Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-08 Thread Edward A. Berry

Roger Rowlett wrote:

No. Kw = [H3O+][OH-] = 1 x 10^-14 at 25 deg C.

So at pH 7.0, you have 10^-7 M each at equilibrium no matter how you slice it 
or whatever
else is in solution. If equilibrium [H3O+] goes up [OH-] goes down 
commensurately.

The pKa of water as an acid is based on Kw and water's effective 
concentration of 55 M
in pure water. This pKa is used to compare the instrinsic acidity of water to 
other weak
acids. Water is an exceptionally weak acid or base.



And note that Kw, like other physical constants, depends on temperature,
ionic strength, etc. Therefore neutrality, defined as the concentration
where H+ = OH- , which is half of pKw*, is not exactly 7.0, but varies.
A lot of students come out of first-year chemistry with the idea that
pH 7. is by definition neutral.

(*That is using the old Kw definition where {H2O} is taken as 1)

The pK at 14 (or 14+log(55)) is for H2O - OH-, H+
i.e. pH where H2O = OH-

The pK at 0 (or -log 55)) is for H3O+ - H2O, H+
i.e. pH ph when H3O+ = H2O


But isn't H+ = H30? then when H3O+ = H2O, [H3O] = 55/2,
   pH would be -log (55/2)
pH is log of activity of water, or whatever the glass electrode measure.
Or- assuming [H2O] always unity, when H2O = H3O+, H3O+ = 1, pH=0
assuming [H2O] always 55, extrapolate to where H3O+ = H2O while keeping H20=55,
then pH would be -log 55


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Clement Angkawidjaja

Hi Deepak,

Assuming that you have done the necessary things to measure the pKr of 
that particular Asp, I would say that the increase is advantageous for 
your enzyme. Enzyme catalysis often involves very subtle changes on the 
ionization state of the active site. But you need to be very careful in 
proposing a catalysis mechanism.


b) How is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water 
molecule to donate a proton?
Are you sure that the water donates a proton? Was your resolution high 
enough to observe it? How did you measure that pKr, by the way?


c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated irrespective of 
whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true?
I would say that the dominant fraction of Asp is deprotonated. But as 
you can see in the papers below, the pKr of Asp can vary from 0.5 to 9.2 
in folded proteins.


d) Have similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before?
there are some papers by Nick Pace's group:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2708032/?tool=pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2679426/?tool=pubmed
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002228360600934X

Cheers,
Clement

--


On 2/7/12 8:48 PM, Deepak Oswal wrote:


Dear colleagues,

We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a 
catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is 
hydrogen bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed 
to donate a proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) 
interpret the significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic 
acid from 3.8 to 6.44 in context with the catalysis? Is this 
advantageous or detrimental? b) How is pKa related to an amino acids’ 
ability to force a water molecule to donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, 
the aspartic acid would be de-protonated irrespective of whether the 
pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have similar increase in pKa 
values observed for aspartic acids before? I would be grateful if 
anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.


Deepak Oswal






Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Xiaodi Yu

Hi Deepak:

I think it is common for the residues which participate catalysis to have a Pka 
deviated from the reality pKa value especially for acid/base catalysis (acid 
base titration assay can help you to figure out the way of catalysis). Usually 
the pKa values of these kind of critical residues are affected by their local 
environment and this character is related to the enzyme's working mechanism.

I am sorry that I am not professional in enzyme, I cannot answer your questions 
for each questions.

Yu Xiaodi

Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:48:26 +0800
From: deepos...@gmail.com
Subject: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


Dear colleagues,

We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a 
catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen 
bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a proton 
during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the significance of this 
increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44 in context with the 
catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How is pKa related to an 
amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to donate a proton? c) At pH 
7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated irrespective of whether the pKa 
is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have similar increase in pKa values 
observed for aspartic acids before? I would be grateful if anybody could 
explain or comment on the above queries.

Deepak Oswal  

Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Roger Rowlett

  
  
Residue pKa values in proteins are strongly
  affected by the local environment and can deviate far from the
  "norm". Of course, the higher the pKa of the residue, the stronger
  general base it will be. There is a significant
  thermodynamic/kinetic advantage in matching the pKa of a general
  base to the pKa of the proton that must be removed for catalysis.
Aspartate frequently plays a role as a general base for assisting
water in nucleophilic attack.

