On 8.4.2011 02:54, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/7/11 7:28 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
I assume that the lack of a CD drive on the HP micro-server
is a sign of things to come,
so I would hope there would be an official method of installing CentOS
on such a machine.
I think
On 7 Apr 2011, at 00:18, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
If anyone can suggest a simpler way of installing CentOS
on a machine without a CD drive I should be interested to hear.
I keep a USB CD drive to hand for servers without optical drives.
Slightly defeatist but much easier; just
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making
modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the
source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface
definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and
John, please stop cluttering the list with your complaining. It's
making a right mess for those of that wish to discuss the project and
its direction.
Wow. Pot? Kettle? So, let me get this straight. People are
able to bitch, whine, complain and needlessly threaten to
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:46:01 -0700
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 04/07/11 10:51 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Dell typically shipped Adaptec cards; I seem to remember 39160's
being shipped in some 1850's I have. That would be more than
enough performance for what you want, and they
I like my Atto ExpressPCI UL5D. Supports LUNs 2TB, which iirc, Adaptec still
(?) doesn't.
- csawyer
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Benjamin Hackl
Sent: 08 April 2011 10:31
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re:
Les Mikesell wrote:
I tried dd-ing this to /dev/sdb (the USB stick).
[tim@helen dvd]$ sudo cp images/diskboot.img /tmp
[tim@helen dvd]$ cd /tmp
[tim@helen tmp]$ sudo dd if=diskboot.img of=/dev/sdb
24576+0 records in
24576+0 records out
12582912 bytes (13 MB) copied, 0.766341 seconds,
On 08/04/11 11:28, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
I re-formatted the USB stick under Windows,
and tried dd-ing diskboot.img to /dev/sdb1
but the outcome was the same.
I'll try again, now that I'm sure what you mean.
You might also have some luck with unetbootin
Folks, it has been asked a few times: PLEASE STOP THE 6 UPDATE THREAD
now!
Developers: please just stop responding to that thread. It's not necessary
to defend yourselves over a certain point (that has long been reached).
Non-devs: if you think you can make a valuable contribution to centos
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Folks, it has been asked a few times: PLEASE STOP THE 6 UPDATE THREAD
now!
Developers: please just stop responding to that thread. It's not necessary
to defend yourselves over a certain point (that has long been
On 08/04/11 03:06, Lucian wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Jerry Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 03:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
The GPL says they must release source. It doesn't say they have to also
release any magic spells they use to compile it.
Actually, it *does*. If
I'm really tired of this.
Ralph: please unsubscribe everyone who can't shut his mouth. Thanks.
A lot of of less-vocal people will thank you.
Kai
___
Wow Kai, maybe you should suspend the mailing list?
At least that
As I seem to have started this little subsection of the thread, please
let me give just one small example to help clarify the situation as it
appears there is still a lot of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.
Let's look at kernel modules, kmod packages. They are built against
Tom Grace wrote:
You might also have some luck with unetbootin
(http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/), might also be in the CentOS repos.
Yes, thanks, that was suggested before,
and I have noted it as a possibility.
But I'd like to get a more CentOS-centred method working, if I can.
--
Hello CentOS developer team,
thank you very much for the release of CentOS 5.6. I have upgraded my
server, notebook, netbook and workstation from 5.5 to 5.6 and
everything works really fine so far, CentOS 5.6 seems to be rock solid.
The only little problem happens on the upgrade of my server,
STOP IT!
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/08/2011 02:37 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
STOP IT!
Kai
Who are you to say that? The king or master of anything? If you don't
like to read about people post, don't read. But I think you are nobody
to say what is or not in this mailing list. In all cases, a moderator
who has to say.
--
On 4/8/11 5:28 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
It should go to the raw disk device, not a partition and you shouldn't
need to
format first.
The reason I re-formatted it was that fdisk said
there was no valid partition table after dd-ing bootdisk.img onto /dev/sdb .
I thought small usb devices
- Original Message
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Fri, 8 April, 2011 13:37:19
Subject: Re: [CentOS] STOP THIS THREAD NOW!
STOP IT!
Kai
If we carry on long enough, Godwin's Law will kick-in and that will be the end
of it. I have had
Am 04/08/2011 02:12 PM, schrieb Ian Murray:
I'm really tired of this.
