Re: [ccp4bb] immobilized DNA resin

2011-04-10 Thread Garnett, James A
Hi Alex,

as you have a DNA binding protein does it have a high pI? If so, good old ion 
exchange with an S-sepharose column should do it.

Cheers

James

Dr James Garnett
Division of Molecular Biosciences, Imperial College London,
Level 5, Biochemistry Building,
South Kensington,
LONDON SW7 2AZ,
UK.

Tel: +44 (0) 207 594 5464
Fax: +44 (0) 207 594 3057

- Reply message -
From: Raji Edayathumangalam r...@brandeis.edu
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] immobilized DNA resin
Date: Sun, Apr 10, 2011 03:38



Hi Alex,

Most DNA-binding proteins has decent affinity to heparin columns. Have you 
tried purifying your protein over heparin columns?

Cheers,
Raji



On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Alexandra Deaconescu 
deac...@brandeis.edumailto:deac...@brandeis.edu wrote:
 Hello ccp4 enthusiasts:

I am afraid this is a non-ccp4 related question. Can anyone recommend an 
immobilized dsDNA chromatographic resin for purification of DNA-binding 
proteins? GE seems to have something - I was wondering if people have other 
recommendations? In the age of GST and His tags etc., these are not very much 
used, but I do not have a tag in this case...

Thanks a lot,
Alex



--

---
Raji Edayathumangalam
Research Fellow in Neurology, Harvard Medical School
Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's 
Hospital
Visiting Research Scholar, Brandeis University



Re: [ccp4bb] immobilized DNA resin

2011-04-10 Thread Jacob Keller
Related fact I learned recently, perhaps of interest for fellow record-keepers:

heparin sulfate has the highest negative charge density of any known
biological molecule.

JPK

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Raji Edayathumangalam r...@brandeis.edu wrote:
 Hi Alex,

 Most DNA-binding proteins has decent affinity to heparin columns. Have you
 tried purifying your protein over heparin columns?

 Cheers,
 Raji



 On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Alexandra Deaconescu deac...@brandeis.edu
 wrote:

  Hello ccp4 enthusiasts:

 I am afraid this is a non-ccp4 related question. Can anyone recommend an
 immobilized dsDNA chromatographic resin for purification of DNA-binding
 proteins? GE seems to have something - I was wondering if people have other
 recommendations? In the age of GST and His tags etc., these are not very
 much used, but I do not have a tag in this case...

 Thanks a lot,
 Alex



 --

 ---
 Raji Edayathumangalam
 Research Fellow in Neurology, Harvard Medical School
 Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's
 Hospital
 Visiting Research Scholar, Brandeis University





-- 
***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
***


Re: [ccp4bb] immobilized DNA resin

2011-04-10 Thread Dima Klenchin

heparin sulfate has the highest negative charge density of any known
biological molecule.


Seems to me that phytic acid (IP6, C6H6-(H2P04)6) and inositol 
heptakisphosphate (IP7) should have higher charge per mass and per volume.


 - Dima


Re: [ccp4bb] immobilized DNA resin

2011-04-10 Thread Jacob Keller
Hey, does Wikipedia lie? Also, the reference is to Lehninger's text,
although I did not verify it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heparin

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dima Klenchin
klenc...@facstaff.wisc.edu wrote:

 heparin sulfate has the highest negative charge density of any known
 biological molecule.

 Seems to me that phytic acid (IP6, C6H6-(H2P04)6) and inositol
 heptakisphosphate (IP7) should have higher charge per mass and per volume.

  - Dima










-- 
***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
***


Re: [ccp4bb] how to quantitate protein which dont have ne aromatic residue

2011-04-10 Thread E rajakumar
Hi Arpita

You can try QUANTI-iT
Protein assay kit from Invitrogen.

But still there is
nearly 20-50% discrepancy between this method and a Abosorbance at 280.

I also faced same
problem with a protein, then re-cloned by adding a Trp at the C-terminus.

Raj

 
E. Rajakumara
Postdoctoral Fellow  Strcutural Biology Program  Memorial Sloan-Kettering 
Cancer Center  New York-10021  NY  001 212 639 7986 (Lab)  001 917 674 6266 
(Mobile)

--- On Sat, 9/4/11, Arpit Mishra ar...@igib.in wrote:

From: Arpit Mishra ar...@igib.in
Subject: [ccp4bb] how to quantitate protein which dont have ne aromatic residue
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Date: Saturday, 9 April, 2011, 3:22 PM

hello everybody
i am working on the protien which dont have any aromatic residue  i do fplc 
other purification using 220 absorption, but i want to quantitate protein 
precisely i have tried using BCA nd bradford but both methods quantification is 
not matching,,so any one is having sum idea how to quantitate it precisely 

thanks in advance for your valuable suggestion..

Arpit Mishra


[ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-10 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Hi,

I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether there
are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual surfaces
is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some advices
about this method.

I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this is
kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some more
direct methods.

Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
unit during calculation.

Thanks!

Hailiang


Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-10 Thread Edward A. Berry

Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference you
mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable 
van-der-Waals
contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold distance
results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating them.
this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

Hailiang Zhang wrote:

Hi,

I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether there
are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual surfaces
is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some advices
about this method.

I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this is
kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some more
direct methods.

Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
unit during calculation.

Thanks!

Hailiang



Re: [ccp4bb] how to quantitate protein which dont have ne aromatic residue

2011-04-10 Thread gauri misra
Hi,
You can read the spectrophotometric absorption at 280 nm and 200nm in UV
range.
It should serve your purpose and provide a decent idea for the amount of
protein in the sample.
Provided that absorbance at 280nm is given by aromatic rings but at the same
time absorbance at 200nm is contributed by peptide bonds. A simultaneous
reading at 260 nm which can be deducted later will substract the effect of
nucleic acids.
The relation between the readings at these values and protein concentration
you can easily find anywhere on the web.

Best wishes
Gauri


[ccp4bb] O-linked glycosylation refinement in Phenix

2011-04-10 Thread Qiang Chen
Dear all,

I'm refining a structure which has both N-linked and O-linked
glycosylation. I use Phenix to do the refinement. It works well for the
N-linked NAG. I defined the link as the following:

apply_cif_link {
  data_link = NAG-ASN
  residue_selection_1 = chain A and resname NAG and resid 701
  residue_selection_2 = chain A and resname ASN and resid 518
}

But it doesn't work when I defined the fucose-threonine link as the
similar way:

apply_cif_link {
  data_link = FUC-THR
  residue_selection_1 = chain A and resname FUC and resid 801
  residue_selection_2 = chain A and resname THR and resid 596
}

The error message is missing CIF link: data_link_FUC-THR.

Does anyone have the experience of the O-linked glycosylaton refinement by
Phenix?

Thanks a lot!


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [ccp4bb] Used AREIMOL to judge the steric clashes

2011-04-10 Thread Hailiang Zhang
Thanks Edward! Actually Areaimol works well for my problem.

But now I have a new issue looking for some advice. I want to randomly
generate some points in the unit cell and make a quick judgment whether it
is outside of the solvent mask or not. It seems that Areaimol doesn't help
at this point, and wonder whether some others tools in CCP4 can help to
make it.

Thanks again for your help!

Best Regards, Hailiang
 Areaimol is good for determining the contact area from the difference you
 mentioned. If you want to distinguish real clashes from comfortable
 van-der-Waals
 contacts, you can use pdbdist3:

   http://sb20.lbl.gov/berry/for/pdbdist3.for

 The two molecules have to be in separate pdb files. You give a
 threshold distance. For every atom in the first structure, every
 atom in the second structure that is closer than the threshold distance
 results in printing out the pair of atoms and the distance separating
 them.
 this gives a list of all contacts within the threshold distance.

 For v-d-w contacts are around 3.4 A, H-bonds 2.7, and anything
 closer than 2.0 could be considered a serious clash.

 Hailiang Zhang wrote:
 Hi,

 I have 2 rigid and fixed proteins and want to quickly judge whether
 there
 are some steric clashes. One quick way I am thinking is using CCP4
 AREAIMOL to calculate the surfaces of each individual protein as well as
 the heterodimer, and check whether the sum of the two individual
 surfaces
 is larger then the dimer. I am wondering whether I can get some advices
 about this method.

 I also know there must be some other tools to quickly do it since this
 is
 kinda a simple docking problem, and I appreciate if suggested some more
 direct methods.

 Finally, I am also wondering whether AREAIMOL considers the assymetric
 unit during calculation.

 Thanks!

 Hailiang