The CFMX updater page recommends 6.1 but if you need an earlier
updater it says you should contact customer support via this page:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/cscontact/
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Marc Bottin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:04:57 +0200
Yeah those are the only ones I found. I;m going to give it
shot, but I'm quickly getting to the point of no return in
terms of deadline. If this doesnt work on Monday I have to
begin to take everything out of stored procedures and put
everything inline.
I would strongly recommend trying
of inheriting a spahgetti
code application thats mission critical.
-Adam
- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 19:13:38 -0400
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Link
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the only one I see related to database drivers
Updater 3 is for 6.0
6.1 includes Updater 3 and much more
HTH
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Macromedia Associate Partner
Does anyone have a link for where I can download Updater 3.
Is it a seperate download than the CFMX 6.1 Updater? I would
imagine its included in the full 6.1 Updater, so I'm really
just wodnering if there is a second file that _just_ updater 3.
I don't have a link handy, but CFMX 6.0
I don't have a link handy, but CFMX 6.0 Updater 3 is not the same as the
CFMX 6.1 installer.
Well I'm still trying to find a solution for my stored procedure issue
with Oracle. We are getting this problem in a 6.1 build, so I wanted
to make that we were updated as much as we possibly could be. :(
can't you use the native driver?
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 3:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Link
I don't have a link handy, but CFMX 6.0 Updater 3 is not the same as the
CFMX 6.1 installer.
Well
Well I'm still trying to find a solution for my stored
procedure issue with Oracle. We are getting this problem in a
6.1 build, so I wanted to make that we were updated as much
as we possibly could be. :(
Of course our dba want to put all the blame on CF or the JDBC
driver but we have
This one?
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/cfmx61_sqlserver_cpu.htm
This is the only one I see related to database drivers.
-Adam
- Original Message -
From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:45:11 -0400
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Link
This is the only one I see related to database drivers.
New database drivers:
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/coldfusion/drivers/3.3/macromedia_drivers
.zip
All CF hot fixes:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/tn17883.htm
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
The cfclasses directory will be recreated on the first page execution.
chris
-Original Message-
From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX Updater 3 strange Install Issue (was Jrun ISAPI)
Wow, I think I finally found
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Available
Databases we connect to are:
Oracle 8i (8.1.7) on two separate Windows NT servers (connected to
using
Oracle's JDBC/OCI
On Monday, Mar 31, 2003, at 10:05 US/Pacific, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
If problems persist I could give the thin drivers a try and see
if that makes a difference.
OK, let us know how you get on.
The Access databases are small and simple- not worth taking up
resources on
an expensive Oracle
The Access databases are small and simple- not worth taking
up resources on an expensive Oracle server.
I would recommend that you reconsider. If you've already got the expensive
Oracle server, you might as well use it; I expect you'd find an overall
savings on resources.
We've always
This guy has had some pretty good, measurable success with U3:
http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/
messageview.cfm?catid=10threadid=582836
He might be a good resource for those who have questions.
Christian
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 11:36 AM, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
Yes, I
On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 11:24 US/Pacific, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
We have a brand new machine, and this is our server configuration:
Looks reasonable.
Databases we connect to are:
Oracle 8i (8.1.7) on two separate Windows NT servers (connected to
using
Oracle's JDBC/OCI 8.1.7.4
I put Updater 3 in almost right away, since I was already on 2 and close to
rolling back to CF 5 due to the serious problems with the server hanging. I
will say that this release appears more stable so far (4 days). It had been
hanging on us almost daily (one day 4 times). After applying
On Friday 28 Mar 2003 15:16 pm, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
to production level with CF MX know that it may be a good idea to give it a
month or so at least and see what kind of feedback comes in. I'm not yet
convinced that CF MX with updater 3 is necessarily up to snuff just yet.
We've not had
Application Specialists
-Original Message-
From: Ruggiero, Kevin D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 7:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Available
I put Updater 3 in almost right away, since I was already on 2 and close to
rolling back to CF 5 due to the serious
-mail
to the list in a few weeks to give an update on how our server is running-
hopefully the info will be of use to people considering migration.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 07:16 US/Pacific, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
But, I want to let those who may be thinking of going to production
level with CF MX know that it may be a good idea to give it a month or
so at
least and see what kind of feedback comes in. I'm not yet convinced
that
for the future of CF.
Thanks,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 12:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Available
On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 07:16 US/Pacific, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
But, I want to let those
You should be fine.
Apache 2 and apache 1 are deemed two separate products (and they really
are), so there are separate restrictions for each, just like between apache
2 and IIS. It's confusing, but there are two points for MX compliance,
1.3.x where x is greater than something and 2.0.y where y
Damon,
What's the Plan-B procedure should our installations decide to die on us and
our customers after installing 3? Just need to know before we move forward.