I think it is unusual for water to act as a general acid (the pKa of
water is 14-15, depending on how you calculate it), but if that is
the case and there is compelling evidence that water is the proton
donor in your reaction, it would be necessary for aspartic acid to
be in its protonated form in order to assist a water-mediated
protonation event. Raising the pKa of aspartic acid would allow a
larger fraction of it to be in its protonated state at
physiologically relevant pH values, although it would reduce the
intrinsic effectiveness of Asp as a general acid. There should be a
significant thermodynamic and kinetic advantage in having Asp
participate directly in a general acid catalyzed reaction, rather
than through a water molecule.

Cheers,

___
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon  Dorothy Kline Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu

On 2/7/2012 10:00 AM, Xiaodi Yu wrote:

  
  
Hi Deepak:

I think it is common for the residues which participate
catalysis to have a Pka deviated from the reality pKa value
especially for acid/base catalysis (acid base titration assay
can help you to figure out the way of catalysis). Usually the
pKa values of these kind of critical residues are affected by
their local environment and this character is related to the
enzyme's working mechanism.

I am sorry that I am not professional in enzyme, I cannot answer
your questions for each questions.

Yu Xiaodi


  Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:48:26 +0800
  From: deepos...@gmail.com
  Subject: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid
  To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
  
  
Dear colleagues,
We have solved
the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to
6.44. It is hydrogen bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water
molecule that is supposed to donate a proton during the
catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic
acid from 3.8 to 6.44 in context with the catalysis? Is
this advantageous or detrimental? b) How is pKa related
to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would
be de-protonated irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8
or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have similar increase in
pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the
above queries.
Deepak Oswal
  
  

  



Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Kevin Jin
As we know, the pKa of water is 15.7. Under pH 7.0, its protonation
should be 50/50.
In this case, we may need to consider water in two formats:

H2O vs. H3O+

When we say water as acid, it usually stands for H3O+ in chemistry. In
chemical equation, H+ represents H3O+.

In enzyme catalysis, water as a general acid sounds reasonable under
pH 7.0. In some famous paper, water has been concluded as the general
base (pKa 15.7) to deprotonate an alpha hydrogen (pKa ~ 22) or a
hydrogen from a sp3 hybridized carbon (pKa ~36). This logic may need
to be reconsidered.
.
Recently, I have read papers for pKa perturbation. I am also
interested in the general base of Asp and Glu in enzyme catalysis.


I will be very happy to read your paper in the future.

Regards,

Kevin Jin

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Deepak Oswal deepos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear colleagues,

 We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
 catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
 bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
 proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
 significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
 in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
 is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
 donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
 irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
 similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
 be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.

 Deepak Oswal


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Fischmann, Thierry
Check this review, for instance:

Pace, C. et al. Protein Ionizable Groups:  pK values and Their Contribution to 
Protein Stability and Solubility.  J. Biol Chem.  284, 13285-13289 (May 15, 
2009)

Thierry



From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Xiaodi Yu
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:00 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

Hi Deepak:

I think it is common for the residues which participate catalysis to have a Pka 
deviated from the reality pKa value especially for acid/base catalysis (acid 
base titration assay can help you to figure out the way of catalysis). Usually 
the pKa values of these kind of critical residues are affected by their local 
environment and this character is related to the enzyme's working mechanism.

I am sorry that I am not professional in enzyme, I cannot answer your questions 
for each questions.

Yu Xiaodi


Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:48:26 +0800
From: deepos...@gmail.com
Subject: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


Dear colleagues,

We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a 
catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen 
bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a proton 
during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the significance of this 
increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44 in context with the 
catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How is pKa related to an 
amino acids' ability to force a water molecule to donate a proton? c) At pH 
7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated irrespective of whether the pKa 
is 3.8 or 6.44; isn't that true? d) Have similar increase in pKa values 
observed for aspartic acids before? I would be grateful if anybody could 
explain or comment on the above queries.

Deepak Oswal
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information
for affiliates is available at 
http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential,
proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are
not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from 
your system.


