Did you get anywhere with this?
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Charles Heizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2005 00:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfinput question...
Hello,
I'm trying to use the cfinput tag with a type of checkbox. The issue I'm
having is that it won't let me use
Why don't you try radio button instead of checkbox?
~
Hello,
I'm trying to use the cfinput tag with a type of checkbox. The issue I'm
having is that it won't let me use the same name more than once.
when you schedule an event w/in cfadmin does it actually load the .cfm
template?
I have a template that when it loads the form it is automatically submitted
(JavaScript Body onload submit)IF I run the template manually the page
works fine, however, as a schedule task nothing happens
BTW
It will not trigger JS no
-Original Message-
From: Kristen Winsor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2005 11:40
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfscheduler and javascript
when you schedule an event w/in cfadmin does it actually load the .cfm
template?
I have a template that when it
I'm looking for a guide to upgrading from 6.1 to 7 on the MM site and
coming up with nothing.
Does anyone know if such a thing exists?
Cheers
Bert
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
Wow, that's a pretty sad oversight on the part of Macromedia.
Basically, if you use any session-based CFCs you are forced to use
sticky sessions. And even that doesn't help at all for failover. They
added a lot of nice stuff in 7.0, but they also dropped the ball on
several things and this is one
I feel bad that I'm entering this thread so late - but I usually do. My
apologies.
First off, I'm not MM blashing here - I've always found their products to be
quite good. However, since they deal with software - they can suffer the bugs,
etc. Since I'm a one person consultant like you, I
Hey Peter,
If you need help on getting MX up and running with Apache let me know...jeez
I have done it enough times!
N
-Original Message-
From: Peter Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2005 13:00
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF7 won't run under IIS, wont install -
From: Peter Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike, I had problems with getting CFMX7 installed on WinXPPro
with Apache 2.0. I downloaded the installer on the Monday
that it came out (like 1am). I must of had bad luck. It
rendered my computer, well - I had 10 hours of
troubleshooting
What? How is it not? You write static files vs using the application scope.
Depending on the application and environment static files would be as fast
if not faster than using the application scope. And you don't have to worry
about corruption of the memory or making a mistake in your logic to
Is there anyway to use cfinclude to point to a .cfm file on a different
website? Or am I stuck with cfhttp?
I'm using CFMX 6.1.
Thanks,
Mark
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency
I will give this a try, thanks for all your help and good luck with the car.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT-SQL matching
Try runnng this:
CREATE TABLE #table1 (
LName
Hello all. I'm an old Netscape iPlanet guy and I am new to IIS 6.0/Windows
Security and have a simple question. I posted this question on an IIS forum
and got no response. :(
Say I have two websites: www.abc.com and www.xyz.com. Both of these websites
have an admin directory that I want password
no, because CFHTTP is an HTTP request so the file is processed by the
CF server so the raw CFM won't be available
john.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:28:39 -0500, Mark Leder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyway to use cfinclude to point to a .cfm file on a different
website? Or am I stuck with
I am not sure where this inconsistency comes from. Is the space
between General Information a cause?
Depends if they are only blank character, or if there the two parts are in two
separate lines.
Depending on the way the code was entered, you may actually have the equivalent
of
- General
Mostly because if you're looking for a field,
you're not going to look in the methods section
of the class docs, even if the field is
actually a method, as you proposed. Just a
differentiation between
state and behaviour that you'd sacrifice.
If I knew the data was in that class (or should
I still fail to understand why it's considered messy / nasty.
If you let the 'final' part of 'public static final' weigh
in
slightly, then Isaac's proposal kind of gives you static.
Because
it's a method not a variable, there is only one instance
(so it's a
class thing), you can't change
Glad I could help.
What LDAP directory are you using? Active Directory or something else?
In AD, if there is a user, you should get the CN as you requested. It
should never be empty. If there is no user, you will get an empty
query.
Try using attributes=* and see if you get anything back.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:24:49 -0500, Bryan F. Hogan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What? How is it not? You write static files vs using the application scope.
Depending on the application and environment static files would be as fast
if not faster than using the application scope. And you don't have
I think the implicit point is that memory (e.g. application scope) is
faster than I/O from the disk (e.g a file) -- and considering that
*read* would be the far more frequent step than *write*, anything in
memory should be faster.
I agree if you're using cffile or using cfinclude or the
Hi Mike,
That's the funny part. If the userID and password I provide exists on
the AD, then I get back an empty query, regarding what attributes I
request in the attributes field. If the user doesn't exists then I get
an error: Inappropriate authentication.
