: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Should Rmerge be reported?
Hi Graeme,
could you explain why Rmeas does not serve the same purpose as Rmerge?
I guess Manfred (and others) have no objection to reporting Rmeas just
instead of Rmerge.
@ Christy: If one of my manuscript were rejected solely
etter ways of measuring damage - Rd, Rcp, ... but these
>>> are not commonplace graphs as I understand it. This little number in
>>> the middle of the table does give you that hint.
>>>
>>> So while I would say rejecting a paper because it was not included
>>> was very hea
rom all
papers either.
All the best Graeme
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of
Manfred S. Weiss Sent: 10 June
2021 13:30 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Should Rmerge be reported?
Dear Cristy,
this is really hilarious. And it just shows how attached
some
ot included
> was very heavy handed, I would not like to see it erased from all
> papers either.
>
> All the best Graeme
> ____
> From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of
> Manfred S. Weiss Sent: 10 June
> 2021 13:30 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Sh
uphill
battle.
All the best Graeme
From: Manfred S. Weiss
Sent: 10 June 2021 13:43
To: Winter, Graeme (DLSLtd,RAL,LSCI) ;
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Should Rmerge be reported?
Dear Graeme,
a better number to look at is Isa. Instead of low
___
From: CCP4 bulletin board <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf
of Manfred S. Weiss
<mailto:manfred.we...@helmholtz-berlin.de>
Sent: 10 June 2021 13:30
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]
from all papers either.
All the best Graeme
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Manfred S. Weiss
Sent: 10 June 2021 13:30
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Should Rmerge be reported?
Dear Cristy,
this is really hilarious. And it just s
Dear Cristy,
this is really hilarious. And it just shows how attached
some ppl are to outdated numbers. Against better
knowledge.
It has been shown many times that Rmerge is flawed
at various levels.
The only reason I can see to report it is to be backwards
compatible. But of course, this is a
Dear Colleagues
Hope to find you all well and healthy.
I have a question regarding Rmerge. In recent years, we have published our
crystallographic structures in highly respected journals using CC1/2,
I/sigma(I), completeness and multiplicity as quality parameters for our
diffraction data.
Recentl
