Is there an equivalent for Flash (AS 2.0), Flex, and CF 7?
On 11/18/05, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/18/05, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you going to get a chance to take a first cut at this? If not, can
> you
> > point me to someplace that I can use to do so?
>
>
> "see the light"... I don't remember if I explicitly mentioned FuseDocs
> back then but I did think FLiP was pretty lame (see link above).
Like so many other things, detailed use of fusedocs and the FLiP
process are really about personal style. I happen to dislike them
both, despite a couple hon
On 11/19/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To open a can of worms can you elaborate?
Most of what I disliked about FB3 is implied in this review of the FB3 book:
http://corfield.org/index.cfm/event/fusebox.fusebook
> I know some
> version-agnostic things about Fusebox (li
On 11/19/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The web flows in a procedural way. It's just a byproduct of HTTP, and
> no real way around it.
Yes, this is an extremely important point that many people seem to
gloss over. Even trying to overlay MVC on the web interaction model is
not a
On 11/19/05, Peter Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, you can announce events in your listeners, however you cannot clear the
> event queue (well, you could if you access some "untouchable" stuff in the
> request scope).
But you can in a filter - which is really just a different type of
l
> I was very public about my dislike for FB3 but FB4 began to persuade
> me and FB41 is very compelling in my opinion.
To open a can of worms can you elaborate? I know some
version-agnostic things about Fusebox (like fusedocs) took some
persuasion for you to see the light. Surely that w
I agree completely with Barney here and would refer folks to these
posts by, respectively, Joe Rinehart and Ben Edwards about the
"implicit" part of the invocation process in Mach II:
http://clearsoftware.net/client/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=FFC3E60A-E081-2BAC-69C5B0BD2C8DE3C0
http://benedwards.
On 11/19/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fusebox 4 was developed specifically for CFMX, and doesn't use OO or
> CFCs. Just because it don't have the buzzword compliance doesn't make
> a framework bad. Heck, FB3 which was designed for CF4 is still a very
> viable framework. Which
On 11/19/05, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been looking at mach-II and model-glue as my two possibilities.
> Has anyone used both and has any comments on which one they liked best and
> why.
Read my frameworks comparison presentation and look at the frameworks
sample code that goes wit
On 11/19/05, Peter Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The distinguishing factor between M2 and MG for controller code is a name --
> controller (MG) or listener (M2). In essense, they act in the same way.
> It's merely a semantic difference IMHO.
I beg to differ...
The more important differ
> The ability to announce events in listeners is so you can leverage
> event-mappings -- which are extremely useful.
I certianly agree, and that's really no different that MG's results.
But in MG you can ONLY announce results, you can't announce arbitrary
events like in M2.
Theorectically, you
> > The distinguishing factor between M2 and MG for controller code is a
> name -- controller (MG) or listener (M2). In essense, they act in the
> same way. It's merely a semantic difference IMHO.
>
> On that narrow point, yes. ;)
>
> MG has the (significant, in my view) advantage that contr
> So, I go to write a unit test around a simple bean object. First test,
> setName(name) Okay, obviously I need to pass in a string to this
> method, but as it is a setter, it does not return anything. So, what
> am I really testing here ... that the method does not blow up, or how
> wou
On 11/18/05, Jeff D. Chastain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I go to write a unit test around a simple bean object. First test,
> setName(name)
> Okay, obviously I need to pass in a string to this method, but as it is a
> setter, it does not
> return anything. So, what am I really testin
Just filter emails with "I will be out of the office" in the body
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 5:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF-Talk: Digest e
Well if you have "issues"...
"Please refer any IT issues to Chris Terrebonne or Tommy Nguyen."
give them a call! :OD
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2005 22:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF-Talk: Digest every 8 hours (Out of the Office)
just
> The distinguishing factor between M2 and MG for controller code is a name --
> controller (MG) or listener (M2). In essense, they act in the same way.
> It's merely a semantic difference IMHO.
On that narrow point, yes. ;)
MG has the (significant, in my view) advantage that control returns
LMAO!!
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:224733
Archives:
couple of quirks here and there (I.E., I don't think they have robust
> error messages enabled in the CF servers), but you can't beat the
> price.
I remember Ben saying robust error messages shouldn't be enabled on a
production server anyway.
Will
~
just please nobody else turn an autoresponder on
On 11/19/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already sent MikeD an email but it is the Sabbath remember. Maybe
> not for much longer, does it end at sundown?
