Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6

2016-10-17 Thread Tom Poage
> On Oct 15, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Tom Poage wrote: > > This email I sent looks like it got stuck in Google yesterday for nearly > 2-1/2 hours before delivery (cf. Received lines in mail header). List > maintainers: Two followup emails I sent yesterday mid-day on this topic still > have not been

Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6

2016-10-17 Thread dkopylenko
1930357d3dc3bdb6d4cffa8214 > > > > From: Misagh Moayyed mailto:mmoay...@unicon.net)> > > Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:43 AM > > To: Tom Poage mailto:tfpo...@ucdavis.edu)>, CAS > > Community mailto:cas-user@apereo.org)> > > Subject: Re: [cas-user

Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6

2016-10-17 Thread Tom Poage
y mailto:cas-user@apereo.org>> Subject: Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6 You can exclude the hazelcast dependency from the relevant module, and provide your own exact version. -- Misagh From: Tom Poage <mailto:tfpo...@ucdavis.edu> Reply: Tom Poage <mailto:tfpo...@ucdavis.edu&g

Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6

2016-10-17 Thread Tom Poage
than or equal to zero. Tom. * https://github.com/apereo/cas/commit/c1cbde11c5722e1930357d3dc3bdb6d4cffa8214 From: Misagh Moayyed Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:43 AM To: Tom Poage , CAS Community Subject: Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6 You can exclude the hazelcast dependency from

Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6

2016-10-15 Thread Tom Poage
This email I sent looks like it got stuck in Google yesterday for nearly 2-1/2 hours before delivery (cf. Received lines in mail header). List maintainers: Two followup emails I sent yesterday mid-day on this topic still have not been delivered. In summary: The RegistryCleaner was moved/refact

Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6

2016-10-14 Thread Misagh Moayyed
You can exclude the hazelcast dependency from the relevant module, and provide your own exact version.  --  Misagh From: Tom Poage Reply: Tom Poage Date: October 14, 2016 at 8:44:49 PM To: CAS Community Subject:  Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6 Disabling the fourth node doesn't c

Re: [cas-user] Server load w/ 4.2.6

2016-10-14 Thread Tom Poage
Disabling the fourth node doesn't change anything. Profiling shows the highest CPU/time is spent in Hazelcast. Whether this is a result of the updated Hazelcast version or the new synchronous CAS code remains to be seen. Is it oossible to downgrade Hazelcast version (say, to 3.6) on CAS 4.2.6,