Ralph: please unsubscribe everyone who can't shut his mouth. Thanks.
A lot of of less-vocal people will thank you.
Kai
___
Wow Kai, maybe you should suspend the mailing
Timothy Murphy wrote on 04/07/2011 08:47 AM:
Network Installation from CentOS Live CD will no longer be available.
(Why not, as a matter of interest?)
Because network installs tend to be problematic for all but those with
local repositories or flawless broadband network connections. Having it
Markus Falb wrote:
Yes, my memory isn't that great, but it is in the install guide:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-
US/ch02s04.html#id3098219
I did try the dd method again, but it didn't work for me.
My memory isnt great neither. There is a boot.iso mentioned
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
STOP IT!
Take a few deep breaths!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I've written some %pre code to grab a few files off a logical volume, if it
exits, before the disk gets formatted, but can't get get it to work correctly.
Essentially:
%pre
...
lvm vgscan
lvm vgchange -a y
...
if [ -d /dev/vol0 ]; then
# do stuff
fi
lvm vgremove -f vol0
The problem is that
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/8/11 5:28 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
It should go to the raw disk device, not a partition and you shouldn't
need to format first.
The reason I re-formatted it was that fdisk said
there was no valid partition table after dd-ing bootdisk.img onto
/dev/sdb .
I
Ian Murray wrote:
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
STOP IT!
If we carry on long enough, Godwin's Law will kick-in and that will be the
end of it. I have had to bite my tongue several times!
Natzis. Hitler. Tea Party Republicans
This thread may now officially be declared dead.
On 8.4.2011 14:58, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Markus Falb wrote:
A more manual way to make usb stick bootable is described instead.
Maybe you have more luck with that.
dd method is not mentioned anymore.
Thanks for that.
This method did work, although there is an error in the description,
Mark-
Thank you for taking one for the team.
On Apr 8, 2011 9:23 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ian Murray wrote:
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
STOP IT!
If we carry on long enough, Godwin's Law will kick-in and that will be
the
end of it. I have had to bite my tongue
Good bye I've had enough for now. I'll be back, but not until Centos 7
is history. It's FREE deal with it!!!
--
Thanks,
Gene Brandt SCSA
8625 Carriage Road
River Ridge, LA 70123
504-452-3250
Family Web Page | My Web Page | LinkedIn | Facebook | Resumebucket
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:30
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be
applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an
adjustment.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing.
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.
Hi all!
We've seen quite a few references on the list to 100% binary
compatibility with upstream. What I am curious about is, how precisely
is this determined? All the ways I can think of for comparing how two
systems might work seem flawed in some way (e.g., using some sort of
checksum; unit
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
Hi all!
We've seen quite a few references on the list to 100% binary
compatibility with upstream. What I am curious about is, how precisely
is this determined? All the ways I can think of for comparing
attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110408/049ff1d7/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:13:54 +0200
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
Hi all!
We've seen quite a few references on the list to 100% binary
compatibility with upstream. What I am curious about is, how precisely
is
On 04/08/2011 11:35 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clarkscl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing.
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a
On 8.4.2011 18:03, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
Hi all!
We've seen quite a few references on the list to 100% binary
compatibility with upstream. What I am
Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
Questions to ask about CentOS building process, and thanks to Akemi
for a quick answer :)
Given that its answered in a FAQ one could argue that it was not a good
question.
You know, there is a famous saying.. If you have
On 4/8/2011 8:15 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/8/11 5:28 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
It should go to the raw disk device, not a partition and you shouldn't
need to format first.
The reason I re-formatted it was that fdisk said
there was no valid partition table after
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
Hello CentOS developer team,
thank you very much for the release of CentOS 5.6. I have upgraded my
server, notebook, netbook and workstation from 5.5 to 5.6 and
everything works really fine so far, CentOS 5.6 seems to be rock
On 4/8/2011 7:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Yes, my memory isn't that great, but it is in the install guide:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-
US/ch02s04.html#id3098219
I did try the dd method again, but it didn't work for me.
I still don't understand what is going
Les Mikesell wrote:
USB disks _can_ have partitions (obviously, since you can stick about
any drive into a usb adapter), but small ones typically don't and you
don't need them to boot. The bootdisk.img layout appears to be a vfat
on the raw disk (no partitioning) with syslinux configure to
I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries.