If I add * for attributes get an
Okay I go something to work so my orginal question is taken care of. However I
have another question that deals with this sort of thing. I am now looking at
another datasource that I am going to have to match on at somepoint later but
they have a single name field where a persons name is one
You might try using the LDAP Browser utility at www.ldapbrowser.com.
They have a freeware ldap browser that may help find the problem.
Also, I would just use a generic account for the username and password.
Preferably those of a domain admin. Then see what happens. If it works
at that point,
BTW, if their domain admin won't give you an account with domain admin
permissions, you can easily create a form where they can enter their
credentials, to be used for the LDAP connection, and have it mail any
output to you.
-Original Message-
From: Victor Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will the last name always be first in the column? In the samples below, is
the person's first name DONALD, and then last names LITTLE, LITTLE VICTOR
and LITTLE Victor?
LITTLE DONALD V
LITTLE DONALD VICTOR
LITTLE DONALD Victor JR
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Eric Creese [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm not sure what was asked for in this thread (may be search engine
submission or finding linking partners)...but
A friend of mine is an SEO company owner and has done work most recently for
some Time Warner siteshe says submit to directory sites first instead of
the search engines.
In fact I think you're on to a hiding to nothing...
I don't think you can make any reasonable assumptions about what is a
middle name and what is a suffix. In the before samples VICTOR could be a
suffix.
Maybe I'm not understanding it all but I don't think you'll be able to do
this with
It is always
LASTNAME FIRSTNAME then ..
LITTLE DONALD Victor JR
So I just want
LASTNAME = LITTLE
FIRSTNAME = DONALD
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT-SQL matching
In fact I think
We are in the early stages of *thinking* about moving away from MS SQL
server and moving to MySQL. Can anyone give me a quick pro / con points for
doing this or not doing this?
We have about 60 Databases set up on on a server that gets low traffic. Few
thousand users per day. Mostly we use the
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:25:14 -0500, Bryan F. Hogan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm not advocating it, running purely with database queries
makes nearly as much sense (at least, up to a point) -- since both
ColdFusion and the database are caching the disk-based data into
memory. Using
Mark W. Breneman wrote:
We are in the early stages of *thinking* about moving away from MS SQL
server and moving to MySQL.
Why? What do you hope to gain from this move?
Jochem
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your
I can give you two good reasons. LiveJournal and Wikipedia. In the
past couple of months both of these websites went down due to power
issues in their coloco facilities. It took a bit of effort to bring
both of these sites back up because the database was in an
inconsistent state. Both sites
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:04:22 -0600, Mark W. Breneman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are in the early stages of *thinking* about moving away from MS SQL
server and moving to MySQL. Can anyone give me a quick pro / con points for
doing this or not doing this?
I'm a big MySQL fan, and a long-time
Yeah, I thought that question might come up...
We are configing a new windows 2000 webserver server and the owner walked up
and just asked out of the blue what if we install MySql and not MSSQL. (and
no this was not a Dilbert Pointy haired Boss sorta moment.) We have talked
about moving to a non
Another point to consider is in MySQL you can not use
A default date field to be auto-populated as you can in
MS-SQL using the NOW() function.
I had to modify my code to accommodate that function.
But for the most part I rather enjoy MySQL.
-Original Message-
From: John Paul
Well, whatever you think of Microsoft, SQL Server is far far better then
mySQL will ever be (cost aside that is!).
-Original Message-
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2005 16:27
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Pro/Con Moving from MSSQL to MySQL
Yeah, I
NOW()? Surely you mean GETDATE()?
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2005 16:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Pro/Con Moving from MSSQL to MySQL
Another point to consider is in MySQL you can not use
A default date field to be auto-populated
Mark W. Breneman wrote:
We are configing a new windows 2000 webserver server and the owner walked up
and just asked out of the blue what if we install MySql and not MSSQL. (and
no this was not a Dilbert Pointy haired Boss sorta moment.) We have talked
about moving to a non Windows platform
That's a ridiculous thing to say without at least qualifying it.
MySQL is a far better tool for me than MSSQL because as a developer I
often need to be able to destroy an existing database and replace it
with a backed up version.
With MySQL I can do that in a matter of a couple of seconds from
No, I doubt the it was because of other programs. I always shut down just
about everything - habit from the good old DOS days (except we didn't have
services_. I would have even done it in Safe Mode if I could have. Actually,
one of the problems was when CFMX7 installed itself - on restart -
Actually, I think you missed part of the point. Regardless of whether
the article is data in a database or a text file sitting on a disk,
the amount of disk I/O to get those blocks into memory is the same
order of magnitude (db page size and fragmentation vs os block size
and fragmentation
If I am not mistaken in that is a new feature in MySql 4.1. We just dealt
with this issue for a client that wanted to run their CFMX/MSSQL site on a
Mac Blue Dragon/MySQL server. If I recall correctly in 4.1 you can control
how the auto-populated date field works. We have two date fields in each
Well whichever, MySQL does not have that functionality.
