Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Jay Patton
ha ha ha i agree Jay Patton Web Pro USA 406.549.3337 ext. 203 1.888.5WEBPRO www.webpro-usa.com - Original Message - From: "Phoeun Pha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: OT: Vacati

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Scott, Andrew
From: Greg Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2001 02:24 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Vacations and being banned I'm sorry, but I really don't understand why this is such a big issue. Fine, someone accidentally sent 200 messages, but it happens. It's hard to underst

Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Michael Dinowitz
rom: Robert Everland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: OT: Vacations and being banned > Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:18:38 -0500 > > Helo 200 messages, times how many people on the list 1000 let's say

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Eric Dawson
we could translate to money? $30CAD per GB of transfer is what I pay. Eric From: Robert Everland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: OT: Vacations and being banned Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:18:38 -0500 Helo 200 mes

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Phoeun Pha
I don't have anything important to say. I'm wasting your time ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsu

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Philip Arnold - ASP
> I'm sorry, but I really don't understand why this is such a big issue. > Fine, someone accidentally sent 200 messages, but it happens. > It's hard to > understand why hitting delete is such a difficult task. It's nice Michael > that you host all of these CF lists and I really do appreciate it,

Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Jennifer
At 10:24 AM 1/15/01 -0500, you wrote: >I'm sorry, but I really don't understand why this is such a big issue. >Fine, someone accidentally sent 200 messages, but it happens. It's hard to >understand why hitting delete is such a difficult task. It's nice Michael >that you host all of these CF list

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread William J Wheatley
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 12:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Vacations and being banned > Helo 200 messages, times how many people on the list 1000 let's say, > that's 200,000 messages of just vacation messages that he hosts. Don't take

Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Greg Wolfinger
happened once. Like I said it happens. Deal. --=@ greg @=-- - Original Message - From: "Robert Everland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:18 AM Subject: RE: OT: Vacations and being banned > Heloo

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Ryan
At 15:59 1/15/01 -, you wrote: >Well I agree in some way - it is pretty annoying, but if they were using any >decent mail client like Outlook 2k the the client recognises when a mail >address has already received the mail and it will not send one out again. > >$0.02 That would stop the loopin

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Robert Everland
xon Ticonderoga -Original Message- From: Greg Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 10:24 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Vacations and being banned I'm sorry, but I really don't understand why this is such a big issue. Fine, someone accidentally

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Dylan Bromby
are pissed off. :) -Original Message- From: Jason Lees (National Express) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:49 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: OT: Vacations and being banned I agree with Micheal, personally, I dont want to know that someone who I dont know is on hol

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
Now, if *Two Persons* set up autoresponders to the list... shades of "Deliverance"... sounds of "Dueling Banjos" in the background. At 10:51 AM -0500 1/15/01, Cameron Childress wrote: >Math time. I'm making a couple of assumptions here, but let's say that two >lists with one thousand subscri

Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Michael Dinowitz
f.770.460.0963 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Greg Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 10:24 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: OT: Vacations and being banned > > > > > > I'm sorry, but I r

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Neil Clark
Well I agree in some way - it is pretty annoying, but if they were using any decent mail client like Outlook 2k the the client recognises when a mail address has already received the mail and it will not send one out again. $0.02 N http://www.mcbdigital.com --->

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Jason Lees (National Express)
Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2001 15:24 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Vacations and being banned I'm sorry, but I really don't understand why this is such a big issue. Fine, someone accidentally sent 200 messages, but it happens. It's hard to understand why hitting

Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Jeffry Houser
It was 200 posts, before Michael removed the person. If no one removed the person, it would have been an infinite number of posts. (See the part about looping). If for no other reason, the policy is in place to make less work for Michael. I can't speak for him, but my time is important.

RE: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Cameron Childress
ount of mail... -Cameron Cameron Childress elliptIQ Inc. p.770.460.7277.232 f.770.460.0963 > -Original Message- > From: Greg Wolfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 10:24 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: OT: Vacations and being ba

Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Its less an issue of being angry than one of preventative medicine. I get flack when we have a lot of vacation posts to the list. I get flack when someone posts with a messed up header and stalls the mail server. I get flack if a message is more than 5 minutes late. I know it sounds like I'm compl

Re: OT: Vacations and being banned

2001-01-15 Thread Greg Wolfinger
I'm sorry, but I really don't understand why this is such a big issue. Fine, someone accidentally sent 200 messages, but it happens. It's hard to understand why hitting delete is such a difficult task. It's nice Michael that you host all of these CF lists and I really do appreciate it, but I jus