Sorry I actually meant to say that all key content and navigation should
be visible in the top 1084 pixels (and maybe less). It's not so much
that we can make the page longer but you loose visitor's attention span
(see http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/).
On 6/30/2010 7:46 AM, Magnus Holm wrot
>From an SEO standpoint rubycamping is probably the better choice over
whywentcamping. Although changing the header to "Camping, a Ruby
Microframwork" would probably be enough anyway.
Dave
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Philippe Monnet wrote:
> Thanks Magnus! I love the idea of working on the
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:57, Philippe Monnet wrote:
> Thanks Magnus! I love the idea of working on the web site for 2.1.
> I am still not crazy about the web site name though - as it is not easy for
> people to remember if they don't know the connection with _why. I personally
> would have prefe
I'm trying to use the new Tilt integration with reststop. All the
aliases and whatnot under "Implementing your own service"
(http://wiki.github.com/camping/reststop/) are there and :views has
been set in the options hash. I tried creating sub-directories in the
views directory (html, HTML) but I st
So maybe another thing we need on the main site is a "Camping Ring"
feature to tie in all Camping fan sites! :-)
On 6/30/2010 7:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
kylekyle and I have planned to use http://thelittlewheels.com/ as a
showcase for camping stuff. probably even more confusing to new
people t
Awesome domain name! And as long as you include the image, it probably
makes sense for new people too.
You know, the password to the camping github account was actually
"littlewheels" :-)
// Magnus Holm
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 15:03, Sean Busbey wrote:
> kylekyle and I have planned to use htt
kylekyle and I have planned to use http://thelittlewheels.com/ as a
showcase for camping stuff. probably even more confusing to new
people than whywentcamping
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 13:57, Philippe Monnet wrote:
> Thanks Magnus! I love the idea of working on the web site for 2.1.
> I am still n
Thanks Magnus! I love the idea of working on the web site for 2.1.
I am still not crazy about the web site name though - as it is not easy
for people to remember if they don't know the connection with _why. I
personally would have preferred rubycamping.com or something linking
Camping to Ruby s
Hey,
I've converted the camping account into an organization (see
http://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations), which means
that it's a lot easier to manage it. There's currently two teams at
the moment:
Owners: These have full admin access (can create repos etc.)
- Magnus
- Philippe
De
Hey campers!
I think it's about time to release Camping 2.1, which features:
* Support for other template engines (Haml, ERB, etc) out of the box
* No longer depends on ActiveRecord (this was a bug)
* Camping.options is now a Hash where you can put all sorts of
configuration stuff
* Camping::Serv
10 matches
Mail list logo
