to use the Bucksaw Reel with 4 couple sets. Everyone is active all the time. Ron Nelson Chula Vista, CA > From: khe...@twcny.rr.com > To: call...@sharedweight.net > Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 06:07:37 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Callers] Dance length > > Gary Roodman (from Binghamton, NY)

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Jeff Kaufman
Richard Hart wrote: > > A caller up here, Byron Ricker, has been writing a few dances that > he calls "quad beckets." Quad becket dances are becket dances that > can be danced with 4 or more couples and that never leaves anyone > out (unless there are an odd number of couples). Many, but not all

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Katy Heine
Gary Roodman (from Binghamton, NY) wrote several four-couple contras, one of which I use often when I have only four couples: RISE AND RUN Becket A1 w/neighbors across, star R 1x; middle four, star L 1x A2 Balance & swing partner B1 couples at first corners* pass thru; couples at second corners

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Laur
That  would be great!  Hope you can share the ones that work  well with us,  with  his permission,  of course. At a dance we rarely have that  few  people left, but for an informal gathering I'm always  looking for ways to keep people on the floor. laur --- On Thu, 5/13/10, Richard Hart

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Richard Hart
I usually consider 5 couple a minimum for a regular contra dance, but triples like Money Musk require more people. A caller up here, Byron Ricker, has been writing a few dances that he calls "quad beckets." Quad becket dances are becket dances that can be danced with 4 or more couples and that

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Amy Cann
>It's been a dream to go through the triplet repertoire and find the good >ones. If you do it, let us know what you find! > Find out which ones David Millstone and Tony Parkes call. :) -Amy

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Martha Edwards
What time do the dances start? Are people leaving because it's too late for them on a Monday night? Could you start earlier? At our calling parties, where space is limited, the ideal number of people is 10 - there is always eighty per cent of the people dancing, and there are never more than two

Re: [Callers] Dance length

2010-05-13 Thread Laur
Meg, This seems right to me as well. We've had dancing at jams or caller sessions and there's a lot of waiting (or inventive scrambling end to end) with six couples or less for a typical contra line. We've done it with laughter and good cheer, but I wouldn't prefer less than 7 couples for a