Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-25 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dave Watts wrote: Simply because I can do it other places, or that it's done for me already in other places. I think that it's inefficient to do on the host, compared to doing it at the network's point of entry. It doesn't really matter how significant the performance hit is, if it is

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jim Vosika
BlackICE Server Protection - $299.95 http://shop.softwaresupermall.com/dr/v2/ec_MAIN.Entry17c?CID=34263SID=3 3655SP=10007PN=5PID=313036DSP=CUR=840PGRP=0CACHE_ID=34263 -Original Message- From: Andy Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:00 PM To: CF-Talk

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Tony Weeg
the built in firewall in Windows XP it rocks. tony -Original Message- From: Andy Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: CF Server Firewall Sorry for the Off Topic but does anyone know of a good server firewall program for Cold

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Duane Boudreau
I like BlackIce from Internet Security Systems (www.iss.com) approx $399 per server Duane -Original Message- From: Andy Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: CF Server Firewall Sorry for the Off Topic but does anyone know of a

Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Douglas Brown
I would look at getting a sonicWall, you can see them here http://www.firewalls.com/sonicwall.asp Douglas Brown Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Andy Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:00 PM Subject: OT: CF Server

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Robert Everland
Developer Extraordinaire Dixon Ticonderoga Company http://www.dixonusa.com -Original Message- From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:03 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall the built in firewall in Windows XP it rocks. tony -Original Message

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jim Vosika
Sorry that link was split, here you go: http://tinyclick.com/?SERVER -Original Message- From: Jim Vosika [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall BlackICE Server Protection - $299.95 http://shop.softwaresupermall.com

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Andy Lynch
Unfortunately, we're running WIN2K... From: Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:03:02 -0400 the built in firewall in Windows XP it rocks. tony -Original Message- From: Andy

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jim Vosika
Don't mean to self promote but we sell it for $299.95 http://tinyclick.com/?SERVER -Original Message- From: Duane Boudreau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:06 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall I like BlackIce from Internet Security Systems

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Robert Bailey
A firewall for CF? Not sure what you are talking about there, but a good firewall for under 1k you may want to look at is Gnatbox. Gets better the more money you can spend. If you are using IIS, check out the IIS lockdown tool from MS that sets up and configures URLScan as well as a host of other

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Andy Lynch
. Andy Lynch Applications Developer WebPort, Inc From: Robert Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:09:07 -0700 A firewall for CF? Not sure what you are talking about there, but a good firewall

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Mike Byers
Has anyone had problems with IIS Lockdown? I am investigating its use and saw that it was mentioned here. Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: Robert Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall A firewall for CF

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
Sorry for the Off Topic but does anyone know of a good server firewall program for Cold Fusion servers? It's seems as if some hackers are getting past our routers and I want to look into all options to lock it down more. My boss said I have to keep it under $1,000. Or just use IP

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread todd
] Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:09:07 -0700 A firewall for CF? Not sure what you are talking about there, but a good firewall for under 1k you may want to look at is Gnatbox. Gets better the more money you can spend. If you are using IIS, check out the IIS lockdown

Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Tony Weeg wrote: the built in firewall in Windows XP Didn't know XP server was out. Jochem __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community.

RE: CF Server Firewall // iis lockdown

2002-06-24 Thread Tony Weeg
no problems with IIS Lockdown at all. -Original Message- From: Mike Byers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall Has anyone had problems with IIS Lockdown? I am investigating its use and saw that it was mentioned

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Tony Weeg
windows XP professional is what I use. on my dev box running cfmx and everything I have come across works 100% tw -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF Server Firewall Tony Weeg wrote

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Shawn Grover
suggestions. Andy Lynch Applications Developer WebPort, Inc From: Robert Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:09:07 -0700 A firewall for CF? Not sure what you are talking about there, but a good

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Alex
Applications Developer WebPort, Inc From: Robert Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:09:07 -0700 A firewall for CF? Not sure what you are talking about there, but a good

