/products/charting
--
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Brodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
(snip)
You'll still have the problems
://www.blinex.com/products/charting
--
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Brodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
Samuel,
This situation occurs when one tries
Actually I'm not advocating moving away from JRUN (the benifits outweigh this issue). In my experiance, I was installing a CF and another application requiring to add classpaths to the JMC to run my application sucessfuly.
In the case mentioned above the person was going to use JRUN to run an
We seem to be having trouble getting JRUN4 and CFMX to work together.
Are there any special tweaks or requirements needed to get the two working
together?
Do I need to use CFMX Enterprise version with JRUN 4 or will the standard
version work just as well?
I switched over to Tomcat in the time
We seem to be having trouble getting JRUN4 and CFMX to work together.
There may be a way of getting a standalone JRun to play nice with the one in
CFMX, but we couldn't figure it out. We gave up in the end and we're running
our pure Java apps through CFMX Enterprise's built-in JRun as well
We seem to be having trouble getting JRUN4 and CFMX to work
together. Are there any special tweaks or requirements needed
to get the two working together?
Do I need to use CFMX Enterprise version with JRUN 4 or will
the standard version work just as well?
I'm not sure what you mean
There may be a way of getting a standalone JRun to play nice
with the one in CFMX, but we couldn't figure it out. We gave
up in the end and we're running our pure Java apps through
CFMX Enterprise's built-in JRun as well as our CF apps. Sounds
crazy but it works OK.
If you're running
://www.blinex.com/products/charting
--
-Original Message-
From: Bosky, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:28 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
We seem to be having trouble getting JRUN4
If you're running CFMX 6.1, I'd recommend taking a look at just running
CFMX
on top of your existing JRun install
Is CFMX for J2EE now simply an install option for Enterprise then? Or is
it a different product version?
Nick
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast
=274threadid=688726highlight_key=ykeyword1=classpath
Jeremy Brodie
Intelix
an Edgewater Technology Solutions Company
web: http://www.edgewater.com
phone:(703) 815-2500
nasdaq symbol: EDGE
We seem to be having trouble getting JRUN4 and CFMX to work together.
Are there any special tweaks
--
Blog:http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
--
-Original Message-
From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Problems using JRUN4
An install option if u own enterprise license.
Stace
_
From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 26, 2003 12:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
If you're running CFMX 6.1, I'd recommend taking a look at just
running
CFMX
on top
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
There may be a way of getting a standalone JRun to play nice
with the one in CFMX, but we couldn't figure it out. We gave
up in the end and we're running our
version of CFMX to use JRUN 4
and CFMX together.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
There may be a way of getting a standalone JRun to play nice
We own a full professional version of CMFX and a full version
of JRUN 4. When running them together CFMX grabs every .jsp
file and won't let JRUN 4 process them. I shouldn't have to
purchase an enterprise version of CFMX to use JRUN 4 and CFMX
together.
Well, you probably don't have to
--
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Brodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
(snip)
You'll still have the problems with the classpaths issue
)
Restart CFMX.
Not sure if it's exact same on Pro though...you will have to try...
-Stace
_
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 26, 2003 3:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems using JRUN4 and CFMX together.
We own a full professional version of CMFX and a full version
> But a lot of
> people don't know enough about CFML to consider it a viable alternative
> to JSP and / or they believe the FUD - Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt -
> spread by CF's detractors...
Well, if you ever used CF3.0, which had NO proper way to handle
multithreaded session requests, and had a
> But a lot of
> people don't know enough about CFML to consider it a viable
alternative
> to JSP and / or they believe the FUD - Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt -
> spread by CF's detractors...
Well, if you ever used CF3.0, which had NO proper way to handle
multithreaded session requests, and
> Well, if you ever used CF3.0, which had NO proper way ...
What was the point of that post? POS, indeed.
My 2 cents worth: we've been using both CF and JRun for some time now. JSP,
on its own, has nothing to recommend it over CF, except that you can deploy
JSP apps on free standards-based
,
BTW) and ColdFusion.
