Hi Andrew,
I don't know for the others, but in my case it would certainly help me
understand your document better and, hopefully, provide you with more useful
feedback, if you were to give us some concrete examples of the type of
models that your specification document targets.
I appreciate that
Dear all,
I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions
are made about the uncertainty and a parameter value is simply given by
its upper and lower bounds.
kind regards,
Michael
On 05/29/2012
On 29/05/12 20:17, Michael Clerx wrote:
Dear all,
I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions
are made about the uncertainty and a parameter value is simply given by
its upper and lower bounds.
I
* Andrew Miller ak.mil...@auckland.ac.nz [2012-05-29 10:52] writes:
On 29/05/12 20:17, Michael Clerx wrote:
Dear all,
I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions
are made about the