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Fischmann, Thierry
Oops, you meant catalytic residue. Check the following:

Harris TK  Turner GJ Structural basis of pertubed pKa values of catalytic 
groups in enzyme active sites IUBMB life, 53 85-98 (Feb 2002)

Thierry


From: Fischmann, Thierry
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:59 AM
To: 'Xiaodi Yu'; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: RE: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

Check this review, for instance:

Pace, C. et al. Protein Ionizable Groups:  pK values and Their Contribution to 
Protein Stability and Solubility.  J. Biol Chem.  284, 13285-13289 (May 15, 
2009)

Thierry



From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Xiaodi Yu
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:00 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

Hi Deepak:

I think it is common for the residues which participate catalysis to have a Pka 
deviated from the reality pKa value especially for acid/base catalysis (acid 
base titration assay can help you to figure out the way of catalysis). Usually 
the pKa values of these kind of critical residues are affected by their local 
environment and this character is related to the enzyme's working mechanism.

I am sorry that I am not professional in enzyme, I cannot answer your questions 
for each questions.

Yu Xiaodi


Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:48:26 +0800
From: deepos...@gmail.com
Subject: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


Dear colleagues,

We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a 
catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen 
bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a proton 
during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the significance of this 
increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44 in context with the 
catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How is pKa related to an 
amino acids' ability to force a water molecule to donate a proton? c) At pH 
7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated irrespective of whether the pKa 
is 3.8 or 6.44; isn't that true? d) Have similar increase in pKa values 
observed for aspartic acids before? I would be grateful if anybody could 
explain or comment on the above queries.

Deepak Oswal
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information
for affiliates is available at 
http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential,
proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are
not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from 
your system.


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Christian Roth
Hi,

you may also look into the papers of John A. Gerlt, who did a lot on 
protonabtraction reactions and the theory behind this. Esspecially the pKa 
disturbance and the match to the pkA of the substrate of the reaction. 

Best Wishes 

Christian

Am Dienstag 07 Februar 2012 12:48:26 schrieb Deepak Oswal:
 Dear colleagues,
 
 We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
 catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
 bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
 proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
 significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
 in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
 is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
 donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
 irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
 similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
 be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.
 
 Deepak Oswal
 


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Hong Zhang
Is the water molecule in question coordinated to any other group(s)? 


-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Kevin
Jin
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:22 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

As we know, the pKa of water is 15.7. Under pH 7.0, its protonation
should be 50/50.
In this case, we may need to consider water in two formats:

H2O vs. H3O+

When we say water as acid, it usually stands for H3O+ in chemistry. In
chemical equation, H+ represents H3O+.

In enzyme catalysis, water as a general acid sounds reasonable under
pH 7.0. In some famous paper, water has been concluded as the general
base (pKa 15.7) to deprotonate an alpha hydrogen (pKa ~ 22) or a
hydrogen from a sp3 hybridized carbon (pKa ~36). This logic may need
to be reconsidered.
.
Recently, I have read papers for pKa perturbation. I am also
interested in the general base of Asp and Glu in enzyme catalysis.


I will be very happy to read your paper in the future.

Regards,

Kevin Jin

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Deepak Oswal deepos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear colleagues,

 We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
 catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
 bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
 proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
 significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
 in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
 is pKa related to an amino acids' ability to force a water molecule to
 donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
 irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn't that true? d) Have
 similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
 be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.

 Deepak Oswal


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Kevin Jin
Maybe you would also be interested in

http://www.jinkai.org/AAD_history.html

Regards,

Kevin

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Christian Roth
christian.r...@bbz.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
 Hi,

 you may also look into the papers of John A. Gerlt, who did a lot on
 protonabtraction reactions and the theory behind this. Esspecially the pKa
 disturbance and the match to the pkA of the substrate of the reaction.

 Best Wishes

 Christian

 Am Dienstag 07 Februar 2012 12:48:26 schrieb Deepak Oswal:
 Dear colleagues,

 We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
 catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
 bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
 proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
 significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
 in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
 is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
 donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
 irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
 similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
 be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.

 Deepak Oswal



Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Francisco Hernandez-Guzman
Hi Deepak,

With regards observed pKa shifts, Prof. Ondrechen from Northeastern University 
has had a long interest in this field.

http://www.northeastern.edu/org/wp/

Under the computational tools that she has developed a program called THEMATICS 
that allows you to predict the pka of titratable amino acids and she has been 
able to predict shifts. Though the server seems to be down at this point, here 
is the reference: Y. Wei, J. Ko, L.F. Murga, and M.J. Ondrechen, BMC 
Bioinformatics 8:119, (2007)

From the commercial side, Dr. Spassov from Accelrys has also been working on 
tools that predict protein ionization. In his work, he has also been able to 
predict significant pka shifts for functionally relevant residues.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2578799/

Cheers,

Francisco


From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Deepak 
Oswal
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 3:48 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

Dear colleagues,
We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a 
catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen 
bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a proton 
during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the significance of this 
increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44 in context with the 
catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How is pKa related to an 
amino acids' ability to force a water molecule to donate a proton? c) At pH 
7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated irrespective of whether the pKa 
is 3.8 or 6.44; isn't that true? d) Have similar increase in pKa values 
observed for aspartic acids before? I would be grateful if anybody could 
explain or comment on the above queries.
Deepak Oswal


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Zachary Wood
Hi Kevin,

Hate to point this out, but under pH 7.0, the protonation state of water is not 
50:50, and it is not a good acid.  The H30+ concentration of pure water is 
10^-7 Molar.  In pure water (assuming 55.5 M) only 1:555,000,000 water 
molecules is in the protonated, charged state (H3O+).  This is why when an 
enzyme uses water in its mechanism as a nucleophile, base, or acid, there is 
usually an acid/base catalyst or  metal that protonates or deprotonates the 
water to 'activate it'. 


Best regards,

Z


***
Zachary A. Wood, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor  
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
University of Georgia
Life Sciences Building, Rm A426B
120 Green Street
Athens, GA  30602-7229
Office: 706-583-0304
Lab:706-583-0303
FAX: 706-542-1738
***






On Feb 7, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Kevin Jin wrote:

 As we know, the pKa of water is 15.7. Under pH 7.0, its protonation
 should be 50/50.
 In this case, we may need to consider water in two formats:
 
 H2O vs. H3O+
 
 When we say water as acid, it usually stands for H3O+ in chemistry. In
 chemical equation, H+ represents H3O+.
 
 In enzyme catalysis, water as a general acid sounds reasonable under
 pH 7.0. In some famous paper, water has been concluded as the general
 base (pKa 15.7) to deprotonate an alpha hydrogen (pKa ~ 22) or a
 hydrogen from a sp3 hybridized carbon (pKa ~36). This logic may need
 to be reconsidered.
 .
 Recently, I have read papers for pKa perturbation. I am also
 interested in the general base of Asp and Glu in enzyme catalysis.
 
 
 I will be very happy to read your paper in the future.
 
 Regards,
 
 Kevin Jin
 
 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Deepak Oswal deepos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear colleagues,
 
 We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
 catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
 bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
 proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
 significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
 in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
 is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
 donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
 irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
 similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
 be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.
 
 Deepak Oswal
 


Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Kevin Jin
Oops, It should be: [H3O+]/[OH-]= 50/50

Kw = [H3O+][OH-],

pH = pKa +log ([OH-]/[H2O])

H3O+ concentration of pure water is 10^-7 mol/L

total H+ = 55.5M * 10^-7 = 5.55* 10^-6 mole. Is this right?

Regards,

Kevin


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Zachary Wood z...@bmb.uga.edu wrote:
 Hi Kevin,

 Hate to point this out, but under pH 7.0, the protonation state of water is 
 not 50:50, and it is not a good acid.  The H30+ concentration of pure water 
 is 10^-7 Molar.  In pure water (assuming 55.5 M) only 1:555,000,000 water 
 molecules is in the protonated, charged state (H3O+).  This is why when an 
 enzyme uses water in its mechanism as a nucleophile, base, or acid, there is 
 usually an acid/base catalyst or  metal that protonates or deprotonates the 
 water to 'activate it'.


