gt; From: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
> To: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC , "Taylor, Karl E."
> , "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
> area_fraction
>
> Dear Martin, Karl, et al,
>
vironmental Data AnalysisEmail:
> alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> R25, 2.22
> Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata On Behalf Of Martin
> Juckes - UKRI STFC
> Sent: 15
on.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata On Behalf Of Martin Juckes
- UKRI STFC
Sent: 15 February 2019 09:21
To: Taylor, Karl E. ; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadat
2019 06:08:31
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
area_fraction
Hi Alison,
Looks good to me.
Perhaps Martin can weigh in on whether or not the phrase "or any other
dimensionless representation of a fraction" is ne
-Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata On Behalf Of Taylor,
> Karl E.
> Sent: 07 February 2019 17:24
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
> area_fraction
>
> HI Martin and all,
>
> I agree that the b
sed across a wide range of disciplines and as far as possible all
> of it has to be consistent and intelligible to everyone.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> - Forwarded message from Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
> -
>
>> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12
> to
> be consistent and intelligible to everyone.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> - Forwarded message from Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
> -
>
>> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12:16:06 +
>> From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
>> To: John Gr
essage from Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
-
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12:16:06 +
> From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
> To: John Graybeal , Jim Biard
>
> Cc: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
>
6 Feb 2019 12:16:06 +
> From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
> To: John Graybeal , Jim Biard
> Cc: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
>area_fraction
>
> Hello John, others,
>
>
> Thanks for t
ions)?
regards,
Martin
From: CF-metadata on behalf of John Graybeal
Sent: 01 February 2019 07:12
To: Jim Biard
Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
area_fraction
Martin,
I like your definition.
Wh
rrect with it, as you say. Could we instead add a note
>> to the definitions pointing out that percent is acceptable as a unit for
>> them?
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> - Forwarded message from Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
>> --
(STFC,RAL,RALSP); CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
area_fraction
Martin,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:32 AM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk>> wrote:
In the interests of clarity, could you s
Martin,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:32 AM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC <
martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
> In the interests of clarity, could you say why the option I've proposed is
> not in your list?
>
I'm sorry. I thought you proposed not using the word "fraction", so that,
for example,
are standard is perceived by others.
regards,
Martin
From: Steven Emmerson
Sent: 31 January 2019 16:02
To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
Cc: CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name
m: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
To: Steven Emmerson
Cc: "CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)"
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
area_fraction
Hi Steve,
The issue is more that CF allows more freedom in the choice of units than many people
ex
ts, I feel it would be better to avoid having the term "fraction" in the
> standard name, given that it is often interpreted as implying a specific
> choice for the units.
>
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> ________________
> From: Steve
--
> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:40:12 +
> From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
> To: Steven Emmerson
> Cc: "CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
>area_fraction
>
> Hi Steve,
>
>
n (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
Cc: CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putting the units in a CF standard name:
area_fraction
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:54 PM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC
mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk>> wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand your comment. Wh
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:54 PM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC <
martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand your comment. When I search for "fraction"
> in the NIST document I find it defined as being a ratio, which is
> inconsistent with the current CF usage. The CF standard
as a "fraction". I'm suggesting a change to remove
this inconsistency,
regards,
Martin
From: Steven Emmerson
Sent: 30 January 2019 17:27
To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
Cc: CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Putt
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:36 AM Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC <
martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
> Could we avoid this confusion in the future by replacing the term with a
> more neutral term, such as "area_cover"?
>
That would be inconsistent with the NIST recommendation. See <
21 matches
Mail list logo