Thanks...
Lee Fuller
Chief Technical Officer
PrimeDNA / AAA Web Hosting Corp.
| -Original Message-
| From: Damon
by the
improved performance and the feature set.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Available
Damon,
What's the Plan-B procedure should our installations decide to die on us
Just a reminder that ColdFusion MX Updater 3 is now available for free
download from the MM website.
In my opinion, this is very close to a full dot-release of CFMX, and
includes all cumulative major fixes in all product areas, and adds over 100
fixes, mostly focused around server reliability
Great.. Thanks Damon!
Lee
| -Original Message-
| From: Damon Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:04 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
|
|
| You should be able to easily back out Updater 3 and restore
| whatever you had
.
=
Douglas White
group Manager
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.samcfug.org
=
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:34 AM
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
| We don't all
PROTECTED]
Christian Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/20/2003 04:27 PM
Please respond to cf-talk
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Michael Kear wrote:
Well in that case you had better
I hope I haven't come across as trying to trivialize the issue. It is
certainly a problem, and I submitted a report to the web team as soon
as I saw the first post. I then ran into the problem myself, and
although downloading the updater to my workstation and then uploading
it to my server
-Talk
| Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
|
|
| I'm assuming there's a reason Erika doesn't want to install
| flash, not just that I don't like flash!. So I'm prepared to
make
| the updater available to her from my web site
Flash or
indeed
has the power to through rights etc...
N
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 March 2003 10:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
This all very nice of you Michael, and I have already received
whats the scoop with the line spacing and the list?
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 March 2003 10:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
This all very nice of you Michael, and I have already received it
from
: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 March 2003 10:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
This all very nice of you Michael, and I have already received it
from
another kind person ...
But it kinda misses some of the point I was trying
Anyone else having problems downloading? I get to 99% (27.9 of 28.5MB)
and then it hangs. It's happened three times now. Any suggestions?
I'm using the link provided in an earlier email, since I cannot upgrade to
the latest version of flash to get the download.
Glad to see it includes CFMX for J2EE!
Chris Norloff
-- Original Message --
From: Steven Erat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:09:21 -0500
CFMX Updater 3 Released March 20, 2003
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 05:35 AM, Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote:
This all very nice of you Michael, and I have already received it
from
another kind person ...
But it kinda misses some of the point I was trying to make.
I got your point, and I passed it along to the web team.
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 07:54 PM, Michael Kear wrote:
I'm assuming there's a reason Erika doesn't want to install flash, not
just that I don't like flash!. So I'm prepared to make the updater
available to her from my web site.
The terms that you agreed to when you downloaded the
reasonable choice.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 07:54 PM, Michael Kear wrote:
I'm assuming there's a reason Erika doesn't
,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 21 March 2003 4:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 07:54 PM, Michael
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Michael Kear wrote:
Well in that case you had better make some arrangements for people who
haven't got flash installed on their server machines. I was only
trying
to help out since you had obviously forgotten about server owners in
your haste to
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
Not to be an ass, but if MM doesn't provide a means to get the updater
without Flash support (which isn't an option on GUI-less *nix
installations,
for example), then you're pretty much limited to illicit distribution
or not
, March 20, 2003 2:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
Not to be an ass, but if MM doesn't provide a means to get the updater
without Flash support (which isn't an option on GUI-less *nix
installations
: Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
Not to be an ass, but if MM doesn't provide a means to get the updater
without Flash support (which isn't an option on GUI-less *nix
Christian,
We know the work arounds.
We can work the work arounds.
The point WAS and STILL IS that we shouldn't HAVE to.
Which you duly noted, thank you VERY MUCH!
Seriously though, why antagonize us all day?
How hard can it possible be, that all day today, you guys couldn't
release a non-flash
Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote:
Seriously though, why antagonize us all day?
How hard can it possible be, that all day today, you guys couldn't
release a non-flash link to the updator?
IIRC it has been documented somewhere on the site that Macromedia finds
it important to know who downloads
Thursday, March 20, 2003, 6:10:44 PM, you wrote:
Please, a non-flash solution is duly needed and wanted, no matter what.
And I'm sure WE will ALL thank you when we get one.
Well, maybe I speak for myself.
JvD aol
Acronym Over Load?
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well that's a reasonable answer, thank you Jochem. ;) You work for them
now? ;)
| aol
What does aol mean?
P.S. Haven't seen you around in awhile ... Hope all is well. :)
| -Original Message-
| From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| IIRC it has been documented
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released
Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote:
Seriously though, why antagonize us all day?
