On 28 Nov 2001, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Then I must ask you (or the ReaHat people) why the hell did they
> change this into a nonstandard location?
>
> It only creates confusion
Very true. The better question is why RedHat doesn't comply
with the FHS and LSB [ http://www.linuxbase.org/te
ProDVD version can be obtained only speaking with Joerg. You may want to
try my (free) version of dvd support from
http://www.abcpages.com/~mache/cdrecord-dvd.html.
For DVD+RW take a look at http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/
mache
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Karl Bellve wrote:
>
> I am looking
yeah, i did have an input from jorg's find, it was relativly small, only a
few lines, mostly password and Xserver stuff... i never knew they ran suid,
you learn somethign every day.
i set the /dev/sg devices to be group owned by cdwriter simply because it is
a scsi emulation.. its an atapi cdw
Karl-Heinz Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You most likely meant 'find / -perm -4000 -ls'
>
> I did mean:
> find / -perm +4000 -ls
>
> and it does work with +1000 just as well -- seems I've no sticky bits set but
> lots of suid bits and some with suid and sgid bits which a -4000 does no
I am looking at getting a Pioneer DVD-R A03 to supplement our CD-R
drive. It will be used on a Linux storage, serving other computers. I
have had very good success with cdrecord/mkiosfs on a Linux system and a
Yamaha SCSI cd-r drive.
I can't find any information about why I should get CDRecord-P
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 17:38:11 2001
>On 28-Nov-01 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>>find / -perm +1000 on your system does produce not even *one* file?
>
>> 1) you don"t really mean 1000 which is the sticky bit?
>I used the plus meaning "this value or higher" i.e. including suid and sgi
On 28-Nov-01 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>find / -perm +1000 on your system does produce not even *one* file?
> 1) you don"t really mean 1000 which is the sticky bit?
I used the plus meaning "this value or higher" i.e. including suid and sgid
> 2) find / -perm +onum is not a valid find command
>From: Karl-Heinz Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Just out of curiosity:
>find / -perm +1000 on your system does produce not even *one* file?
>How do you run your xserver?
1) you don"t really mean 1000 which is the sticky bit?
2) find / -perm +onum is not a valid find command line
If
On 28-Nov-01 Sam Halliday wrote:
> but is it still ok for me to install cdrecord normally (not superuser id'd)
> and allow priveledged users the ownership of the relevant /dev/sg devices?
It would also be ok to only set suid (i.e. chmod 47xx) without setting sgid
(set group id) as I understand J
Hi all,
Heiko and I are currently trying to make cdrtools compile and run again on
BeOS.
Is there anybody out who owns an old BeOS installation where an old version
of cdrecord did compile?
The reason is that we like to change the files in a way that will not
break anything on old versions whil
but is it still ok for me to install cdrecord normally (not superuser id'd)
and allow priveledged users the ownership of the relevant /dev/sg devices?
i thought that was the safest option ... then anyone can run cdrecord, but
they get a priveledges error if they do anythign they arnt suppossed.
Zitat von Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Don"t install cdrecord SIGD, and (more iportant) don"t tell people to
> do so
Why not? What's so bad about cdrecord being SGID?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (de) http://quote.6x.to (en)
Homepage: http://www.d
>From: Karl-Heinz Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On 27-Nov-01 Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> So sprach »Sam Halliday« am 2001-11-27 um 16:49:31 + :
>>> which device must i allow them to use in order that this scheduler can be
>>> utilised in cdrecord, and thus preventing buffer underruns under ce
>From: Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>So sprach =BBSam Halliday=AB am 2001-11-27 um 16:49:31 + :
>> which device must i allow them to use in order that this scheduler can be=
>=20
>> utilised in cdrecord, and thus preventing buffer underruns under certain=
>=20
>> circumstances?
>I ha
>From: Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> This Key2audio protection DOES NOT WORK. I've just bought a SONY MUSIC
>> audio cd which is Key2audio protected (last album of Ozark Henry).
>> [...]
>> There was an eleventh track which was recognized as data by WinOnCD. All I
>> did was not
Zitat von Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mmmm PAM is Pluggable Authentication Mudule and is a Sun invention
> for Solaris from around 1990.
Yes, I know.
I simply didn't know that PAM does do that. Thanks anyhow.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (de) http://quote
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 08:56:53 2001
>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> >From: Danilo Godec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> >On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Danilo Godec wrote:
>>
>> >I got it... /etc/default/cdrecord is the location now...
>>
>> It never was at a different place.
>Sur
>From: Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>So sprach =BBDenis Pelletier=AB am 2001-11-27 um 12:23:45 -0500 :
>> The "magic" is called pam. I doubt that it's exclusive to Mandrake.
>Oh, pam does that? Didn't know that, because I didn't care about it :)
>You're right, pam certainly isn't anyth
18 matches
Mail list logo
