[ceph-users] Delta Lake Support

Hey Cephers, There is a new OSS software called Delta Lake https://delta.io/ It is compatible with HDFS but seems ripe to add Ceph support as a backend storage. Just want to put this on the radar for any feelers. Best ___ ceph-users mailing list

Re: [ceph-users] Right way to delete OSD from cluster?

I generally have gone the crush reweight 0 route This way the drive can participate in the rebalance, and the rebalance only happens once. Then you can take it out and purge. If I am not mistaken this is the safest. ceph osd crush reweight 0 On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:45 AM Fyodor Ustinov

Re: [ceph-users] Bionic Upgrade 12.2.10

> from Xenial to Bionic, as well as new ceph nodes that installed straight to > Bionic, due to the repo issues. Even if you try to use the xenial packages, > you will run into issues with libcurl4 and libcurl3 I imagine. > > Reed > > On Jan 14, 2019, at 12:21 PM, Scottix

[ceph-users] Bionic Upgrade 12.2.10

Hey, I am having some issues upgrading to 12.2.10 on my 18.04 server. It is saying 12.2.8 is the latest. I am not sure why it is not going to 12.2.10, also the rest of my cluster is already in 12.2.10 except this one machine. $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list deb

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs free space issue

I just had this question as well. I am interested in what you mean by fullest, is it percentage wise or raw space. If I have an uneven distribution and adjusted it, would it make more space available potentially. Thanks Scott On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:05 AM Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs tell command not working

Awww that makes more sense now. I guess I didn't quite comprehend EPERM at the time. Thank You, Scott On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:19 AM John Spray wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:35 PM Scottix wrote: > > > > ceph tell mds.0 client ls > > 2018-07-27 12:32:40.344654 7

[ceph-users] cephfs tell command not working

ceph tell mds.0 client ls 2018-07-27 12:32:40.344654 7fa5e27fc700 0 client.89408629 ms_handle_reset on 10.10.1.63:6800/1750774943 Error EPERM: problem getting command descriptions from mds.0 mds log 2018-07-27 12:32:40.342753 7fc9c1239700 1 mds.CephMon203 handle_command: received command from

Re: [ceph-users] Multi-MDS Failover

So we have been testing this quite a bit, having the failure domain as partially available is ok for us but odd, since we don't know what will be down. Compared to a single MDS we know everything will be blocked. It would be nice to have an option to have all IO blocked if it hits a degraded

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy on 14.04

have to delete your conf file folder. > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It looks like ceph-deploy@2.0.0 is incompatible with systems running > 14.04 > > and it got released in the luminous branch with the new deployment > c

[ceph-users] ceph-deploy on 14.04

It looks like ceph-deploy@2.0.0 is incompatible with systems running 14.04 and it got released in the luminous branch with the new deployment commands. Is there anyway to downgrade to an older version? Log of osd list XYZ@XYZStat200:~/XYZ-cluster$ ceph-deploy --overwrite-conf osd list

Re: [ceph-users] *** SPAM *** Re: Multi-MDS Failover

r the other > ranks. I'm not sure if it *could* following some code changes, but > anyway that just not how it works today. > > Does that clarify things? > > Cheers, Dan > > [1] https://ceph.com/community/new-luminous-cephfs-subtree-pinning/ > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018

Re: [ceph-users] Multi-MDS Failover

<pdonn...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Of course -- the mons can't tell the difference! > > That is really unfortunate, it would be nice to know if the filesystem > has > > been degraded and to what

Re: [ceph-users] Multi-MDS Failover

when you say not optional that is not exactly true it will still run. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:37 PM Patrick Donnelly <pdonn...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Updated to 12.2.5 > > > > We are starting to t

[ceph-users] Multi-MDS Failover

Updated to 12.2.5 We are starting to test multi_mds cephfs and we are going through some failure scenarios in our test cluster. We are simulating a power failure to one machine and we are getting mixed results of what happens to the file system. This is the status of the mds once we simulate