I wish it did. But still, I do enjoy using MySQL rather
than MS-SQL. But that is my personal choice
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 11:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
My bad, I misunderstood.
Run this and wack in some more sample data to see if it works
CREATE TABLE #temp ( Names VARCHAR(100) )
INSERT INTO #temp ( Names ) VALUES ( 'LITTLE DONALD V' )
INSERT INTO #temp ( Names ) VALUES ( 'LITTLE DONALD VICTOR' )
INSERT INTO #temp ( Names ) VALUES ( 'LITTLE
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:15:34 -0600, toru okada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can give you two good reasons. LiveJournal and Wikipedia. In the
past couple of months both of these websites went down due to power
issues in their coloco facilities. It took a bit of effort to bring
both of these
OK Spike ;-), I will certainly say it is a sweeping statement but based on
experience it is far far better.
I am not sure you mean about destroying a DB and restoring? With SQL Server
it is certainly far better to totally avoid using Enterprise Manager as it
is evil, I will give you that - stick
I will give it a try. I wnet ahead and did it in two steps and got the data I
want but to get it all in one would be what I would like.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT-SQL matching
My
One is the obvious question of, have you thought of PostgreSQL? It is
much more feature rich than MySQL and is now also a native Windows app
with version 8 (previously it wasn't, at least as standard).
--
Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Limu Company -
toru okada wrote:
I can give you two good reasons. LiveJournal and Wikipedia.
They are not reasons to stay away from MySQL, just examples of
misconfigured systems and bad behaving OS'es.
What might be a reason is that the default configuration of MySQL
offers no data integrity protection in
That doesn't really cover static, though - what makes a
static
member static is that it belongs to the type instead of
one instance
of a type. I.e.:
InstanceOne.StaticVar = 1
InstanceTwo.StaticVar = 2
!--- Would show 2 if we had statics ---
cfoutput#InstanceOne.StaticVar#/cfoutput
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:33:40 -0800, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a ridiculous thing to say without at least qualifying it.
Agreed. No better than blithely saying MySQL rules because it's open source :)
MySQL is a far better tool for me than MSSQL because as a developer I
often need
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:39:41 -0500, Adkins, Randy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well whichever, MySQL does not have that functionality.
I wish it did. But still, I do enjoy using MySQL rather
than MS-SQL. But that is my personal choice
Actually, MySQL has an entire field type for handling
With Static Publishing you don't have to worry about the coupling of the
files to the db if the db were to die, you don't have to worry about the
extra overhead that CF has to do. Actually CF I believe uses static
publishing itself. Why send a file through the engine, have it access the
db,
Hi,
Thanks for your message. I will be away on vacation Feb 24th - Mar 4th. I
will reply to your message on my return.
Have a great day!
Bryon
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
Actually, that's not fair at all. You can use T-SQL and the osql
command line just as effectively, though it takes more steps and isn't
as intuitive since MS has forced you to think GUI. It takes a
similar amount of steps to restore a database through the MySQL
Administrator GUI too if
Another point to consider is in MySQL you can not use
A default date field to be auto-populated as you can in
MS-SQL using the NOW() function.
GETDATE() -- NOW() Is Access... or does MySQL use now() also?
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features
Mark W. Breneman wrote:
We are configing a new windows 2000 webserver server and
the owner walked up
and just asked out of the blue what if we install MySql
and not MSSQL. (and
no this was not a Dilbert Pointy haired Boss sorta
moment.) We have talked
about moving to a non Windows
Damien McKenna wrote:
One is the obvious question of, have you thought of PostgreSQL? It is
much more feature rich than MySQL and is now also a native Windows app
with version 8 (previously it wasn't, at least as standard).
Hey, you stole my line!
There are a number of other alternatives to
I know that we will have to rewrite anything that we have
used MSSQL
functions and MSSQL SQL commands.
Less than you think needs rewritten -- MySQL has lots of
common MS-SQL
(and Oracle, etc) commands built-in or aliased to the
native MySQL
functions. The only difference in very common
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:45:01 +0100, Jochem van Dieten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are not reasons to stay away from MySQL, just examples of
misconfigured systems and bad behaving OS'es.
sorry jochem, i am going to have to resepectfully disagree with you
here. This would not happen with a
The example I gave was just that, an example. There are
plenty more such
as the ability to dump a database table to an SQL script.