How hard can it possible be, that all day today, you guys couldn't
release a non-flash link to the updator?
IIRC it has
Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote:
Well that's a reasonable answer, thank you Jochem. ;) You work for them
now? ;)
Work? I'll have to graduate first.
| aol
What does aol mean?
http://www.antionline.com/jargon/AOL!.php
Jochem
installing flash is difficult.
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2003 11:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
That'll let you access the rest of the site
]
*
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Released
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Barney
Yeah, but apparently ... And please tell me I'm wrong ... You can't
download it unless you have Flash installed and running ... However, on
my server ... I am NOT installing the latest Flash player and I just
want to use the HTML version of the page
So if someone could guide me to a dowload
Yeah, but apparently ... And please tell me I'm wrong ... You can't
download it unless you have Flash installed and running ... However, on
my server ... I am NOT installing the latest Flash player and I just
want to use the HTML version of the page
So if someone could guide me to a dowload
?
barneyb
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
Yeah, but apparently ... And please tell me I'm wrong ... You can't
download it unless you have Flash installed
is difficult.
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2003 11:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
That'll let you access the rest of the site without flash
Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MK Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2003 11:19 AM
MK To: CF-Talk
MK Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
MK That'll let you access the rest of the site without flash, but not the
MK download page. just get a redirect to the
MK 'flash_app_requirements.html',
MK which says you
19, 2003 4:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
I'm assuming there's a reason Erika doesn't want to install flash, not
just that I don't like flash!. So I'm prepared to make the updater
available to her from my web site.
Erika, please email me and I'll let you know where
Message-
From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 4:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Released
I'm assuming there's a reason Erika doesn't want to install flash, not
just that I don't like flash!. So I'm prepared to make the updater
Bryan,
Did you try the usual:
1) Make sure you're using mixed mode authentication on SQL server.
2) Make sure your passwords are not more than 16 chars.
3) Make sure you aren't using (local) as the server etc.
Thanks,
André
PS
Good luck with the dating web app!
-Original Message-
I'm able to setup SQL2K datasources using Windows
Datasource utility just fine, but they don't show
in CF Admin.
Are you using SQL Server logins, or Windows Authentication? You have to use
SQL Server logins.
Are you using default or named SQL Server instances? If you're using named
The diagnostic jar file can be found here:
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=23602Method=Full
chris
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX Updater 2 to blame?
Hey All,
I saw a
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 2 to blame?
I'm able to setup SQL2K datasources using Windows
Datasource utility just fine, but they don't show
in CF Admin.
Are you using SQL Server logins, or Windows
I am having a great amount of difficulty downloading the CFMX updater 2.
When I click on the file, I get sent back to Macromedia's home page. I
have contacted Macromedia and haven't heard anything except the usual
canned response.
If anyone could send me the actual file, or direct me to
Do have any type of firewall software running on your workstation like
Zone Alarm, Black Ice, Norton Internet
Security, or WatchDog? If so, try disabling it, download the file,
then re-enable your firewall.
Christian
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 02:46 PM, Sandy Clark wrote:
I am
Thanks,
Problem solved
-Original Message-
From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 3:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 2 woes
Do have any type of firewall software running on your workstation like
Zone Alarm, Black Ice, Norton
I can't offer much help, but just so you know, I was talking to someone
who was using ADO with MX and we got it working before the patch, but
it was very slow. So we decided to patch it, and the code just stopped
working. Reverting to a previous way of accessing the object fixed the
problem...very
: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
Oh, god I hate those things. They're always such a pain
to use on intranet's (especially where 'net access is
explicity forbidden.).
Give me a nice reliable (portable) service pack any day.
I agree that the patches should be available for separate
Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
It doesn't trigger any network connection. I thought this was weird. I was
expecting it to go off to the Macromedia site.
Oh well, so in reality it is a service pack...
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17
It doesn't trigger any network connection. I thought this was
weird. I was expecting it to go off to the Macromedia site.
Oh well, so in reality it is a service pack...
I'm not sure about this entirely. I think it's possible that this updater
installed some sort of update program, in
- Original Message -
From: John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say it was more or less an equivalent of Microsoft's Hot Fix Rollup
package - a series of fixes that didn't warrant a full service pack but
nevertheless important.
---
Well MM have stated that their
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 06:50 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
I'm not sure about this entirely. I think it's possible that this
updater
installed some sort of update program, in addition to the fixes that it
installed. I don't know how to invoke the updater, or even if there is
one,
It really sounds like an intelligent, well-thought-out concept
It sounds like a service pack with a different name.
Thomas Chiverton
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
Why is an updater like CFMX at a disadvantage when compared
to a service pack.
