Re: [CentOS] OT: Areca ARC-1220 compatible with SATA III (6Gb/s) drives?

[John R Pierce]

On 9/22/2016 5:56 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:

Running C6 fileserver. Want to replace 7 year old HDs connected to an Areca
ARC-1220 raid sata II (3Gb/s) controller. Has anyone used this controller
with newer 2TB SATA III (6Gb/s) WD Re drives like the WD2000FYYZ or the
WD2004FBYZ?


sata III drives should work fine with a sata II controller, in sata II mode.

the big issue is if the controller supports drives > 2TB

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Install Mariadb on Centos 7 fails

[david]

Folks

I'm having problems installing Mariadb in Centos 7.


Here's what I did:

0)  Become root
1)  Make sure that mariadb and mysql are NOT installed.
2)  Delete residual libs
 rm -rf /var/lib/mysq*
3)  yum install -y mariadb-server
installed mariadb-5.5.50-1.el7_2.x86_64 from the Centos 
'updates' repository

4)  systemctl start mariadb
5)  systemctl status mariadb

All works well until step 5, where I get the result:



# systemctl status mariadb
? mariadb.service - MariaDB database server
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/mariadb.service; enabled; 
vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2016-09-22 17:46:38 
PDT; 4min 3s ago

 Main PID: 16261 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

Sep 22 17:46:37 goat.xxx.com mysqld_safe[16261]: 
/usr/bin/mysqld_safe: line 139: /var/log/mysqld.log: Permission denied
Sep 22 17:46:37 goat.xxx.com mysqld_safe[16261]: 
/usr/bin/mysqld_safe: line 183: /var/log/mysqld.log: Permission denied
Sep 22 17:46:37 goat.xxx.com mysqld_safe[16261]: touch: cannot touch 
`/var/log/mysqld.log': Permission denied
Sep 22 17:46:37 goat.xxx.com mysqld_safe[16261]: chown: cannot access 
`/var/log/mysqld.log': No such file or directory
Sep 22 17:46:37 goat.xxx.com mysqld_safe[16261]: chmod: cannot access 
`/var/log/mysqld.log': No such file or directory
Sep 22 17:46:37 goat.xxx.com systemd[1]: mariadb.service: main 
process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Sep 22 17:46:38 goat.xxx.com systemd[1]: mariadb.service: control 
process exited, code=exited status=1
Sep 22 17:46:38 goat.xxx.com systemd[1]: Failed to start MariaDB 
database server.
Sep 22 17:46:38 goat.xxx.com systemd[1]: Unit mariadb.service entered 
failed state.

Sep 22 17:46:38 goat.xxx.com systemd[1]: mariadb.service failed.
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
[root@goat ~]#

My environment is a Centos 7 installation running as a VM inside 
Vmware, and is not a production system.  It is updated nightly.


When I examined the files alluded to,

  /var/log/mysqld.log
 does not exist
but
  /var/log/mariadb/mariadb.log
 exists and is empty.

Adivce would be appreciated

Thanks

David



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] OT: Areca ARC-1220 compatible with SATA III (6Gb/s) drives?

[Robert Arkiletian]

Running C6 fileserver. Want to replace 7 year old HDs connected to an Areca
ARC-1220 raid sata II (3Gb/s) controller. Has anyone used this controller
with newer 2TB SATA III (6Gb/s) WD Re drives like the WD2000FYYZ or the
WD2004FBYZ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-es] Rutas con Ipsec site to site

[paulcriollo]

Saludos.
Les comento que conectado un sitio a con un sitio b usando ipsec con
libreswan en un centos 7
el tunel se conecta sin problemas, pero en mi red del sitio donde esta la
infraestructura del centos alli tengo un iptables con proxy transparente.
Cuando levanto el iptables + proxy tengo internet pero ya no llego a las
redes internas del site a, ya no tengo ping ni aplicaciones, solo cuando
detengo el iptables tengo acceso a la redes del sitio a.

Estare agradecido con sus aportes.

att.

