On 2016-Sep-21 11:00, Alice Wonder wrote:
> I feel the same way but I find that it is generally safe and beneficial to
> update the LAMP stack on servers and the multimedia stack on the desktop.
>
> Things like HTTP/2 are not available in the Apache that ships even with
> CentOS 7 and the PHP is s
Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html
I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's
pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign of
bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here.
$ tai
> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
> From: isdtor
>
> Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
>
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html
>
> I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's
> pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID]
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard wrote:
>
> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
> > From: isdtor
> >
> > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
> >
> > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html
> >
> > I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard innovate.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
>> > From: isdtor
>> >
>> > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
>> >
>> > http://labs.adobe.co
Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard > innovate.net> wrote:
>>> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100
>>> > From: isdtor
>>> >
>>> > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux?
>>> >
The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple
releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as
for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few
changes for branding/artwork as we can.
That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with f
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple
> releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as
> for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few
> changes for branding/artwork as we can.
>
> That said,
Hello All,
I purchased some Dell Latitude 3570 laptops. They came with Ubuntu
preinstalled. ( Which I swapped for Centos7)
I have to use Elrepo kernel on these machines to get some of the fn function
keys to work.
So I installed Elrepo's kernel-ml and selected this kernel with:
# grub2-set-d
On 09/22/2016 10:14 AM, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I purchased some Dell Latitude 3570 laptops. They came with Ubuntu
> preinstalled. ( Which I swapped for Centos7)
> I have to use Elrepo kernel on these machines to get some of the fn function
> keys to work.
> So I
On 09/21/2016 08:25 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 09/21/2016 09:16 AM, H wrote:
I wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing automated login
to websites.
Maybe you should take another look at keepass, then? Mono is available in
EPEL. keepass runs reasonably well in it. ke
I have never heard of ACI before and I really do not know what it is.
In the other hand, what does this have do to with the passwords in Samba?
Obviously, there are many things I do not know about LDAP and Samba but I
have to manage it
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Gordon Messmer
wrot
On 09/22/2016 11:38 AM, H wrote:
It seems this is only for C7?
Why do you think that? I checked an RHEL 6 system for the required mono
packages.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 09/22/2016 12:18 PM, Bernard Fay wrote:
I have never heard of ACI before and I really do not know what it is.
ACIs are the rules in your directory server that govern what entries and
attributes (such as the samba password) each DN (user) is allowed to
edit. You should have an ACI that all
On September 22, 2016 3:33:15 PM EDT, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
>On 09/22/2016 11:38 AM, H wrote:
>> It seems this is only for C7?
>
>
>Why do you think that? I checked an RHEL 6 system for the required
>mono
>packages.
>
>___
>CentOS mailing list
>CentO
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 09:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox ...
> That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available,
> therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg
> enabled starting with ve
On 09/22/2016 01:12 PM, H wrote:
I did install mono and then downloaded keepass in zip format,
installed it and tried to run it. It did not work
You probably need to install the mono-winforms package.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https:/
On 23/09/16 02:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> That said, we (I :D) want a firefox with ffmpeg support available,
> therefore I have created a centosplus version of firefox that has ffmpeg
> enabled starting with version 45.4.0-1, released to the repositories a
> few minutes ago. You can get it from th
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple
> releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as
> for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few
> changes for brandin
Running C6 fileserver. Want to replace 7 year old HDs connected to an Areca
ARC-1220 raid sata II (3Gb/s) controller. Has anyone used this controller
with newer 2TB SATA III (6Gb/s) WD Re drives like the WD2000FYYZ or the
WD2004FBYZ?
___
CentOS mailing li
Folks
I'm having problems installing Mariadb in Centos 7.
Here's what I did:
0) Become root
1) Make sure that mariadb and mysql are NOT installed.
2) Delete residual libs
rm -rf /var/lib/mysq*
3) yum install -y mariadb-server
installed mariadb-5.5.50-1.el7_2.x86_64 from the Ce
On 9/22/2016 5:56 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
Running C6 fileserver. Want to replace 7 year old HDs connected to an Areca
ARC-1220 raid sata II (3Gb/s) controller. Has anyone used this controller
with newer 2TB SATA III (6Gb/s) WD Re drives like the WD2000FYYZ or the
WD2004FBYZ?
sata III drive
22 matches
Mail list logo
