On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 08:13 US/Pacific, James Smith wrote:
How do I stop DreamweaverMX adding a / to the front of all my links?
This is a setting in the site definition: absolute vs relative links.
Hmm, I can't find it now. Well, it used to be a setting in DW4 but it
seems that DWMX
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 11:06 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
another it was never achieved -- but the docs have always reflected the
desired functionality rather than the actual functionality.
So we're agreed that it's a documentation bug then? ;)
An Architect's View --
own dear JRun 4. Support for that would
depend on demand I expect, the same way each of the other platforms was
approached.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 19:20 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
Quick question for anyone using *nix and / or Apache.
Using IIS on a windows server, file paths can be specified in cffile
and
cfdirectory using / or \ interchangeably. I'm guessing this isn't
true for
*nix servers, but
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 20:37 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
I'd imagine they avoided making file paths case insensitive because
*nix
allows you to have 2 or more separate files or directories named
Application, APPLICATION and AppliCATioN. I've never really understood
why
this is
On Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002, at 21:34 US/Pacific, Mosh Teitelbaum wrote:
I imagine the powers that be in Redmond figured that allowing
multiple files that were all named the same thing (despite case
differences) would be too confusing for the intended every day users
of the
OS.
Remember that
On Monday, Oct 21, 2002, at 02:31 US/Pacific, D. Delcomminette INGECOM
wrote:
I got it !
I am using cfsavecontent to generate parts of my pages. With debug
option
on in MX the variable containing the result of my savecontent are
displayed
at the bottom of the page.
You could try using
, if you've *already* submitted that, Vern or I can follow-up
to see what happened to the issue internally...
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
On Saturday, Oct 19, 2002, at 10:12 US/Pacific, Doug wrote:
I am reading so much pain and suffering caused by configuration issues
with the migration to ColdFusionMX.
Well, since folks come to this list when they have problems, you're
more likely to read of 'pain and suffering' here than
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 19:06 US/Pacific, Tony Weeg wrote:
race condition?
When two requests might get processed at the same time and both might
try to read and/or update a shared scope variable... a case of
whichever request wins the the race... :)
A rule of thumb here is: if you don't
On Saturday, Oct 19, 2002, at 05:16 US/Pacific, cf-talk wrote:
Hi list, anybody who knows how they did:
http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/story/
Well, it's 'just' a Flash movie. What would you like to know about it?
We may have used FlashCom for the video, I'm not sure. I can certainly
On Saturday, Oct 19, 2002, at 13:25 US/Pacific, cf-talk wrote:
What version of Flash ?
MX (of course) with Flash Player 6.
BTW, there's a public beta of the new 6r60 player just started - check
out the Flash Support Center:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/ts/documents/
On Saturday, Oct 19, 2002, at 14:00 US/Pacific, Sean A Corfield wrote:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/ts/documents/
flashplayer_beta.htm
Darn email wrap!
http://shorterlink.com/?HGXWBF
~|
Archives: http
formatted HTML text in place.
ObCF: Of course, DWMX can't do this for CF since cfinclude... pulls
in a file based on various server mappings etc etc. But you do have
Live Data View...
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 07:44 US/Pacific, Troy Simpson wrote:
But look at the second run. The second run and other runs to the
database were consisted. The jdbc:oracle:thin driver was always the
fastest followed by the jdbc:oracle:oci driver. The slowest was the
MXJDBC driver. This
On Thursday, Oct 17, 2002, at 17:01 US/Pacific, Troy Simpson wrote:
Inorder to utilized the jdbc-oci drivers I believe that you actually
need an Oracle Client. More binaries are
required then the ones supplied at:
http://otn.oracle.com/software/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/htdocs/
jdbc9201.html.
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 08:55 US/Pacific, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
Does anyone know if HomeSite+ or DWMX make good PERL editors? If not,
what is the best application development environment out there for
PERL?
vi :-)
Heh... that would be my first answer too... You could also check out
Hey Dick... Are you trying to sneak around the OT ruling on the thread
by posting it under a different subject? LOL!