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade Order with ceph-mgr

he step 7 there indicates > the order would be after mon upgrade and before osd. There are couple > threads related to colocated mon/osd upgrade scenario's. > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Right I have ceph-mgr but when I

Re: [ceph-users] Upgrade Order with ceph-mgr

Kulkarni <vakul...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Now that we have ceph-mgr in luminous what is the best upgrade order for > the > > ceph-mgr? > > > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/

[ceph-users] Upgrade Order with ceph-mgr

Now that we have ceph-mgr in luminous what is the best upgrade order for the ceph-mgr? http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/upgrading-ceph/ Thanks. ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Install previous version of Ceph

gt; drastically simpler once you get to that point. > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:08 AM Ronny Aasen <ronny+ceph-us...@aasen.cx> > wrote: > >> On 23. feb. 2018 23:37, Scottix wrote: >> > Hey, >> > We had one of our monitor servers die on us and I have a repla

[ceph-users] Install previous version of Ceph

Hey, We had one of our monitor servers die on us and I have a replacement computer now. In between that time you have released 12.2.3 but we are still on 12.2.2. We are on Ubuntu servers I see all the binaries are in the repo but your package cache only shows 12.2.3, is there a reason for not

Re: [ceph-users] Bluestore osd_max_backfills

When I add in the next hdd i'll try the method again and see if I just needed to wait longer. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:19 PM Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com> wrote: > > > Op 7 november 2017 om 22:54 schreef Scottix <scot...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >

[ceph-users] Bluestore osd_max_backfills

Hey, I recently updated to luminous and started deploying bluestore osd nodes. I normally set osd_max_backfills = 1 and then ramp up as time progresses. Although with bluestore it seems like I wasn't able to do this on the fly like I used to with XFS. ceph tell osd.* injectargs

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph release cadence

Personally I kind of like the current format and fundamentally we are talking about Data storage which should be the most tested and scrutinized piece of software on your computer. Having XYZ feature later than sooner compared to oh I lost all my data. I am thinking of a recent FS that had a

Re: [ceph-users] mon osd down out subtree limit default

Great to hear. Best On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:54 AM John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't want to hijack another thread so here is my question. > > I just learned about this option from

[ceph-users] mon osd down out subtree limit default

I don't want to hijack another thread so here is my question. I just learned about this option from another thread and from my understanding with our Ceph cluster that we have setup, the default value is not good. Which is "rack" and I should have it on "host". Which comes to my point why is it

Re: [ceph-users] Mysql performance on CephFS vs RBD

I'm by no means a Ceph expert but I feel this is not a fair representation of Ceph, I am not saying numbers would be better or worse. Just the fact I see some major holes that don't represent a typical Ceph setup. 1 Mon? Most have a minimum of 3 1 OSD? basically all your reads and writes are

Re: [ceph-users] Random Health_warn

> -- > > ____ > From: ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of John > Spray [jsp...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 3:47 PM > To: Scottix >

Re: [ceph-users] Random Health_warn

Ya the ceph-mon.$ID.log I was running ceph -w when one of them occurred too and it never output anything. Here is a snippet for the the 5:11AM occurrence. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:56 PM Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:49:21PM +, Scot

[ceph-users] Random Health_warn

ceph version 10.2.5 (c461ee19ecbc0c5c330aca20f7392c9a00730367) We are seeing a weird behavior or not sure how to diagnose what could be going on. We started monitoring the overall_status from the json query and every once in a while we would get a HEALTH_WARN for a minute or two. Monitoring

Re: [ceph-users] Failing to Activate new OSD ceph-deploy

cipient of this message or received it > erroneously, please notify the sender and delete it, together with any > attachments, and be advised that any dissemination or copying of this > message is prohibited. > -- > > --

Re: [ceph-users] Failing to Activate new OSD ceph-deploy

advised that any dissemination or copying of this message is prohibited. -- -- *From:* ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of Scottix [scot...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, July 07, 2016 5:01 PM *To:* ceph-users *Subj

Re: [ceph-users] Feedback wanted: health warning when standby MDS dies?

