Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-10 Thread Dwayne Cole
I did download the latest Flex. I am running eclipse 3.1 and cfeclipse 1.2. Are there any problems I should be concerned in making this switch? Plus should I try to unplug the all the rds plug-ins first? -- Original Message -- From: Tom Chiverton <[EMAI

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-09 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 05 January 2007 15:59, Dwayne Cole wrote: > Thanks Tom for what ever help you can give. Right. Try with Eclipse 3.2 and the new Flex 2.0.1 :-) -- Tom Chiverton Helping to efficiently administrate six-generation IPOs This email is s

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-05 Thread Dwayne Cole
Well yes. I can waite but you know how it is when you the brand new feature only keystrokes away. You end up waisting a bunch of time looking for a solution, and with eclipse, possible creating a real hair ball. Thanks Tom for what ever help you can give. -- Original Message ---

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-05 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 04 January 2007 17:15, Dwayne Cole wrote: > Frankly, I don't want to remove it. I just want it to work. I was going to > remove the RDS plugin, then reinstall it, hoping that that would work. Can it wait till next week ? -- Tom Chiverton Helping to proactively harvest scalable funct

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-04 Thread Dwayne Cole
I did that by removing the plugin components from the "eclipse/features" and the "eclipes/plug-ins" directories. Frankly, I don't want to remove it. I just want it to work. I was going to remove the RDS plugin, then reinstall it, hoping that that would work. > >On Thursday 04 January 2007

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 04 January 2007 15:46, Dwayne Cole wrote: > PROBLEM: > The components are gone, and the plugin is diable but all the cfeclipse > navigation elements to support working with eclipse are still showing up ie > (RDS Configuration Dialog, RDS Perspectives etc.) I suggest you look for and re

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-04 Thread Dwayne Cole
> >On Thursday 04 January 2007 00:42, Dwayne Cole wrote: >> I delete the files but it still behaves like there there. I disable the > >Where did you delete them from from ? > >> plug in and can't figure out how to enable. > >You enable it in the same place. I DOWNLOADED THE FILE FROM HERE: htt

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 04 January 2007 00:42, Dwayne Cole wrote: > I delete the files but it still behaves like there there. I disable the Where did you delete them from from ? > plug in and can't figure out how to enable. You enable it in the same place. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to seamlessly empower

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-03 Thread Dwayne Cole
>There is no such thing. >An RDS plugin ships with Flex Builder 2, that you can use with Eclipse 3.1 - >do you mean that ? > Yes this is exactly what I mean. Flex Builder 2 is built on Enclipse. When you launch Flex Builder you'll see that it looks just like Eclipse. The RDS / Coldfusion Ex

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2007-01-03 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Monday 01 January 2007 01:29, Dwayne Cole wrote: > In installed the RDS cfeclipse (3.1) plugin CFMX 7. There is no such thing. An RDS plugin ships with Flex Builder 2, that you can use with Eclipse 3.1 - do you mean that ? -- Tom Chiverton Helping to elementarily disintermediate network prod

Re: RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2006-12-31 Thread Dwayne Cole
Amended; It says that the plugin has a configuration error. I tried to disable and uninstall the plugin to no avail. In fact when I open cfeclipse all the rds features (rds configuration in preferences, cfplugin in manage configuration). I was going to just re-install but I can't get the darn

RDS in CFECLIPSE. What's Wrong?

2006-12-31 Thread Dwayne Cole
In installed the RDS cfeclipse (3.1) plugin CFMX 7. When I set up the preference using port 80. I am able to test and verify the connection but when I go to view the Dataview I get an error that says: "unable to connect to part: RDS Dataview" then the dataview tab pops up but says: "An erro

Re: RDS in CFEclipse

2006-06-08 Thread Larry Lyons
> According to the docs on the labs site, CFEclipse should talk RDS now, > yet > despite upgrading to the latest stable, I don't see the new menu > options. > > Anyone else getting this, working or not ? > -- > Tom Chiverton > It took me a short while, but I managed to get it working just fi

Re: RDS in CFEclipse

2006-06-08 Thread Mark Drew
Sorry Tom, The RDS Plugin is an Adobe (tm) product. It works well with CFEclipse but its not exactly *integrated* its all part of Eclipse though :) MD On 8 Jun 2006, at 16:05, Tom Chiverton wrote: > On Thursday 08 June 2006 14:42, Nick Tong - TalkWebSolutions.co.uk > wrote: >> check out this

Re: RDS in CFEclipse

2006-06-08 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 08 June 2006 14:42, Nick Tong - TalkWebSolutions.co.uk wrote: > check out this post: > http://succor.co.uk/index.cfm/2006/5/25/RDS-plugin-for-cfeclipse Ah ha. Buggered URL in the Beta3 docs :-) -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent

RE: RDS in CFEclipse

2006-06-08 Thread Sandra Clark
: Thursday, June 08, 2006 9:23 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RDS in CFEclipse According to the docs on the labs site, CFEclipse should talk RDS now, yet despite upgrading to the latest stable, I don't see the new menu options. Anyone else getting this, working or not ? -- Tom Chiv

Re: RDS in CFEclipse

2006-06-08 Thread Nick Tong - TalkWebSolutions.co.uk
check out this post: http://succor.co.uk/index.cfm/2006/5/25/RDS-plugin-for-cfeclipse On 08/06/06, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > According to the docs on the labs site, CFEclipse should talk RDS now, yet > despite upgrading to the latest stable, I don't see the new menu options. > >

RDS in CFEclipse

2006-06-08 Thread Tom Chiverton
According to the docs on the labs site, CFEclipse should talk RDS now, yet despite upgrading to the latest stable, I don't see the new menu options. Anyone else getting this, working or not ? -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on be