The service packs (MS Windows) I have installed all had a GUI
that operated similar to the updater. (Only you'd download 1
service pack only to find out it had another service pack as
a prerequisite)... My
If your using Website as your server, you have to reinstall the website MX connector
after running the CFMX update. For some reason, the update kills it (removes some of
the jrun files). Other than that, it all went smoothly.
You can test that the CFMX update has installed properly by using
Which web server was that Michael? Just want to be clear that it was not IIS and
Apache, which are our primary concerns.
-jesse noller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater
primary concerns.
-jesse noller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater
If your using Website as your server, you have to reinstall the website MX connector
after
Folks - we released an updater for CFMX last night. You can find it
here:
http://dynamic.macromedia.com/bin/MM/software/trial/hwswrec.jsp?product=
cfmx_updater
There is a large list of fixes contained with the updater. You can find
that here:
Thanks for the heads up, Dave. It's all set now.
Deb
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta
To: CF-Talk
Sent: 9/17/2002 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater
Hmmm...according to the release notes, you released the updater a year
ago!
And MM was saying for months that there wasn't even
From the Updated Faq on the website:
What is the Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater?
The Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater replaces the concept of a service pack by
providing an easy way to ensure you always have access to the latest security,
stability, and critical
, 2002 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
From the Updated Faq on the website:
What is the Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater?
The Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater replaces the concept of a
service pack by providing an easy way to ensure you always
/coldfusion
|-Original Message-
|From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:57 PM
|To: CF-Talk
|Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
|
|
|Updated/updater
|
|Jesse Noller
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Macromedia Server Development
|Unix
You can roll back. Release note shows you how.
- Original Message -
From: Stephenie Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
Is there a way to roll this back? Or is there pretty much
I like it!
It really sounds like an intelligent, well-thought-out concept -- I
think it should result in quicker turn-around of fixes, and should be
less burdensome than applying a massive service pack -- a much more
responsive and dynamic way to apply fixes.
This would be especially
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:55:05 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote:
What is the Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater?
The Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater replaces the concept of a service pack
by providing an easy way to ensure you always have access to the latest security,
stability, and
Oh, god I hate those things. They're always such a pain
to use on intranet's (especially where 'net access is
explicity forbidden.).
Give me a nice reliable (portable) service pack any day.
I agree that the patches should be available for separate download; some MM
folks here said that
?
Thanks,
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Debbie Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
Thanks for the heads up, Dave. It's all set now.
Deb
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta
To: CF-Talk
Sent: 9/17
Updater
Thanks for the heads up, Dave. It's all set now.
Deb
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta
To: CF-Talk
Sent: 9/17/2002 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater
Hmmm...according to the release notes, you released the updater a year
ago!
And MM was saying for months
, September 17, 2002 1:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
There's only one CFIDE folder ... ?
Which installer are you using Ken?
~Todd
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Ken Brocx wrote:
I have tried to install the updater but it says it didn't install at
the
end and to make sure the MX server is shut down
Same thing happened to me.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
-Original Message-
From: Ken Brocx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
I have
Is that really an issue with server software?
Would the silent install option solve the problem if you have multiple
Developer versions deployed?
Does the license allow you to have multiple developer versions deployed?
Dick
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 01:00 PM, Lewis Sellers wrote:
]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
I have tried to install the updater but it says it didn't install
at
the
end and to make sure the MX server is shut down. I have shutdown
the
three CFMX services from the windows services menu. Am I missing
]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
Same thing happened to me.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
-Original Message-
From: Ken Brocx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday
, I
can figure that part out though.
I just can't get the updater for windows to finish installing.
Thanks todd, any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
strange, I didn't have to shut anything, down, chose the paths
and it worked perfectly.
.tony
Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
I posted this question once before, but I don't remember getting a response
and I don't have email from this list that old...
Does anyone know of a size limit for input type=file...? I couldn't
find one in the official HTTP RFC...
+---+
Bryan Love
strange, I didn't have to shut anything, down, chose the paths
and it worked perfectly.
..tony
Thanks for rubbing it in tony...
-Ken
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
Same
at www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta
To: CF-Talk
Sent: 9/17/2002 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
Same thing happened to me.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
-Original Message
I got it! It was pointing to the wrong CFIDE folder, turns out we have
three (at least) on the dev server sigh
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Love [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
I posted this question once
Great! I suspected that might be it. Glad it's going now!
-Vern
-Original Message-
From: Ken Brocx
To: CF-Talk
Sent: 9/17/2002 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater
I got it! It was pointing to the wrong CFIDE folder, turns out we have
three (at least) on the dev server sigh
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
