On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Benjamin Huntsman via cctalk
wrote:
>
> I have an ES47 I got for a price I could stomach, but it's sans rail kit,
> drinks power like it's going out of style, and can anchor a 40-ft yacht.
>
> Anyone out there do Alphas anymore?
I have a 2
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Benjamin Huntsman via cctalk wrote:
Anyone out there do Alphas anymore?
Well my AS4100 is running OpenVMS even as we speak. I have an Alphastation
500 here doing nothing. I arranged for somebody to get two free DS20Es
last year so, yes, I still do alphas.
Intel? Don't
I have a Compaq XP1000/667 that’s my primary VMS system. I picked up a couple
XP1000’s a little over a decade ago when they were affordable, as a replacement
for my AlphaStation 433au. I need a new power supply for the /500. I think
the days of hobbyist-friendly prices are largely gone.
Place your wagers...
How many more years do you think it'll take before decent, practical-sized
Alphas, like the DS15, and to some degree, the DS10, will be obtainable at
hobbyist-friendly prices?
I have an ES47 I got for a price I could stomach, but it's sans rail kit,
drinks power like
Martin Eberhard got me the schematic for the GR 721, which is very similar
-- I traced the pinout on the DB25 and it's correct for the 771. In case
anyone else needs it:
http://deramp.com/downloads/mfe_archive/030-Keyboards/George%20Risk/GR%20721%20Keyboard%20Schematic.JPG
The 771 needs +5 and
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Paul Berger
via cctalk
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:41 PM
To: Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk
Subject: Re: XT/370 microcode
The IBM Systems Journal article does not go into great detail but says
that a
On 12 March 2018 at 18:41, Paul Berger via cctalk wrote:
> I am not at liberty to post the document.
This?
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5387781/?reload=true
Also:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224102395_System370_capability_in_a_desktop_computer
If
The IBM Systems Journal article does not go into great detail but says
that a complex of three separate processors are used, a modified 68000
that executes "a large subset of 370 instructions", a standard 68000 to
emulate the remainder odf the instructions and a modified 8087 to
execute the
What kind of parts does it have? If it is all ttl, you only need to connect 5
volts and ground. There will be a strobe, 7 or 8 bits of data and possible
wires for repeat ( usually these go directly to the keyboards repeat switch,
without logic.
Older keyboards required a negative rail. This
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 9:57 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:54 AM, emanuel stiebler via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-03-12 15:49, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
>>> As the most obvious example of the impedance
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:54 AM, emanuel stiebler via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 2018-03-12 15:49, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
> > As the most obvious example of the impedance mismatch between 370
> > architecture and 68000 microarchitecture, the 68000 is hardwired to have
> >
On 2018-03-12 15:49, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
> As the most obvious example of the impedance mismatch between 370
> architecture and 68000 microarchitecture, the 68000 is hardwired to have
> eight each data and address registers, not sixteen GPRs, and microcode
> can't easily paper over that.
On 2018-03-12 15:49, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
> As the most obvious example of the impedance mismatch between 370
> architecture and 68000 microarchitecture, the 68000 is hardwired to have
> eight each data and address registers, not sixteen GPRs, and microcode
> can't easily paper over that.
On 03/12/2018 07:44 AM, systems_glitch via cctalk wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm looking for info on a George Risk 771 parallel ASCII keyboard. I've got
> one but no documentation or existing cabling. I'd like to interface it to
> my Poly-88.
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
>
Wasn't there something about that
Some of the code is now on bitsavers..
Dave
From: Eric Smith
Sent: 12 March 2018 14:41
To: Dave Wade ; General Discussion: On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts
Cc: Lars Brinkhoff
Subject: Re: XT/370 microcode
As the most obvious example of the impedance mismatch between 370
architecture and 68000 microarchitecture, the 68000 is hardwired to have
eight each data and address registers, not sixteen GPRs, and microcode
can't easily paper over that.
Similarly, the 8087 microarchitecture has hardwired
All,
I'm looking for info on a George Risk 771 parallel ASCII keyboard. I've got
one but no documentation or existing cabling. I'd like to interface it to
my Poly-88.
Thanks,
Jonathan
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, 05:13 Dave Wade via cctalk
wrote:
> . Wikipedia says there were/are
> 2x68000 CPU's..
>
One Motorola chip was the custom one, the other was normal (as indicated by
mask code). There was also an Intel math co, presumably derived from 8087.
I used to
Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Does someone have good connections with people inside IBM? I'd like to
> ask about 68000 microcode for the XT/370 product.
Martin Ziskind says he has floppy disks with VM/PC, but no way to read
them.
Hi,
last weekend I cleaned and restored a TI Silent 703 printing terminal.
A rather common type with its whopping 300 baud transfer rate - nevertheless
a piece of history.
It was easy to fix a broken trace on the keyboard PCB (corrosion) and to
roughen the idler roller for better grip on the
I don't suppose any one left in IBM has any knowledge of this. Perhaps no
one ever did and it was all done by Motorola. Wikipedia says there were/are
2x68000 CPU's..
.. I would ask on IBM Main...
http://www.cpushack.com/2013/03/22/cpu-of-the-day-ibm-micro-370/
seems to have some names..
Dave
Does someone have good connections with people inside IBM? I'd like to
ask about 68000 microcode for the XT/370 product.
22 matches
Mail list logo