PAUL CRIOLLO
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

[Robert Arkiletian]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Johnny Hughes  wrote:

> The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple
> releases back due to stability issues.  CentOS also has removed it as
> for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few
> changes for branding/artwork as we can.
>
> That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available,
> therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg
> enabled starting with version 45.4.0-1, released to the repositories a
> few minutes ago.  You can get it from the CentOS Plus Repository:
>
>  https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus
>
> Now that we are maintaining a CentOSPlus Firefox .. if there are other
> things people want compiled into Firefox that are configure options and
> you are creating/compiling a new firefox, please use the CentOS-Devel
> mailing list to discuss this with me and we can try to roll those things
> into the CentOS Plus version of Firefox.
>
>
Thanks for all your work allowing us to continue to use CentOS.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

[Peter]

On 23/09/16 02:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available,
> therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg
> enabled starting with version 45.4.0-1, released to the repositories a
> few minutes ago.  You can get it from the CentOS Plus Repository:

Thanks so much Johnny!


Peter



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

[Jason Pyeron]

> -Original Message-
> From: Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:50
> 
> let me chase that up,
> 
> I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US 
> centric - but it also looks like it 
> aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project 

No. Glad I get to clarifiy. It is a set of answers to questions, from a SME 
point of view, think FAQ.

Who is better to answer about product X? The vendor (in this case community) or 
a bureaucrat? The VPAT is a standard set of
accessibility questions. This is why a Voluntary Product Accessibility Template 
is requested. It allows consumers to compare apples
to apples.

Here are some samples (CentOS 6):

Section 1194.21 Software Applications and Operating Systems (text mode)
(a) When software is designed to run on a system that has a keyboard, product 
functions shall be executable from a keyboard where
the function itself or the result of performing a function can be discerned 
textually.

Supported: All command line mode tasks are executed from a keyboard.

Section 1194.21 Software Applications and Operating Systems (gui)
(c) A well-defined on-screen indication of the current focus shall be provided 
that moves among interactive interface elements as
the input focus changes. The focus shall be programmatically exposed so that 
Assistive Technology can track focus and focus changes.

Supported: The GTK2 2.x GUI toolkit exposes focus programmatically via the ATK 
(Accessibility Tool Kit).
Section 1194.31 Functional Performance Criteria
(a) At least one mode of operation and information retrieval that does not 
require user vision shall be provided, or support for
Assistive Technology used by people who are blind or visually impaired shall be 
provided.

Supported: Support for Assistive Technology is provided via the Controlling 
Terminal interface.

Section 1194.41 Information, Documentation and Support
(a) Product support documentation provided to end-users shall be made available 
in alternate formats upon request, at no additional
charge

Supported: Centos documentation is available in electronic form and can be 
downloaded from here:
http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation and upstream documentation is availble at 
http://www.redhat.com/docs/. Most of our manuals are
available in HTML and PDF forms.


> side. best to work it via the board first.
> 
> Regards
> 
> On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback.
> > 
> > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board 
> concern, it is down at the FAQ level) do I run it by the 
> Board? In other words,
> > where do I discuss this?
> > 
> > I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment.
> > 
> > -Jason
> > 
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Karanbir Singh
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07
> >>
> >> Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok 
> to post ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >>> I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .
> >>>
>  -Original Message-
>  From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org
>  [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org 
>  ] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
>  Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
>  To: centos-docs@centos.org
>  Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508
>  compliancestatement
> 
>  Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a
>  CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted?
> 
>  Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources
> 
>  -Jason
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us 
>  ]
> > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
> > To: 'centos-de...@centos.org'
> > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
> >
> > I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a
> > federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production.
> >
> > One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?"
> >
> > Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted?
> >
> > P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs
> > in https://git.centos.org/project/websites 
>   .
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > --
> > 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > -   
> -
> > - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. 
> http://www.pdinc.us   -
> > - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street 
> #100-
> > - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 
> 21218   -
> > -   
> -
> > 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

[Karanbir Singh]

let me chase that up,

I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric -
but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS
project side. best to work it via the board first.

