Yep, but Apollo as a delivery mechanism and RIA just makes more sense imo.
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
I am having a problem on a CFMx7.0.2 server where JAVA CFX tags do not work. I
have registered the tags in the cfadmin as I normally would (yes the tag name
and the class is correct), and they are in a folder which is mapped in the jvm
class path {application.home}/../cfx) Whenever any CFX tag
I think Flex is a better solution for developing desktop-like
applications that have a requirement of broadband service or
will be focused on internal networks (similar to
client/server apps). For a typical consumer-oriented website
where you need to accommodate for a variety of
Hi Dave,
Flex applications can work pretty well without any more bandwidth than a
typical web application. The big limitation is the requirement of Flash
Player 9, and related to that the inability to run Flex applications without
a standard desktop computer.
I'll try that out with ScrapBlog
Or Apollo. That's the whole point of it; freeing internet technologies
from the restrictions of the browser.
On 4/8/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you need to build a desktop application, then use
desktop development tools such as MS' suite of .Net tools.
I'm still not convinced
I was agreeing with you - you CAN'T directly get schema metadata
through SQL.
Oops, sorry, I read too fast ;-/
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL
I guess we'll disagree on this. The evolution of libraries
such as jQuery, Dojo YUI! have made development using these
technologies far too easy and with the adoption rates
continuing to climb, I can't call them band-aids. Perhaps
thats what they were when people initially did remote
Russ Michaels wrote:
I am having a problem on a CFMx7.0.2 server where JAVA CFX tags do not work.
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/allaire/cfx/CustomTag
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass0(Native Method)
Is WEB-INF\lib\cfx.jar on the classpath?
Jochem
There's a big difference between Windows authentication and Windows-like
authentication - I'm not even sure what you mean by that.
Windows authentication typically doesn't use a password - the password
itself is hashed by the client, and the hash is sent to the server for
comparison. IIS
We're trying to integrate utilities like Sharepoint, which
ties in to the domain for authentication but pops up the
Username and Password prompt. That's what I'm defining
as Windows Like.
IIS can authenticate users against the domain using Basic authentication,
NTLM, and Digest
I have CF running on my new vista machine.
Just dloaded and trying to install updater 7.01 so I can install 7.02, and the
installer appears to hang up and go no nowhere.
Anyone else with Vista and these issues?
BTW, I don't know what all the hoopla was surrounding vista. It seems to
On 4/8/07, Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're trying to integrate utilities like Sharepoint, which
ties in to the domain for authentication but pops up the
Username and Password prompt. That's what I'm defining
as Windows Like.
IIS can authenticate users against the domain using
not discounting those things but I see the exact same functionality, as do a
few others, without frames and Ajax =\
We actually do have support with CF 7.x and I should put in a call on this soon
myself. If I find anything I'll let you guys know.
I could be forgetting but I believe that using basic authentication isn't a
great option in general. If you're site is not running SSL I think password and
usernames are sent as clear text.
I can tell you on several security checklists I've had to read in my day
they've all required the
I could be forgetting but I believe that using basic authentication isn't a
great
option in general. If you're site is not running SSL I think password and
usernames are sent as clear text.
Mine is not to question why or how things are working, only to build a
mechanism that unifes their
Why shouldn't we be able to have that sort of power with distributed
multiuser applications? There is no reason, other than inertia, why we
can't.
Who says we don't? The apps that I built back in the early 90's worked
quite well across the Enterprise even before the Internet became
pervasive
HTTP can carry any message that I can imagine, thus it can be the delivery
mechanism for any language to express an RIA. The only argument that makes
sense is that the _browser_ is an inefficient mechanism for delivering RIA as
opposed to Flex.
Regarding Flex, I hate compiling things when
I suspect that shared hosting may not be a significant source of CF sales
revenue. In my experience, which doesn't involve shared hosting at all, CF 7
has been much more reliable than CF 6.
The fact that it may not be a significant source of income is a poor reason to
ignore that segment. I'm
Also check your exception log. Even if an error does make it to the browser
it should be logged there.
Jaime Metcher
-Original Message-
From: Kris Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 7 April 2007 6:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfcontent excel session and url variables
It's looking pretty bleak - we can't store CFCs in session because they take
too much memory, and we can't instantiate per request because it takes too
much CPU.Thank heavens for procedural programming. ;)
Seriously, though, I have high hopes of CF8 in this respect. We have the
language
I'm thinking of purchasing the book Software Engineering for Internet
Applications by Eve Andersson (Author), Philip Greenspun (Author), Andrew
Grumet (Author). Has anyone here read it and benefited from it?
CoolJJ
~|
I think that on all these things, moderation and compromise is the key.
You can spend thousands of your clients dollars tweaking performance
out of every last action on the site, but it's not always warranted.
For example, on a page that's key to the site, the central, most
visited page in the
I usually don't have problems with grouping and outputting data, but this one's
got my number so far...
With my db schema, a question can be related to more than one answer set. An
answer set can be related to more than one question.
An answer set can be related to more than one answer. An
I beleive your cfoutput group should match the sort order of the query.
On 4/8/07, Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I usually don't have problems with grouping and outputting data, but this
one's got my number so far...
With my db schema, a question can be related to more than one
then you're pre-cf7. what version of cf?
this is just locally, testing it.
However cf7 on the host gives the same type error after setting to
setLocale(en_GB) - btw, moving to BD shortly if that makes a difference.
Parameter 1, �66.16, of function LSParseCurrency is an invalid currency
I beleive your cfoutput group should match the sort order of the query.
I added the questionid to the front of the sort order. Still no luck.
I did setup a valuelist so I could see what's coming straight out of the query.
It produces this:
use distinct in there to only output one of each name
I beleive your cfoutput group should match the sort order of the
query.
I added the questionid to the front of the sort order. Still no luck.
I did setup a valuelist so I could see what's coming straight out of
the query. It
using cf7, utf-8, that snippet works fine.
I checked GetEncoding(URL) and it said utf-8
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7
Flex 2
Free Trial
you gotta remember cfm wasnt made to work as a shared server.
and i wouldnt blame hms, blame some bad code from someone on the server (aka
will).
and Will, what about my code? I got my own vps servers there and my sites are
never down, which is remarkable considering that they are on winblows
use distinct in there to only output one of each name
I tried distinct, didn't work. Here's what my output looks like:
http://wtomlinson.com/questionCap.jpg
SELECT DISTINCT
tblquestionsets.questionsetid,
tblquestionsets.questionsetname,
tblquestions.questionid,
tblquestions.questionsetid,
stylo stylo wrote:
However cf7 on the host gives the same type error after setting to
setLocale(en_GB) - btw, moving to BD shortly if that makes a difference.
no, it cannot give the same error, cf7 accepts java style locales. your host is
using a cf version prior to 7.
I have no idea,
stylo stylo wrote:
using cf7, utf-8, that snippet works fine.
I checked GetEncoding(URL) and it said utf-8
and did you set it previously? in any case that's what cf's expecting/using not
what the other app's producing.
can you post the entire url var or point to a public page that exhibits
Nothing worked so ended up regexing them and resetting them. Thanks for the
help anyway.
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 experience time-saving features, more productivity.
However cf7 on the host gives the same type error
Just to clarify, I meant the same ?66 is not a number error, not a locale error.
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business.
34 matches
Mail list logo