 Best regards,

 Z


 ***
 Zachary A. Wood, Ph.D.
 Assistant Professor
 Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
 University of Georgia
 Life Sciences Building, Rm A426B
 120 Green Street
 Athens, GA  30602-7229
 Office: 706-583-0304
 Lab:    706-583-0303
 FAX: 706-542-1738
 ***






 On Feb 7, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Kevin Jin wrote:

 As we know, the pKa of water is 15.7. Under pH 7.0, its protonation
 should be 50/50.
 In this case, we may need to consider water in two formats:

 H2O vs. H3O+

 When we say water as acid, it usually stands for H3O+ in chemistry. In
 chemical equation, H+ represents H3O+.

 In enzyme catalysis, water as a general acid sounds reasonable under
 pH 7.0. In some famous paper, water has been concluded as the general
 base (pKa 15.7) to deprotonate an alpha hydrogen (pKa ~ 22) or a
 hydrogen from a sp3 hybridized carbon (pKa ~36). This logic may need
 to be reconsidered.
 .
 Recently, I have read papers for pKa perturbation. I am also
 interested in the general base of Asp and Glu in enzyme catalysis.


 I will be very happy to read your paper in the future.

 Regards,

 Kevin Jin

 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Deepak Oswal deepos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear colleagues,

 We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
 catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
 bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
 proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
 significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
 in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
 is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
 donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
 irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
 similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
 be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.

 Deepak Oswal




Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Roger Rowlett

  
  
No. Kw = [H3O+][OH-] = 1 x 10^-14 at 25 deg C.
  
  
So at pH 7.0, you have 10^-7 M each at
  equilibrium no matter how you slice it or whatever else is in
  solution. If equilibrium [H3O+] goes up [OH-] goes down
commensurately.

  The "pKa" of water as an acid is based on Kw and water's effective
  concentration of 55 M in pure water. This "pKa" is used to compare
  the instrinsic acidity of water to other weak acids. Water is an
  exceptionally weak acid or base.
  

___
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon  Dorothy Kline Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu

On 2/7/2012 3:42 PM, Kevin Jin wrote:

  Oops, It should be: [H3O+]/[OH-]= 50/50

Kw = [H3O+][OH-],

pH = pKa +log ([OH-]/[H2O])

H3O+ concentration of pure water is 10^-7 mol/L

total H+ = 55.5M * 10^-7 = 5.55* 10^-6 mole. Is this right?

Regards,

Kevin


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Zachary Wood z...@bmb.uga.edu wrote:

  
Hi Kevin,

Hate to point this out, but under pH 7.0, the protonation state of water is not 50:50, and it is not a good acid.  The H30+ concentration of pure water is 10^-7 Molar.  In pure water (assuming 55.5 M) only 1:555,000,000 water molecules is in the protonated, charged state (H3O+).  This is why when an enzyme uses water in its mechanism as a nucleophile, base, or acid, there is usually an acid/base catalyst or  metal that protonates or deprotonates the water to 'activate it'.


Best regards,

Z


***
Zachary A. Wood, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
University of Georgia
Life Sciences Building, Rm A426B
120 Green Street
Athens, GA  30602-7229
Office: 706-583-0304
Lab:    706-583-0303
FAX: 706-542-1738
***






On Feb 7, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Kevin Jin wrote:



  As we know, the pKa of water is 15.7. Under pH 7.0, its protonation
should be 50/50.
In this case, we may need to consider water in two formats:

H2O vs. H3O+

When we say water as acid, it usually stands for H3O+ in chemistry. In
chemical equation, H+ represents H3O+.

In enzyme catalysis, water as a general acid sounds reasonable under
pH 7.0. In some famous paper, water has been concluded as the general
base (pKa 15.7) to deprotonate an alpha hydrogen (pKa ~ 22) or a
hydrogen from a sp3 hybridized carbon (pKa ~36). This logic may need
to be reconsidered.
.
Recently, I have read papers for pKa perturbation. I am also
interested in the general base of Asp and Glu in enzyme catalysis.


I will be very happy to read your paper in the future.

Regards,

Kevin Jin

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Deepak Oswal deepos...@gmail.com wrote:

  
Dear colleagues,

We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.

Deepak Oswal

  
  




  

  



Re: [ccp4bb] On pKa of Aspartic acid

2012-02-07 Thread Horacio Botti
Dear all,

for further discussion

I believe that using the 0-14 pH scale assumes water activity of pure
water, something that is surely not matched in the surface or pocket of a
protein, so keeping this in mind I always prefer to speak about apparent
pKa of a group if talking about a non solvent-exposed group.