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 08:56 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
I started this thread, and maybe I should end it.
I posted it here, because I thought it applied to
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 11:59 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
I miss Windows3.11's stability, should we start a petition to have
Microsoft start redeveloping it?
Microsoft cancelled WfWG??? I'm bummed... I loved that OS...
(c'mon, it's Friday!)
SOAP is not so much a means of transmitting
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 10:12 US/Pacific, Costas Piliotis wrote:
Thing is though, the problem mostly is that Macromedia isn't really
listening. They SHOULD care about we use as an editor.
Yes, they really are listening. And they really care. Believe me. If
they weren't / didn't, then
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 15:37 US/Pacific, Brook wrote:
I'm running CFMX (with the updater installed) on win2k sp3. Everything
was
running fine, but now, at least one a day, the server freezes. Its the
strangest thing. The CPU and/or Memory do not spike or accumulate. The
services are
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 17:29 US/Pacific, Brook wrote:
Well, it's using MSSQL and the default JDBC driver that ships with
CFMX. I
SQL 2k or v7 or...?
didn't think this was important because I don't think it's a DB issue.
Unless you think that a DB issue could manifest itself like this.
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 18:00 US/Pacific, Tony Weeg wrote:
is it safe to assume that everywhere on a page, where i am either
setting or reading from session variables, that i should have cflock's
of the exclusive type (when writing to session vars) and cflocks of
the readonly type (when
On Friday, Oct 18, 2002, at 18:03 US/Pacific, Brook wrote:
Interesting, well maybe I can use a combination of the two. Store the
XML
data and then when needed parse section of it into arrays or what not
and
then work with the resulting objects in CF. And then save it back into
the
XML
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 22:43 US/Pacific, DDE wrote:
On page submit, I call a very simple JS function ( DoIT() ). Can't
give a
URL, but a piece of code:
I tried this code and it seemed to work just fine. I tried it with both
the dockable.cfm debugging template and the classic.cfm
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 22:53 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here's a link to the article I'm referring to:
http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/coldfusion/articles/jai_images.html
Has anyone else tested out this Java class / CFC wrapper for
manipulating images
on the fly? I
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 06:13 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
[horrific factorial implemented with try/catch snipped]
Yech... I pitty your server. :P
My Mac laptop, you mean? :)
In answer to Kola's question about try-catch in CF5: try-catch
generally introduces an overhead in every
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 05:38 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
I want to report a bug in Macromedia's JDBC driver for Sybase
Bear in mind that we didn't write any of the drivers - they are all
third-party. So it's not 'our' bug per se.
My problem is that I am using CFMX on Mac OS X
What database driver are you using with CFMX? Have you tried installing
the OCI drivers?
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 15:01 US/Pacific, Troy Simpson wrote:
First the Database is Oracle9i on an independent system.
I run the following query on Coldfusion 4.5x (with the latest
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 16:26 US/Pacific, Troy Simpson wrote:
I'm using the supplied Oracle driver that came with ColdFusion MX
Enterprise.
OK, that is an Oracle 8i JDBC driver.
I assume that is not the same ones you are referring too, huh?
Correct. The OCI drivers are mostly native
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 16:28 US/Pacific, Greg Bullough wrote:
In doing so, you have not only hobbled a lot of development paradigms
where
people develop on Pro and deploy on Enterprise Clusters
Given that the Developer Edition is effectively a dual-IP Enterprise
version, I'm not
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 22:44 US/Pacific, DDB Lists wrote:
Ok, so I have those drivers, now what?
Do I drop them in the cfmx directory somewhere or do they go in the
java jre
dir at a particualr place, and how do i use them?
You can put them wherever you like - you just need to add
Java applications will eat
up a lot of memory in normal operation. The JVM then garbage collects
and manages its memory internally even tho' it doesn't relinquish it
back to the OS. The JVM will typically use as much memory as it is
allowed and a 900Mb default doesn't surprise me.