I would take the analogy of a Raid scenario. Basically a standby is considered like a spare drive. If that spare drive goes down. It is good to know about the event, but it does in no way indicate a degraded system, everything keeps running at top speed. If you had multi active MDS and one goes

Re: [ceph-users] 10.2.3 release announcement?

Agreed no announcement like there usually is, what is going on? Hopefully there is an explanation. :| On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:01 AM Henrik Korkuc wrote: > Hey, > > 10.2.3 is tagged in jewel branch for more than 5 days already, but there > were no announcement for that yet. Is

Re: [ceph-users] Failing to Activate new OSD ceph-deploy

it in atleast. --Scott On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 PM Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, > This is the first time I have had a problem with ceph-deploy > > I have attached the log but I can't seem to activate the osd. > > I am running > ceph version 10.2.0 (3a9fba20ec743

[ceph-users] Failing to Activate new OSD ceph-deploy

Hey, This is the first time I have had a problem with ceph-deploy I have attached the log but I can't seem to activate the osd. I am running ceph version 10.2.0 (3a9fba20ec743699b69bd0181dd6c54dc01c64b9) I did upgrade from Infernalis->Jewel I haven't changed ceph ownership but I do have the

Re: [ceph-users] Required maintenance for upgraded CephFS filesystems

Great thanks. --Scott On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:59 AM John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there anyway to check what it is currently using? > > Since Firefly, the MDS rewrites TMAPs to

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS in the wild

I have three comments on our CephFS deployment. Some background first, we have been using CephFS since Giant with some not so important data. We are using it more heavily now in Infernalis. We have our own raw data storage using the POSIX semantics and keep everything as basic as possible.

Re: [ceph-users] Weighted Priority Queue testing

We have run into this same scenarios in terms of the long tail taking much longer on recovery than the initial. Either time we are adding osd or an osd get taken down. At first we have max-backfill set to 1 so it doesn't kill the cluster with io. As time passes by the single osd is performing the

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs rm -rf on directory of 160TB /40M files

I have been running some speed tests in POSIX file operations and I noticed even just listing files can take a while compared to an attached HDD. I am wondering is there a reason it takes so long to even just list files. Here is the test I ran time for i in {1..10}; do touch $i; done

Re: [ceph-users] Old MDS resurrected after update

Thanks for the responses John. --Scott On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I had a weird thing happen when I was testing an upgrade in a dev > > environment

[ceph-users] Old MDS resurrected after update

I had a weird thing happen when I was testing an upgrade in a dev environment where I have removed an MDS from a machine a while back. I upgraded to 0.94.6 and low and behold the mds daemon started up on the machine again. I know the /var/lib/ceph/mds folder was removed becaues I renamed it

Re: [ceph-users] osd become unusable, blocked by xfsaild (?) and load > 5000

Looks like the bug with the kernel using ceph and XFS was fixed, I haven't tested it yet but just wanted to give an update. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1527062 On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:05 AM Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can confirm it seems to b

Re: [ceph-users] osd become unusable, blocked by xfsaild (?) and load > 5000

I can confirm it seems to be kernels greater than 3.16, we had this problem where servers would lock up and had to perform restarts on a weekly basis. We downgraded to 3.16, since then we have not had to do any restarts. I did find this thread in the XFS forums and I am not sure if has been fixed

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Attributes Question Marks

OpenSuse 12.1 3.1.10-1.29-desktop On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, 5:34 AM Yan, Zheng <uker...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm positive the client I sent you the log is 94. We do have one client >> still on 87

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Fuse Issue

lp...I think "cct" must be the > broken one, but maybe it's just the Inode* or something. > -Greg > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was rsyncing files to ceph from an older machine and I ran into a > > ceph-fu

[ceph-users] CephFS Fuse Issue

I was rsyncing files to ceph from an older machine and I ran into a ceph-fuse crash. OpenSUSE 12.1, 3.1.10-1.29-desktop ceph-fuse 0.94.3 The rsync was running for about 48 hours then crashed somewhere along the way. I added the log, and can run more if you like, I am not sure how to reproduce