Regards

On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback.
> 
> How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at 
> the FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words,
> where do I discuss this?
> 
> I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment.
> 
> -Jason
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Karanbir Singh
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07
>>
>> Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>> I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .
>>>
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org
 [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org 
  ] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
 Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
 To: centos-docs@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508
 compliancestatement

 Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a
 CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted?

 Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources

 -Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us  ]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
> To: 'centos-de...@centos.org'
> Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
>
> I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a
> federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production.
>
> One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?"
>
> Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted?
>
> P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs
> in https://git.centos.org/project/websites 
>   .
>
> -Jason
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -   -
> - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us 
>   -
> - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> -   -
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs 
  

>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>>> CentOS-docs@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs 
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karanbir Singh
>> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/   | 
>> twitter.com/kbsingh
>> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc 
>>  
>> ___
>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>> CentOS-docs@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs 
>>  
>>
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
> 


-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

[Gordon Messmer]

On 09/22/2016 01:12 PM, H wrote:
I did install mono and then downloaded keepass in zip format, 
installed it and tried to run it. It did not work


You probably need to install the mono-winforms package.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

[Jason Pyeron]

> -Original Message-
> From: Brandon James
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:10
> 
> Jason,
> 
> Please let me know if you need any additional help with this 
> request. I agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized. 

Not that I can think of, Karanbir thinks this might have to go before the Board.

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement

[Jason Pyeron]

I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback.

How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at the 
FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words,
where do I discuss this?

I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment.

-Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07
>
> Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ?
>
> Regards
>
> On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org
> >> [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org 
> >>  ] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
> >> To: centos-docs@centos.org
> >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508
> >> compliancestatement
> >>
> >> Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a
> >> CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted?
> >>
> >> Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources
> >>
> >> -Jason
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us  ]
> >>> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
> >>> To: 'centos-de...@centos.org'
> >>> Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
> >>>
> >>> I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a
> >>> federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production.
> >>>
> >>> One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?"
> >>>
> >>> Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted?
> >>>
> >>> P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs
> >>> in https://git.centos.org/project/websites 
> >>>   .
> >>>
> >>> -Jason
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >>> -   -
> >>> - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us 
> >>>   -
> >>> - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
> >>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> >>> -   -
> >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >>>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> CentOS-docs mailing list
> >> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs 
> >>  
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS-docs mailing list
> > CentOS-docs@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs 
> >  
> >
>
>
> --
> Karanbir Singh
> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/   | 
> twitter.com/kbsingh
> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc 
>  
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs 
>  
> 


___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement

[Brandon James]

Jason,

Please let me know if you need any additional help with this request. I
agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized.

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jason Pyeron  wrote:

> I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
> > To: centos-docs@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508
> > compliancestatement
> >
> > Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a
> > CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted?
> >
> > Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
> > > To: 'centos-de...@centos.org'
> > > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
> > >
> > > I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a
> > > federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production.
> > >
> > > One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?"
> > >
> > > Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted?
> > >
> > > P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs
> > > in https://git.centos.org/project/websites .
> > >
> > > -Jason
> > >
> > > --
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > -   -
> > > - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
> > > - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
> > > - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> > > -   -
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > >
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS-docs mailing list
> > CentOS-docs@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
> >
>
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>



-- 


Brandon James
Founding Member
Email:brandon.ja...@sunayu.com
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement

[Karanbir Singh]

Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ?

Regards

On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org 
>> [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
>> To: centos-docs@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 
>> compliancestatement
>>
>> Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a 
>> CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted?
>>
>> Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources
>>
>> -Jason
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us] 
>>> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
>>> To: 'centos-de...@centos.org'
>>> Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
>>>
>>> I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a 
>>> federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production.
>>>
>>> One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?"
>>>
>>> Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted?
>>>
>>> P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs 
>>> in https://git.centos.org/project/websites .
>>>
>>> -Jason
>>>
>>> --
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>> -   -
>>> - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
>>> - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
>>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
>>> -   -
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>> CentOS-docs@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>>
> 
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
> 


-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

[Always Learning]

On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 09:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:

> The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox ...