Sean
On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 10:32 US/Pacific, Yves Arsenault wrote:
And maybe the Flash X integration?
http://www.corfield.org/blog/2002_10_01_archive.html#82572877
SOAP is not so much a means of transmitting data
but a mechanism for calling COM objects over the Web.
-- not Microsoft
On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 01:32 US/Pacific, Kola Oyedeji wrote:
Sean, have I missed something, are you saying try and catch add a
significant performance overhead?
try/catch is not an efficient way to solve the problem posed. try/catch
is designed for unexpected error conditions and should
On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 07:51 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
I suppose I should clarify by saying that I haven't simply disregarded
the
original intent of cftry all-together. I do use it mostly for error
handling, although much of it is for custom error handling, such as
server
On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 17:26 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
Isaac the Butcher of Fusion ... :)
Careful, that might stick! :)
[horrific factorial implemented with try/catch snipped]
Of course not... For starters, there are existing UDF's on cflib.org to
handle factorials. :P And I'm
Ben Forta's Reality ColdFusion MX : Macromedia Flash MX Integration
would probably be a good starting point. It walks you through four case
studies of Flash / CF integration, showing the ActionScript and the CF
and not going into UI stuff too much.
On Tuesday, Oct 15, 2002, at 17:32
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 09:12 US/Pacific, Jeffry Houser wrote:
But got confused when someone said they use telnet to check there
mail. ( What they must have meant was they use telnet to get into the
server, and then use a server-side program to check there mail ).
Nope, you can telnet
Which version of CF? Which OS? etc etc
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 09:39 US/Pacific, Clark, Aimee wrote:
This is my first attempt at creating a cfschedule page. Unfortunately,
it is
not working. I coded it to run the test2.cfm page at 11:35AM, but it
did not
generate the emails I was
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 16:06 US/Pacific, Mosh Teitelbaum wrote:
Macromedia's perceived lack of response has been a fairly popular
topic on
this list. While I don't completely agree with the perception,
anything
that allows developers greater interaction with MM (such as a JCP-like
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 17:13 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
There is another way to simulate variables or ranges in a case
statement
with a cftry and cfcatch blocks...
try/catch is a pretty heavy operation - you should only use it for
(unexpected) error cases, not normal
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 18:00 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
I should probably stay out of this--- oh, what the hell.
Now look what you've started! :)
BTW, Vince, I'd like typing of variables and Nulls in CFML :)
Hey Vince, ya wanna see my feature wishlist? It's *really* long!!
In no
obviously *proves* that strong typing
is not needed.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 19:30 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
Rather than have the chaos of Babel, at some point, if there are lots
of implementers of CFML, control of the (non-copyrighted) CFML language
should be placed in the hands on an independent entity.
Well, we told Sun that back
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 20:04 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
What happened to cffinally anyway? It was in the beta of Neo and then
later taken out.
I guess there wasn't time before launch to finish and fully QA the
implementation of that tag? A lot of things changed between the beta
and
On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 12:40 US/Pacific, Smith, Don , , WHS/PSD
wrote:
So who has a good book to recommend? I'm looking for a book that uses
broad
concepts that can be implemented in CFMX, so something like Object
Modeling
for Visual Basic would contain a lot of info I just
Yes, that's a pretty solid book (almost anything by Martin Fowler is
worth reading - check out his website: http://www.refactoring.com).
On Sunday, Oct 13, 2002, at 16:37 US/Pacific, John Wilker wrote:
I've read much of: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object
Modeling Language
On Friday, Oct 11, 2002, at 09:30 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
It's the Default Locale, and JRE 1.4.1
Hmm, a lot of people are running JRE 1.3.1 so this might be the
culprit? Can anyone else running 1.4.1 confirm (or deny) this
dateFormat problem? Can anyone who *is* seeing the bug please
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 20:26 US/Pacific, Joshua Miller wrote:
I appreciate your posting this to the list. Let me take this
opportunity to extend an invitation to anyone using JEdit with
ColdFusion to contribute their findings, advice, screenshots, macros,
etc. to the FAQ.
I blogged
On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 10:00 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
Yeah we still are. If you'd like I'll send you a link to our dev
server (off
list) with a page that shows whats going on. Mail me off list if you
want to
see. Sean has the link too.
I can confirm that Rob is definitely
On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 05:58 US/Pacific, Everett, Al wrote:
Anybody using the BigIP load balancer from F5? Have you had any
problems
with sticky sessions?
We have run F5's Big IP in the following setup with no problems:
F5 Big IP
/ \
dateFormat error in MX? would have been more descriptive (and more
tactful).
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Not Another MX boo boo?
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:07 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 08:41 US/Pacific, Jesse Noller wrote:
So, say you use something like, (lets pick on something easy) fusebox.
Fusebox
Let me jump in before people start flaming Jesse for picking on
Fusebox...
is a methodology for programming your CF application. Now, say you
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 09:14 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
Error Occurred While Processing Request
{ts '2002-10-09 09:12:48'} is an invalid date format.
The Error Occurred in D:\http\test\datetest.cfm: line 8
6 : /FORM ---
7 :
8 : CFSET str = dateformat(now(),mm/dd/yy (ddd))
9 :
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 09:28 US/Pacific, Rick Faircloth wrote:
I've just been monitoring the thread, but from what I've read earlier,
this and maybe other CF-lists and other software lists might be worth
assigning someone to, to monitor and respond to as their day job.
Like a Community
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 11:34 US/Pacific, Yexley Robert D Contr Det
1 AFRL/WSI wrote:
Line 90 is nothing more than the line with my /cfstoredproc on it.
So it appears obvious to me that somewhere within my stored proc call
that I have something wrong or missing or whatever. But I
Edwin Smith's session should be just what you need:
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/conference/
ConferenceProgramDetails.cfm#SS320W
CFMX: Under the Hood (Level: Expert, Format: Workshop)
ColdFusion MX is based on J2EE architecture. In addition to leveraging
the Servlet API up-front, JDBC
.X 5%
Netscape 3.X 6%
That's about 78% IE.
Hope that helps.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
~|
Archives: http
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 11:39 US/Pacific, Troy Simpson wrote:
Anyone know what product is the upgrade to ColdFusion Studio 5?
I can not find a ColdFusion Studio MX product on Macromedia's website.
If a ColdFusion Studio MX product does exist, is it worth upgrading
from
ColdFusion
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 07:25 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
I also expect a response when I ask questions like Why does Flash
Remoting in CFMX Enterprise not work with Java?
You've had a response to that - you just didn't like what you heard!
The response is Flash Remoting as supplied
Cathy Taylor wrote:
I'm trying to evaluate our CF MX upgrade on Solaris before I turn our
masses loose on it. I can't run it as root and our security
regulations forbid me from creating a new user to run it as (that
wouldn't work anyway since our web server runs as nobody). I've read
the
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:47 US/Pacific, Sean A Corfield wrote:
scorfiel 23763 23758 0 13:40:03 pts/20:00 fgrep cf
nobody 27009 27007 0 Sep 04 ? 1435:01
/data/www/appserver/neo/bin/cfusion -start default
nobody 27007 1 0 Sep 04 ?0:00
/data/www
recently.
Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture
Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
fax: (415) 865-3113 -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 08:32 US/Pacific, Mark A. Kruger - CFG
wrote:
Pardon me for asking but... how does MM handle a situation where
something
worked correctly on CF 5, but now is failing on CFMX? Is that CFMX?
Or do
It could be user code, configuration or CFMX.
There have
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 09:04 US/Pacific, Lee Fuller wrote:
You see, (and this is a bit of a walk down memory lane, and maybe even
borders on a fantasy dream world) when Allaire started, we had open,
clear and useful discussions about what was happening with the product.
I think pretty
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 11:03 US/Pacific, Mark A. Kruger - CFG
wrote:
Dev workstation with XP, IIS 5 (maybe 6?), connecting to an SQL 7 box
(SP
) - SQL server was remote from the CFMX server
Production server with Win2k (sp2 and hotfixes) with IIS 5 connecting
to an
SQL 7 box (sp 3)
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:43 US/Pacific, jon hall wrote:
Isn't there a Flash Remoting Java server shipped with EJB's now?
There is a Flash Remoting for J2EE product, yes:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashremoting/
Are there any code samples floating around that I could peek at to
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:47 US/Pacific, Sean A Corfield wrote:
As far as I know, our guys just followed the installation instructions
but I'll ask them if there were any issues around the 'nobody' user.
I asked the engineers who did the installs: they just followed the
instructions
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 10:55 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I personally believe that this is the root of nearly every problem at
Macromedia right now. Internally and externally. Internally, probably
mostly due to the fragmented communities of employees in the east/west
coast
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:15 US/Pacific, Lee Fuller wrote:
Sorry.. Let me clarify..
I was specifically talking about the Server Settings section of the
summary. I know that you probably don't want your datasources, etc.,
all strewn about the net. :)
And also make sure y'all don't
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:24 US/Pacific, JLH All Turbo wrote:
I'm getting that error when verifying a connetion through the CFMX dsn
creator. I also get it when I try to run any CFMX cfm pages that use
that
dsn.
YET when I try connecting and verifying through Win2k's ODBC set up..
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:07 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))
No longer works in MX. looks like only certain characters work in date
format.
I get:
date is 08/10/02 (Tue)
using this code:
cfoutput
cfset str = dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))/
date is
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 18:05 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
I thought all the db drivers were 3rd party ... Has Allaire / MM
actually
developed db drivers?
Er, no, I just meant that the JDBC drivers about which people are
complaining were not written by us... which means that we
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 15:09 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
And as I responded in IM, that isn't answer. Why?
It *is* an answer. Saying wibble would be an answer. I never claimed
it was a helpful answer!
1. If that was true I could buy Flash Remoting for J2EE and use it with
CFMX
2.
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 17:21 US/Pacific, Drew Harris wrote:
So, what is the difference between Flash Communication Server and Flash
Remoting Server?
Flash Communication Server is a server (like a web server or an
application server) that allows multiple Flash clients to shared
objects
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:45 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
According to Sean, there is no way to use Flash Remoting with CF and
Java from the same application server.
That is not what I said. You're just twisting people's words.
I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:44 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
In my book, an answer is
supposed to be a solution to a problem; not wibble.
Yeah? Well, not everyone reads your book...
* Flash Remoting doesn't work...
Blah, blah, blah. OK, now you're really just being annoying. I've
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 01:38 US/Pacific, Kola Oyedeji wrote:
I'm joining this thread late. Can I just confirm what you guys are
saying: In CFMX named locks should be used in place of scoped locks and
locks are only needed When a possible race condition could occur?
The last part is
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 10:30 US/Pacific, Dave Wilson wrote:
Is it just me, or is CFMX proving totally unstable for everyone else
too?
It isn't *just* you but it is certainly a minority. Unfortunately,
mailing lists like this (and the webforums) are typically where people
come when they
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 10:56 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
We are porting cf5 to MX and had several sloppy coding errors, as
well as
some full fledged product errors. All in all, when the code is
optimized for
MX - which almost no currently existing cf code is - it runs like a
champ.
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 11:02 US/Pacific, Joe Zanter wrote:
Perhaps this has been covered (but I couldn't find it in the archive)..
I used to use the auto completion feature in CF pre-DWMX. Does that
feature exist in DWMX.
Yes. DWMX will offer a drop-down context menu of tags as you type
?
- Are there other errors in the CF logs?
Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture
Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
fax: (415) 865-3113 -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 11:37 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
We actually are talking with you right now - and I mean specifically
YOU.
:) - refer to Mark J's e-mail. I'll reiterate what our issue is with
the
JDBC Driver.
Ah, I didn't connect Rob Rohan with [EMAIL PROTECTED] in Mark's Cc:
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 12:13 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry for the interruption. I don't wish to take away from this
thread but
how do you tell if the CFUpdater has already been installed or not? I
have
a client who doesn't remember if he installed the updater or not.
error
rate tho'...