That can be
handy if you need to send some sample data to another
developer.
There's a 3rd party GUI tool called SqlYob (I think) for MySQL that
handles a lot
Eric
You can use this UDF too
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.getLastName(@fullname varchar(200))
RETURNS varchar(50)
AS
begin
Set @fullname = substring(@fullname,Charindex(' ',@fullname) + 1
,len(@fullname))
Set @fullname = substring(@fullname,1 ,charindex( ' ', @fullname ))
return @fullname
END
On
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:43:28 -0500, John Paul Ashenfelter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, what a load of FUD. Neither LiveJournal nor Wikipedia blame the
outages on MySQL.
Nor did I say that. What I said is that because of the power failure
their databases where left in a inconsistement
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:39:41 -0500, Adkins, Randy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well whichever, MySQL does not have that functionality.
I wish it did. But still, I do enjoy using MySQL rather
than MS-SQL. But that is my personal choice
Actually, MySQL has an entire field type for handling
It's not that I couldn't get it to play with Apache. I did get CF parse cfm
files and apache to serve them. That wasn't the problem. It was the
java.lang.OutOfMemory errors that were the problem. JRUN would eat up it's
entire memory allocation (512MB) within 5 minutes and this is on a dev
Adkins, Randy wrote:
Another point to consider is in MySQL you can not use
A default date field to be auto-populated as you can in
MS-SQL using the NOW() function.
I had to modify my code to accommodate that function.
But for the most part I rather enjoy MySQL.
But OTOH, there's the
toru okada wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:45:01 +0100, Jochem van Dieten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are not reasons to stay away from MySQL, just examples of
misconfigured systems and bad behaving OS'es.
sorry jochem, i am going to have to resepectfully disagree with you
here. This
I think you mean SQLYog,
I've used it quite a bit in the past and it's very handy if you aren't a
command line junkie, or can't remember the specific syntax of a command.
Spike
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
The example I gave was just that, an example. There are
plenty more such
as the ability to
Yeah, I hear that. I suspect that more clusters use session affinity
than you suspect, and just accept that failover scenarios aren't as
good. The server cluster we built a couple years ago doesn't use
session affinity (an intentional design characteristic), but we're
finding that there are more
toru okada wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:45:01 +0100, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
They are not reasons to stay away from MySQL, just examples of
misconfigured systems and bad behaving OS'es.
sorry jochem, i am going to have to resepectfully disagree with you
here. This would not happen
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Qasim Rasheed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 11:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT-SQL matching
Eric
You can use this UDF too
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.getLastName(@fullname varchar(200))
RETURNS varchar(50)
AS
begin
Set
One is the obvious question of, have you thought of
PostgreSQL? It is
much more feature rich than MySQL and is now also a native
Windows app
with version 8 (previously it wasn't, at least as
standard).
--
Damien McKenna - Web Developer -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Limu Company -
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Damien McKenna wrote:
One is the obvious question of, have you thought of PostgreSQL? It is
much more feature rich than MySQL and is now also a native Windows app
with version 8 (previously it wasn't, at least as standard).
Hey, you stole my line!
There are a
Keith Gaughan wrote:
Adkins, Randy wrote:
Another point to consider is in MySQL you can not use
A default date field to be auto-populated as you can in
MS-SQL using the NOW() function.
I had to modify my code to accommodate that function.
But for the most part I rather enjoy MySQL.
I used the windows version of PostgreSQL on a pretty big project last
year. The deployment was on *nix, but I was developing on Windows.
The only gotcha I ran into was that the pid file sometimes got left
behind if PostgreSQL terminated unexpectedly. That resulted in me not
being able to start
Hi all,
I have an include for a dynamic side menu and there is a lot of data in the
menus. There is 3 level of menus and hte guy who programmed it made loops
inside of loops with different queries. I'm looking for a way to optimize
this since it's taking 1000 ms to load.
I looked at the cache
I'd try and cache the menu, and use to URL var to specify a different
stylesheet for the colors.
-Adam
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:45:54 -0500, CFDEV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have an include for a dynamic side menu and there is a lot of data in the
menus. There is 3 level of menus and
thanks
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:196355
Archives:
A week or so ago I peeked at the PostGreSQL web site and looked over
their Windows port. All of the Experimental and total rewrite and
not fully tested messages convinced me to keep waiting, as my needs
are for full production.
But from the sound of it some of you out there have bitten the
CFDEV wrote:
I have an include for a dynamic side menu and there is a lot of data in the
menus. There is 3 level of menus and hte guy who programmed it made loops
inside of loops with different queries. I'm looking for a way to optimize
this since it's taking 1000 ms to load.