Re: [ceph-users] Cephfs total throughput

I have a program that monitors the speed, and I have seen 1TB/s pop up and there is just no way that is true. Probably the way it is calculated is prone to extreme measurements, where if you average it out you get a more realistic number. On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:25 PM Mark Nelson

[ceph-users] Object Storage and POSIX Mix

I saw this article on Linux Today and immediately thought of Ceph. http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/storage-management/object-storage-vs.-posix-storage-something-in-the-middle-please-1.html I was thinking would it theoretically be possible with RGW to do a GET and set a BEGIN_SEEK and

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS vs Lustre performance

I'll be more of a third-party person and try to be factual. =) I wouldn't throw off Gluster too fast yet. Besides what you described with the object and disk storage. It uses Amazon Dynamo paper on eventually consistent methodology of organizing data. Gluster has different features so I would

Re: [ceph-users] Unexpected period of iowait, no obvious activity?

Ya Ubuntu has a process called mlocate which run updatedb We basically turn it off shown here http://askubuntu.com/questions/268130/can-i-disable-updatedb-mlocate If you still want it you could edit the settings /etc/updatedb.conf and add a prunepath to your ceph directory On Tue, Jun 23, 2015

Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.2 Hammer released

I noticed amd64 Ubuntu 12.04 hasn't updated its packages to 0.94.2 can you check this? http://ceph.com/debian-hammer/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages Package: ceph Version: 0.94.1-1precise Architecture: amd64 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:35 AM Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote: This

Re: [ceph-users] Discuss: New default recovery config settings

From a ease of use standpoint and depending on the situation you are setting up your environment, the idea is as follow; It seems like it would be nice to have some easy on demand control where you don't have to think a whole lot other than knowing how it is going to affect your cluster in a

Re: [ceph-users] How to backup hundreds or thousands of TB

As a point to * someone accidentally removed a thing, and now they need a thing back I thought MooseFS has an interesting feature that I thought would be good for CephFS and maybe others. Basically a timed Trashbin Deleted files are retained for a configurable period of time (a file system level

Re: [ceph-users] MDS unmatched rstat after upgrade hammer

, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:10 PM Yan, Zheng uker...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote: I was testing the upgrade on our dev environment and after I restarted the mds I got the following errors. 2015-04-08 15:58:34.056470 mds.0 [ERR] unmatched rstat

Re: [ceph-users] Firefly, cephfs issues: different unix rights depending on the client and ls are slow

… The time variation is caused cache coherence. when client has valid information in its cache, 'stat' operation will be fast. Otherwise the client need to send request to MDS and wait for reply, which will be slow. This sounds like the behavior I had with CephFS giving me question marks.

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Attributes Question Marks

issues. Anyway we are going to update the machine soon so, I can report if we keep having the issue. Thanks for your support, Scott On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:07 PM Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote: I'll try the following things and report back to you. 1. I can get a new kernel on another

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Attributes Question Marks

Ya we are not at 0.87.1 yet, possibly tomorrow. I'll let you know if it still reports the same. Thanks John, --Scottie On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:57 PM John Spray john.sp...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/03/2015 22:35, Scottix wrote: I was testing a little bit more and decided to run the cephfs

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Attributes Question Marks

:32:50.577443 7f47c3006780 -1 Bad entry start ptr (0x2aee801f65) at 0x2aee802aa4 Events by type: no output here On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:01 PM Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote: I did a bit more testing. 1. I tried on a newer kernel and was not able to recreate the problem, maybe

[ceph-users] CephFS Attributes Question Marks

We have a file system running CephFS and for a while we had this issue when doing an ls -la we get question marks in the response. -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun root14761 Feb 9 16:06 data.2015-02-08_00-00-00.csv.bz2 -? ? ? ? ?? data.2015-02-09_00-00-00.csv.bz2 If we

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Attributes Question Marks

PM, Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote: We have a file system running CephFS and for a while we had this issue when doing an ls -la we get question marks in the response. -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun root14761 Feb 9 16:06