However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com not found:
3(NXDOMAIN)'. Also, apache is returning error on start as '[error] (EAI
2)Name or service not known: Could not resolve host name
vhost1.example.com--
On 4/8/2011 7:55 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote on 04/07/2011 08:47 AM:
Network Installation from CentOS Live CD will no longer be available.
(Why not, as a matter of interest?)
Because network installs tend to be problematic for all but those with
local repositories or
Johan Martinez wrote:
I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries.
However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com not found:
3(NXDOMAIN)'. Also, apache is returning error on start as '[error] (EAI
2)Name or service not known: Could not resolve host name
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Because network installs tend to be problematic for all but those with
local repositories or flawless broadband network connections. Having it
present was raising unrealistic expectations of netinstall as a viable
option, and resulting in bad first experiences with
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johan Martinez wrote:
I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries.
However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com not found:
3(NXDOMAIN)'. Also, apache is returning error on start as '[error] (EAI
Hi there --
I am trying to install the 64-bit version onto one of our servers. When I get to
the point
of loading various software packages, I normally select KDE desktop, and also
make
sure that CentOS extras is also selected. Once that is done, I click on Next to
have
the installation
Markus Falb wrote:
Maybe you have more luck with that.
dd method is not mentioned anymore.
Thanks for that.
This method did work, although there is an error in the description,
which slightly confused me.
You could file a bug in Upstream Vendors bugzilla ;-)
I'll try that, though I
On 4/8/2011 1:22 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
USB disks _can_ have partitions (obviously, since you can stick about
any drive into a usb adapter), but small ones typically don't and you
don't need them to boot. The bootdisk.img layout appears to be a vfat
on the raw disk (no partitioning) with
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dvorkin, Asya dvork...@umdnj.edu wrote:
Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
Questions to ask about CentOS building process, and thanks to Akemi
for a quick answer :)
Given that its answered in a FAQ one could argue that it was not
I just did a test install off a netinstall iso to a mirror repo which left
no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file in place.
So a quick check:
# yum whatprovides /etc/sysconfig/iptables --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=base
--enablerepo=updates --disableplugin=\*
No Matches found
Without that file
On 04/08/11 11:24 AM, Johan Martinez wrote:
I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries.
However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com
http://vhost1.example.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)'. Also, apache is
returning error on start as '[error] (EAI 2)Name
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Kaplan, Andrew H.
ahkap...@partners.org wrote:
Hi there --
I am trying to install the 64-bit version onto one of our servers. When I
get to the point
of loading various software packages, I normally select KDE desktop, and
also make
sure that CentOS extras
fred smith wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
long-term support.
I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have I missed it?
I did not use the word announce in my post.
I do not know what
This is working fine on another CentOS system. This particular install where
host command is failing is trimmed down install using kickstart file. It is
working on a system where install is default 'Server non-GUI', option given
during interactive CD install. I guess this has to do with some
Try flushing DNS cache:
/etc/init.d/nscd restart
On Apr 8, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Johan Martinez wrote:
This is working fine on another CentOS system. This particular install where
host command is failing is trimmed down install using kickstart file. It is
working on a system where install is
Hi there --
Thanks for the reply. I am doing the install as we speak without issue.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Akemi Yagi
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 3:24 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Exception
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Dvorkin, Asya dvork...@umdnj.edu wrote:
Try flushing DNS cache:
/etc/init.d/nscd restart
nscd is not running.
On Apr 8, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Johan Martinez wrote:
This is working fine on another CentOS system. This particular install
where host command is
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Because network installs tend to be problematic for all but those with
local repositories or flawless broadband network connections. Having it
present was raising unrealistic expectations of
On 4/8/2011 3:25 PM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
fred smith wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
long-term support.
I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have I missed it?
I did not use the word
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Olaf Mueller daily-pla...@istari.de wrote:
fred smith wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
long-term support.
I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have I
On 08/04/11 19:49, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I just did a test install off a netinstall iso to a mirror repo which left
no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file in place.
So a quick check:
# yum whatprovides /etc/sysconfig/iptables --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=base
--enablerepo=updates
On 08/04/11 20:56, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/04/11 19:49, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I just did a test install off a netinstall iso to a mirror repo which left
no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file in place.
So a quick check:
# yum whatprovides /etc/sysconfig/iptables --disablerepo=\*
On 4/8/2011 4:00 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/04/11 20:56, Ned Slider wrote:
On 08/04/11 19:49, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I just did a test install off a netinstall iso to a mirror repo which left
no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file in place.
So a quick check:
# yum whatprovides
On Friday, April 08, 2011 02:22:47 PM Timothy Murphy wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
USB disks _can_ have partitions (obviously, since you can stick about
any drive into a usb adapter),
The instructions in http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-
US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Installation_Guide/
William Hooper wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
snip
The issues you saw with grub being installed on the USB stick instead of
the HDD are a bigger concern in my book. I wonder if you you have
better luck installing GRUB on
And since that file contains the rules list for iptables, it doesn't
make sense for iptables to run without it.
Basically, if you want to run iptables, you need to define some rules
first. Either create the file by hand and then start iptables, or
create the rules in iptables and use service
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 02:27 PM:
None of that applies to NFS installs against locally downloaded isos -
which is the fastest/easiest approach to a full set of install choices
unless it is your first machine and you don't have anything to act as
the server.
Agreed. In my mind that
On 4/8/2011 3:19 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
None of that applies to NFS installs against locally downloaded isos -
which is the fastest/easiest approach to a full set of install choices
unless it is your first machine and you don't have anything to act as
the server.
Agreed. In my mind that
William Hooper wrote on 04/08/2011 03:50 PM:
Forgive me if I've missed it mentioned, but it looks like the option
is only being removed from the LiveCD. Using the netinstall.iso is
still available and would be a more efficient way of doing network
installs anyway (9.5M vs 685M).
Precisely.
On Friday 08 April 2011 14:32, the following was written:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johan Martinez wrote:
I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries.
However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com not found:
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 04:29 PM:
Why force people to burn two disks when they
would only need one?
You are welcome to debate that with the LiveCD maintainer, or to roll
your own version including the option, but as a guy who has spent a lot
of time answering the newbies on the forum
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 04/08/2011 04:10 PM:
..
What you have to do is tell it no bootloader, then before you reboot at
the end of the install, usef-2 or whatever to get to another screen,
then... lessee, I forget if it's mounted the install as /mnt/sysimage or
not, but mount your /boot on
On 4/8/2011 3:35 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 04:29 PM:
Why force people to burn two disks when they
would only need one?
You are welcome to debate that with the LiveCD maintainer, or to roll
your own version including the option, but as a guy who has spent a
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote on 04/08/2011 02:32 PM:
I am trying to install the 64-bit version onto one of our servers. When
I get to the point
of loading various software packages, I normally select KDE desktop, and
also make
sure that CentOS extras is also selected. Once that is done, I click on
Johan Martinez wrote on Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:31:32 -0500:
This is working fine on another CentOS system.
It doesn't matter if it works fine. The host command indeed does dns
lookups as John Pierce already pointed out and apache does, too. With your
experience level I suggest believing him. It's
Phil Schaffner wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 04/08/2011 04:10 PM:
..
What you have to do is tell it no bootloader, then before you reboot at
the end of the install, usef-2 or whatever to get to another screen,
then... lessee, I forget if it's mounted the install as /mnt/sysimage or
not,
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 04/08/2011 04:56 PM:
In a standard install? I'll look, but don't remember that option.
It is present, but easy to overlook.
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Under Centos 5.5 on an x86_64 box I am seeing large memory usage
associated with perl .so modules.
Example: this script:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Time::HiRes;
open(SMAPS, /proc/$$/smaps);
while (SMAPS) {
if (m/^\d/) {
chomp($lib = (split(' ', $_))[5]);
} elsif (m/^Size:\s*(\d+.*)/) {
my
Olaf Mueller wrote on 04/08/2011 08:35 AM:
...
The only little problem happens on the upgrade of my server, since my
web server doesn't start after reboot. But this was easy to fix since
this error was known from the RHEL 5.6 upgrade.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669963
You
On Friday, April 08, 2011 04:42:59 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
Did anyone tell them how easy an nfs install is?
That makes the assumption that there is an nfs server available. We certainly
don't do nfs here.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 4/8/2011 4:22 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Olaf Mueller wrote on 04/08/2011 08:35 AM:
...