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread todd
Just be aware that under heavy load it will be. :P Give me a break, ~Todd On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Alex wrote: Just be aware the nanoseconds that the firewall slows you down will not be noticeable. On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just be aware that software firewalls will

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Len Conrad
you are doing IP filtering/routing with them - not true firewalling. firewalling is a collection of policies implemented variously, and packet filtering routers and router ACL's are clearly, and truly, within that definition. Len www.menandmice.com/DNS-training : DNS Training

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
I just ment a good server firewall, for my cf server. We have linksys routers but my boss seems to think hackers are getting past those which I suppose is possible... So he wanted my to find a software firewall to run in addition to our routers firewall. Your boss seems to think there's

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Shawn Grover
any day - S flexible, from a routing view point, AND a security viewpoint) -Original Message- From: Len Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:57 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall you are doing IP filtering/routing with them - not true

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Kirk Boecker
SecureIIS from Eeye is pretty cool www.secureIIS.com Kirk -Original Message- From: Andy Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: CF Server Firewall Sorry for the Off Topic but does anyone know of a good server firewall program for

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
SecureIIS from Eeye is pretty cool www.secureIIS.com While it is pretty cool (I'm evaluating the 2.0 beta right now), it's not a firewall, it's an input filter for IIS. It won't do anything to stop someone from connecting to any other services on the machine. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Nate Swanson
Message- From: Duane Boudreau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:06 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall I like BlackIce from Internet Security Systems (www.iss.com) approx $399 per server Duane -Original Message- From: Andy Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Tony Weeg wrote: windows XP professional is what I use. on my dev box running cfmx and everything I have come across works 100% It works for me too on test machines. But in production? No way. Jochem __ This list and all

Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dave Watts wrote: I have to say, I agree with Robert here, in that if you want to control traffic at your server itself (host security), rather than or in addition to controlling traffic at the router and firewall, the OS provides all the tools you need. Windows NT 4 and higher allow you to

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
I have to say, I agree with Robert here, in that if you want to control traffic at your server itself (host security), rather than or in addition to controlling traffic at the router and firewall, the OS provides all the tools you need. Windows NT 4 and higher allow you to block

Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dave Watts wrote: Nope. That's what external firewalls are for. My approach to host-based security is generally just to disallow as much traffic as I can; I don't know what kind of performance hit you'd take with doing that on each host, and I don't want to find out. Why not? If you don't

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
Nope. That's what external firewalls are for. My approach to host-based security is generally just to disallow as much traffic as I can; I don't know what kind of performance hit you'd take with doing that on each host, and I don't want to find out. Why not? If you don't know

Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dave Watts wrote: Nope. That's what external firewalls are for. My approach to host-based security is generally just to disallow as much traffic as I can; I don't know what kind of performance hit you'd take with doing that on each host, and I don't want to find out. Why not? If you don't

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread jon
settings will go unmessed with. 'Course, that's a little too DIY for most people, but it does work quite well. -- jon -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:15 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Server Firewall I have to say, I

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
Snort is rad... but is it a firewall? I use it on my linux machines as an intrusion detection system. No, it's not a firewall, it's an IDS, as you mention. However, combined with host-based IP security filters to stop traffic, and application input filters like URLScan and SecureIIS, it

Re: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Alex
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have to say, I agree with Robert here, in that if you want to control traffic at your server itself (host security), rather than or in addition to controlling traffic at the router and firewall, the OS provides all the tools you need. Windows

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
Snort does not do any filtering. It's an IDS that logs scans. Yes. I realize that. Jochem's complaint about using TCP/IP Filtering and IP security policies in Windows 2000 was that it didn't do stateful inspection. My response to that, assuming that Jochem's concern was primarily that these

RE: CF Server Firewall

2002-06-24 Thread Dave Watts
But the point is, that I really don't understand why you wouldn't want to know what the performance hit is. How can you make an informed decision (not) to do statefull filtering, if you don't even know that? Simply because I can do it other places, or that it's done for me already in