-Original Message-
From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 23, 2003 12:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Jrun4 and CFMX
> Well, if you ever used CF3.0, which had NO proper way ...
What was the point of that post? POS, indeed.
M
> However it's riduculous to compare those versions to the modern
versions: remembe what ELSE was available then? NOTHING was very good
at the time (well, except for Perl, I suppose). WebPlus a poor CF clone,
Java was so much in it's infancy you couldn't really build squat (except
for
On Thursday, Sep 18, 2003, at 12:48 US/Pacific, Bryan F. Hogan wrote:
> Save from EJB, etc, what does JSP the language have over CFMX if it
> does
> have something over CFMX? If they both can do the same job, why would
> one
> choose JRun over CFMX? Speaking of those that do choose JRun over
Thanks Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
I see many people using JSP all the time, and I wonder what the
big deal is. I say to myself if they just knew what CFML could
I've asked this question before but I'm still unclear about it. In was cases
would you choose Jrun4 over CFMX. Can't they both do the same thing? Even if
there is something in JRun that CFMX doesn't natively do, can't CFMX be
extended to do it?
What is the advantages of using JRun over CFMX
I've asked this question before but I'm still unclear about
it. In was cases would you choose Jrun4 over CFMX. Can't they
both do the same thing? Even if there is something in JRun
that CFMX doesn't natively do, can't CFMX be extended to do
it?
What is the advantages of using JRun over
Ok, say you don't use J2EE functionality. Are there any advantages to JRun
over CFMX?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
I've asked this question before but I'm still unclear
- but if you want to
mix then you'll need JRUN (or some other J2EE server).
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
Ok, say you don't use J2EE functionality
Ok, say you don't use J2EE functionality. Are there any advantages
to JRun over CFMX?
If you install CFMX Enterprise or CFMX Standard by themselves, they come
with a subset of JRun - enough of JRun to run CFMX, basically. If you
install CFMX for J2EE on top of an existing J2EE server, like
, why would one
choose JRun over CFMX? Speaking of those that do choose JRun over CFMX.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
It may be flippant - but I've said if you don't know
Right, I think I'm thinking more about JSP the language than the server.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
Ok, say you don't use J2EE functionality. Are there any advantages
: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
Ok, say you don't use J2EE functionality. Are there any advantages
to JRun over CFMX?
If you install CFMX Enterprise or CFMX Standard by themselves, they come
:34 PM
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
It may be flippant - but I've said if you don't know whether or not you
need it, then you probably don't.
In this case JRUN will let you code to the J2EE development standards
(EJB, JSP, etc) while CFMX will let you code CFML and take advantage of
Java
to JRun
over CFMX?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
I've asked this question before but I'm still unclear about
it. In was cases would you choose Jrun4 over CFMX. Can't
Jim,
You can still run JSP pages without a separate installation of JRun.
--
Marc A. Garrett
since1968.com
Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may be flippant - but I've said if you don't know whether or not you
need it, then you probably don't.
In this
Why would you use JRun if you weren't going to write any Enterprise Java?
Good question, it's what I'm trying to ask!! Why use JRun over CFMX?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Jrun4
all of the selling points for CFML, what are they for JSP, leaving out J2EE?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Jrun4 and CFMX
Oh, ok. In that case, I'd go with CFMX in a heartbeat. I haven't
I see many people using JSP all the time, and I wonder what the
big deal is. I say to myself if they just knew what CFML could
do to their development. But these people are die-hard scripters
and they stick to JSP. Other than J2EE, does JSP have anything over
CFML? I know all of the
Right, I think I'm thinking more about JSP the language than
the server.
I can't think of any reason I'd use JSP over CFMX, if I knew both and both
were available.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: Jrun4 and CFMX
| I see many people using JSP all the time, and I wonder what the
| big
...
Cheers,
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 18, 2003 8:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Jrun4 and CFMX
Isn't it true that the die-hard CFML coders are just as fervent? The
same goes
for the C and VB coders, right.
You use the tools
41 matches
Mail list logo