The only little problem happens on the upgrade of my server, since my
web server doesn't start after reboot. But this was easy to fix since
this error was known from the RHEL 5.6 upgrade.
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 05:33 PM:
Is there some way for yum to know about that?
Only if it errors out on a bad package. There have been (to my
knowledge) two different types of errors. One was a truncated package
on the mirrors that was damaged in transit from the build system. The
On 4/8/2011 4:26 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 04:42:59 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
Did anyone tell them how easy an nfs install is?
That makes the assumption that there is an nfs server available. We
certainly don't do nfs here.
If this isn't your first install, you are a
On Friday, April 08, 2011 05:43:03 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/8/2011 4:26 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
That makes the assumption that there is an nfs server available. We
certainly don't do nfs here.
If this isn't your first install, you are a couple of commands away from
having one.
On 4/8/2011 4:48 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
That makes the assumption that there is an nfs server available. We
certainly don't do nfs here.
If this isn't your first install, you are a couple of commands away from
having one. Faster/easier than burning yet another iso or 7.
That makes the
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:25:00PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
fred smith wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
long-term support.
I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have I missed
fred smith wrote:
Clearly you found my comment to be offensive. It certainly was
not meant that way. It was simply a friendly warning that depending
on a pre-announcement set of files may not give you the final product.
Ok, I get the point now. Sorry Fred, my reaction was not appropriate.
You
William Hooper wrote:
An this was posted to the CentOS twitter account yesterday 4/7
(shortly after having to re-issue the x86_64 ISOs):
http://twitter.com/CentOS/status/55950095505567745
Just want to also point out that CentOS-5.6 is *not* released. And
packages, ISOS are liable to
Amazing!! Great work!!
Thank you
Aly
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I see the following in the CentOS 5.6 Release Notes:
6.3. Packages that have been upgraded in 5.6 since the 5.5 release
* python-2.4.3-27.el5_5.3
Wouldn't subversion also be listed?
CentOS 5.5 has subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1
CentOS 5.6 has subversion-1.6.11-7.el5
Is this list
Lamar Owen wrote:
USB disks _can_ have partitions (obviously, since you can stick about
any drive into a usb adapter),
The instructions in http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-
US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Installation_Guide/
certainly advise making a partition /dev/sdb1
with partition
Les Mikesell wrote:
That makes the assumption that there is an nfs server available. We
certainly don't do nfs here.
If this isn't your first install, you are a couple of commands away from
having one. Faster/easier than burning yet another iso or 7.
That makes the assumption I haven't
Les Mikesell wrote:
I did try the dd method again, but it didn't work for me.
I still don't understand what is going wrong for you. I just went
through these motions:
download the bootdisk.img file from:
http://mirror.highspeedweb.net/CentOS/5.5/os/i386/images/
then
dd
Afternoon,
I've got an old Dell PERC 4DC (PCI 64bit/33MHz) sitting in my home rig
and with a new board on the way that has PCI-X (133) and PCIe (x4)
slots, I was wondering what people would recommend for a cheap
hardware parallel SCSI RAID controller (no fake raid please) that is
relatively cheap
5.6 is out. That is good news.
I did a yum update on one of my non-critical server, and the server
stoped responding to ping after the reboot, and never answered back.
It's now been 10 minutes, so I'll have to take a ride to the colo...
Nice work dev team, keep up the good work. Let's hope
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Nicolas Ross wrote:
5.6 is out. That is good news.
I did a yum update on one of my non-critical server, and the server
stoped responding to ping after the reboot, and never answered back.
It's now been 10 minutes, so I'll have to take a ride to the colo...
Nice work dev
Phil Schaffner wrote:
You are welcome to debate that with the LiveCD maintainer, or to roll
your own version including the option, but as a guy who has spent a lot
of time answering the newbies on the forum who got tripped up by it, I
fully support the decision.
If you feel that, why not
On 04/08/11 5:12 PM, Drew wrote:
Afternoon,
I've got an old Dell PERC 4DC (PCI 64bit/33MHz) sitting in my home rig
and with a new board on the way that has PCI-X (133) and PCIe (x4)
slots, I was wondering what people would recommend for a cheap
hardware parallel SCSI RAID controller (no fake
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