I looked
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
free Open Source arena there is Firebird, Ingress, Derby and
derby? well lets see what hani has to say about it:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient
Well the color is to highlight the menu for which page we are in at the
moment and this is determined by a url variable...
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 24, 2005 13:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Trying to optimize some code
CFDEV
Any ideas?
I use only one query, one loop on the query with grouping, and a
recursive Custom Tag.
Pretty fast indeed, but not really trivial.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any
The file version of my jrun.dll is 4.0.3.19147. It's not working for .cfm
files (.jsp files seem OK) on IIS5.1/JRun4/CFMX7.
Can anyone tell me if this is the correct version for CF7? I guess maybe
not, since it was created by the wsconfig tool which is part of JRun4 which
pre-dates CF7. If not,
No, I did find that this is only the case when the form type is flash.
I think it a bug.
- Charles
On 2/24/05 4:20 AM, Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you get anywhere with this?
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Charles Heizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24
CFDEV wrote:
Well the color is to highlight the menu for which page we are in at the
moment and this is determined by a url variable...
That is no problem. Consider the folowing menu:
cfoutput
style type=text/css
ul.menu li.#url.page# {background-color: navy;}
/style
/cfoutput
ul id=menu
I need to allow the user to select multiple items.
- Charles
On 2/24/05 3:25 AM, Tarantor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you try radio button instead of checkbox?
~
Hello,
I'm trying to use the cfinput tag with a type of checkbox. The issue
Bert said:
I'm looking for a guide to upgrading from 6.1 to 7 on the MM site and
coming up with nothing.
Does anyone know if such a thing exists?
Cheers
You mean something like this?
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/documentation/en/coldfusion/mx7/cfmx7_mig
rating.pdf
George
[EMAIL
Ok, I am trying to do something that I would think would be very easy. And I
guess I am just a little slow today, but I figure out how i would do this.
I have query of scores and employee names. I would like to have a header and
footer and the body looped over per dept. I also have column
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:52:26 -0800, Charles Heizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use the cfinput tag with a type of checkbox. The issue I'm
having is that it won't let me use the same name more than once.
That's correct. Each field must have a unique name.
--
Sean A Corfield --
Hi,
Does anyone know the URL of listing of all the known bugs in ColdFusion MX.
--
Umer Farooq
Octadyne Systems
+1 (519) 489-1119 voice
+1 (519) 635-2795 mobile
+1 (530) 326-3586 fax
WEB SOLUTIONS FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION:
http://www.Non-ProfitSites.biz
WARNING:
ah. Sterile and dispassionate. This guy needs to learn how to express himself.
:D
--
--mattRobertson--
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
Do you know why that is, since a regular input checkbox field does not have
to be unique it's only when I use the format type as flash?
Thanks,
- Charles
On 2/24/05 10:42 AM, Sean Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:52:26 -0800, Charles Heizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(If you're annoyed by BlueDragon product plugs please stop reading now).
If serialization of CFCs is critical for you, this feature is supported by
BlueDragon 6.1, and the soon-to-be-released BlueDragon 6.2. This means that
with BlueDragon you can:
- Put CFCs into the J2EE Session scope and
Well Flash has a Client-side state where as HTML doesn't.
HTML simple aggregates all inputs with the same name when its submitted.
Flash already knows they are different controls and since you can bind
data to a specific checkbox then they would have to be enforced as unique.
Brendan
Charles
I've found static publishing to a .html file to be a real boon insofar
as resources are concerned. Cuts CF and the db clean out of the
picture, although as has been said this does nothing for disk i/o.
This can create problems, though, if you need to keep users' sessions
alive, since they are
I'd be less worried about the speed of serving or ram usage as I would
how long the X minutes between reloads is. Re-grabbing several MB of
data from a database is going to make your site speed crawl while it
happens, not to mention you'd need to carefully cflock the application
scope writes to
There isn't one. MM keeps that private. However, if you have
specific questions, they're usually pretty good about sharing relevant
info.
cheers,
barneyb
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:45:24 -0500, Umer Farooq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know the URL of listing of all the known bugs
Paul Hastings wrote:
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
free Open Source arena there is Firebird, Ingress, Derby and
derby? well lets see what hani has to say about it:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/
The line about it being 01:30 probably explains most :-)
But for some serious research into
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:45:24 -0500, Umer Farooq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know the URL of listing of all the known bugs in ColdFusion MX.
There isn't one in the sense that there's no searchable bug base. I
*think* there's a Known Issues document somewhere on Macromedia's
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