>
> On 11/19/05, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please tell me we aren't
I already sent MikeD an email but it is the Sabbath remember. Maybe
not for much longer, does it end at sundown?
On 11/19/05, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please tell me we aren't going to get this every 8 hrs for the next week...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike McCon
I personally don't like FB and wouldn't use it. But my own framework is
similar in some ways, just a lot simpler.
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 November 2005 20:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Mach-II vs model-glue
Fusebox 4 was developed speci
First off, I know I'm biased -- considering my involvement in the 1.1.0 release
of Mach-II.
>I happen to like MG better than M2, but it's more of a style thing
>than anything about the frameworks themselves. I think MG is more
>helpful in distinguishing what is controller code and what is model
Please tell me we aren't going to get this every 8 hrs for the next week...
-Original Message-
From: Mike McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 16:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF-Talk: Digest every 8 hours (Out of the Office)
I will be out of the office f
I will be out of the office from Monday November 21 through Friday, November
25. Please refer any IT issues to Chris Terrebonne or Tommy Nguyen. I'll be
back in the office on Monday, November 28.
M. McConnell
~|
Logware (www.
Fusebox 4 was developed specifically for CFMX, and doesn't use OO or
CFCs. Just because it don't have the buzzword compliance doesn't make
a framework bad. Heck, FB3 which was designed for CF4 is still a very
viable framework. Which isn't to say you should pick up a new
framework (or three), of
I have decided it is about to upgrade my framework. While mine still works
great, it was developer prior to MX, so is not oo and doesn't use CFC's
I have been looking at mach-II and model-glue as my two possibilities.
Has anyone used both and has any comments on which one they liked best and
why.
Perfect. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Open Source Shopping Cart Coding Guidelines
On 11/18/05, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you going to get a chance to take a first cu
I'm working on a similar project. We have daily newsletters that are
sent from our University Relations group. These are saved in an
Exchange mailbox on a regular basis.
I created a page that uses cfx_imap4 to pull these messages, save the
attachments to a folder, then saves the actual email mes
Here's what I've found, but I haven't figured out a workable solution yet...
The RC4 encryption/decryption works perfectly unless it encounters a NULL
string in the encryption/decryption process. Since CF does not handle NULL
character and returns an empty string, that position does not get
en
I concedethat is a better test.
Larry Juncker
President & CEO
ALJ Computer Services, LLC
1445 So 27th Street
Fort Dodge, IA 50501
Office 515-576-0885
Fax 515-576-8510
Cell 515-571-1826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Satu
>>I'm looking for examples, tips, tricks, tutorials,
I you care for something ready to work, have a look at CF_onLineHelp here:
http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/onlineHelp/viewonlineHelp.cfm
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.conten
>>and return Not ALpha, Upper or Lower.
It still does not return proper info for international characters.
Since CF is a multilingual application, the least would be the function
to be compatible with
uCase and lCase CF functions and Locale settings.
So I maintain this to be a better solution :
I have updated my isUpperLower UDF. I am including the code here for anyone
who would like a copy. It will check the submittesd character to see if is an
AlphaNumeric Upper or Lower case and return Not ALpha, Upper or Lower.
/**
* Checks to see if a letter submitted is Alphanumeric Upper or
Hi all
I'm looking for examples, tips, tricks, tutorials, ... about how to
build a dynamic help system with CF. Data will be stored in DB and
users can build the menu and related subjects.
Any help will be very appreciated.
Cheers
MD
I will be out of the office from Monday November 21 through Friday, November
25. Please refer any IT issues to Chris Terrebonne or Tommy Nguyen. I'll be
back in the office on Monday, November 28.
M. McConnell
~|
Discover CFTi
800 or even 2400 SQL inserts won't be a big deal, load-wise. I've
handled that many queries in minutes. Are the two databases on
separate servers?
What I would do is use a stored procedure that first checks for the
existence of the record; if the record exists, don't insert,
otherwise, do. That
Or bugger that and contact Mike Kear at AFPWebworks. Have been "using" him for
years and quite satisfied considering we are both in Australia and the servers
are in the USofA.
Email him a [EMAIL PROTECTED] and discuss your requirements as I am sure he
will be able to assist.
Regards,
PT
Manage
Never, we don't do linux as we are a windows house.
The majority of people use windows anyway, especially for CF.
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2005 21:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Hosting
Ok, but when are you going to have CF/Linux
39 matches
Mail list logo