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS Attributes Question Marks

(a whole lot of) logging to the client's log file and you could see what requests are getting processed by the Ceph code and how it's responding. That might let you narrow things down. It's certainly not any kind of timeout. -Greg On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote

[ceph-users] Replacing Ceph mons understanding initial members

We currently have a 3 node system with 3 monitor nodes. I created them in the initial setup and the ceph.conf mon initial members = Ceph200, Ceph201, Ceph202 mon host = 10.10.5.31,10.10.5.32,10.10.5.33 We are in the process of expanding and installing dedicated mon servers. I know I can run:

Re: [ceph-users] jbod + SMART : how to identify failing disks ?

I would say it depends on your system and where drives are connected to. Some HBA have a cli tool to manage the drives connected like a raid card would do. One other method I found is sometimes it will expose the leds for you http://fabiobaltieri.com/2011/09/21/linux-led-subsystem/ has an article

Re: [ceph-users] cephfs survey results

___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users

Re: [ceph-users] ceph features monitored by nagios

/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph-fuse remount

Thanks for the info. I was able to do a lazy unmount and started back up fine if anyone wanted to know. On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote: I wanted to update ceph-fuse to a new version and I

[ceph-users] Ceph-fuse remount

]: fuse failed to initialize 2014-07-16 09:08:57.784900 7f669be1a760 -1 fuse_mount(mountpoint=/mnt/ceph) failed. ceph-fuse[10461]: mount failed: (5) Input/output error Or is there a better way to do this? -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS MDS Setup

0.80.1 (a38fe1169b6d2ac98b427334c12d7cf81f809b74) Do I need to start over and not add the mds to be clean? Thanks for your time On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@42on.com wrote: On 05/21/2014 09:04 PM, Scottix wrote: I am setting a CephFS cluster and wondering about MDS

[ceph-users] CephFS MDS Setup

standby? How reliable is the standby? or should a single active mds be sufficient? Thanks -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph User Committee monthly meeting #1 : executive summary

, Artisan Logiciel Libre ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://www.twitter.com/scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com

Re: [ceph-users] shutting down for maintenance

-ceph.com -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://www.twitter.com/scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] optimal setup with 4 x ethernet ports

list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://www.twitter.com/scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http

Re: [ceph-users] Newbie question

/ceph-users-ceph.**comhttp://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Follow Me: @Scottix http://www.twitter.com/scottix http://about.me/scottix scot...@gmail.com ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com

[ceph-users] Documentation OS Recommendations

I was looking at someones question on the list and started looking up some documentation and found this page. http://ceph.com/docs/next/install/os-recommendations/ Do you think you can provide an update for dumpling. Best Regards ___ ceph-users mailing

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Hadoop Configuration

file, to see if CephPoolException.class is in there? It might just be that the libcephfs.jar is out-of-date. -Noah On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote: I am running into an issues connecting hadoop to my ceph cluster and I'm sure I am missing something but can't

[ceph-users] Ceph Hadoop Configuration

I am running into an issues connecting hadoop to my ceph cluster and I'm sure I am missing something but can't figure it out. I have a Ceph cluster with MDS running fine and I can do a basic mount perfectly normal. I have hadoop fs -ls with basic file:/// working well. Info: ceph cluster version

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy questions

, Scottix On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Greg, I am starting to understand it better. I soon realized as well after doing some searching I hit this bug. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5194 Which created the problem upon rebooting. Thank You, Scottix

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy questions

. Thanks for responding, Scottix On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:35 AM, John Wilkins john.wilk...@inktank.comwrote: ceph-deploy adds the OSDs to the cluster map. You can add the OSDs to the ceph.conf manually. In the ceph.conf file, the settings don't require underscores. If you modify your

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy questions

Thanks Greg, I am starting to understand it better. I soon realized as well after doing some searching I hit this bug. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5194 Which created the problem upon rebooting. Thank You, Scottix On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote