Over here we use Xstandard (xstandard.com). It is the best editor I have
seen and I have seen the FCKEditor and other like-editors. Xstandard outputs
Xhtml compliant code and has great custom css class integration. Their
website is not the best, but their tech support is super fast and always
helpf
Thanks Rick...looks easy to install. You're always a big help.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:28 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: best rich text editor for CF?
Andy Matthews wrote:
> I've tried out FCK
Here an great comparison list of rich editors:
http://www.geniisoft.com/showcase.nsf/WebEditors
Cheers, Artur
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 4:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: best rich text editor for CF?
Previously I&#x
Andy Matthews wrote:
> I've tried out FCKEditor and it appears to be very nice, cross-browser but
from an i18n perspective, FCKeditor is a lot better than tinyMCE.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:23271
Andy Matthews wrote:
> I've tried out FCKEditor and it appears to be very nice, cross-browser but
> it's got a lot of extra things you need to do to get it working fully. I'm
> spefically referring to the image browser having to be configured manually.
>
> Alternately, does anyone have any code wh
Previously I've used Activedit which worked really well, seemed to be pretty
easy to use. But it's IE only, I'm not a huge fan of the way it rewrites our
code and it costs money.
I've tried out FCKEditor and it appears to be very nice, cross-browser but
it's got a lot of extra things you need to d
>>Can I have a look at your html editor?
It is only used on admin side on some of my sites.
And since it is not (yet) a commercial product I sell with my tags,
I have no sample public yet.
I'll try to set up something and I'll let you know.
--
___
REUSE CODE!
>>I have to say though that the latter is not a
half bad idea. When i have some time (yeah right... free time) I'll look
into adding that into my cms when I upgrade to FCKEditor 2.0
I have already made some work on that. It is not yet sufficiently
"client proof" to be installed
on a production s
User defined styles are totally the way to go. In our tool (CMS/DMS +
other communications-related stuff), we expose both the ability to
define entirely custom CSS, and a simple editor for creating classes
with basic options (text styling, pretty much). It works really well.
The system uses all
On 8/11/05, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> or that because the Board of Directors wants to
> >>use Comic Sans in 96-pt Muave for their monthly report's page title that
> you
> >>can't accomodate them because only a bad system would allow such a
> thing...
>
> No, my point i
Claude,
Can I have a look at your html editor?
Felipe
On 8/11/05, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>This is also a good way to avoid popup blocker blues.
>
> I solved this problem with a "pop up enabled test" on the admin login.
> If pop ups are not allowed, the user is sent
> That's one reason I like TinyMCE, you can customize it to your needs so
> you're not giving people access to completely break everything.
I've got one client with a TON of admin forms with FCK all over them.
The client does *everything* in Word and then paste, and that's why we
went with FCK.
Toolbars can be configured in FCKEditor, too. And the new version works on a
couple other browsers.
TinyMCE is very nice, but the lack of image upload and preview is enough for me
to not use it. My experience is that clients need and love this feature. Rick
Root developed a "plugin" that kind o
gt; There's no right or wrong approach.
>
>
> Look here for a minimalist view and implementation of a different
> editor (by Massimo Foti, a very knowledgeable guy):
>
> http://www.olimpo.ch/tmt/tag/tmt_xhtmleditorPro/
>
>
> Irvin
>
>
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Irvin Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I like FCKEditor v1.6.
FCKeditor v1 only works with IE.
> Version 2 is out with additional features (like form
> creation, tables, fonts, colors, etc). Some people love them;
> I consider them useless and potential
ork
smoothly - a perfect example being the hard-coded upload directories).
There's no right or wrong approach.
Look here for a minimalist view and implementation of a different editor (by
Massimo Foti, a very knowledgeable guy):
http://www.olimpo.ch/tmt/tag/tmt_xhtmleditorPro/
Irvin
's spellchecker (which works very well - much like GMail's).
cheers,
barneyb
On 8/10/05, Roger B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
> > our own simple CMS?
>
> Until TinyMCE gets native Spellerp
So you have the HTML editor launch the CMS image upload module. Everyone's
happy.
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
>>Cuz god only knows nobody shoul
>>This is also a good way to avoid popup blocker blues.
I solved this problem with a "pop up enabled test" on the admin login.