> That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available,
> therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg
> enabled starting with version 45.4.0-1, released to the repositories a
> few minutes ago.  You can get it from the CentOS Plus Repository:
> 
>  https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus

Gosh. Brilliant, excellent.

We (everyone including me) are gratefully for your tremendous and
magnificent technical support; not forgetting all the other members of
the dedicated 'C' team whose efforts make Centos probably the best
'free' version of Linux, certainly for business, and so dependable and
enjoyable to use.

THANK YOU.


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.  England's place is in the European Union.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

[H]

On September 22, 2016 3:33:15 PM EDT, Gordon Messmer  
wrote:
>On 09/22/2016 11:38 AM, H wrote:
>> It seems this is only for C7? 
>
>
>Why do you think that?  I checked an RHEL 6 system for the required
>mono 
>packages.
>
>___
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@centos.org
>https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I did install mono and then downloaded keepass in zip format, installed it and 
tried to run it. It did not work so I gave up... At the same time I had gotten 
AutoType to work on keepassx and decided to stay with that for now... I did not 
like that mono seemed to be some windows emulation which turned me off...

I know, no good reasons for the above... :-)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] smbldap-passwd does not update samba password

[Gordon Messmer]

On 09/22/2016 12:18 PM, Bernard Fay wrote:

I have never heard of ACI before and I really do not know what it is.


ACIs are the rules in your directory server that govern what entries and 
attributes (such as the samba password) each DN (user) is allowed to 
edit.  You should have an ACI that allows users to modify their own 
password and samba password.



In the other hand, what does this have do to with the passwords in Samba?



?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

[Gordon Messmer]

On 09/22/2016 11:38 AM, H wrote:
It seems this is only for C7? 



Why do you think that?  I checked an RHEL 6 system for the required mono 
packages.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] smbldap-passwd does not update samba password

[Bernard Fay]

I have never heard of ACI before and I really do not know what it is.

In the other hand, what does this have do to with the passwords in Samba?

Obviously, there are many things I do not know about LDAP and Samba but I
have to manage it



On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Gordon Messmer 
wrote:

> On 09/20/2016 04:05 AM, Bernard Fay wrote:
>
>> What do you mean by ACIs?
>>
>
>
> What ACIs govern access to attributes and entries, on your LDAP server?
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement

[Jason Pyeron]

I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .

> -Original Message-
> From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org 
> [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
> To: centos-docs@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 
> compliancestatement
> 
> Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a 
> CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted?
> 
> Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources
> 
> -Jason
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us] 
> > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
> > To: 'centos-de...@centos.org'
> > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
> > 
> > I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a 
> > federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production.
> > 
> > One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?"
> > 
> > Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted?
> > 
> > P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs 
> > in https://git.centos.org/project/websites .
> > 
> > -Jason
> > 
> > --
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > -   -
> > - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
> > - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
> > - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> > -   -
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 
> 
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
> 

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement

[Jason Pyeron]

Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 
VPAT can be posted?

Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources

-Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us] 
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08
> To: 'centos-de...@centos.org'
> Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
> 
> I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a 
> federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production.
> 
> One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?"
> 
> Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted?
> 
> P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs 
> in https://git.centos.org/project/websites .
> 
> -Jason
> 
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -   -
> - Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
> - Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> -   -
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS] Using keepass on Centos 6

[H]

On 09/21/2016 08:25 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:

On 09/21/2016 09:16 AM, H wrote:

I wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing automated login 
to websites.



Maybe you should take another look at keepass, then?  Mono is available in 
EPEL.  keepass runs reasonably well in it.  keefox should work as expected.  
The technical barriers here are .. basically non-existent.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


It seems this is only for C7?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-virt] Fwd: Centos 6 AMI does not support c4-8xlarge

[John Peacock]

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Karanbir Singh  wrote:

> I've asked the AWS MP folks to enable as many instance types in as many
> regions as possible. I am also pushing a new imageset across all regions
> this coming Monday, which would include all updates upto 31st Aug 2016
> applied in already.
>

​No sign of a new image and the existing "​
CentOS 6 (x86_64) - with Updates HVM
​" still ​doesn't support c4-8xlarge.  Can you confirm this is still in
process?