Horacio

2012/2/7 Roger Rowlett rrowl...@colgate.edu

  No. Kw = [H3O+][OH-] = 1 x 10^-14 at 25 deg C.

 So at pH 7.0, you have 10^-7 M each at equilibrium no matter how you slice
 it or whatever else is in solution. If equilibrium [H3O+] goes up [OH-]
 goes down commensurately.

 The pKa of water as an acid is based on Kw and water's effective
 concentration of 55 M in pure water. This pKa is used to compare the
 instrinsic acidity of water to other weak acids. Water is an exceptionally
 weak acid or base.


 ___
 Roger S. Rowlett
 Gordon  Dorothy Kline Professor
 Department of Chemistry
 Colgate University
 13 Oak Drive
 Hamilton, NY 13346

 tel: (315)-228-7245
 ofc: (315)-228-7395
 fax: (315)-228-7935
 email: rrowl...@colgate.edu

 On 2/7/2012 3:42 PM, Kevin Jin wrote:

 Oops, It should be: [H3O+]/[OH-]= 50/50

 Kw = [H3O+][OH-],

 pH = pKa +log ([OH-]/[H2O])

 H3O+ concentration of pure water is 10^-7 mol/L

 total H+ = 55.5M * 10^-7 = 5.55* 10^-6 mole. Is this right?

 Regards,

 Kevin


 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Zachary Wood z...@bmb.uga.edu 
 z...@bmb.uga.edu wrote:

  Hi Kevin,

 Hate to point this out, but under pH 7.0, the protonation state of water is 
 not 50:50, and it is not a good acid.  The H30+ concentration of pure water 
 is 10^-7 Molar.  In pure water (assuming 55.5 M) only 1:555,000,000 water 
 molecules is in the protonated, charged state (H3O+).  This is why when an 
 enzyme uses water in its mechanism as a nucleophile, base, or acid, there is 
 usually an acid/base catalyst or  metal that protonates or deprotonates the 
 water to 'activate it'.


 Best regards,

 Z


 ***
 Zachary A. Wood, Ph.D.
 Assistant Professor
 Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
 University of Georgia
 Life Sciences Building, Rm A426B
 120 Green Street
 Athens, GA  30602-7229
 Office: 706-583-0304
 Lab:706-583-0303
 FAX: 706-542-1738
 ***






 On Feb 7, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Kevin Jin wrote:


  As we know, the pKa of water is 15.7. Under pH 7.0, its protonation
 should be 50/50.
 In this case, we may need to consider water in two formats:

 H2O vs. H3O+

 When we say water as acid, it usually stands for H3O+ in chemistry. In
 chemical equation, H+ represents H3O+.

 In enzyme catalysis, water as a general acid sounds reasonable under
 pH 7.0. In some famous paper, water has been concluded as the general
 base (pKa 15.7) to deprotonate an alpha hydrogen (pKa ~ 22) or a
 hydrogen from a sp3 hybridized carbon (pKa ~36). This logic may need
 to be reconsidered.
 .
 Recently, I have read papers for pKa perturbation. I am also
 interested in the general base of Asp and Glu in enzyme catalysis.


 I will be very happy to read your paper in the future.

 Regards,

 Kevin Jin

 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Deepak Oswal deepos...@gmail.com 
 deepos...@gmail.com wrote:

  Dear colleagues,

 We have solved the crystal structure of a human enzyme. The pKa of a
 catalytically critical aspartic acid has increased to 6.44. It is hydrogen
 bonded (2.8 Angstroms) to a water molecule that is supposed to donate a
 proton during the catalysis. Can anybody help me a) interpret the
 significance of this increase in pKa of the aspartic acid from 3.8 to 6.44
 in context with the catalysis? Is this advantageous or detrimental? b) How
 is pKa related to an amino acids’ ability to force a water molecule to
 donate a proton? c) At pH 7.4, the aspartic acid would be de-protonated
 irrespective of whether the pKa is 3.8 or 6.44; isn’t that true? d) Have
 similar increase in pKa values observed for aspartic acids before? I would
 be grateful if anybody could explain or comment on the above queries.

 Deepak Oswal




-- 
Horacio Botti
PhD MD
Protein Crystallography Unit
Institut Pasteur of Montevideo