What is the full data source configuration, including Advanced Settings?
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
~|
Archives
never had any problems with CF 4.5
- Are there other errors in the CF logs? - No
Hmm, doesn't sound like an unusual setup. That's a very frequent error
rate tho'...
What is the full data source configuration, including Advanced
Settings?
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog
Resurrecting an old thread...
On Thursday, Aug 15, 2002, at 21:41 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
http://www.devx.com/xml/articles/ml062502/ml062502-1.asp. The article
Interesting article. I've just started looking at Oracle's native XML
support in 9i (release 9.2). It looks very promising...
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 11:37 US/Pacific, Paul Giesenhagen wrote:
Yup (on CF5, good practice on CFMX but not required)
cflock timeout=20 throwontimeout=No type=READONLY
scope=SESSION
cfoutput#session.fullname#/cfoutput
/cflock
Better practice:
cflock timeout=20 throwontimeout=No
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 14:27 US/Pacific, Dave Watts wrote:
This is true for versions prior to CF MX. For those versions, you
should use
the SCOPE attribute. Sean's point is only applicable to CF MX, in
which you
only lock to prevent logical errors - in that case, you want your lock
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 12:07 US/Pacific, Gaulin, Mark wrote:
Actually, that using NAME is not a better practice... the SCOPE
attribute is
safer and is also what MM support advised us to use (when applicable).
Pre-MX.
Sure, the scope of a NAME-based lock will be tighter than using
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 14:05 US/Pacific, Clark, Aimee wrote:
1. I have a cfset counter = 0 in the application.cfm.
This will set counter to zero on every single page request which is
probably not what you want.
I think you want something like:
cflock name=email_counter
On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 15:55 US/Pacific, Lewis Sellers wrote:
Well, some of us just don't care to subscribe to the cf-community
because it's mostly all irrelevant, endless, juvenile chatter. :) So
many folks will never see such posts.
That sounds like an even better reason for such
the product team management, I have blogged this
link (yeah, I bet several of you went off and blogged it already
anyway!). I also blogged (yesterday) the URL into the CF FAQ that talks
about how to buy CF5 for those folks that need it.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're
On Wednesday, Oct 2, 2002, at 08:29 US/Pacific, Charlie Griefer wrote:
Very cool...and not to push it...how about Studio 5? We get quite a
few
people coming into our #cf channel asking how they can get a
(legitimate)
copy of Studio 5.
Hmm, I don't know. I'll defer to Christine L and Vern
Perhaps you have a variable called premium elsewhere in your code that
has a non-simple value?
On Wednesday, Oct 2, 2002, at 04:53 US/Pacific, Dave Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
I've just been checking through our applications after upgrading from
CF4.5
to CFMX and came across the following
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 17:55 US/Pacific, Nat Papovich wrote:
Unfortunately though, Rob's really long index doesn't appear to use
Fusebox
3's core file, which I assume, is the complex machinery you
mention,
Sean. In pre-FB3, there is very little to no machinery used, so long
cfswitch
On Tuesday, Oct 1, 2002, at 06:49 US/Pacific, Benjamin S. Rogers wrote:
This is the exact same argument that gets made against ColdFusion.
Not by me.
I'm
sure those early Word Perfect assembly programmers said the same thing
about programmers writing word processing programs in languages
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 01:32 US/Pacific, Robertson-Ravo, Neil
(REC) wrote:
I totally disagree.. getting it 'connected' is the easy part. The
actual
movement and animation (for which Flash is designed) is the difficult
part.
Flash MX is designed to allow complex client-server
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 06:29 US/Pacific, Robertson-Ravo, Neil
(REC) wrote:
anti Flash Remoting - far from it, I just dont see the business benefit
(development time = cost) of using say Flash for things which could be
developed in normal HTML.
The benefit is in the end result: a
801 - 900 of 1199 matches
Mail list logo