Thanks

John
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1912 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1912 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1912.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
2ce0afdb82af0c333af9f9576b7d34681cb0ee3f5a2e110ced675fcb60318cd4  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
2ce0afdb82af0c333af9f9576b7d34681cb0ee3f5a2e110ced675fcb60318cd4  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
6e4b4673b2ef0b166b48bce94cf130b3962d4ee880202c2730ea100b8bc72349  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
a76139ad1d2b42254a5803d3f970102f55dd75111e75f4286673f8e64ce40596  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: JohnnyCentOS

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS] always boot from Elrepo kernel

[johan . vermeulen7]

Hello All, 

I purchased some Dell Latitude 3570 laptops. They came with Ubuntu 
preinstalled. ( Which I swapped for Centos7) 
I have to use Elrepo kernel on these machines to get some of the fn function 
keys to work. 
So I installed Elrepo's kernel-ml and selected this kernel with: 
# grub2-set-default 0 
( after disabling secure boot) 

The problem I see is that after a next kernel update, the new Centos kernel 
will be nr 0 and the machine will 
boot from that kernel if I tested this correctly. 

Is there a way I can enable elrepo kernel update but not the regular Centos 
kernel? 

Many thanks, J. 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-virt] Virtualization SIG membership

[Frantisek Kluknavsky]

Hi,

can I join the Virtualization SIG? I am interested in packaging docker
with Lokesh Mandvekar.

Thank you very much,

Fero



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

[m . roth]

Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple
> releases back due to stability issues.  CentOS also has removed it as
> for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few
> changes for branding/artwork as we can.
>
> That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available,
> therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg
> enabled starting with version 45.4.0-1, released to the repositories a
> few minutes ago.  You can get it from the CentOS Plus Repository:
>
>  https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus
>
Thank you very much, Johnny, both for the addition, and for letting us know.

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-docs] Centos doesn't load or work

[Trevor Hemsley]

On 22/09/16 15:46, Robert Cunliffe wrote:
>
> I've tried Zorrin, Ubuntu and Centos.
>
> Zorrin and Ubuntu work fine, but Centos doesn't load, or run.
>
> I asked for advice, didn't get any and seem to have been added to all
> your Centos mailing lists.
> *Please remove me from your mailing lists.*
>
> Sincerely,
> Bob Cunliffe
>
>
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Click the link on the bottom of every mail as that takes you to a web
page with an unsubscribe option.


Trevor

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

[CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

[Johnny Hughes]

The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple
releases back due to stability issues.  CentOS also has removed it as
for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few
changes for branding/artwork as we can.

That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available,
therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg
enabled starting with version 45.4.0-1, released to the repositories a
few minutes ago.  You can get it from the CentOS Plus Repository:

 https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus

Now that we are maintaining a CentOSPlus Firefox .. if there are other
things people want compiled into Firefox that are configure options and
you are creating/compiling a new firefox, please use the CentOS-Devel
mailing list to discuss this with me and we can try to roll those things
into the CentOS Plus version of Firefox.

Since CentOS-5 is End Of Life in about 6 months, I don't plan to add a
Firefox to CentOS Plus there unless there are many who absolutely need it.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-docs] Centos doesn't load or work

[Robert Cunliffe]

I've tried Zorrin, Ubuntu and Centos.

Zorrin and Ubuntu work fine, but Centos doesn't load, or run.

I asked for advice, didn't get any and seem to have been added to all your 
Centos mailing lists.
Please remove me from your mailing lists.

