Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources

2013-05-02 Thread Dworkowski Florian
I can not really speak for a home-source setup, but here at the SLS MX group we run two Pilatus6M (one of which is the first Pilatus ever made) and one Pilatus2M. In nearly four years since we installed the first one we never had any hardware issue other than users damaging the case. So I'd say

Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources

2013-05-01 Thread Fareed Aboul-Ela
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Sent: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 2:53 pm Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources One of the main things (if not THE main thing) to worry about when investing in such expensive equipment is long-time reliability and quality of service in your place. Nothing is more frustrating than

Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources

2013-04-30 Thread David Schuller
The Excillum MetalJet (TM) source is technically very interesting, with its liquid metal jet anode, but I have no idea how well it works for typical in-house crystallography use. On 04/30/13 15:00, Fareed Aboul-Ela wrote: I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a

Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources

2013-04-30 Thread Boaz Shaanan
One of the main things (if not THE main thing) to worry about when investing in such expensive equipment is long-time reliability and quality of service in your place. Nothing is more frustrating than seeing your wonderful and expensive equipment standing idle for long periods because of lack