Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread Steffen Bruening
Hi Bill, When you ask for callers ahead of you, you should go with ContactsWaiting+decrement step, because position in Queue is your position and when nobody else is in the queue you will hear a - 1 after the decrement, don't know whether there is also an increment step. At the end it is your

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread Bill Lake
Sounds like either way works, so as long as it works, it really doesn't matter how you get it, just as long as the proctor gets what he is supposed to hear. I know I have used the slightly longer way as it helps me stay organized but next lab session I am going to try this if I can keep my ducks

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread William Bell
Steffen, Thanks for the reply. Actually, position in queue is the correct reporting statistic because I want to know how many contacts are ahead of the current contact. ContactsWaiting gives total number of contacts waiting for a resource without context for the existing contact. So, if I had

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread William Bell
Bill, You are correct. That variable will never have a value of -1 given that it is re-initialized during every loop iteration. I use UCCX to record all prompts for UCCX and BACD. I use CUC for CUC and CUE prompt manager for its prompts. I haven't practiced doing recordings in CUC (other than

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt Question

2012-11-30 Thread Steffen Bruening
Hi Bill, I had my first attempt in November, but failed because I don't read some question corectly in every detail. I had this problem with -1 in some of my lab sessions (not proctor labs) and it worked with contacts waiting for me. I tested it with 3 call-in users and all get an indivudually