The ceph tool got moved into ceph-common at some point, so it
shouldn't be in the ceph rpm. I'm not sure what step in the
installation process should have handled that, but I imagine it's your
problem.
-Greg
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Michael Kuriger mk7...@yp.com wrote:
Hi all,
When
Hi,
I'm trying to understand object storage replication between two ceph
clusters in two zones in a single region. Setting up replication itself
isn't the issue, it's how to ensure high availability and data safety
between the clusters when failing over.
The simplest case is flipping the
Hi all,
After the previous thread, I'm doing my SSD shopping for and I came across
an SSD called an Edge Boost Pro w/ Power Fail, it seems to have some
impressive specs - in most places decent user reviews, in once place a poor
one - I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with these
Hello everyone,
I have a radosgw configured with the bellow ceph.conf file, but this instanse
aren't generate any log entry on log file path, the log is aways empty, but
if I take a look to the apache access.log there are a lot of entries.
Anyone knows why?
Regards.
Italo Santos
Blind-bucket would be perfect for us, as we don't need to list the objects.
We only need to list the bucket when doing a bucket deletion. If we
could clean out/delete all objects in a bucket (without
iterating/listing them) that would be ideal..
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:34 PM, GuangYang
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 16:12:59 -0600 Tony Harris wrote:
Hi all,
After the previous thread, I'm doing my SSD shopping for and I came
across an SSD called an Edge Boost Pro w/ Power Fail, it seems to have
some impressive specs - in most places decent user reviews, in once
place a poor one - I
We have had good experience so far keeping each bucket less than 0.5 million
objects, by client side sharding. But I think it would be nice you can test at
your scale, with your hardware configuration, as well as your expectation over
the tail latency.
Generally the bucket sharding should
We have a file system running CephFS and for a while we had this issue when
doing an ls -la we get question marks in the response.
-rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun root14761 Feb 9 16:06
data.2015-02-08_00-00-00.csv.bz2
-? ? ? ? ??
data.2015-02-09_00-00-00.csv.bz2
If we
Forgive me if this is unhelpful, but could it be something to do with
permissions of the directory and not Ceph at all?
http://superuser.com/a/528467
Bill
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote:
I bet it's that permission issue combined with a minor bug in FUSE on
that kernel, or maybe in the ceph-fuse code (but I've not seen it
reported before, so I kind of doubt it). If you run ceph-fuse with
debug client = 20 it will output (a whole lot of) logging to the
client's log file and you
Update: the attempt to define a traditional replicated pool was successful;
it's online and ready to go. So the cluster basics appear sound...
-don-
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Don
Doerner
Sent: 02 March, 2015 16:18
To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
On 11/02/2015 1:46 PM, 杨万元 wrote:
Hello!
We use Ceph+Openstack in our private cloud. Recently we upgrade
our centos6.5 based cluster from Ceph Emperor to Ceph Firefly.
At first,we use redhat yum repo epel to upgrade, this Ceph's
version is 0.80.5. First upgrade monitor,then osd,last
I have met this before.
Because I use apache with rgw, radosrgw is executed by the user
'apache', so you have to make sure the apache user have permissions to
write the log file.
在 2015年03月03日 07:06, Italo Santos 写道:
Hello everyone,
I have a radosgw configured with the bellow ceph.conf
We're seeing a lot of this as well. (as i mentioned to sage at
SCALE..) Is there a rule of thumb at all for how big is safe to let a
RGW bucket get?
Also, is this theoretically resolved by the new bucket-sharding
feature in the latest dev release?
-Ben
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Erdem
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a file system running CephFS and for a while we had this issue when
doing an ls -la we get question marks in the response.
-rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun root14761 Feb 9 16:06
data.2015-02-08_00-00-00.csv.bz2
-? ? ?
3 Ceph servers on Ubuntu 12.04.5 - kernel 3.13.0-29-generic
We have an old server that we compiled the ceph-fuse client on
Suse11.4 - kernel 2.6.37.6-0.11
This is the only mount we have right now.
We don't have any problems reading the files and the directory shows full
775 permissions and doing
I'll try the following things and report back to you.
1. I can get a new kernel on another machine and mount to the CephFS and
see if I get the following errors.
2. I'll run the debug and see if anything comes up.
I'll report back to you when I can do these things.
Thanks,
Scottie
On Mon, Mar
Hi Don,
On 03/03/2015 01:18, Don Doerner wrote: Hello,
I am trying to set up to measure erasure coding performance and overhead. My
Ceph “cluster-of-one” has 27 disks, hence 27 OSDs, all empty. I have ots of
memory, and I am using “osd crush chooseleaf type = 0” in my config file,
Hello,
I am trying to set up to measure erasure coding performance and overhead. My
Ceph cluster-of-one has 27 disks, hence 27 OSDs, all empty. I have ots of
memory, and I am using osd crush chooseleaf type = 0 in my config file, so my
OSDs should be able to peer with others on the same
I forgot to mention a very important note for those running the v0.92
development release and upgrading:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Sage Weil wrote:
Upgrading
-
* If you are upgrading from v0.92, you must stop all OSD daemons and flush their
journals (``ceph-osd -i NNN --flush-journal'')
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Nathan O'Sullivan nat...@mammoth.com.au wrote:
On 11/02/2015 1:46 PM, 杨万元 wrote:
Hello!
We use Ceph+Openstack in our private cloud. Recently we upgrade our
centos6.5 based cluster from Ceph Emperor to Ceph Firefly.
At first,we use redhat yum repo epel
I think this will be fixed in next firefly point release
tracker for firefly 0.80.8 speed decrease
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10956
Jason Dillaman link it to the famous object_cacher bug:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9854
- Mail original -
De: Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com
À:
Thank you folks for bringing that up. I had some questions about sharding.
We'd like blind buckets too, at least it's on the roadmap. For the current
sharded implementation, what are the final details? Is number of shards
defined per bucket or globally? Is there a way to split current indexes
into
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Sage Weil wrote:
I forgot to mention a very important note for those running the v0.92
development release and upgrading:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Sage Weil wrote:
Upgrading
-
* If you are upgrading from v0.92, you must stop all OSD daemons and flush
their
Try and check the xfs fragmentation factor on your „old“ osds.
$ xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sdX
and see if it’s incredible high.
On 27 Feb 2015, at 14:02, Corin Langosch corin.lango...@netskin.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm using ceph for a long time now, since bobtail. I always upgraded every
Hi Alex,
I see I even responded in the same thread! This would be a good thing
to bring up in the meeting on Wednesday. Those are far faster single
OSD results than I've been able to muster with simplemessenger. I
wonder how much effect flow-control and header/data crc had. He did
have
Hi people,
I had one OSD crash, so the rebalancing happened - all fine (some 3% of the
data has been moved arround, and rebalanced) and my previous
recovery/backfill throtling was applied fine and we didnt have a unusable
cluster.
Now I used the procedure to remove this crashed OSD comletely
HI all,
I think this question can maybe be linked to the mail I sent (fev 25) related
to unconsistency between bucket and bucket.instance.
Best regards
De : ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] De la part de
baijia...@126.com
Envoyé : lundi 2 mars 2015 08:00
À : ceph-users;
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
I'll be honest, the pricing on Intel's website is far from reality. I
haven't been able to find any OEMs, and retail pricing on the 200GB 3610
is ~231 (the $300 must have been a different model in the line).
Hello,
Today I thought I'd experiment with snapshots and cloning. So I did:
rbd import --image-format=2 vm-proto.raw rbd/vm-proto
rbd snap create rbd/vm-proto@s1
rbd snap protect rbd/vm-proto@s1
rbd clone rbd/vm-proto@s1 rbd/server
And then proceeded to create a qemu-kvm guest with rbd/server
It's a little worse, but not much:
root@r-ch106:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sda1
actual 397955, ideal 324744, fragmentation factor 18.40%
root@r-ch106:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sdb2
actual 378729, ideal 324349, fragmentation factor 14.36%
root@r-ch105:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sdb2
actual 382831,
Hi all! I have been trying to get permanent my fs maked by the rbd device
mapping on rhel7 modifying /etc/fstab but everytime I reboot the server I lose
the mapping to the pool so the server gets stuck since It didnt find the
/dev/rbd0 device, does anybody know if there any procedure to not
Hi,
I rebooted a failed server, which is now showing a rogue filesystem mount.
Actually, there were also several disks missing in the node, all reported as
prepared by ceph-disk, but not activated.
[root@ceph2 ~]# grep /var/lib/ceph/tmp /etc/mtab
/dev/sdo1 /var/lib/ceph/tmp/mnt.usVRe8 xfs
OK
thx Wido.
Than can we at least update the documentaiton, that will say MAJOR data
rebalancing will happen AGAIN, and not 3%, but 37% in my case.
Because, I would never run this during work hours, while clients are
hammering VMs...
This reminds me of those tunable changes couple of months ago,
On 2015-02-28 20:46:15 +, Gregory Farnum said:
Sounds good!