Sincerely,
Bob Cunliffe
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] Proposed Contribution for the "How To's" Section

[Alan Bartlett]

On 21 September 2016 at 18:07, Rob Morrison
 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My username is RobMorrison
>
> The proposed subject of my Wiki contribution is "Backing up with Bacula"
>
> Some background information in case you are not aware of Bacula:
>
> According to Source Forge statistics (rank and downloads), Bacula is by far
> the most popular Open Source backup program. It eables you (or the system
> administrator) to manage backup, recovery, and verification of computer data
> across a network of computers of different kinds. Bacula is relatively easy
> to use and very efficient, while offering many advanced storage management
> features that make it easy to find and recover lost or damaged files. In
> technical terms, it is an Open Source, network based backup program.
>
> So far there have been over 3Million downloads of Bacula, and it is used by
> many leading data centers and research establishments around the world, such
> as NASA.
>
> The proposed location of my Wiki contribution is
> https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BaculaBackups
>
> Many thanks and best regards,
>
> Rob
>
> http://blog.bacula.org/

Hi Rob,

Sorry for the delay in responding to your request.

I have just initialised a wiki HomePage and the HowTos/BaculaBackups
page for you.

If you have any problems, please contact either Akemi or myself via this list.

Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1912 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1912 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1912.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
5db5b87af33b62adae7d1f8cdb15cf2df808b3107f8c8a0d4fd589ca582a0cca  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm
ee49b07504047d332d7a001190d1b1d8386222c633ec97cf35ff6fbf9a863dfe  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
47da078c1d9e77f972d0d997142bbf46b03432c2431c738b300924cc4b813905  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1912 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1912 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1912.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
6d421377bd95103ec94a1ea92728d760226ce7b3c0badc36fd3d5d6335137640  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm

x86_64:
6d421377bd95103ec94a1ea92728d760226ce7b3c0badc36fd3d5d6335137640  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
3dbd57f243afb7a2d21fc2a693c4d2ee932e0dd6cd5f99874a44ff15dd36e72f  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
13436da10e73e4448a6719e8a735b3ce2874d25c247022014d7dd63dc41fb5e4  
firefox-45.4.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

[m . roth]

Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew 
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard > innovate.net> wrote:
>>> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
>>> > From: isdtor 
>>> >
>>> > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
>>> >
>>> > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html


Speaking of which... not the beta, but the current updated default. I have
one, and only one, radio station I'm streaming 'bout half the day,
weekdays - wqxr.org NYC, and it keeps complaining I need a newer
flashplayer. I click the x in the pink box, it goes away, and everything's
fine - it' just annoying. Doesn't happen anywhere else I'm streaming. Is
this an artifact of it expecting an even newer version, or something
cached on my system, or...?

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

[Phelps, Matthew]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew 
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard  innovate.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
>> > From: isdtor 
>> >
>> > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
>> >
>> > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html
>> >
>> > I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's
>> > pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign
>> > of bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here.
>> >
>> > $ tail -n 3 pluginreg.dat
>> > [INVALID]
>> > /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so:$
>> > 147454127:$
>> > $ file /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
>> > /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared
>> > object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped $
>> > strings /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so | grep
>> > FlashPlayer_23 FlashPlayer_23_0_0_179_FlashPlayer
>> > $ rpm -q firefox
>> > firefox-45.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64
>> > $
>> >
>> > I have it working on a different Linux system, not CentOS, with ff
>> > 48.0.1.
>> >
>>
>> I've been using it -- currently ..._179 -- (sparingly) on a -7
>> machine with the default (firefox-45.3.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64) ff.
>>
>>
> Looks like it's compiled against a later version of glibc:
>
> > ldd libflashplayer.so | grep "not found"
> ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for
> `./libflashplayer.so'
> ./libflashplayer.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
> not found (required by ./libflashplayer.so)
> ./libflashplayer.so: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found
> (required by ./libflashplayer.so)
> ./libflashplayer.so: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found
> (required by ./libflashplayer.so)--
>

FYI, this has been reported on the Adobe "Flash Player Beta Channel" forum,
and I've +1ed it. I would suggest doing the same to add some more pressure
on them.


https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2209127   (Adobe sign-in required)


-- 
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

[Phelps, Matthew]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard  wrote:

>
> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
> > From: isdtor 
> >
> > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
> >
> > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html
> >
> > I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's
> > pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign
> > of bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here.
> >
> > $ tail -n 3 pluginreg.dat
> > [INVALID]
> > /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so:$
> > 147454127:$
> > $ file /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
> > /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared
> > object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped $
> > strings /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so | grep
> > FlashPlayer_23 FlashPlayer_23_0_0_179_FlashPlayer
> > $ rpm -q firefox
> > firefox-45.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64
> > $
> >
> > I have it working on a different Linux system, not CentOS, with ff
> > 48.0.1.
> >
>
> I've been using it -- currently ..._179 -- (sparingly) on a -7
> machine with the default (firefox-45.3.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64) ff.
>
>
Looks like it's compiled against a later version of glibc:

> ldd libflashplayer.so | grep "not found"
ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `./libflashplayer.so'
./libflashplayer.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
not found (required by ./libflashplayer.so)
./libflashplayer.so: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found
(required by ./libflashplayer.so)
./libflashplayer.so: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found
(required by ./libflashplayer.so)


-- 
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Flash player beta

[Richard]

> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
> From: isdtor 
>
> Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
> 
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html
> 
> I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's
> pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign
> of bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here.
> 
> $ tail -n 3 pluginreg.dat 
> [INVALID]
> /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so:$
> 147454127:$
> $ file /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
> /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared
> object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped $
> strings /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so | grep
> FlashPlayer_23 FlashPlayer_23_0_0_179_FlashPlayer
> $ rpm -q firefox
> firefox-45.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64
> $ 
> 
> I have it working on a different Linux system, not CentOS, with ff
> 48.0.1.
> 

I've been using it -- currently ..._179 -- (sparingly) on a -7
machine with the default (firefox-45.3.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64) ff.







___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Flash player beta

[isdtor]

Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?

http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html

I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's 
pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign of 
bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here.

$ tail -n 3 pluginreg.dat 
[INVALID]
/usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so:$
147454127:$
$ file /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
/usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, 
x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
$ strings /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so | grep FlashPlayer_23
FlashPlayer_23_0_0_179_FlashPlayer
$ rpm -q firefox
firefox-45.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64
$ 

I have it working on a different Linux system, not CentOS, with ff 48.0.1.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073

[Прокси]

On 2016-Sep-21 11:00, Alice Wonder wrote:
> I feel the same way but I find that it is generally safe and beneficial to
> update the LAMP stack on servers and the multimedia stack on the desktop.
> 
> Things like HTTP/2 are not available in the Apache that ships even with
> CentOS 7 and the PHP is so outdated that it causes problems when using third
> party projects because the developers of those projects aren't using
> anything that old anymore. And for the TLS stack, mobile really benefits
> from chacha20 ciphers.
> 
> With respect to multimedia, there's the fluendo codec pack but interestingly
> FireFox won't play mp3 with the fluendo codec pack, it wants the libmad
> plugin.
> 
> And even more bizarre, maybe they have fixed it, but GStreamer 1.x in CentOS
> 7 when it shipped was not capable of decoding the VP9 codec used in WebM2.
> CentOS 7 came with tools to encode VP9 but the GStreamer was too crusty to
> decode it, and the commercial fluendo plugins were of no help there -
> replacing the GStreamer 1.x packages with a modern build was the only
> option.
> 
> Stability is pointless when it doesn't serve the intended purpose.

Agree, but applications on my server work just fine with the old
version. In case I need feature available only in the new version, I'd
move to the new one.


There is another CVE I'm having problem with.
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2015-8866

This one is still under investigation. I see Remi's comment in the
bugzilla that it isn't really a security issue, but it's the Approved
Scanning Vendors who should be convinced in that, and they mark it's PCI
status as "fail". Anyone have any idea how to mitigate this issue? Some
workaround? 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos