an Emeritus
Fellowship using this e-mail address.
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory
Sent: 12 July 2018 17:48
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
Dear Roy
Ah, OK. Thanks. Having thought
"Lowry, Roy K."
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" ,
> "j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk"
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
>
> Dear Jonathan,
>
>
> The extra text that I am preparing in the Trac ticket for a
using this e-mail address.
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory
Sent: 12 July 2018 16:36
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
Dear Roy
That's good news. Thanks for your patience. I like
y K."
> To: Jonathan Gregory , "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
>
> Dear Jonathan,
>
>
> Getting back to this now I've had some feedback. 'organisms_in_taxon' is fine
> and a rem
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
Dear Roy and Martin
I think taxonomic_category might be a little better than taxon, but it still
seems obscure to me. Can you see something wrong with organisms_in_taxon (or
_from_ or _belonging_to_
behalf of Jonathan
Gregory <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
Sent: 21 May 2018 16:37
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
Dear Roy and Martin
I think taxonomic_category might be a little better than taxon, but it still
seems obscure to me.
ta@cgd.ucar.edu>,
> "j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk" <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
>
> Dear Jonathan,
>
>
> Getting back to Trac 99. I prefer Martin's suggestion here. Are you happy
>
- UKRI STFC <martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk>
Sent: 02 May 2018 08:47
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk; Lowry, Roy K.
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
Dear Roy, Jonathan,
I understand the cause of Jonathan's concern: wikipedia suggests a b
: "Lowry, Roy K." <r...@bodc.ac.uk>
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>,
> "j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk" <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
>
ac.uk>
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>,
> "j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk" <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
>
> Dear Jonathon,
>
>
> I realised that I hadn'
cas.ac.uk>
Sent: 16 April 2018 19:19
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Standard Names to support Trac ticket 99
Dear Roy
Thanks for this. It looks sensible and well-constructed to me. I have two
comments.
* In response to your question, I think biological_taxon_lsid is bette
rwarded message from "Lowry, Roy K." <r...@bodc.ac.uk> -
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:02:59 +
> From: "Lowry, Roy K." <r...@bodc.ac.uk>
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: [CF-metadata] Standard Name
Dear All,
Here is an initial batch of 8 Standard Names to support the CF taxon dimension.
Two are dimension labels whilst the other six are measurements to which the
taxon is a co-ordinate. Five of these are to cover Daniel's proposal that
prompted the resurrection of Ticket 99.
I've
13 matches
Mail list logo