-Greg
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:55 AM David
da...@visions.se wrote:
Hi!
We did that a few weeks ago and it mostly worked fine.
However, on startup of one of the 4 machines, it got stuck
while starting OSDs (at least that's
Hi cephers,
The next ceph breizhcamp will be scheduled the 12th march 2015, at Nantes
more precisely at Suravenir Assurance 2 rue vasco de gama,Saint-Herblain,
France.
It will begin at 10.00AM.
join us an fill the http://doodle.com/hvb99f2am7qucd5q
--
Eric Mourgaya,
Respectons la planete!
On 03/02/2015 03:56 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Hi people,
I had one OSD crash, so the rebalancing happened - all fine (some 3% of the
data has been moved arround, and rebalanced) and my previous
recovery/backfill throtling was applied fine and we didnt have a unusable
cluster.
Now I used
Hi all, especially devs,
We have recently pinpointed one of the causes of slow requests in our
cluster. It seems deep-scrubs on pg's that contain the index file for a
large radosgw bucket lock the osds. Incresing op threads and/or disk
threads helps a little bit, but we need to increase them
On our Ubuntu 14.04/Firefly 0.80.8 cluster we are seeing
problem with log file rotation for the rados gateway.
The /etc/logrotate.d/radosgw script gets called, but
it does not work correctly. It spits out this message,
coming from the postrotate portion:
/etc/cron.daily/logrotate:
reload:
This is probably LevelDB being slow. The monitor has some options to
compact the store on startup and I thought the osd handled it
automatically, but you could try looking for something like that and see if
it helps.
-Greg
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:02 AM Corin Langosch corin.lango...@netskin.com
You can turn the filestore up to 20 instead of 1. ;) You might also
explore what information you can get out of the admin socket.
You are correct that those numbers are the OSD epochs, although note
that when the system is running you'll get output both for the OSD as
a whole and for individual
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Erdem Agaoglu erdem.agao...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, especially devs,
We have recently pinpointed one of the causes of slow requests in our
cluster. It seems deep-scrubs on pg's that contain the index file for a
large radosgw bucket lock the osds. Incresing op
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Schneller
daniel.schnel...@centerdevice.com wrote:
On our Ubuntu 14.04/Firefly 0.80.8 cluster we are seeing
problem with log file rotation for the rados gateway.
The /etc/logrotate.d/radosgw script gets called, but
it does not work correctly. It spits
All,
Using ceph-deploy, I see a failure to install ceph on a node. At the beginning
of the ceph-deploy output, it says it is installing stable version giant.
The last few lines are...
[192.168.167.192][DEBUG ] -- Finished Dependency Resolution
[192.168.167.192][WARNIN] Error: Package:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Mark Wu wud...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering how the value of journal_align_min_size gives impact on
journal padding. Is there any document describing the disk layout of
journal?
Not much, unfortunately. Just looking at the code, the journal will
align any
Hi Gregory,
We are not using listomapkeys that way or in any way to be precise. I used
it here just to reproduce the behavior/issue.
What i am really interested in is if scrubbing-deep actually mitigates the
problem and/or is there something that can be further improved.
Or i guess we should go
Problem solved, I've been pointed at repository problem and an existing Ceph
issue (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10476) by a couple of helpful folks.
Thanks,
-don-
From: Don Doerner
Sent: 02 March, 2015 10:20
To: Don Doerner; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: RE: Fresh install of GIANT
On 2015-03-02 18:17:00 +, Gregory Farnum said:
I'm not very (well, at all, for rgw) familiar with these scripts, but
how are you starting up your RGW daemon? There's some way to have
Apache handle the process instead of Upstart, but Yehuda says you
don't want to do it.
-Greg
Well, we
Hi,
I had a cluster that was working correctly with Calamari and I was able to see
and manage from the Dashboard.
I had to reinstall the cluster and change IP Addresses etc. so I built my
cluster back up, with same name, but mainly network changes.
When I went to calamari, it shows some stale
Hey cephers,
The basic schedule has been posted for CDS tomorrow and Wednesday. If
you are a blueprint owner and are unable to make the slot you have
been assigned please let me know. We're working with some pretty tight
time constraints to make this all work, but there is a little wiggle
room if
Daniel,
on CentOS the logrotate script was not invoked incorrectly because it
was called everywhere as radosgw:
e.g.
service radosgw reload /dev/null or
initctl reload radosgw cluster=$cluster id=$id 2/dev/null || :
but there isn't any radosgw service!
I had to change it into ceph-radosgw
51 matches
Mail list logo
