+1
Edward
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:48 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> Once that's in, for 296 I propose that we proceed with the remove, and
>> since it will be a clean remove in svn history it will be easy for
>> Edward or anyone else to reve
+1, even though I'm still +1 CQL just -1 time
Michael
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:48 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> Once that's in, for 296 I propose that we proceed with the remove, and
>> since it will be a clean remove in svn history it will
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:48 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Once that's in, for 296 I propose that we proceed with the remove, and
> since it will be a clean remove in svn history it will be easy for
> Edward or anyone else to revert and work on locally. When progress is
> made and CQL sucks less t
So, for 185, I have a half-assed CQL update that at least keeps it
working for ascii data.
Once that's in, for 296 I propose that we proceed with the remove, and
since it will be a clean remove in svn history it will be easy for
Edward or anyone else to revert and work on locally. When progress i
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 21:15 -0300, Edward Ribeiro wrote:
> I am particularly interested on query languages, and CQL would be nice
> thing work on since I put on indefinite hold my previous suggestion to
> cassandra (the RESTful client interface). If no one else is willing to
> support it, I would b
I am particularly interested on query languages, and CQL would be nice
thing work on since I put on indefinite hold my previous suggestion to
cassandra (the RESTful client interface). If no one else is willing to
support it, I would be glad to.
Edward
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Ell
