> On Oct 15, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Tom Poage wrote:
>
> This email I sent looks like it got stuck in Google yesterday for nearly
> 2-1/2 hours before delivery (cf. Received lines in mail header). List
> maintainers: Two followup emails I sent yesterday mid-day on this topic still
> have not been
1930357d3dc3bdb6d4cffa8214
> >
> > From: Misagh Moayyed mailto:mmoay...@unicon.net)>
> > Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:43 AM
> > To: Tom Poage mailto:tfpo...@ucdavis.edu)>, CAS
> > Community mailto:cas-user@apereo.org)>
> > Subject: Re: [cas-user
y
mailto:cas-user@apereo.org>>
Subject: Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6
You can exclude the hazelcast dependency from the relevant module, and provide
your own exact version.
--
Misagh
From: Tom Poage <mailto:tfpo...@ucdavis.edu>
Reply: Tom Poage <mailto:tfpo...@ucdavis.edu&g
than or
equal to zero.
Tom.
* https://github.com/apereo/cas/commit/c1cbde11c5722e1930357d3dc3bdb6d4cffa8214
From: Misagh Moayyed
Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:43 AM
To: Tom Poage , CAS Community
Subject: Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6
You can exclude the hazelcast dependency from
This email I sent looks like it got stuck in Google yesterday for nearly
2-1/2 hours before delivery (cf. Received lines in mail header). List
maintainers: Two followup emails I sent yesterday mid-day on this topic
still have not been delivered.
In summary:
The RegistryCleaner was moved/refact
You can exclude the hazelcast dependency from the relevant module, and provide
your own exact version.
--
Misagh
From: Tom Poage
Reply: Tom Poage
Date: October 14, 2016 at 8:44:49 PM
To: CAS Community
Subject: Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6
Disabling the fourth node doesn't c
Disabling the fourth node doesn't change anything.
Profiling shows the highest CPU/time is spent in Hazelcast. Whether this is a
result of the updated Hazelcast version or the new synchronous CAS code remains
to be seen.
Is it oossible to downgrade Hazelcast version (say, to 3.6) on CAS 4.2.6,