If pop ups are not allowed, the user is sent to a page that explain how
to allow them
at least for the domain thay are working for.
Don't forget that the CMS is intende
>>style control in fckeditor works for us.
Yes, it is ok, the only thing I don't like, is that the designer must
use XML to describe the styles,
not always an easy approach, even developpers are not always familiar
with XML.
In my editor, (and I'm sure with some others), a regular CSS file can
st 11, 2005 12:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
Claude Schneegans wrote:
> - a good HTML Editor should not be embeded in a textarea, instead, it
> should open a new window which can be resized any sized to resemble
> the final page the text is intended, otherwise it
nyway. And when they want to get in, post some info and get out in 30
seconds or less, you had better not put up hoops to uploading images.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 11:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text E
>>Cuz god only knows nobody should ever want to put an image into a web
page. They should always have to call the server administrator in order
to do so.
You didn't get the point:
I said that image upload must be done by the CMS, not the HTML editor.
--
___
a good CMS should NOT allow users to use HTML to fulfill all their
fantasies.
>>But try telling a
>>user their tabulated data can't be entered into the cms (tables are about
>>the only way that'll happen)
When I said "should NOT allow users to use HTML" I was thinking of colors,
fonts,
Somebody needs to keep a control on job security... ;-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
> Finally, the HTML editor should not allow users to upload any im
> Finally, the HTML editor should not allow users to upload any image
> anytime.
Cuz god only knows nobody should ever want to put an image into a web
page. They should always have to call the server administrator in order
to do so.
I guess that's a fine idea if you don't care about usability
Claude Schneegans wrote:
> What for instance would you like to have?
You pretty much listed our requirements :)
> - a good CMS should NOT allow users to use HTML to fulfill all their
> fantasies.
> So, users should not be able to define any color, font size and what
> ever, instead, they
> sho
> a good CMS should NOT allow users to use HTML to fulfill all their
> fantasies.
See, this is -- to me at least -- where the laboratory gets hit smack in
the face with reality. Yes of course styles should rule. But try telling a
user their tabulated data can't be entered into the cms (tables ar
> So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
> our own simple CMS?
Until TinyMCE gets native Spellerpages support, I'll consider
FCKeditor the go-to WYSIWYG editor.
--
Roger Benningfield
http://journurl.com/
http://admin.support.j
I love Xstandard.
http://www.xstandard.com
- j
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Best Rich Text Editor (was: RE: Looking for very simple CMS)
> -Original Message-
> From:
>>None of them do exactly what we want
What for instance would you like to have?
I've designed my own, because I didn't find any (at that time) which had
all the characteristics
I thought should belong to an HTML editor in a good CMS.
- a good CMS should NOT allow users to use HTML to fulfill
That's not a problem. It already is. =]
Cheers,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 10, 2005 12:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
If I could recommend a feature, make is Flash6 Player compatible.
-Adam
On 8/
t; Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pete Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 10, 2005 11:28 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
>
> Connie DeCinko wrote:
>
> > So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who n
> -Original Message-
> From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who
> need to build our own simple CMS?
I still love TinyMCE.
--
Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Limu
FCKeditor.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2005 18:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Best Rich Text Editor (was: RE: Looking for very simple CMS)
So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
our own simple CMS
www.flashtexteditor.com
I'm working on a free version in my spare time, but its nowhere near ready
for beta.
Cheers,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Pete Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 10, 2005 11:28 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
Connie De
Connie DeCinko wrote:
> So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
> our own simple CMS? I keep hearing FCK lately, but until recently never
> heard of it. Others I have heard about, seems no one talks about anymore.
We're moving from soeditor (
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 1:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Best Rich Text Editor (was: RE: Looking for very simple CMS)
So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
our own simple CMS? I keep hearing FCK lately, but until recently never
h
TinyMCE is my favorite. Very nice interface, both for the user and
the developer, and extension is a snap.
cheers,
barneyb
On 8/10/05, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
> our own simple CMS? I keep
So what is the best Rich Text editor today, for those of who need to build
our own simple CMS? I keep hearing FCK lately, but until recently never
heard of it. Others I have heard about, seems no one talks about anymore.
Constanty "Connie" DeCinko III
Web Architect, Webmaster, Web
40 matches
Mail list logo
